The huge mistake almost everyone is making when washing their socks
It's instinctive to turn socks out the right way before washing, particularly if there's visible dark marks along the underside.
But a laundry expert explained that this is in fact the opposite of what you need to do to achieve the best possible clean.
According to a washing product scientist, the correct way to wash socks is to first turn them 'inside out'.
'To achieve optimal cleaning, turn your socks inside out before washing,' Sara Shorter, a Research and Development Product Scientist at Unilever, told the Daily Mail.
The cleaning expert, who works with brands like OMO, Radiant and Surf, said there are two main reasons why socks will benefit from being washed this way.
From a hygiene perspective, Sara explained that 'washing socks inside out enables dead skin and bacteria to be removed more effectively'.
The second reason relates to maintaining their condition in the long term.
If socks are visibly dark and dirty on the sole and heel, Sara suggested the additional pre-wash step of 'applying some laundry liquid directly to the stain before turning inside out and washing'
'Washing inside out keeps your socks looking newer for longer by reducing friction on the outside of the socks, which helps to maintain patterns and colours,' Sara said.
However, if socks are visibly dark and dirty on the sole and heel, the expert suggested an additional pre-wash step as the best method to refresh them.
'If socks are stained, apply some laundry liquid directly to the stain before turning inside out and washing,' Sara recommended.
Using a 'good quality detergent' in your washing machine is also a must according to the cleaning product formulator.
And if you're serious about preserving the lifespan of your socks, Sara also suggests avoiding warm water and switching to a cold water washing powder because this better 'preserves the fabric and elasticity of the socks'.
In addition to following the inside-out washing technique, the way you dry your socks can also impact their longevity.
Sara recommends 'hanging your socks to dry instead of using a dryer' - and as with washing, they should be inside out.
'Line drying helps to maintain shape and elasticity,' she explained.
However, the product scientist also suggested being mindful of limiting your socks' exposure to direct sunlight 'because the UV in sunlight can break down the elastane in socks'.
'No one wants saggy socks,' she added.
Sara also confirmed that 'socks should be washed after every wear'.
'Frequent washing is important because feet sweat. Damp, dirty socks can lead to fungal infections or offensive odours.'
By contrast, a separate laundry expert recently told Daily Mail that towels might not need to be washed quite as often as most people think.
A report earlier this year saw a spokesperson from UK expert testing and review site Which? recommend that towels should be washed around 'once a week' – depending on their level of usage.
'You might find yourself wondering how often you really need to wash your towels, but the answer depends on your household setup, and how you look after them,' the consumer watch group spokesperson explained.
The Which? expert suggested that 'around once a week, especially for hand towels,' was the ideal amount of washes.
Furthermore, if towels have become crispy and scratchy over time, the consumer group spokesperson offered a solution that could return them to their original, fluffy state.
'Try soaking them in a mix of water and white vinegar (one cup of vinegar to four cups of water is a good general guide),' the Which? spokesperson advised.
'Then rinse off the vinegar and machine wash at 40°C rather than 60°C, making sure the load is no more than three-quarters full to ensure room for the towels to move around.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
16 minutes ago
- Times
I'm a boomerang kid at 38
The hallway of my mum's new-build maisonette looked like the 'after' pictures of the world's least fun car boot sale. Huge blue and red laundry bags bulging with clothes, battered suitcases, baby toys, coats thrown carelessly and a rogue bag of cables that even the Dalai Lama wouldn't have the patience to untangle. Standing to one side, trying to remain calm, was my 78-year-old mum. 'How long are you staying for?' she joked. 'TBC,' I grimaced back. This was in January when my partner and I, along with our one-year-old son, moved in with my mum while the 'fixer-upper' house we bought as our first family home was, uh, fixed up. It saved us thousands but everyone — apart from the baby — was nervous. I'm definitely not the only one moving back home. A recent survey by the British bank TSB found that 80 per cent of first-time buyers moved back in with their parents to get onto the property ladder. My mum has been living alone for more than 30 years. First in the house I grew up in, then in the pristine new flat she downsized to a few years ago. She's no Hyacinth Bucket but she was used to having everything just so. When she left a room in the morning it would look the same way when she returned at night — and the same could very much not be said once we moved in. For me and my partner, there were other worries. There's only one TV, and our viewing habits, dinner timings and entire routine were different from my mum's. The space was small. Perfect for one, maybe two people, but three adults and chaos monkey? Nope. Too small. There's nowhere to escape. We also had to go back to sharing a bedroom with our son again after finally getting him settled into his own room. And I don't know if you've ever tried to work from home with your boomer parent in the house but I'd compare it to trying to work in a room with an affectionate labrador that happens to have the stealth of a monster truck and the street smarts of an undercover spy. However, in the five months we spent living with her, I learnt some valuable things. The first I knew before we moved in but I really knew it by the time we left: how lucky we were to have the option to do this in the first place. To have family in the city you live and work in isn't a given. To have them in London, the most expensive place to live in the UK, and round the corner from your life, your work and your kid's nursery is like having a winning lottery ticket in your purse. Mum was patient and kind. She kept our son entertained while we made him dinner, put up with him wrecking her curtains and carpet, and coped with my snapping at her that I was 'trying to work' for approximately 12 hours a day. The second was that you really only know someone when you live with them. Like most children, my relationship with my mum was previously frozen in time. We revert to type the minute we're in the same room: I am always the mouthy boundary-pusher and she is always the warrior-like matriarch whose word is final. But the truth, of course, is that we're different now, both made softer and harder by the toll life takes, by age and by motherhood itself. Living with each other forced us to reckon with the people we actually are, rather than the family personas we used to take on. Three years ago my mum was diagnosed with Parkinson's, something we've all been in denial about since. But I needed to see how it affected her life. At present, the answer is not much. However, I now know the ways in which that will change and what I can do to help when it does, because I am under the skin of her day-to-day life in a way you can't be when you check in by phone once a week or see each other for Sunday lunch. In the reverse, she knows what type of mother I am and that I am finally, for the first time in my adult life, in a relationship with a functional, kind man. Some nights, after I'd go to bed, my partner and my mum would sit up and chat. I only found this out afterwards, and how much he enjoyed it. And lastly, that time she had with her young grandson was precious. They imprinted on each other in a way I never could have predicted. His face still lights up when Grandma enters the room. He took his first steps on her velvet-soft rug. He runs into her place and goes straight for the window they'd look out of together, counting the cars on the street below. We all cried when the time came for us to finally move out because we knew that blink-and-you'll-miss-it moment in time meant more than anything. Amy Grier What it's like to live with my parents at 23 by Esme Gordon-Craig When I was younger I enjoyed imagining a 23-year-old-version of myself. She was living in a small but elegant flat in London, maybe with a boyfriend, but I also considered that a couple of best friends would be fun too. I pictured having the perfect office job with the perfect office outfit, along with all the emotional and financial freedoms that would follow. This fantasy, a product of overwatching The Devil Wears Prada, is yet to come true. Instead, having now reached the great age of 23, I find myself living at home with my parents, cushioned among all the emotional and financial security that brings. This is increasingly common for my generation. The cost of living crisis has ensured that those of us in our early twenties who have the opportunity to live at home will happily sacrifice our independence for the sake of saving, or even just affording to live. We see it as a temporary situation, one that might one day lead to the ultimate goal of adulthood: having a home of our own. Having the option to live at home as an adult is both a blessing and curse. It's a blessing for many reasons, an obvious one being no rent. Then there are the added extras: I have my washing done for me, bills are nonexistent and a home-cooked meal is guaranteed every night. • The reality of living with your parents in your twenties However, as much as I love my parents, there are downsides. Number one, if you want the perks of being supported like a child you have to accept being treated like one too. There are no drunken nights out ending in early-morning cereal binges and no hungover lie-ins that blend beautifully into a day-long movie marathon. I can't even guarantee access to the TV. World War Three can kick off with the simple act of not turning off a light switch or forgetting to open the gate for the postman, and remoulding one's life around the routine of one's parents can be exceptionally challenging when everything down to the hot water has a regimented schedule. Then there's the problem of socialising. I had a boyfriend who was living at home after he graduated. I wouldn't say this was the reason we ended it but coming downstairs to be greeted by his parents every morning added an element of awkwardness. The big issue for me is that, unlike my ex, home is nowhere near London. It's nowhere near anything, really, and to make matters worse, I can't drive. Yes, I still get lifts on nights out.
Daily Mail
33 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Prince Harry condemns Sentebale charity boss for acting in the 'poorest taste' by referencing Princess Diana after she won control of duke's 'life's work' that royal fears will 'go down in flames'
Prince Harry believes the boss of Sentebale acted in the 'poorest taste' by invoking Princess Diana 's memory after she retained control of the charity he set up to continue his mother's work in Africa, a source close to the royal has claimed. The Duke of Sussex is said to have been left 'devastated' by the boardroom battle that saw him leave the organisation after 19 years, which he fears will now go 'down in flames'. Harry, who co-founded Sentebale in 2006, is said to consider it a 'hostile takeover' of the charity by chairwoman Dr Sophie Chandauka who he claims has destroyed his 'life's work'. 'She's allowing it to go down in flames because of her own pride and hubris… he has for the last 19 years established this charity from nothing', a source close to Harry claimed. A dispute earlier this year prompted Harry to step down as patron in support of trustees who resigned in opposition to Dr Chandauka, who then accused him of 'harassment and bullying at scale' - a claim that is vehemently denied. On Tuesday, the Charity Commission published a report criticising all sides for making the fallout public with interviews and statements, but the war of words continues. Dr Chandauka then vowed to honour the founding mission of Sentebale in memory of the Duke's late mother after the watchdog ruled she could stay in her position. But sources close to Harry, who co-founded Sentebale in 2006, have criticised the chair, saying her 'hostile takeover' of the charity had destroyed his 'life's work'. The Charity Commission yesterday revealed it had found 'no evidence of widespread or systematic bullying or harassment including misogyny or misogynoir' following a bitter boardroom battle at Sentebale. Neither side was satisfied with the final adjudication, which criticised all parties involved, and, although the regulator urged all to be 'mindful to channel their belief in the charity's mission in a constructive and collaborative way', there seems little hope of the row going away. Dr Chandauka said: 'Despite the recent turbulence, we will always be inspired by the vision of our founders, Prince Harry and Prince Seeiso, who established Sentebale in memory of their precious mothers, Princess Diana and Queen Mamohato.' But a source close to Harry said in response: 'For Sophie Chandauka to have invoked Princess Diana's memory in her own defence was in the poorest possible taste. 'She's got what she wants, which is control of the charity, but unfortunately the people who suffer most out of all of this… are the children of Lesotho and Botswana.' Speaking to the Telegraph, the source added: 'The most devastating thing for Prince Harry in all of this is that his life's work and all the money he was able to pump into Lesotho and Botswana through his work has gone down in flames.' Sentebale meanwhile has appeared to suggest allegations made by Dr Chandauka of bullying, harassment and misogyny at the charity - which the commission found no evidence of - may be pursued against individuals through 'avenues more appropriate'. Another source said: 'This has been emotionally absolutely devastating for Prince Harry and (Sentebale co-founder) Prince Seeiso (of Lesotho). What's been perpetrated over the last few months is nothing short of a hostile takeover.' Seeiso also stepped down as patron of the charity which works in Botswana and Lesotho supporting the health and wellbeing of young people, especially those with HIV and Aids. The source added: 'You have to remember Prince Seeiso and Prince Harry started this charity nearly two decades ago to honour the work and continue the legacy of their mothers Queen Mamohato and Princess Diana, and the work that they had done in southern Africa to support those living with HIV and Aids. 'In the 19 years that they have worked with this charity, and a lot of the former board of trustee members, they have raised tens of millions of pounds and distributed tens of millions of pounds.' The commission criticised all parties in the dispute for allowing it to play out publicly and described how all trustees contributed to a 'missed opportunity' to resolve the issues that led to the serious disagreement which risked undermining public trust in charities generally. The regulator, which cannot investigate individual allegations of bullying, found no evidence of systemic bullying or harassment, including misogyny or misogynoir at the charity but acknowledged 'the strong perception of ill treatment' felt by some involved. After conducting its regulatory compliance case the commission issued a Regulatory Action Plan with Sentebale saying it had complied with the steps, from implementing an internal dispute policy to improving the charity's complaints and whistle-blowing procedures. The trustees who resigned said in a statement they were 'gravely concerned for the future of the charity' adding they were 'disheartened' by the way the regulator had 'chosen to ignore key concerns and irrefutable evidence raised with them regarding the leadership and oversight of Sentebale's chair'. Sentebale said in statement: 'The Charity Commission is explicitly clear, including in its public guidance, that it is not the commission's responsibility to adjudicate or mediate internal disputes. This would include individual allegations of bullying, harassment, misogyny, misogynoir etc. 'As a result, the commission has not investigated any individual allegations and therefore has not made any findings in relation to individuals, including Prince Harry. 'The issues not investigated by the commission can and may be dealt with through avenues more appropriate than the commission.'
BBC News
33 minutes ago
- BBC News
West Yorkshire Fire Service battery bin plea as lithium-ion blazes increase
A senior West Yorkshire fire officer has warned about disposing batteries in household bins amid what the force described as a "growing national crisis".Lithium-ion batteries, commonly found in everyday items such as vapes, mobile phones and power tools, are increasingly causing fires when discarded incorrectly, West Yorkshire Fire and Rescue Service (WYFRS) Wakefield alone, almost 85 tonnes of electrical items were incorrectly placed in recycling bins last year, leading to 46 fires at one rubbish sorting site as well as five bin lorry Assistant District Commander David Burland said: "These avoidable fires are also taking away resources from other emergencies." "Lithium-ion batteries are everywhere, more places than you realise," he said. "And if you throw one in a standard household bin, when your bin wagon collects waste, it compacts it and the danger starts when the lithium-ion batteries are crushed or damaged. "They can instantly burst into flames due to the chemicals inside them," Mr Burland added. Despite being small and portable, lithium-ion batteries have a high energy and power density so when not made correctly, can exhibit "thermal runway" - a self-heating state that can result in them ejecting gas, shrapnel and extremely high temperatures leading to fires. WYFRS has launched a campaign, alongside Wakefield Council and waste management firm Biffa, to raise awareness about the dangers of disposing of all libraries and supermarkets have special recycling boxes for batteries and council websites can offer advice about disposal Burland also warned about the dangers of buying battery packs online - often to convert standard pedal bikes to said it was especially risky to charge an e-bike indoors, particularly in house shares or flats where space was at a minimum. "Try and charge them somewhere safely away from your property if possible."Do not block your escape route overnight, because that could be the difference in you getting out or not," he added. A man died in Bradford after his converted e-bike caught fire while charging in the living room overnight at his Janjua, 28, was found unresponsive in a bedroom in December 2023 after he returned to the fire-engulfed house because he thought his brother was still inside. A coroner said the blaze was likely caused by a "catastrophic failure" of the bike battery.A Prevention of Future Deaths report has since been released urging the government to examine rules around the sale of lithium-ion battery kits - which are unregulated. The Product Regulation and Metrology Act 2025 was recently passed which enabled the government to "address challenges" arising from technological advances such as the fire risk associated with e-bikes and lithium-ion Burland said buying battery kits online had increased as they were cheap. "But that cost is at a bit of a price to safety as well."Some government regulation of how these batteries are tested before being sold to make sure they fit to British standard trademarks is needed," he said. Mr Burland added: "That could be a good place to start." Listen to highlights from West Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North.
