logo
Downtown L.A. Has Seen Its Share of Violence. Then Someone Went After Its Trees.

Downtown L.A. Has Seen Its Share of Violence. Then Someone Went After Its Trees.

New York Times25-04-2025
On a busy stretch of Grand Avenue in downtown Los Angeles, three orange-and-white traffic cones sit atop the dirt in grates on the sidewalk where three trees once stood.
It's not a construction site. It's a kind of crime scene.
The three trees were some of the victims of one man's bizarre eight-day tree-killing spree that destroyed more than a dozen mature trees in and around downtown Los Angeles, blocks from City Hall and Frank Gehry's Walt Disney Concert Hall.
The man, the authorities said, roamed the streets in the middle of the night and used a chain saw to cut elm, ficus and other trees. Some were sawed right across the middle. Others were left with bare branches. Officials said the damage totaled $347,000. He was apprehended on Earth Day.
Downtown Los Angeles is one of those urban American places that has, in a sense, seen it all.
There have been violent attacks that made headlines, such as a shooting at a Target in December that injured two security guards. There is homelessness, with tents and encampments spread across sidewalks and doorways. It had emptied out during the pandemic but has experienced a revival as tourists and residents flock to popular spots like Grand Central Market. Downtown remains a hub of protests and gatherings, including a parade last year celebrating the Dodgers' World Series victory.
But the sight of butchered trees, some of the few spots of greenery in a landscape of concrete and skyscrapers, has rattled and saddened Angelenos far beyond downtown.
The case sparked an intense manhunt, prompting the police to ask the public for tips and scour surveillance footage. The mayor, the district attorney and city leaders have weighed in. There have been news conferences calling for increased investments in public safety. After the wildfires that destroyed thousands of homes and upended thousands of lives three months ago, some residents have wondered: What's next?
Blair Besten, the executive director of the nonprofit Historic Core Business Improvement District, said that while crime is not uncommon in the city, losing the trees felt personal for many residents of downtown.
'It's just one of those things,' Ms. Besten said. 'How bad can it get?'
One of the first trees was chopped down on April 14. Others were damaged in the days afterward. In all, at least 13 trees were destroyed or mutilated, and investigators were reviewing evidence to see if more trees had been cut down.
On Tuesday, the police said they had arrested a man at a homeless encampment who they believed was responsible. Detectives relied on tips from residents in the neighborhood and the surveillance footage they examined from several buildings and other sites.
The man, Samuel Patrick Groft, 45, of Los Angeles, was charged with felony vandalism, and he was being held in a county jail on a $150,000 bail. The police declined to comment about the motive behind the attack.
Records show that Mr. Groft has had several run-ins with the law, including charges of assault with a deadly weapon, burglary and vandalism.
In 2023, Mr. Groft told The University Times, the student newspaper of California State University, Los Angeles, that he had been experiencing homelessness for several years. Mr. Groft said that he had been offered a shared room through a public program, but declined the offer because he did not want to live with a 'schizophrenic guy.'
It was unclear whether Mr. Groft had a lawyer. The Los Angeles County Public Defender's Office did not respond to requests for comment.
Cassy Horton, a co-founder and board member of the Downtown Los Angeles Residents Association, an advocacy group of neighbors, said the felled trees have become a rallying cry to call attention to downtown's needs.
'It's not just a neighborhood where people go home at 5,' Ms. Horton said. 'To have something like that taken away, when it's so hard for us to move the needle already to improve the neighborhood, I think really hurt people, and it felt very senseless.'
Ysabel Jurado, a city councilwoman who represents downtown, told reporters at a news conference on Thursday that two trees would replace each one that was cut down, thanks to the help of nonprofits in the area.
'For many of our DTLA residents, the public right of way is their front yard, so the loss of these trees is personal,' Ms. Jurado said in a statement.
Among the trees that were damaged were three Chinese elms and one ficus tree on Grand Avenue, along with another ficus tree, one sycamore and one palm, according to the city's street services department, StreetsLA.
Ms. Horton, who has lived downtown for three years and has worked there since 2009, said she has seen the trajectory of the area go from bustling with foot traffic to being 'gutted' during the height of the coronavirus pandemic lockdowns.
Since that time, downtown Los Angeles has slowly come back to life. Tourists regularly visit to take rides up the Angels Flight Railway, two funiculars that carry people up a steep slope in the Bunker Hill area. Others stop at the bars and restaurants on their way to a concert or a Lakers game at Crypto.com Arena on the west side of downtown.
'It is the place that people come after the Dodgers win,' Ms. Horton said. 'It's the place that people come to protest new policies from the Trump administration. It is our natural convening place.'
Claudia Oliveira, the chief executive and president of the Downtown Los Angeles Chamber of Commerce, said the episode 'struck a nerve' there because residents have already had to contend with so many other issues.
'A person should not be walking around with a chain saw,' Ms. Oliveira said. 'That's not normal.'
Nathan Hochman, the Los Angeles County district attorney, said on Thursday that Mr. Groft had been charged with eight felony counts of vandalism. Mr. Groft could face additional charges as investigators gather more evidence.
'What took years to grow only took minutes to destroy,' Mr. Hochman said in a statement, adding that his office will prosecute 'anyone who engages in such criminal conduct to the fullest extent of the law.'
If convicted, Mr. Groft could face more than six years in prison.
Even after the arrest, the experience has been unnerving for many.
'What could be a tree today can be a person tomorrow,' Ms. Oliveira said. 'It's scary.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Report of shooter at Villanova University was 'cruel hoax,' president says
Report of shooter at Villanova University was 'cruel hoax,' president says

NBC News

time27 minutes ago

  • NBC News

Report of shooter at Villanova University was 'cruel hoax,' president says

What we know Villanova University issued an active shooting alert this afternoon, urging everyone on campus to 'Move to secure location. Lock/barricade doors." The school's president later said that the situation was a "cruel hoax — there was no active shooter, no injuries and no evidence of firearms present on campus." Today was new student orientation at the private Catholic university in Villanova, Pennsylvania, according to the school's website. It was the second shooting scare at an American college today. A false threat was also reported at the University of Tennessee Chattanooga campus. Police are clearing the scene Officials are clearing the scene at Villanova University after today's shooting scare. Radnor Township Police Department, Villanova Public Safety Department, Pennsylvania State Police and the Office of the District Attorney are among the agencies at the scene. "We are thankful to confirm that there is no evidence of an active shooter incident or victims," Radnor Township police said, adding, "We could not be more proud of our Villanova community for following the shelter in place practices and allowing law enforcement to methodically investigate the incident." The hoax is under investigation by the FBI, Delaware County District Attorney's Office and Radnor Township Police Department. Second university shooter hoax today The Villanova hoax is the second to impact an American college today. Earlier today, there was an active shooter report on the University of Tennessee Chattanooga campus, which was determined to be a false threat. " There was no evidence of any shooting or other threat to the University community, and no injuries were reported," the Tennessee university's police department said. The incident is under investigation by local law enforcement as well as the FBI. Gov. Shapiro vows to find people responsible for fake Villanova threat Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro said today's active shooter report at Villanova was "unfounded" and a "cruel swatting incident — when someone calls in a fake threat to induce panic." "Swatting is illegal. I've directed @PAStatePolice to work alongside their partners and use every tool at our disposal to find the person or people who called in this fake threat and hold them accountable," he wrote on X. Shapiro thanked law enforcement who raced to the scene. "I know today was every parent's nightmare, and every student's biggest fear. I'm profoundly grateful no one was hurt," he said. The university said in a statement that the school's Department of Public Safety received an anonymous report around 4:30 p.m. of an active shooter in the Charles Widger School of Law. The report was determined to be false and a hoax, it said. Photos of the scene at Villanova University Students at Villanova University were alerted to reports of an active shooter situation on campus today. Officials later said the report of a shooting at the law school was a hoax. Villanova president says incident was a 'cruel hoax' The reported active shooter incident on Villanova's campus today was a 'cruel hoax,' the university's president, Rev. Peter M. Donohue, said. 'Mercifully, no one was injured, and we now know that it was a cruel hoax — there was no active shooter, no injuries and no evidence of firearms present on campus,' he wrote in an email to the school community. 'While that is a blessing and relief, I know today's events have shaken our entire community,' Donohue added. He noted that the news about a possible shooter at the law school came in during an orientation Mass welcoming new students and their families. 'I would like to thank everyone involved in securing the safety of our community, especially our Villanova Public Safety department and the first responders from Radnor Police and other local police departments," he said. "I would also like to thank our Orientation Counselors and all of the Villanova staff in attendance at the Orientation Mass, who responded calmly and compassionately to a very frightening and unnerving situation.' He also apologized to incoming students and their loved ones, saying: 'This is not the introduction to Villanova that I had hoped for you.' Share Villanova incident remains active, police say Radnor Township police said in an update shortly before 6 p.m. that units are continuing to clear buildings at Villanova University, and the incident 'remains ACTIVE.' Thus far there are no reported victims. Those on campus are asked to continue sheltering in place. Share Gov. Josh Shapiro says state and federal law enforcement on scene Marlene Lenthang Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro said state police, local and federal law enforcement are all at Villanova University responding to the active shooter report. "Avoid the area and follow the direction of local authorities. We will share additional information as it becomes available," the governor wrote on X. Marlene Lenthang contributed.

Trump admin pausing issuance of visas for foreign truck drivers, Rubio says
Trump admin pausing issuance of visas for foreign truck drivers, Rubio says

The Hill

time33 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Trump admin pausing issuance of visas for foreign truck drivers, Rubio says

President Trump's administration is pausing all issuance of worker visas for foreign truck drivers, Secretary of State Marco Rubio said on Thursday, arguing the growing number of international, commercial operators is putting the lives of Americans in danger. 'Effective immediately we are pausing all issuance of worker visas for commercial truck drivers. The increasing number of foreign drivers operating large tractor-trailer trucks on U.S. roads is endangering American lives and undercutting the livelihoods of American truckers,' Rubio said in a Thursday post on social platform X. Rubio's announcement comes days after Harjinder Singh, a truck driver, was accused of making an illegal U-turn that killed people around 50 miles north of West Palm Beach. The Department of Homeland Security said this week that Singh, who was arrested for three counts of vehicular homicide, was in the U.S. illegally. Secretary of Transportation Sean Duffy said on Tuesday that the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration launched an investigation into the deadly Florida highway crash. Trump penned an executive order in late April requiring all commercial truck drivers operating in the U.S. to be proficient in English. The president designated English as the country's official language in an executive order in March. 'They should be able to read and understand traffic signs, communicate with traffic safety, border patrol, agricultural checkpoints, and cargo weight-limit station officers,' the White House said in the order at the time. 'Drivers need to provide feedback to their employers and customers and receive related directions in English.' Foreign truckers in the U.S. are usually working on H-2B visas. On Thursday, the State Department confirmed that it is vetting over 55 million U.S. visa holders for possible deportable infractions, including criminal activity, visa overstays and engagement in any form of terrorist activity.' The State Department said last week that it would pause all visas for visitors from the Gaza Strip as it conducts a 'full and thorough review of the process and procedures used to issue a small number of temporary medical-humanitarian visas in recent days.'

Divided court eliminates Trump's half-billion-dollar fine in fraud case
Divided court eliminates Trump's half-billion-dollar fine in fraud case

Boston Globe

timean hour ago

  • Boston Globe

Divided court eliminates Trump's half-billion-dollar fine in fraud case

While the court effectively upheld the fraud judgment against the president, several of the justices raised major questions about the case, which was decided by a state trial judge last year. A primary goal of their decision was to allow Trump to move to New York's highest court, giving him another opportunity to challenge the finding that he was a fraudster. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Despite the complexities, Thursday's ruling handed Trump a financial victory and a measure of legal validation. It represented a setback for New York's attorney general, Letitia James, who is one of the president's foremost adversaries and a target of his wide-ranging retribution campaign. The case had been a career-defining victory after she campaigned promising to bring Trump to justice. Advertisement Trump responded on social media Thursday, declaring victory and praising the court for having 'the Courage to throw out this unlawful and disgraceful Decision.' He added that the case had been 'a Political Witch Hunt, in a business sense.' Advertisement Trump's company, the Trump Organization, released a statement saying the case was brought out of political malice for the president and that the ruling 'unanimously derails the effort to destroy his business.' Still, the decision fell short of a full vindication. In denying Trump's bid to throw out the case, the court kept in place the ruling that he had committed fraud, an ignominious distinction for a sitting American president. James, in a statement, said that the court had 'affirmed the well-supported finding of the trial court: Donald Trump, his company, and two of his children are liable for fraud.' James, who pledged to appeal, filed the case against Trump and his family real estate business in 2022, accusing them of inflating his net worth to obtain favorable loan terms. After a months-long trial, the judge overseeing the case ruled last year that Trump was liable for conspiring to commit fraud, denting the mogul image that had enabled his political rise. Thursday's ruling came almost a year after the five judges, from the Appellate Division for the 1st Department, heard oral arguments, a delay that reflected the legal and political complexities of a case against a sitting president. Ultimately, the case was so divisive that the judges failed to form a true majority. Moulton's opinion upholding the case and wiping out the financial penalties received one additional vote, from the presiding justice, Dianne Renwick. Another judge, David Friedman, who has been skeptical of the accusations for years, wanted to throw the case out entirely, believing James had lacked the power to bring it. Two other judges, John Higgitt and Llinet Rosado, concluded that James had the authority to file the case, but wanted to provide Trump a new trial. Arguing that 'a remarkable situation has necessitated a remarkable solution,' they agreed to let the fraud judgment stand so that the case could move to a higher appeals court. They wrote that they did so 'after much consideration, with great reluctance.' Advertisement The four justices who formed the reluctant majority were appointed by Democratic governors. Friedman was appointed by Governor George Pataki, a Republican. In his own lengthy opinion, Friedman pointed out that he and two other judges — a majority — had believed that the judgment against Trump should be thrown out. But the trio could not agree on an effective remedy, allowing the judgment to stand for now. Friedman also blasted James for comments she made while running for office in 2018. She had pledged to investigate Trump, calling his presidency 'illegitimate' and saying she would join with other attorneys general in seeking to remove him from the White House. Even the judges more sympathetic to the attorney general's case agreed that criticism was merited, though they noted that they had already considered Trump's claims of political persecution and rejected them. In the appeal, Trump's lawyers argued that the roughly $450 million judgment — which before Thursday's ruling sat at more than $520 million with interest — was excessive, given that his lenders never lost money, and that the attorney general's office was meddling in private transactions. In Thursday's decision, Moulton agreed that the punishment outstripped the wrongdoing. He concluded that it was 'an excessive fine' barred under the Constitution. He rejected a new trial, however, saying that it is 'difficult to imagine that a trial could proceed while one of the principal defendants, and a central witness, is President of the United States.' Advertisement Moulton also wrote that the evidence clearly demonstrated liability, highlighting volumes of evidence against Trump, his two sons who run the family business and some of the company's top executives. The ruling maintained the result of a case that put Trump's fantastical claims of wealth on trial. But the judges' various disagreements reinforced the importance of any future decision in New York's highest court, the Court of Appeals. When the state judge, Arthur F. Engoron, imposed the half-billion-dollar judgment in February of last year, the eye-popping sum appeared to represent an existential threat to the Trump Organization. Trump's company struggled for weeks to line up a bond that would allow him to appeal the judgment without paying the state. When Trump came up short, the attorney general's office appeared poised to freeze some of Trump's bank accounts, until the appeals court allowed him to post a smaller bond. The court also did not force Trump to pay the penalty while he appealed the case. Much has changed since then, when Trump was still facing criminal indictments as he tried to reclaim the White House. Not only did he win reelection — a victory that effectively eliminated his criminal cases — but he also has recently reaped a windfall from his personal business ventures. His foray into cryptocurrency has been particularly profitable, adding billions of dollars in paper value to his net worth and removing any real threat to his financial stability. The civil fraud trial stemming from James's lawsuit was not decided by a jury. Instead, the power belonged to Engoron, who found after months of testimony that Trump had lied to lenders about the value of his properties. The judge sought to claw back Trump's ill-gotten profits and interest savings. Advertisement The judge also delivered a sweeping array of punishments, including barring Trump for three years from serving in top roles at any New York company, including portions of his own Trump Organization. He banned Trump's adult sons for two years. The appeals court, while eliminating the financial penalties, gave those other punishments the green light. This article originally appeared in

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store