Fast food fixer: 83-year-old Hungry Jack wants a five-minute plan for Domino's Pizza
Since then, however, it hasn't capitalised on their flash-in-the-pan success. Pizza sales have stalled. Profit predictions were downgraded three times in a year.
'It has been this huge growth story for a long time. The last two or three years hasn't [delivered] any growth,' said investment banking firm Barrenjoey's head of consumer research, Tom Kierath.
Investors fled the stock after van Dyck's resignation was announced, sending the share price to little over a tenth of that peak to $16.96. Cowin was aware of the need to reassure rattled shareholders, with van Dyck's departure coming so soon after Meij's. The billionaire businessman has a personal stake – 25.7 per cent – in fixing this.
'The business has got to do better. We're custodians of other people's money,' he said. 'But to make this business successful, we have to have growth, and we have to do it now, rather than on a long-term basis.'
What's gone wrong at Domino's?
Domino's problems didn't appear overnight. Many of the competitive edges that once made it a market leader have eroded over years. Meij sought to make Domino's website and app best-in-class, spending nearly $23 million in half a year alone on digital platforms.
The investment doesn't appear to have generated high returns.
'You had the Peloton bubble, you had the Lululemon bubble with everyone buying casual wear, and we had this Domino's bubble because they were digitally well advanced beyond anyone else,' said food industry consultant and Titanium Food director Suzee Brain.
'That gave them inflated confidence that they were the new flavour of the month. So they started some really massive expansion off the back of a false economy.'
The rapid store roll-out across Europe and Asia, once a major sales driver, was reversing. In Australia, Domino's couldn't keep the sales spurt they enjoyed during the pandemic.
'They weren't able to keep a lot of those customers, because there's another problem: the product is not all that great,' said Brain. 'They've never marketed it because they make great pizza … But now, it actually needs to be about the pizza.'
Domino's is now facing a more competitive and diverse fast-food landscape, where players such as Guzman y Gomez and El Jannah are attracting younger customers and US chains Five Guys and Wingstop are keen for their slice of the market.
As Australia's dominant pizza chain, industry watchers believe Domino's must advocate more effectively for the entire pizza category.
Loading
'As part of your, 'what we do for the kids, for a family eating Sunday evening dinner' [considerations], does Domino's become part of the conversation more than it currently is? That's the opportunity,' said one industry analyst who declined to be named.
The business must become more profitable, Cowin has told investors. Ideally, this would happen through a sales uplift, but as there's no guarantee of that, costs need to be pulled out of the business. As delivery aggregators Uber Eats and DoorDash eat Domino's lunch, IT spending has been an early target.
'Our technology is not any better than the Uber's and the other people that we have to deal with,' said Cowin. 'If you don't have a competitive advantage, let's stop trying to recreate the wheel.'
Franchisee profitability is now a key priority for Domino's, with weekly store sales ranging from $30,000 a week to $100,000, Cowin revealed. But margins were eroded by the spurt of high inflation across ingredients such as cheese as well as wages, fuel and electricity. Meij tried to pass this on by imposing a 6 per cent delivery fee, which backfired with customers who punished the move by buying fewer pizzas.
'Relative price point becomes very important,' said Ten Cap co-founder and lead portfolio manager Jun Bei Liu. 'This price increase for the fast food category was just so wrong.'
Several fund managers, stock pickers and analysts believe at least some dead weight needs to be shed. Domino's should sell France and exit Japan, said outspoken stockbroker Angus Aitken.
Barrenjoey's Keirath agrees. 'If they get Taiwan, right, is it going to move the dial? No, it's becoming a distraction. The same in Malaysia,' he said.
'What you do by staying in those markets is you dilute the core markets.'
Who's up for the job?
Recruitment is under way for Van Dyck's replacement. But they will have to be someone who will have to play by the rules laid out by Cowin, who has made it clear he wants to see rapid change.
Loading
'If you have a strong chair in place [who has] already said to the market, 'well, that guy is not there because he's not delivering on costs', then the next person has to subscribe to that view,' said Ten Cap's Liu.
'When you have to focus on costs, you got to be a tough person. You can't be a nice guy.'
And there are plenty who think Domino's is still a good deal, such as Morningstar equity analyst Johannes Faul, who said the leadership instability has injected uncertainty in the short-term but described the pizza chain as 'a robust brand of the future'.
'We do think Domino's still has growth ahead of it. Quite significantly so,' Faul said.
Aitken said there was still a 'huge mass market' for Domino's products. 'The demise of Domino's as a product is not apparent to us,' he said.
'We think backing the number one [quick-service restaurant] money-maker over 50 years, when he has no friends, is a great time to back Jack Cowin and Domino's.'
Turning things around could take three years. 'Jack might be in his 80s, but is hands-on and can fix this with the right team.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Advertiser
43 minutes ago
- The Advertiser
Negligence ruling upheld for Ruby Princess COVID cruise
The operator of a cruise ship that embarked just as the COVID-19 pandemic gripped the globe will remain liable to pay passengers impacted by the virus after a failed appeal. Carnival's Ruby Princess set off from Sydney on a 13-day tour of New Zealand in March 2020 with 2671 passengers and 1146 crew on board. The voyage was cut short after 11 days just as Australia shut its borders when COVID-19 ran rampant globally. Twenty-eight people on the vessel died during the outbreak and 663 positive cases were reported amongst passengers. A class action lawsuit headed by Shine Lawyers and lead applicant Susan Karpik found that Carnival was misleading and negligent in October 2023. The company knew or ought to have known about the heightened risk of COVID-19 infection on the vessel and owed a duty of care to Ms Karpik to take reasonable care of her health and safety as a passenger, Federal Court Justice Angus Stewart said. A panel of three judges unanimously dismissed an appeal on Tuesday after Carnival challenged those findings. The Ruby Princess cruise should have been cancelled, Justices Brigitte Markovic, Sarah Derrington and Darren Jackson wrote. "It was a foreseeable consequence of Mrs Karpik's boarding (the ship) that she would be exposed to the heightened risk of there being COVID-19 on board the Ruby Princess," they said. The court also tossed a separate appeal seeking to increase the damages awarded to her by Justice Stewart. While she was allowed $4423 plus interest for out-of-pocket medical expenses, the judge declined to award non-economic damages as she had not been diagnosed with long COVID. She had originally sought more than $360,000 in damages for injuries, distress and disappointment. Carnival offered to settle the case for $15 million before a trial began in October 2022. But the offer was rejected by the passengers, who asked for $69 million. Carnival has been contacted for comment on the appeal's dismissal. Shine Lawyers joint head of class actions Vicky Antzoulatos said the firm was pleased with the appeal court's decision. "Passengers can now proceed to have their individual claims assessed," she said in a statement. "We hope this result will lead to a meaningful resolution of their claims so that they can finally put this sorry episode of their lives behind them." Justice Stewart will determine the next steps in the case at a later date. The operator of a cruise ship that embarked just as the COVID-19 pandemic gripped the globe will remain liable to pay passengers impacted by the virus after a failed appeal. Carnival's Ruby Princess set off from Sydney on a 13-day tour of New Zealand in March 2020 with 2671 passengers and 1146 crew on board. The voyage was cut short after 11 days just as Australia shut its borders when COVID-19 ran rampant globally. Twenty-eight people on the vessel died during the outbreak and 663 positive cases were reported amongst passengers. A class action lawsuit headed by Shine Lawyers and lead applicant Susan Karpik found that Carnival was misleading and negligent in October 2023. The company knew or ought to have known about the heightened risk of COVID-19 infection on the vessel and owed a duty of care to Ms Karpik to take reasonable care of her health and safety as a passenger, Federal Court Justice Angus Stewart said. A panel of three judges unanimously dismissed an appeal on Tuesday after Carnival challenged those findings. The Ruby Princess cruise should have been cancelled, Justices Brigitte Markovic, Sarah Derrington and Darren Jackson wrote. "It was a foreseeable consequence of Mrs Karpik's boarding (the ship) that she would be exposed to the heightened risk of there being COVID-19 on board the Ruby Princess," they said. The court also tossed a separate appeal seeking to increase the damages awarded to her by Justice Stewart. While she was allowed $4423 plus interest for out-of-pocket medical expenses, the judge declined to award non-economic damages as she had not been diagnosed with long COVID. She had originally sought more than $360,000 in damages for injuries, distress and disappointment. Carnival offered to settle the case for $15 million before a trial began in October 2022. But the offer was rejected by the passengers, who asked for $69 million. Carnival has been contacted for comment on the appeal's dismissal. Shine Lawyers joint head of class actions Vicky Antzoulatos said the firm was pleased with the appeal court's decision. "Passengers can now proceed to have their individual claims assessed," she said in a statement. "We hope this result will lead to a meaningful resolution of their claims so that they can finally put this sorry episode of their lives behind them." Justice Stewart will determine the next steps in the case at a later date. The operator of a cruise ship that embarked just as the COVID-19 pandemic gripped the globe will remain liable to pay passengers impacted by the virus after a failed appeal. Carnival's Ruby Princess set off from Sydney on a 13-day tour of New Zealand in March 2020 with 2671 passengers and 1146 crew on board. The voyage was cut short after 11 days just as Australia shut its borders when COVID-19 ran rampant globally. Twenty-eight people on the vessel died during the outbreak and 663 positive cases were reported amongst passengers. A class action lawsuit headed by Shine Lawyers and lead applicant Susan Karpik found that Carnival was misleading and negligent in October 2023. The company knew or ought to have known about the heightened risk of COVID-19 infection on the vessel and owed a duty of care to Ms Karpik to take reasonable care of her health and safety as a passenger, Federal Court Justice Angus Stewart said. A panel of three judges unanimously dismissed an appeal on Tuesday after Carnival challenged those findings. The Ruby Princess cruise should have been cancelled, Justices Brigitte Markovic, Sarah Derrington and Darren Jackson wrote. "It was a foreseeable consequence of Mrs Karpik's boarding (the ship) that she would be exposed to the heightened risk of there being COVID-19 on board the Ruby Princess," they said. The court also tossed a separate appeal seeking to increase the damages awarded to her by Justice Stewart. While she was allowed $4423 plus interest for out-of-pocket medical expenses, the judge declined to award non-economic damages as she had not been diagnosed with long COVID. She had originally sought more than $360,000 in damages for injuries, distress and disappointment. Carnival offered to settle the case for $15 million before a trial began in October 2022. But the offer was rejected by the passengers, who asked for $69 million. Carnival has been contacted for comment on the appeal's dismissal. Shine Lawyers joint head of class actions Vicky Antzoulatos said the firm was pleased with the appeal court's decision. "Passengers can now proceed to have their individual claims assessed," she said in a statement. "We hope this result will lead to a meaningful resolution of their claims so that they can finally put this sorry episode of their lives behind them." Justice Stewart will determine the next steps in the case at a later date. The operator of a cruise ship that embarked just as the COVID-19 pandemic gripped the globe will remain liable to pay passengers impacted by the virus after a failed appeal. Carnival's Ruby Princess set off from Sydney on a 13-day tour of New Zealand in March 2020 with 2671 passengers and 1146 crew on board. The voyage was cut short after 11 days just as Australia shut its borders when COVID-19 ran rampant globally. Twenty-eight people on the vessel died during the outbreak and 663 positive cases were reported amongst passengers. A class action lawsuit headed by Shine Lawyers and lead applicant Susan Karpik found that Carnival was misleading and negligent in October 2023. The company knew or ought to have known about the heightened risk of COVID-19 infection on the vessel and owed a duty of care to Ms Karpik to take reasonable care of her health and safety as a passenger, Federal Court Justice Angus Stewart said. A panel of three judges unanimously dismissed an appeal on Tuesday after Carnival challenged those findings. The Ruby Princess cruise should have been cancelled, Justices Brigitte Markovic, Sarah Derrington and Darren Jackson wrote. "It was a foreseeable consequence of Mrs Karpik's boarding (the ship) that she would be exposed to the heightened risk of there being COVID-19 on board the Ruby Princess," they said. The court also tossed a separate appeal seeking to increase the damages awarded to her by Justice Stewart. While she was allowed $4423 plus interest for out-of-pocket medical expenses, the judge declined to award non-economic damages as she had not been diagnosed with long COVID. She had originally sought more than $360,000 in damages for injuries, distress and disappointment. Carnival offered to settle the case for $15 million before a trial began in October 2022. But the offer was rejected by the passengers, who asked for $69 million. Carnival has been contacted for comment on the appeal's dismissal. Shine Lawyers joint head of class actions Vicky Antzoulatos said the firm was pleased with the appeal court's decision. "Passengers can now proceed to have their individual claims assessed," she said in a statement. "We hope this result will lead to a meaningful resolution of their claims so that they can finally put this sorry episode of their lives behind them." Justice Stewart will determine the next steps in the case at a later date.


Perth Now
an hour ago
- Perth Now
Negligence ruling upheld for Ruby Princess COVID cruise
The operator of a cruise ship that embarked just as the COVID-19 pandemic gripped the globe will remain liable to pay passengers impacted by the virus after a failed appeal. Carnival's Ruby Princess set off from Sydney on a 13-day tour of New Zealand in March 2020 with 2671 passengers and 1146 crew on board. The voyage was cut short after 11 days just as Australia shut its borders when COVID-19 ran rampant globally. Twenty-eight people on the vessel died during the outbreak and 663 positive cases were reported amongst passengers. A class action lawsuit headed by Shine Lawyers and lead applicant Susan Karpik found that Carnival was misleading and negligent in October 2023. The company knew or ought to have known about the heightened risk of COVID-19 infection on the vessel and owed a duty of care to Ms Karpik to take reasonable care of her health and safety as a passenger, Federal Court Justice Angus Stewart said. A panel of three judges unanimously dismissed an appeal on Tuesday after Carnival challenged those findings. The Ruby Princess cruise should have been cancelled, Justices Brigitte Markovic, Sarah Derrington and Darren Jackson wrote. "It was a foreseeable consequence of Mrs Karpik's boarding (the ship) that she would be exposed to the heightened risk of there being COVID-19 on board the Ruby Princess," they said. The court also tossed a separate appeal seeking to increase the damages awarded to her by Justice Stewart. While she was allowed $4423 plus interest for out-of-pocket medical expenses, the judge declined to award non-economic damages as she had not been diagnosed with long COVID. She had originally sought more than $360,000 in damages for injuries, distress and disappointment. Carnival offered to settle the case for $15 million before a trial began in October 2022. But the offer was rejected by the passengers, who asked for $69 million. Carnival has been contacted for comment on the appeal's dismissal. Shine Lawyers joint head of class actions Vicky Antzoulatos said the firm was pleased with the appeal court's decision. "Passengers can now proceed to have their individual claims assessed," she said in a statement. "We hope this result will lead to a meaningful resolution of their claims so that they can finally put this sorry episode of their lives behind them." Justice Stewart will determine the next steps in the case at a later date.


West Australian
an hour ago
- West Australian
Negligence ruling upheld for Ruby Princess COVID cruise
The operator of a cruise ship that embarked just as the COVID-19 pandemic gripped the globe will remain liable to pay passengers impacted by the virus after a failed appeal. Carnival's Ruby Princess set off from Sydney on a 13-day tour of New Zealand in March 2020 with 2671 passengers and 1146 crew on board. The voyage was cut short after 11 days just as Australia shut its borders when COVID-19 ran rampant globally. Twenty-eight people on the vessel died during the outbreak and 663 positive cases were reported amongst passengers. A class action lawsuit headed by Shine Lawyers and lead applicant Susan Karpik found that Carnival was misleading and negligent in October 2023. The company knew or ought to have known about the heightened risk of COVID-19 infection on the vessel and owed a duty of care to Ms Karpik to take reasonable care of her health and safety as a passenger, Federal Court Justice Angus Stewart said. A panel of three judges unanimously dismissed an appeal on Tuesday after Carnival challenged those findings. The Ruby Princess cruise should have been cancelled, Justices Brigitte Markovic, Sarah Derrington and Darren Jackson wrote. "It was a foreseeable consequence of Mrs Karpik's boarding (the ship) that she would be exposed to the heightened risk of there being COVID-19 on board the Ruby Princess," they said. The court also tossed a separate appeal seeking to increase the damages awarded to her by Justice Stewart. While she was allowed $4423 plus interest for out-of-pocket medical expenses, the judge declined to award non-economic damages as she had not been diagnosed with long COVID. She had originally sought more than $360,000 in damages for injuries, distress and disappointment. Carnival offered to settle the case for $15 million before a trial began in October 2022. But the offer was rejected by the passengers, who asked for $69 million. Carnival has been contacted for comment on the appeal's dismissal. Shine Lawyers joint head of class actions Vicky Antzoulatos said the firm was pleased with the appeal court's decision. "Passengers can now proceed to have their individual claims assessed," she said in a statement. "We hope this result will lead to a meaningful resolution of their claims so that they can finally put this sorry episode of their lives behind them." Justice Stewart will determine the next steps in the case at a later date.