Audio of special counsel interview adds to renewed debate of Biden's fitness as president
A 2023 audio recording of President Joe Biden speaking haltingly and having memory lapses is the latest in a series of recent disclosures that have reopened a debate. PHOTO: DOUG MILLS/NYTIMES
WASHINGTON – A 2023 audio recording of President Joe Biden speaking haltingly and having memory lapses is the latest in a series of recent disclosures that have reopened a debate over Mr Biden's physical and mental fitness while in office and prompted fresh recriminations among Democrats.
The recording, released by the news outlet Axios on May 16 night, documents a four-minute portion of Mr Biden's interview with Mr Robert K. Hur, a special counsel who investigated his handling of classified information.
Mr Hur had concluded early 2024 that 'no criminal charges' were warranted in the case. But in clearing the president, Mr Hur portrayed Mr Biden as an 'elderly man with a poor memory,' based off an hours-long interview with the president, inflaming concerns that Mr Biden's fitness for office had significantly declined.
The audio clip did not reveal new exchanges between Mr Hur and Mr Biden.
But it gives a fuller picture of why Mr Hur described Mr Biden as he did, capturing the president's whispery voice and the long pauses in his speech.
Trump administration officials have decided to release the fuller audio, according to two people familiar with the matter, speaking on the condition of anonymity to describe the decision, which has yet to be announced.
The audio clip comes as a forthcoming book – written by Mr Jake Tapper of CNN and Mr Alex Thompson of Axios – has provided new details on Mr Biden's mental and physical decline and chronicled how Mr Biden's advisers stamped out discussion of his age-related limitations.
Among other issues, the book recounts Mr Biden forgetting the names of longtime aides and allies, and outsiders who had not seen the president in some time being shocked at his appearance.
Top Democrats who closed ranks to defend Mr Biden in his moment of crisis and vouched for his fitness for office have now had to rationalise those statements.
In an interview on the 'Talk Easy With Sam Fragoso' podcast last month, Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts – who had urged Mr Biden to remain in the race to the end – visibly struggled not to laugh when the host asked if the president had at the time been 'as sharp as you'.
'I said I had not seen decline,' Ms Warren said, adding that Mr Biden 'was sharp, he was on his feet'.
'Senator, 'on his feet' is not praise,' Mr Fragoso said as Ms Warren smiled and chuckled. ''He can speak in sentences' is not praise.'
Ms Warren replied: 'OK, fair enough. Fair enough.'
The new debate recalls one of the Democratic Party's most painful periods, when Mr Biden and his allies struggled to right his reelection campaign amid calls by Democratic officials – both in private and in public – to drop out and name a successor.
Those calls erupted after a disastrous debate performance against former President Donald Trump that doomed Mr Biden's campaign.
The president ultimately cleared the way for his running mate, Vice-President Kamala Harris, to take his place at the top of the ticket.
The Biden administration had already released a lightly redacted transcript of the interview, but not the audio, asserting executive privilege. A spokesperson for Mr Biden said the recording did nothing but confirm what was already public.
In the clip of the October 2023 interview with Mr Hur, Mr Biden speaks softly and haltingly as he struggles to recall key dates – such as the death of his son, Beau, from cancer in May 2015.
Mr Hur did not ask specifically about Beau, but Mr Biden told the special counsel that 'in 2017, 2018, that area,' Beau, who had served in the Delaware National Guard and had deployed to Iraq in 2008, had 'either been deployed or dying.' Minutes later, the president said that 'in 2017, Beau had died.'
The death of Mr Biden's son was one of the most emotional moments in Mr Biden's life, and Mr Hur's assessment that Biden 'did not remember, even within several years, when his son Beau died', infuriated the president.
'How in the hell dare he raise that?' Mr Biden said in a news conference hours after the report was made public, adding, 'Frankly, when I was asked the question I thought to myself, it wasn't any of their damn business.'
In one particularly meandering exchange, Mr Biden took the better part of a minute – interspersed with several seconds-long pauses – to say that 'Beau had passed and – this is personal – the genesis of the book and the title 'Promise Me Dad' was a – I know you're all close with your sons and daughters, but Beau was like my right arm and Hunt was my left,' referring to his son Hunter.
Concerns about Mr Biden's lapses persisted through the end of Mr Biden's 2024 campaign, growing with each public fumble at a rally or news conference.
Even during the news conference denouncing the special prosecutor's assessment of his memory, Biden spoke of 'the president of Mexico, el-Sissi,' confusing the presidents of Mexico and Egypt in response to a question about negotiations to release hostages held by Hamas. NYTIMES
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
38 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Musk deletes post claiming Trump ‘in the Epstein files'
US President Donald Trump (left) and Elon Musk speak in the Oval Office before departing the White House in Washington, DC, on March 14, 2025. PHOTO: AFP - Tech billionaire Elon Musk has deleted an explosive allegation linking Mr Donald Trump with disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein that he posted on social media during a vicious public fallout with the US President this week. Mr Musk – who exited his role as a top White House advisor just last week – alleged on June 5 that the Republican leader is featured in secret government files on former associates of Epstein, who died by suicide in 2019 while he faced sex trafficking charges. The Trump administration has acknowledged it is reviewing tens of thousands of documents, videos and investigative material that his 'MAGA' movement says will unmask public figures complicit in Epstein's crimes. 'Time to drop the really big bomb: (Trump) is in the Epstein files,' Mr Musk posted on his social media platform, X as his growing feud with the president boiled over into a spectacularly public row on June 5. 'That is the real reason they have not been made public.' Mr Musk did not reveal which files he was talking about, and offered no evidence for his claim. He initially doubled down on the claim, writing in a follow-up message: 'Mark this post for the future. The truth will come out.' However, he appeared to have deleted both tweets by the morning of June 7. Supporters on the conspiratorial end of Mr Trump's 'Make America Great Again' base allege that Epstein's associates had their roles in his crimes covered up by government officials and others. They point the finger at Democrats and Hollywood celebrities, although not at Mr Trump himself. No official source has ever confirmed that the president appears in any of the material. Mr Trump knew and socialised with Epstein but has denied spending time on Little Saint James, the private redoubt in the US Virgin Islands where prosecutors alleged Epstein trafficked underage girls for sex. 'Terrific guy,' Mr Trump, who was Epstein's neighbour in both Florida and New York, said in an early 2000s profile of the financier. 'He's a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side.' Just last week Mr Trump gave Mr Musk a glowing send-off as he left his cost-cutting role at the so-called Department of Government Efficiency (Doge). But their relationship imploded within days as Mr Musk described as an 'abomination' a spending bill that, if passed by Congress, could define Mr Trump's second term in office. Mr Trump hit back in an Oval Office diatribe, and from there the row detonated, leaving Washington and riveted social media users alike stunned by the blistering break-up between the world's richest person and the world's most powerful. With real political and economic risks to their row, both then appeared to inch back from the brink on June 6, but the White House denied reports they would talk. AFP Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
International Business Times
2 hours ago
- International Business Times
Russia Offers Political Asylum to Elon Musk Amid Escalating Feud with Donald Trump
Russian lawmaker Dmitry Novikov has proposed that Elon Musk might consider seeking political asylum in Russia if he wishes to amid escalating tensions between the Tesla CEO and President Donald Trump. Novikov, who is the First Deputy Chairman of the State Duma Committee on International Affairs and is a member of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation, made the remark after a fiery exchange of allegations between Musk and Trump, according to the Russian news agency TASS. "I think that Musk has a completely different game, that he will not need any political asylum," Novikov told the news agency on Friday following calls from Trump allies to deport Musk. Russia to Welcome Musk If Required "However, if he did, Russia, of course, could provide it," he added in response to a question about whether Russia would grant asylum to Musk, similar to the way it did for Edward Snowden. The lawmaker pointed out that over time, Musk has developed "a kind of political communication", and therefore "individual disagreements will remain separate disagreements." "At this stage, the return of the Democratic team to the White House in three years is not what I think Musk needs and not what he is ready to applaud. Therefore, there are tactical differences, and there are strategic things, and he will adhere to them, it seems to me," Novikov explained. The offer from Russia came after Bannon, one of Elon Musk's most vocal critics, suggested on Thursday night that Trump should deport Musk after the multi-hour tirade. Bannon, said, "They [US government] should initiate a formal investigation of his immigration status because I am of the strong belief that he is an illegal alien, and he should be deported from the country immediately." Trump's Enemy, Russia's Friend Bannon's remarks came after Musk on Thursday threatened to shut down SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft, which transports astronauts to and from the International Space Station (ISS). Bannon claimed this posed a significant risk to national security and urged Trump to invoke the Defense Production Act to take control of SpaceX without delay. Meanwhile, when questioned about the controversy on Friday, Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov refused to comment, according to the Moscow Times. "This is a domestic issue of the United States, and we don't intend to interfere," Peskov told reporters. "We're confident the US president will handle this situation on his own." Russia has in the past offered asylum to American whistleblower Edward Snowden as well as British blogger Graham Phillips, who is known for his pro-Kremlin stance.
Straits Times
9 hours ago
- Straits Times
Trump has options to punish Musk even if his federal contracts continue
The relationship between US President Donald Trump and Mr Elon Musk exploded into warfare on June 5. PHOTO: HAIYUN JIANG/NYTIMES WASHINGTON - After the relationship between President Donald Trump and Mr Elon Musk exploded into warfare on June 5, Mr Trump suggested that he might eliminate the tech titan's federal contracts. 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts. I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it,' Mr Trump posted on his social media platform. That's not as easy as Mr Trump implies. The Pentagon and Nasa remain intensely reliant on SpaceX, Mr Musk's rocket launch and space-based communications company, to get to orbit and move government data across the world. But there are options available to the president that could make Mr Musk's relationship with the federal government much more difficult than it has been so far in Mr Trump's second administration. Mr Trump's most accessible weapon to punish Mr Musk is the ability to instruct federal regulators to intensify oversight of his business operations, reversing a slowdown in regulatory actions that benefited Mr Musk's businesses after Mr Trump was elected. 'In an administration that has defined itself by reducing regulation and oversight, it would not be difficult to selectively ramp up oversight again,' said Mr Steven Schooner, a former White House contracts lawyer who is now a professor at George Washington University. With a decree, Mr Trump could suspend Mr Musk's security clearance, a step that the Trump administration has also taken against some of its Biden-era critics. That move would make it harder for Mr Musk to continue in his role as CEO of SpaceX, given its billions of dollars in Pentagon contracts. Pentagon investigators had been examining whether Mr Musk has violated federal security clearance requirements for disclosing contacts with foreign government leaders, The New York Times reported in 2024. The Trump administration could also slow down new contracts going to SpaceX in the years to come, perhaps by looking for ways to drive more work to its rivals, such as Mr Jeff Bezos' Blue Origin or the Boeing and Lockheed partnership called United Launch Alliance. But billions of dollars in financial commitments have been made to SpaceX for launches that will be spread out over the rest of Mr Trump's term to deliver astronauts and cargo to the International Space Station and even the moon, as well as to send military and spy satellites into orbit. Moreover, the services SpaceX provides are vital to some of Mr Trump's top agenda items, such as building a new space-based missile defence programme that the Pentagon is calling Golden Dome. That programme will require dozens of launches to orbit as well as space-based observation and data transmission systems to track and help intercept missile threats. SpaceX is by far the dominant global player in these launches. While Blue Origin and other companies like Rocket Lab and Relativity Space are building or have recently built their own new rockets, none has the kind of launch record and reliability that SpaceX's Falcon 9 rocket has. Overall, the federal government has awarded nearly US$18 billion (S$23 billion) in contracts to SpaceX over the past decade, including US$3.8 billion just in the 2024 fiscal year, according to a tally by the Times. That makes SpaceX one of the largest federal contractors, with most of that money coming from Nasa and the Pentagon. Terminating SpaceX's contracts 'would end the US capability to launch astronauts to orbit for the foreseeable future,' said Ms Laura Seward Forczyk, founder of the space consulting firm Astralytical. It would also significantly delay the US effort to return humans to the moon, she said. Ms Bethany Stevens, Nasa's press secretary, hinted on Mr Musk's X social platform late on June 5 afternoon – as the verbal war between Mr Musk and Mr Trump continued to play out – that the deals with SpaceX are in fact not going to be cancelled anytime soon. 'Nasa will continue to execute upon the President's vision for the future of space,' Ms Stevens said, without mentioning Musk or SpaceX by name. 'We will continue to work with our industry partners to ensure the President's objectives in space are met.' But Mr Trump has more flexibility when it comes to the alphabet soup of federal agencies that regulate SpaceX as well as Tesla, Mr Musk's car company; X; the Boring Co., his underground drilling outfit; and Neuralink, his computer chip brain implant startup. The federal government, by most historical and ethical norms, is not supposed to be used as a retaliatory machine to punish political enemies. And that practice by Mr Trump would be abnormal and inappropriate, Schooner said. But the Trump administration, including the Justice Department, has shown itself willing to take up investigations that target Mr Trump's enemies or organisations that he dislikes, like Harvard University or even his former aides who have become critics, like Mr Chris Krebs, his former top cybersecurity official. Before Mr Trump was elected, at least 11 federal agencies had ongoing investigations or lawsuits targeting Mr Musk's companies. These included the Federal Aviation Administration's scrutiny of launch safety issues, the Environmental Protection Agency's inquiry into potential water pollution at SpaceX's Texas launch site and transportation regulators' questions about fatal accidents involving Tesla cars using autopilot. Several of those inquiries were put on hold. In other instances, fines that Mr Musk's companies had been assessed were being reconsidered, including one that the FAA announced in September for what it said were safety violations during launches in Florida. Mr Trump's top transportation official vowed at his confirmation hearing to 'review' that fine. As of last week, it had still not been paid, an agency official said. The Fish and Wildlife Service also has slowed down its oversight of SpaceX's Texas launch site, where the company for years has been accused of damaging adjacent state park and National Wildlife Refuge lands. That enforcement effort could be turned back on almost overnight if Mr Trump ordered it. But no other US company can currently do what Nasa needs. Boeing, the other company Nasa hired to take astronauts to orbit, has yet to complete fixes for its Starliner capsule after a test mission left two Nasa astronauts, Suni Williams and Butch Wilmore, in orbit for nine months before they finally returned to Earth in a SpaceX Crew Dragon. Aerospace company Northrop Grumman also has a contract to take cargo to the space station with its Cygnus spacecraft, but the most recent Cygnus had to be scrapped after it was damaged during shipment to Florida for launch. Mr Musk appears to recognise this leverage he has over Nasa. He initially threatened on June 5, as the war of words with Mr Trump played out, to stop future flights to deliver astronauts to the space station, but he appeared to walk back that threat later in the day. NYTIMES Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
