
How to spot greenwashing and buy actual green products
These words and images may look environmentally friendly, but they could also stem from a marketing strategy known as greenwashing. The practice occurs when companies sell the idea of 'green' products while accomplishing little or nothing for the environment.
There is a growing market for products that minimize damage to the environment, according to Todd Larsen, executive codirector for consumer and corporate engagement at Green America, a nonprofit that certifies environmentally responsible businesses and promotes ethical consumption.
Forty-six percent of people said they are purchasing more sustainable products to help the environment in a 2024 PricewaterhouseCoopers survey of 20,000 participants across 31 countries and territories.
Purchasing more sustainably is prevalent especially among younger people, Larsen said, leading some companies to engage in deceptive marketing practices that exploit consumer values.
Greenwashing misleads the public to 'believe that a company or other entity is doing more to protect the environment than it is,' all while promoting false, distracting solutions to the climate crisis, according to the United Nations.
The UN has identified several tactics commonly used in greenwashing: making unsubstantiated net-zero claims, in which a company says it balances the amount of greenhouse gas emissions with the amount it removes from the atmosphere; highlighting minor improvements in which a product meets minimum regulatory requirements; and emphasizing a single attribute while ignoring the product's or company's broader environmental impact.
Greenwashing occurs mostly when companies 'overcommunicate or under-communicate' on sustainability performance, according to Andreas Rasche, a professor of business in society at the Centre for Sustainability at Copenhagen Business School in Denmark. Misleading branding, vague claims and unregulated labels on products make it difficult for consumers who are aiming to reduce their environmental footprint to make informed decisions, Rasche said.
But not all greenwashing by companies is intentional, he said. Rather than outright deception, 'greenwashing can be an outcome of poor management rather than a deliberate strategy,' Rasche said. These companies may want to produce their products in ways more beneficial to the environment but may fall short internally, he added.
On the other hand, some companies overcompensate out of fear of appearing to greenwash through the practice of 'greenhushing,' which Rasche defines as individuals or organizations 'deliberately not talking about sustainability despite them actually having a sustainable track record.'
Buying sustainable products does not have to be an overwhelming endeavor. If something sounds too good to be true about being kinder to the planet, it probably is. When it comes to spotting green products, 'a lot of it is also about common sense,' Rasche said.
Here are some red flags to watch out for to avoid greenwashing:
Overly vague claims: Look for terms such as eco-friendly, green or nontoxic without explanation.
Companies can essentially slap those terms onto a package without proof, according to Scott Faber, the Environmental Working Group's senior vice president for government affairs. With a lack of oversight, 'it's just another way to sell a story,' Faber told CNN via email. EWG is a nonprofit research and advocacy group that focuses on consumer health, toxic chemicals and pollutants.
A newer term circulating is 'regenerative,' Faber said, which companies often use to mean extending beyond sustainability to actively restoring, renewing or improving components of the environment and resources.
People should expect to see that term more frequently despite there being no widely accepted or legal definition of what it means, he said.
Unlike organic labeling, which is required to undergo audits and meet legal standards, 'most claims that foods regenerate soil aren't tied to such standards and don't require third-party verification,' Faber said.
Nature imagery: Visuals such as windmills, green packaging or leafy visuals, suggestive of sustainability, mean nothing if they omit evidence of any environmental claims, according to Faber.
No verification: No backup of a product's claims or credible third-party certification means those assertions might not be true.
'Companies should really substantiate in what way their product actually is green. So that could be a trusted certification, like USDA (US Department of Agriculture) organic,' Green America's Larsen said. 'Or they could have information on their website where they go into detail about things like their supply chain and how it's truly green, and they actually are showing you information that's verifiable.'
Homemade labels that lack verification: Check if a company provides transparent information about its practices online.
Claims that defy logic: What about a carbon-neutral airline? Carbon-neutral means achieving net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by balancing 'those emissions so they are equal to, or less than, the emissions removed,' according to the United Nations. Ask yourself, 'Is this actually possible?' Rasche advised. 'Can an airline at this point in time really be carbon-neutral?'
Doing your homework about a product, especially one you buy a lot, can be worth it.
Experts advise looking for certifications, questioning unsubstantiated language and visuals, and conducting an online search for a product and company to learn about how goods are made and whether there is evidence for what the company says.
Faber suggests asking yourself a series of questions: Who is verifying the claim? Is the claim specific or too general to be proven? What's missing? Is the packaging more prominent than the product?
The 'what's missing' question is often the most important to ask, Faber said. 'A cereal box might brag about recycled packaging but still use pesticide-laced oats,' he said. 'A meat company might call their beef 'regeneratively raised' without saying anything about antibiotic use.'
Experts also recommend turning to the US Environmental Protection Agency's list of more than 100 ecolabels recommended for consumers on its website. Ecolabels are marks on products that show they meet specific environmental standards.
'It's a bit of work, but on the other hand, you're really learning about the products you're purchasing, and you can feel better about those products,' Larsen said. 'You can tell other people what you learned about those products and encourage them to purchase them as well.'
The United Nations also suggests consumers consider a product's entire life cycle — from the extraction of raw materials to its disposal — while taking into account potential environmental consequences from the packaging materials.
There is also the option to buy secondhand goods, a double win by granting new life for products and preventing further landfill waste or emissions.
Spotting greenwashing in the food industry requires a little bit of work, too. You can identify deceptive packaging and vague labels, and there are additional clues in ingredient lists to see how processed a product may be.
When it comes to packaging, 'if a product screams 'natural' in bold letters but the ingredient list reads like a chemistry textbook, that's a red flag,' Faber noted. 'These claims are often designed to cover up ingredients linked to serious health harms.' Such ingredients include potentially harmful additives like food dyes.
He pointed to the Environmental Working Group's Food Scores, which can help consumers 'see past the front-of-pack claims and understand what's really in their food.'
An effective way to avoid misleading marketing of food is to make your own meal or snack without unhealthy additives. And although not always feasible, Larsen suggests going straight to the source when possible by speaking with a farmer at a farmers market to learn about growing practices and products.
In the United States, the Federal Trade Commission has Green Guides designed as guidance for marketers to avoid making environmental claims that are deceptive or could mislead consumers. However, there is a lack of strong legal enforcement for them and federal oversight beyond that guidance, according to Larsen and Rasche.
'While the Green Guides are just that, guides and not rules or regulations, they are enforceable under Section 5 of the FTC Act, which prevents unfair or deceptive acts or practices in commerce,' FTC spokesman Mitchell Katz told CNN via email. Consumers can file complaints about alleged fraud and deception from companies on the 'report fraud' tab on the FTC's website.
The gap between guidance and regulation leaves room for companies to make environmental claims that may not hold up. Well-known brands have faced consequences for statements found to be misleading about the recyclability or sustainability of their products.
Keurig Dr Pepper settled charges filed by the US Securities and Exchange Commission last year after labeling its K-Cup single-use beverage pods as recyclable, even though two of the largest US recycling companies rejected the pods.
A Keurig Dr Pepper spokesperson told CNN via email that the company has taken steps to make its products recyclable and to support modern recycling systems across North America.
'In 2020, we changed all of our K-Cup pods to be made from polypropylene — a more widely accepted material in curbside recycling programs,' the spokesperson said. 'We also provide clear recycling instructions on our packaging and encourage consumers to check locally as each community determines what it accepts into its recycling program.'
With sustainability regulations facing rollback in the United States, it is increasingly incumbent on individuals to protect themselves in their consumption habits, Larsen said.
'We all are investors. We all have pension savings. We all go to the supermarket, so it depends also on us and on our day-to-day behavior,' Rasche noted. 'And we shouldn't feel too disempowered, because, in a sense, we also have action' in our everyday choices.
Be sure to know what is real, he said, because when you really buy green, you're contributing to a more sustainable future.
Sign up for CNN's Life, But Greener newsletter. Our limited newsletter series guides you on how to minimize your personal role in the climate crisis — and reduce your eco-anxiety.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
a minute ago
- Forbes
Cyber Attacks Could Stifle Online Demand From The Under-35s
There was a return to very slight growth last year for U.K. retail sales volumes but concerns are widening that high-profile British and American cyber attacks targeting major retail chains will undermine the flaccid growth seen so far this year. Top retailers on both sides of the Atlantic—from Marks & Spencer (M&S), Coop, and Harrods, to Ahold Delhaize USA and jewelry house Pandora's U.S. operations—have been targeted by ransomware and other attacks, driving down consumer confidence as shoppers worry about their data being stolen. M&S, with sales of £13.9 billion ($18.9 billion) in the year to March 2025, issued a £300 million ($407 million) profit warning in May due to the impact of its cyber attacks, and has only recently restored its online services. Year-to-date, the retailer's share price is down by 7.7%. According to London-based data and analytics house GlobalData, it is younger, not older, generations that appear to be taking the threat of retail data breaches most seriously. A survey from the company, conducted in July covering 2,000 U.K. respondents, shows that four in every five (79%) of those aged 25-34 were most worried. Across all age groups the concern about personal data security dropped to 69% of consumers. That worry is driving action. One third of 16-34s told GlobalData they are considering 'cutting back or stopping' online purchases versus just 11% of over 55s. This puts retailers under increasing pressure to improve their systems and restore digital trust with younger shoppers. 'This is especially the case for online pure-plays, which cannot redirect sceptical consumers to stores,' said the company. Age differences are stark GlobalData's lead retail analyst Emily Salter, offered a nuanced take on the significant age disparity—and a silver lining. She said: 'Older shoppers have children and greater pressures on their time, or less ability to visit stores as they age. Younger shoppers also place more emphasis on experiential shopping, so this combined with security concerns could push them into stores. The convenience associated with the online channel will still trump security concerns for most consumers.' The resilience of older consumers for online shopping, while comforting to retailers, will not offset spending declines from younger consumers, even if they go into physical stores to make purchases. Given the current precarious U.K, retail market, the negative potential arising from cyber attacks could damage a newly recovering market. According to Britain's Office of National Statistics (ONS), retail sales volumes rose by 0.7% in 2024, following a fall of 2.9% in 2023, and 4.1% in 2022. And while this marked the first rise in three years, sales volumes have not returned to 2022 levels. In June, Matt Britzman, senior equity analyst at investment group Hargreaves Lansdown, said: 'U.K. consumers are starting to lose some steam, as retail sales in May grew at their slowest pace in six months and the labour market shows signs of cooling. A few factors are likely at play, ranging from the lingering effects of higher prices to growing uncertainty about the future. Low single-digit growth ahead 'Supermarkets are still holding up well, with food sales rising 3.6%, but non-essential items took a hit in May. One month doesn't make a trend, but in the current climate, modest, low single-digit growth is likely where retail sales are headed.' June ONS data suggest that online spending has not been affected yet. Sales values rose by 3.3% when comparing the second quarter with the first quarter. However, further data breaches could negatively affect the 'low single-digit growth' predicted by Hargreaves Lansdown. GlobalData's Salter said: 'Younger consumers are more concerned about retailers storing their payment details, and think they are not doing enough to protect their private information when shopping online. Paying with mobile wallets and third-party providers such as Apple Pay and PayPal is a way that consumers can avoid having to give their details directly to retailers.' Salter argues that retailers must therefore ensure their websites and apps are compatible with these payment methods as they are especially popular among under-35s.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Angi, Bumble, Chewy, Roku, and Teladoc Stocks Trade Up, What You Need To Know
What Happened? A number of stocks jumped in the afternoon session after markets continued to rally as the latest inflation data reinforced expectations for a Federal Reserve rate cut as soon as September. The latest Consumer Price Index (CPI) report for July showed inflation holding steady, reinforcing market expectations that the Federal Reserve could begin cutting interest rates as soon as September. Lower interest rates generally stimulate the economy by making borrowing cheaper for consumers and businesses. This can lead to increased consumer spending and e-commerce activity, which directly benefits online retail and marketplace companies. The positive economic outlook fueled a broad-based rally, pushing the S&P 500 and Nasdaq to new record highs and lifting most growth-oriented technology stocks. The stock market overreacts to news, and big price drops can present good opportunities to buy high-quality stocks. Among others, the following stocks were impacted: Gig Economy company Angi (NASDAQ:ANGI) jumped 5.2%. Is now the time to buy Angi? Access our full analysis report here, it's free. Consumer Subscription company Bumble (NASDAQ:BMBL) jumped 12.8%. Is now the time to buy Bumble? Access our full analysis report here, it's free. Online Retail company Chewy (NYSE:CHWY) jumped 7.8%. Is now the time to buy Chewy? Access our full analysis report here, it's free. Consumer Subscription company Roku (NASDAQ:ROKU) jumped 3.7%. Is now the time to buy Roku? Access our full analysis report here, it's free. Online Marketplace company Teladoc (NYSE:TDOC) jumped 8.8%. Is now the time to buy Teladoc? Access our full analysis report here, it's free. Zooming In On Bumble (BMBL) Bumble's shares are very volatile and have had 28 moves greater than 5% over the last year. But moves this big are rare even for Bumble and indicate this news significantly impacted the market's perception of the business. The previous big move we wrote about was 21 days ago when the stock gained 7.8% on the news that an analyst at UBS raised the price target on the stock and positive sentiment lifted consumer-focused companies. UBS analyst Chris Kuntarich increased the firm's price target on Bumble to $7.50 from $6.00 while maintaining a "Neutral" rating on the shares. The move came amid a broader rally for consumer internet stocks. Market sentiment received a boost after the announcement of a new U.S.-Japan trade deal, which eased investor concerns over international trade disputes by lowering proposed tariffs on certain imports. This development was seen as a positive for the economy, potentially supporting consumer purchasing power. For a company like Bumble, whose revenue depended on users paying for subscriptions and premium features, signs of a confident consumer were a positive indicator. Bumble is down 20.2% since the beginning of the year, and at $6.36 per share, it is trading 30% below its 52-week high of $9.08 from November 2024. Investors who bought $1,000 worth of Bumble's shares at the IPO in February 2021 would now be looking at an investment worth $90.46. Today's young investors likely haven't read the timeless lessons in Gorilla Game: Picking Winners In High Technology because it was written more than 20 years ago when Microsoft and Apple were first establishing their supremacy. But if we apply the same principles, then enterprise software stocks leveraging their own generative AI capabilities may well be the Gorillas of the future. So, in that spirit, we are excited to present our Special Free Report on a profitable, fast-growing enterprise software stock that is already riding the automation wave and looking to catch the generative AI next. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
ACV Auctions, eBay, and Upwork Stocks Trade Up, What You Need To Know
What Happened? A number of stocks jumped in the afternoon session after markets continued to rally as the latest inflation data reinforced expectations for a Federal Reserve rate cut as soon as September. The latest Consumer Price Index (CPI) report for July showed inflation holding steady, reinforcing market expectations that the Federal Reserve could begin cutting interest rates as soon as September. Lower interest rates generally stimulate the economy by making borrowing cheaper for consumers and businesses. This can lead to increased consumer spending and e-commerce activity, which directly benefits online retail and marketplace companies. The positive economic outlook fueled a broad-based rally, pushing the S&P 500 and Nasdaq to new record highs and lifting most growth-oriented technology stocks. The stock market overreacts to news, and big price drops can present good opportunities to buy high-quality stocks. Among others, the following stocks were impacted: Online Marketplace company ACV Auctions (NYSE:ACVA) jumped 3.2%. Is now the time to buy ACV Auctions? Access our full analysis report here, it's free. Online Marketplace company eBay (NASDAQ:EBAY) jumped 3%. Is now the time to buy eBay? Access our full analysis report here, it's free. Gig Economy company Upwork (NASDAQ:UPWK) jumped 3.2%. Is now the time to buy Upwork? Access our full analysis report here, it's free. Zooming In On Upwork (UPWK) Upwork's shares are very volatile and have had 21 moves greater than 5% over the last year. In that context, today's move indicates the market considers this news meaningful but not something that would fundamentally change its perception of the business. The previous big move we wrote about was 22 days ago when the stock gained 3.3% on the news that Jefferies initiated coverage of the company with a "Buy" rating, and a new filing revealed a significant purchase by an institutional investor. The investment bank set a price target of $18 per share, citing Upwork's strong position to capitalize on the global shift toward flexible and remote work. Analysts are optimistic about the company's growth prospects, driven by the adoption of AI-powered tools on its platform and increasing use by enterprise clients. Adding to the positive sentiment, a new SEC filing disclosed that investment firm Jennison Associates LLC has taken a new position in Upwork, purchasing over 50,000 shares. This type of institutional investment often signals confidence in a company's future performance. The stock's move comes as investors anticipate Upwork's second-quarter earnings report, which is scheduled for August 6, 2025. Upwork is down 13.7% since the beginning of the year, and at $14.17 per share, it is trading 19% below its 52-week high of $17.50 from May 2025. Investors who bought $1,000 worth of Upwork's shares 5 years ago would now be looking at an investment worth $944.04. Today's young investors likely haven't read the timeless lessons in Gorilla Game: Picking Winners In High Technology because it was written more than 20 years ago when Microsoft and Apple were first establishing their supremacy. But if we apply the same principles, then enterprise software stocks leveraging their own generative AI capabilities may well be the Gorillas of the future. So, in that spirit, we are excited to present our Special Free Report on a profitable, fast-growing enterprise software stock that is already riding the automation wave and looking to catch the generative AI next. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data