logo
Powell's Gamble: That the Economy Will Reveal Its True Self in the Next Two Months

Powell's Gamble: That the Economy Will Reveal Its True Self in the Next Two Months

Hindustan Times31-07-2025
Setting interest rates is sometimes more art than science, especially when the economy keeps defying predictions—a reality the Federal Reserve confronted head-on Wednesday.
There are two economic worlds the U.S. could be living in right now, and Fed officials might not know which one for months. In one, economic weakness that's been lurking beneath reasonably solid headline numbers finally surfaces. In the other, artificial intelligence investment and buoyant household wealth power the economy past trade-war headwinds.
The Fed href="https://www.wsj.com/economy/central-banking/fed-holds-rates-steady-but-two-officials-back-a-cut-6fc17c67" target="_blank" class="backlink" data-vars-page-type="story" data-vars-link-type="Manual" data-vars-anchor-text="held rates steady">held rates steady this week, and Fed Chair Jerome Powell kept his options wide open for its next gathering in September, promising little while ruling out nothing.
Officials are betting they can afford to wait at least two months for clarity on whether tariffs will slow economic activity, fuel inflation, or pass by with little effect. That patience comes with risks—on both sides.
Powell suggested he was still committed to preserving the soft landing it looked like the economy had achieved at the beginning of the year, in which inflation had declined without significant damage to the labor market. By pushing up prices of some goods, tariffs have since created crosswinds that could blow the Fed off course.
The Fed provided extraordinary stimulus when the Covid-19 pandemic hit five years ago and was slow to withdraw it, leading to a blitz of rate hikes in 2022 when inflation proved more stubborn.
On Wednesday, the Fed chair repeated the pledge he made four years ago to make sure any price increases wouldn't persist.
'We want to do that efficiently, though—efficiently,' he said at a news conference. Cutting rates too soon could force the Fed to come back later and raise them. 'That's inefficient,' Powell said. But waiting too long could cause unnecessary damage to the labor market.
In one economic world, the low and stable unemployment rate that Powell touted as a sign of economic stability is masking gradual labor market deterioration that could accelerate quickly.
'The unemployment rate being at 4.1% gives you a false sense of what's actually going on in the job market,' said Neil Dutta, head of economic research at Renaissance Macro Research.
More people are out of the workforce who actually want jobs than is typical for an economy with such a low unemployment rate, said Dutta. An unusually high number of workers are seeing no wage growth, and barely half of industries have been adding jobs—a historically weak reading. Fed governor Christopher Waller flagged such concerns in a speech two weeks ago.
A shopper browses in a San Francisco bookstore. Pockets of weakness are showing up in consumer spending.
A world where the labor market is starting to come undone will validate Powell's critics who say the Fed should have resumed cutting this week, if not earlier this year. Waller, who dissented from the Fed's decision Wednesday because he favored a rate cut, has argued that the economy isn't as strong as it might seem.
Powell didn't dismiss those fears on Wednesday. The unemployment rate has stabilized because both the supply of workers and the demand for labor is falling at roughly the same pace. That's one reason 'we do see downside risk in the labor market,' he said.
Pockets of weakness are also showing up in consumer spending. Bank of America Institute data shows spending on services, such as hotels, airfares and dining, has declined for three straight months, the first time since 2008. Lower-income households saw credit-card spending decline in the three months through June for the first time in over a year.
Consumers are pulling back on discretionary categories like travel and dining even as nondiscretionary costs like insurance and rent continue climbing.
'If you were to say, 'what is the temperature of the consumer right now?' I would tell you that it's cooling but it's not frozen. It's not collapsing,' said Liz Everett Krisberg, head of the Bank of America Institute.
Housing markets represent another source of economic drag that could amplify labor market weakness. Residential investment has been declining and inventories of for-sale housing are growing, a sign that more housing markets are exhausting the universe of buyers willing or able to purchase homes with mortgage rates above 6.5%.
Fed governor Christopher Waller dissented at Wednesday's meeting in favor of a rate cut.
But there's a competing view that sees these warning signs as noise rather than signal. In the second world, the economy's track record of defying predictions continues, powered by forces that could override the emerging weakness.
The economy has motored through a swift run-up in interest rates in 2022, a regional banking crisis in 2023, and now trade disruptions in 2025, said Ajay Rajadhyaksha, global chairman of research at Barclays.
Rajadhyaksha highlights two key factors sustaining the economy: a boom in AI investment that has offset weakness in rate-sensitive sectors, and a considerable wealth buildup from higher home prices and stock portfolios that could support consumer spending by the well-off.
'Every time I go to Asia or Europe, I'm reminded that people don't realize how much richer in the last four years U.S. households have become than the rest of the world,' he said.
Absent some unforeseen shock such as a swift jump in long-term government-debt yields, 'I have a very hard time seeing an outright recession in the United States,' Rajadhyaksha said.
In this state of the world, the Fed would have little reason to cut this year, said Michael Gapen, chief U.S. economist at Morgan Stanley. Even if tariff-related price hikes prove temporary, as Waller expects, they could set up a problematic sequence if, for example, Republicans' tax cuts or potential consumer rebates boost spending.
'It's not the tariffs that create the persistence; it's the demand side that feeds off of that tariff story,' Gapen said.
Rajadhyaksha thinks higher prices from tariffs will be a one-off, but he thinks the Fed will be hard-pressed to cut in September because those price increases will show up in the July and August inflation reports due beforehand.
Claudio Irigoyen, a former central banker in Argentina who now heads global economic research at Bank of America, called it risky to assume the answers to any tariff shock could be fully resolved in a matter of months.
'The pandemic was also a temporary shock that the Fed decided to look through, and they were wrong,' he said. 'Not because it wasn't temporary, but because temporary means a year and a half or two—long enough for you not to ignore it.'
He pointed to other risks of financial froth that call into question the case for lowering rates. If rate cuts are urgently needed, 'why is the stock market going up every day?' asked Irigoyen. 'Why is private credit booming?'
Powell didn't sound like someone in a rush to find out. 'I think you have to think of this as still quite early days,' he said, referring to understanding the effects higher tariffs will have on the economy. 'We're just going to have to watch and learn.'
Write to Nick Timiraos at Nick.Timiraos@wsj.com
Powell's Gamble: That the Economy Will Reveal Its True Self in the Next Two Months
Powell's Gamble: That the Economy Will Reveal Its True Self in the Next Two Months
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Airlines' push for speed: Is safety becoming a casualty?
Airlines' push for speed: Is safety becoming a casualty?

Hindustan Times

timean hour ago

  • Hindustan Times

Airlines' push for speed: Is safety becoming a casualty?

Those who flew in the 1960s and 1970s may remember how flying was a relatively relaxed and pleasurable experience. Of course, there were reports of untoward incidents, but these were extremely rare. By and large, flying was a happy, stress-free experience — for both passengers and airlines. Then came the entry of private airlines. More aircraft, more slots, and more choice for the fliers. Run by the government, airports — especially in the metros — got busier, and their shortcomings soon became visible. The rules of the game, however, remained largely unchanged, and flying remained an exclusive club, out of reach for most. Air Deccan's entry reset the paradigm — this time, by ushering in the low-fare flight revolution. Other companies followed, and flying became far more accessible, replacing train travel at the higher end for many, to save time. From 2004-05 to around 2019, fliers enjoyed having plenty of options and cheap fares, airline salaries rose as the business grew and began to deliver returns for some players. Indian airports, which had been languishing under government control, improved vastly under private stewardship and became comparable to some of the best globally. Then came Covid-19 and halted everything for a bit. But it is what has happened after the pandemic that is worrying. Even though flying today is much safer than five or six decades ago, the entire ecosystem now seems set to a frantic pace, making the whole experience more tense. Post Covid, leisure travel has come back with a vengeance, and business travel has limped back, albeit at a much slower clip. Airports — some with improved facilities given the private-sector funds pouring in — have become more crowded. And commanders and crew have emerged from the pandemic far more stressed than when it started. Amid this, the near-hostile relationship developing between crew and management in almost all Indian airlines is deeply concerning. Crew members allege that an obsession to cut costs (and maximise profits) seems to have crept into the psyche of the carriers — including the market leader that sets the tone. In some ways, this penny pinching and the obsession with on-time efficiency runs counter to safety. Let me elaborate on a few new practices that are of no benefit to the passenger and serve only one purpose: Maximising revenue and profit. These are on top of the additional costs imposed on passengers, such as clubbing food with drinks that I have written about earlier. One is the near-constant endeavour by low-fare airlines to maximise the number of hours each aircraft flies and cut aircraft turnaround times. This has often led to a situation where a long line of passengers looking to board a flight sweats it out in the vestibule, waiting while those who arrived on the same flight disembark. While this may be important for the carriers to reduce aircraft turnaround time, it makes fliers feel rushed and adds to the 'assembly line' feeling of boarding a flight . zA senior airline insider and frequent flier asked me, 'Why should I care how quickly the aircraft is turning around?', arguing that the Directorate General of Civil Aviation should be laying down the maximum number of hours an aircraft should be utilised rather than letting airlines push things to the breaking point. He argues that ground engineers, in particular, should be given ample time to declare an aircraft worthy of flying. In this mad rush, something might give. In the worst-case scenario, he points out, safety could be the casualty. The obsession with on-time is also beginning to lead to frayed nerves — with both the check-in staff and those in charge of boarding pushed to less-than-pleasant interactions with passengers perceived to be causing delays. The ground staff often seems on the edge — almost as if their life depended on it, akin to fast-delivery agents skipping red lights on the roads, risking their lives. Civility is the first casualty when a passenger is delayed for some unavoidable reason. Being on-time is great, but if it comes at the cost of customer experience and frayed nerves, one is not sure if that is worth it. This is not to say all passengers are always easy, but the constant drumming of the 'late is a four-letter word' message in the ears of ground staff has led to paranoia about performance and apathy towards the flier creeping in. Civility is one of the factors that distinguishes Indian airlines from most American and European carriers, a quality worth preserving. Do we really want to be brusque or even rude with elderly passengers, or refuse to accommodate someone who has a disability or is otherwise slow for some reason? Surely, we don't need to ape the West in their worst practices? Another point is that commanders and crew are pressured by operations control and flight dispatchers on on-time take-off and reducing aircraft weight regardless of whether or not they are comfortable with the minimum equipment list (MEL) or even the fuelling requirements for the flight. A former Jet captain who is now with one of the low-fare carriers says that at his former airline, he often had to point out that the aircraft was 'over-fuelled', and even a small query on the MEL ensured prompt redressal. In his present airline, fuel is often at bare minimum, and dispatch is almost hounding the crew to take off on time, dismissive of MEL concerns. Caution, he argues, is being thrown to the winds. This is a consequence of the low-fare philosophy of maximising profits — which per se is fine. But it can't come at any cost, overriding all other considerations, including safety. Ask any flier, and they would swear by the 'better late than never' adage. Anjuli Bhargava writes about governance, infrastructure and the social sector. The views expressed are personal.

American job slowdown, H‑1B backlash: Is the clock ticking for Indian talent in the US?
American job slowdown, H‑1B backlash: Is the clock ticking for Indian talent in the US?

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

American job slowdown, H‑1B backlash: Is the clock ticking for Indian talent in the US?

Is the clock ticking for Indian talent in the US? In August 2025, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) did something uncharacteristically jarring—it quietly downgraded previous job estimates, revealing that 258,000 jobs initially reported for May and June had not, in fact, materialised. July's fresh data wasn't any better: Only 73,000 new jobs were added, marking the weakest performance since the COVID-19 collapse of 2020. The picture was bleak enough to prompt a public reckoning. As Douglas Holtz-Eakin, former director of the Congressional Budget Office, told CNN, 'The job market is terrible. Outside of education and health, the economy has lost private sector jobs in the past three months. That's terrible. ' It wasn't just a statistical correction—it was an unmistakable signal that the engine of job creation was losing steam. President Donald Trump's reaction to the BLS report? Swift and severe. He fired BLS Commissioner Dr Erika McEntarfer, accusing her of intentionally damaging the economy's image ahead of the election cycle. The move sent shockwaves—not only because it politicised statistical reporting—but because it underscored a dangerous truth: when narratives trump numbers, policy decisions can become erratic and targeted. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like The Simple Morning Habit for a Flatter Belly After 50! Lulutox Undo For Indian professionals on H‑1B visas, many working in sectors (mostly tech) directly affected by these shifts, this wasn't just a Washington shake-up. It was a flashing red light. Economic gloom and the growing crisis for Indian techies on H-1B visa Nowhere has the economic slowdown hit harder—or more symbolically—than in the technology sector, the very engine room of American innovation and the primary destination for skilled Indian immigrants on H‑1B visas. According to Crunchbase, over 95,000 U.S.-based tech workers were laid off in 2024, with an additional 4,500 roles eliminated in just one week of July 2025. The CRN list of 2025 tech layoffs reads like a who's who of Silicon Valley titans: Meta, Microsoft, Amazon, Google, Salesforce, Intel, and Oracle. Salesforce, notably, has placed a full freeze on hiring new software engineers this year. These aren't merely cyclical belt-tightening measures. They mark a structural recalibration of the sector—away from expansive hiring and toward leaner, AI-driven operational models. And that recalibration comes with a sharp, often underdiscussed casualty: H‑1B visa holders, the majority of whom are Indian and heavily concentrated in tech roles. Indeed, according to the National Foundation for American Policy, Indian nationals received 72% of all H‑1B visas in recent years. Top sponsoring firms include Amazon, Cognizant, Infosys, and TCS—all deeply enmeshed in the tech ecosystem now undergoing contraction. The fallout is visible and brutal. As per Bloomberg, more than 200,000 tech workers were laid off in the U.S. between November 2022 and January 2023 alone, and industry estimates suggest that 30–40% of those affected were Indian IT professionals. Nearly 80,000 Indian workers on H‑1B and L‑1 visas have faced job losses since late 2022, many with just 60 days to find a new employer before being forced to leave the country. This is not just an economic hiccup. It's a systemic shock—a cold pause that is statistical, immediate, and structurally skewed against the very immigrant talent that helped build the American tech miracle. The rising heat against OPT and H‑1B deepens the crisis The American economic engine may be sputtering, but for Indian professionals in the U.S., it's not just the slowdown that's cause for alarm. A rising wave of political hostility toward high-skilled immigration—especially the OPT and H‑1B visa programmes—is turning an economic risk into a full-blown career crisis. The Optional Practical Training (OPT) programme—long considered the vital bridge from American universities to the U.S. workforce for international students—is now facing the threat of repeal. Critics have labelled it a regulatory loophole, arguing that it allows foreign graduates to bypass traditional labour certification and take American jobs. Leading the charge are figures like Jessica Vaughan of the Center for Immigration Studies, who calls OPT a 'shadow guestworker programme.' And in a chilling turn, Joseph B. Edlow, now USCIS Director, has declared his intent to 'remove the ability for employment authorizations for F‑1 students beyond the time that they are in school.' This isn't just political theatre. Ending OPT would dismantle the first step in the employment ladder for thousands of Indian graduates, especially in STEM fields where they make up the overwhelming majority. For many, OPT isn't just optional—it's their only on-ramp to long-term employment and eventual H‑1B sponsorship. The rhetoric extends well beyond student pathways. Former Trump strategist Steve Bannon has called for an immediate moratorium on all foreign student visas, declaring: 'No foreign students should be in the country right now.' His remarks have been echoed—more pointedly—by Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene, who has explicitly demanded a ban on Indian H‑1B visa holders, claiming they displace American tech graduates. What was once fringe positioning is now bleeding into legislative language and policy debate. The MAGA playbook is evolving from anti-undocumented sentiment to a more coded, targeted hostility toward high-skilled immigrants—particularly those from India, who dominate both the H‑1B and OPT pipelines. A vicious loop: Job cuts, visa heat, and the Indian immigrant squeeze The combination of shrinking tech opportunities, hostile political rhetoric, and legal uncertainty is producing a chilling effect that's both economic and existential. None of these developments—slowing job growth, rising layoffs, or anti-immigrant sentiment—exist in isolation. They're mutually reinforcing. A weaker economy provides the political cover to restrict immigration. Restricting immigration further strains sectors already short of talent. It's a vicious loop, and Indian workers are caught in the middle. TOI Education is on WhatsApp now. Follow us here . Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!

Bengaluru woman gets Rs 12 lakh refund afterdecade-long wait for housing site
Bengaluru woman gets Rs 12 lakh refund afterdecade-long wait for housing site

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

Bengaluru woman gets Rs 12 lakh refund afterdecade-long wait for housing site

Bengaluru: After waiting for over a decade for a promised residential plot that never materialised, a woman got a ruling in her favour. The 3rd Additional Bengaluru Urban District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission directed a telecom employees cooperative society and a developer to refund over Rs 12 lakh with interest and compensate her for mental agony and litigation expenses. On Dec 30, 2011, Leena Khemani, from Kalkondrahalli, Sarjapur Road, applied for a 60x40 sq ft site in the Ayushmanbhava Layout located on Attiebel Road, Bidaraguppe. The residential housing project, proposed by the Karnataka Telecom Department Employees Cooperative Society, was promoted by DB Enterprises. She paid Rs 2.4 lakh to the promoter as service charges and Rs 9.6 lakh to the co-operative society towards the site value of Rs 12 lakh. However, the society failed to register the site in her name. On Dec 23, 2020, the society cited delays due to the Covid-19 pandemic and said the layout would be completed in 12-14 months. A second communication, dated Sep 9, 2021, reiterated the same. Khemani issued a legal notice to the society on Sep 28, 2023, as it failed to register her site and did not give her any relief. She then filed a consumer complaint on Jan 20, 2024 and sought relief for deficiency of service. You Can Also Check: Bengaluru AQI | Weather in Bengaluru | Bank Holidays in Bengaluru | Public Holidays in Bengaluru In its defence, the cooperative society claimed it was willing to register the site if the balance amount of Rs 4.1 lakh was paid. It said it had obtained layout approval for 4.5 acres and had sought the conversion of 30 acres from agricultural to residential use. The society contended that the value of the site was Rs 13.6 lakh and not Rs 12 lakh as claimed by Khemani. However, DB Enterprises did not appear before the commission despite being served notice. The commission noted the society and promoter had failed to submit any evidence in their support, unlike Khemani. "Despite 11 years, the layout wasn't developed or the site registered…even though the complainant paid the amount in the years 2011, 2012, and 2013, no return has been received," the commission, comprising Shivarama K, Chandrashekar S Noola, and Rekha Sayannavar, observed. The commission held the cooperative society guilty of deficiency in service, while the promoter engaged in unfair trade practice by taking Rs 2.4 lakh without delivering any service. The commission ordered a refund of Rs 9.6 lakh with 9% interest and Rs 2.4 lakh with a similar rate of interest and directed the society to pay the complainant Rs 30,000 for mental agony and Rs 10,000 in litigation costs. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and s ilver prices in your area.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store