Australians urged to walk together for reconciliation
As Australians crossed into a new millennium, more than 250,000 people crossed the Sydney Harbour Bridge for reconciliation.
It was an iconic moment Reconciliation Australia chief executive Karen Mundine said, and one being remembered 25 years later as Reconciliation Week begins with the theme "Bridging Now to Next".
"That was such a great moment, to see so many people came out in force and say 'I want to be part of this work, I want to be part of reconciliation'," she told AAP.
Reconciliation Week is held each year between May 27 and June 3, marking the successful 1967 referendum, and the High Court Mabo decision respectively.
Ms Mundine said to understand where Australia found itself, it was important to understand the past, the triumphs and the setbacks, and the truth of its history.
"'Bridging Now to Next' is really about learning from history, it's about grounding us and where we are today and then using all of that combined knowledge to chart a new path forward," she said.
Ms Mundine said 25 years after the bridge walk, there was still a need for reconciliation in Australia, with the issues of voice, treaty and truth-telling, raised in the Uluru Statement from the Heart not yet dealt with.
"(During the referendum) we weren't able to convince enough Australians to get that over the line," she said.
"That's the job of reconciliation to get out there and broaden the Australian community's understanding about history and understanding that impact on First Nations people, not just in the past but as it happens today."
Monday marked eight years since the Uluru Statement from the Heart was issued, an anniversary that brought up a lot of emotion for Allira Davis.
The Cobble Cobble woman is a co-chair of the Uluru Youth Dialogue and Australia still has a long way to go to meaningfully recognise Aboriginal people.
"We still need structural reform in place," she said.
"We still need something that represents us.
"Unfortunately, Closing the Gap is not working. We've only met four of the 19 targets ... something needs to change."
But just as the thousands who crossed the harbour bridge for reconciliation in 2000, Ms Davis said there were plenty of people who stood with First Nations people in October 2023, and continue to do so.
"We do have 6.2 million friends that did vote yes," she said.
"In terms of reconciliation, I think our non-Indigenous brothers and sisters are still walking with us."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News AU
an hour ago
- Sky News AU
NT cattlemen dealt blow in compensation push over Gillard government live export ban after judge shoots down $600 million claim
Northern Territory cattlemen have been dealt a blow in their bid for compensation over the Gillard government's decision to ban live cattle exports in 2011. The federal court has ruled the government is only liable for the loss of income suffered in one year, not three years as sought by the cattlemen. Former Labor agriculture minister Joe Ludwig announced the ban on June 7, 2011. It was lifted on July 6 the same year, but cattlemen argued the impact of the decision lasted far longer as the relationship between Australia and Indonesia soured. The ban followed an investigation by Animals Australia and Four Corners into the treatment of cattle in Indonesian abattoirs, that prompted large protest rallies in Melbourne and Sydney. The cattlemen launched a class action over the decision arguing it had cost them up to $600 million across the supply chain. In 2020, Federal Court justice Steven Rares ruled in favour of the lead applicant, the Brett Cattle Company. Justice Rares found Senator Ludwig had acted recklessly when he implemented the ban, as he awarded the company $2.94 million in damages. For the past five years, the cattlemen and the federal government have been locked in legal argument about how much compensation should be paid to the other members of the class action. The government made an offer of $215 million to settle the case, saying the ban had only affected the export of about 88,000 head of cattle in 2011. The cattlemen rejected the offer, arguing the ban impacted the number of cattle Indonesia would except from 2011 until 2013 as they sought up to $600 million in compensation. But late on Thursday, Justice Thomas Thawley ruled the quota of cattle accepted by Indonesia had only been impacted in 2011. He said a drop in the quota in 2012 and 2013 was due to the Indonesian government's policy to pursue greater self-sufficiency in its beef market, not because of the fallout from the Australian government's 2011 ban. His decision means the amount of compensation awarded is likely to be closer to the government's $215 million offer, than the $600 million the cattlemen had sought. Justice Thawley placed a 48-hour embargo on the publication of the full reasons for his decision. In a statement NT Cattlemen's Association chief executive officer Romy Carey acknowledged the court's decision. 'While the judgment marks a significant milestone in a legal battle that has spanned more than a decade, we are still working through the detail and assessing its full implications both for the families directly affected and the wider cattle industry,' she said. 'At the request of the Commonwealth, the Federal Court has placed the reasons for judgment under a 48-hour embargo. 'Accordingly, we have not yet been provided with access to the full decision and will refrain from further comment until we are in a position to respond responsibly and with the complete facts before us.'
The Advertiser
an hour ago
- The Advertiser
State budget targets police numbers, new housing
HIGHLIGHTS OF THE SOUTH AUSTRALIAN BUDGET LAW AND ORDER *$172 million for 326 extra police by 2030-31 *$46.8 million for red light, mobile phone and point-to-point cameras *$72.4 million over five years for 116 extra prison beds *$24 million for prosecutions staff, forensic testing, more sheriff's officers and child protection legal work *$29.6 million for 98 extra regional police security officers by 2028-29 SUPPORTING THE ECONOMY *$650 million Whyalla steelworks package *$73.4 million drought support package *$50 million venture capital fund *$30 million national collaborative research infrastructure strategy *$20 million powering business grants *$19.6 million defence sector support HOUSING *$552 million to directly support the construction of 2935 homes in northern, southern and central Adelaide and help vulnerable people find housing HEALTH *An extra $1.9 billion over five years to support increased capacity in hospitals, including $117 million for mental health services, $77 million for state cancer network, $45 million for a new Mt Barker Hospital and $42.9 million to support older people to transition to residential aged care to reduce bed block INFRASTRUCTURE *$27.3 billion over four years for major projects, including joint federal projects such as the $15.4 billion South Rd tunnels to complete the North-South transport corridor and the $3.2 billion new Women's and Children's Hospital *$656.3 million for high-productivity vehicle network over 10 years for upgrades between the South Eastern Freeway and the Sturt Highway *$250 million to remove the Curtis Rd level crossing at Munno Para, to reduce traffic congestion in the northern suburbs *$80 million over five years for Main South Rd safety upgrades between Myponga and Yankalilla EDUCATION *$70 million for a Birth-Year 6 school in Adelaide's north, with 60 preschool places and 400 school places *$40 million for heating and cooling upgrades at schools. *$27.7 million over four years to fast track the rollout of three-year-old preschool, with an extra 2000 places available from 2026 *$171 million for low interest loans for non-government schools and not for profit early childhood care providers to build capacity for three-year-old preschool COST OF LIVING *$20.7 million over four years to cut the cost of bus and train 28-day passes to $10 a month, a saving of $18.60 a month, equating to 25-cent fares for school travel ENVIRONMENT *$71.1 million over three years for River Murray measures to remove barriers to the delivery of environmental water to floodplains and wetlands *$20.9 million over three years for councils to reduce reliance on River Murray water by investing in alternative water resources and infrastructure *$14 million for replenishment of sand on Adelaide beaches REGIONS *$45 million for emergency fruit fly response *$44 million over four years to replace a coastal research vessel *$11.8 million over five years for biosecurity response measures HIGHLIGHTS OF THE SOUTH AUSTRALIAN BUDGET LAW AND ORDER *$172 million for 326 extra police by 2030-31 *$46.8 million for red light, mobile phone and point-to-point cameras *$72.4 million over five years for 116 extra prison beds *$24 million for prosecutions staff, forensic testing, more sheriff's officers and child protection legal work *$29.6 million for 98 extra regional police security officers by 2028-29 SUPPORTING THE ECONOMY *$650 million Whyalla steelworks package *$73.4 million drought support package *$50 million venture capital fund *$30 million national collaborative research infrastructure strategy *$20 million powering business grants *$19.6 million defence sector support HOUSING *$552 million to directly support the construction of 2935 homes in northern, southern and central Adelaide and help vulnerable people find housing HEALTH *An extra $1.9 billion over five years to support increased capacity in hospitals, including $117 million for mental health services, $77 million for state cancer network, $45 million for a new Mt Barker Hospital and $42.9 million to support older people to transition to residential aged care to reduce bed block INFRASTRUCTURE *$27.3 billion over four years for major projects, including joint federal projects such as the $15.4 billion South Rd tunnels to complete the North-South transport corridor and the $3.2 billion new Women's and Children's Hospital *$656.3 million for high-productivity vehicle network over 10 years for upgrades between the South Eastern Freeway and the Sturt Highway *$250 million to remove the Curtis Rd level crossing at Munno Para, to reduce traffic congestion in the northern suburbs *$80 million over five years for Main South Rd safety upgrades between Myponga and Yankalilla EDUCATION *$70 million for a Birth-Year 6 school in Adelaide's north, with 60 preschool places and 400 school places *$40 million for heating and cooling upgrades at schools. *$27.7 million over four years to fast track the rollout of three-year-old preschool, with an extra 2000 places available from 2026 *$171 million for low interest loans for non-government schools and not for profit early childhood care providers to build capacity for three-year-old preschool COST OF LIVING *$20.7 million over four years to cut the cost of bus and train 28-day passes to $10 a month, a saving of $18.60 a month, equating to 25-cent fares for school travel ENVIRONMENT *$71.1 million over three years for River Murray measures to remove barriers to the delivery of environmental water to floodplains and wetlands *$20.9 million over three years for councils to reduce reliance on River Murray water by investing in alternative water resources and infrastructure *$14 million for replenishment of sand on Adelaide beaches REGIONS *$45 million for emergency fruit fly response *$44 million over four years to replace a coastal research vessel *$11.8 million over five years for biosecurity response measures HIGHLIGHTS OF THE SOUTH AUSTRALIAN BUDGET LAW AND ORDER *$172 million for 326 extra police by 2030-31 *$46.8 million for red light, mobile phone and point-to-point cameras *$72.4 million over five years for 116 extra prison beds *$24 million for prosecutions staff, forensic testing, more sheriff's officers and child protection legal work *$29.6 million for 98 extra regional police security officers by 2028-29 SUPPORTING THE ECONOMY *$650 million Whyalla steelworks package *$73.4 million drought support package *$50 million venture capital fund *$30 million national collaborative research infrastructure strategy *$20 million powering business grants *$19.6 million defence sector support HOUSING *$552 million to directly support the construction of 2935 homes in northern, southern and central Adelaide and help vulnerable people find housing HEALTH *An extra $1.9 billion over five years to support increased capacity in hospitals, including $117 million for mental health services, $77 million for state cancer network, $45 million for a new Mt Barker Hospital and $42.9 million to support older people to transition to residential aged care to reduce bed block INFRASTRUCTURE *$27.3 billion over four years for major projects, including joint federal projects such as the $15.4 billion South Rd tunnels to complete the North-South transport corridor and the $3.2 billion new Women's and Children's Hospital *$656.3 million for high-productivity vehicle network over 10 years for upgrades between the South Eastern Freeway and the Sturt Highway *$250 million to remove the Curtis Rd level crossing at Munno Para, to reduce traffic congestion in the northern suburbs *$80 million over five years for Main South Rd safety upgrades between Myponga and Yankalilla EDUCATION *$70 million for a Birth-Year 6 school in Adelaide's north, with 60 preschool places and 400 school places *$40 million for heating and cooling upgrades at schools. *$27.7 million over four years to fast track the rollout of three-year-old preschool, with an extra 2000 places available from 2026 *$171 million for low interest loans for non-government schools and not for profit early childhood care providers to build capacity for three-year-old preschool COST OF LIVING *$20.7 million over four years to cut the cost of bus and train 28-day passes to $10 a month, a saving of $18.60 a month, equating to 25-cent fares for school travel ENVIRONMENT *$71.1 million over three years for River Murray measures to remove barriers to the delivery of environmental water to floodplains and wetlands *$20.9 million over three years for councils to reduce reliance on River Murray water by investing in alternative water resources and infrastructure *$14 million for replenishment of sand on Adelaide beaches REGIONS *$45 million for emergency fruit fly response *$44 million over four years to replace a coastal research vessel *$11.8 million over five years for biosecurity response measures HIGHLIGHTS OF THE SOUTH AUSTRALIAN BUDGET LAW AND ORDER *$172 million for 326 extra police by 2030-31 *$46.8 million for red light, mobile phone and point-to-point cameras *$72.4 million over five years for 116 extra prison beds *$24 million for prosecutions staff, forensic testing, more sheriff's officers and child protection legal work *$29.6 million for 98 extra regional police security officers by 2028-29 SUPPORTING THE ECONOMY *$650 million Whyalla steelworks package *$73.4 million drought support package *$50 million venture capital fund *$30 million national collaborative research infrastructure strategy *$20 million powering business grants *$19.6 million defence sector support HOUSING *$552 million to directly support the construction of 2935 homes in northern, southern and central Adelaide and help vulnerable people find housing HEALTH *An extra $1.9 billion over five years to support increased capacity in hospitals, including $117 million for mental health services, $77 million for state cancer network, $45 million for a new Mt Barker Hospital and $42.9 million to support older people to transition to residential aged care to reduce bed block INFRASTRUCTURE *$27.3 billion over four years for major projects, including joint federal projects such as the $15.4 billion South Rd tunnels to complete the North-South transport corridor and the $3.2 billion new Women's and Children's Hospital *$656.3 million for high-productivity vehicle network over 10 years for upgrades between the South Eastern Freeway and the Sturt Highway *$250 million to remove the Curtis Rd level crossing at Munno Para, to reduce traffic congestion in the northern suburbs *$80 million over five years for Main South Rd safety upgrades between Myponga and Yankalilla EDUCATION *$70 million for a Birth-Year 6 school in Adelaide's north, with 60 preschool places and 400 school places *$40 million for heating and cooling upgrades at schools. *$27.7 million over four years to fast track the rollout of three-year-old preschool, with an extra 2000 places available from 2026 *$171 million for low interest loans for non-government schools and not for profit early childhood care providers to build capacity for three-year-old preschool COST OF LIVING *$20.7 million over four years to cut the cost of bus and train 28-day passes to $10 a month, a saving of $18.60 a month, equating to 25-cent fares for school travel ENVIRONMENT *$71.1 million over three years for River Murray measures to remove barriers to the delivery of environmental water to floodplains and wetlands *$20.9 million over three years for councils to reduce reliance on River Murray water by investing in alternative water resources and infrastructure *$14 million for replenishment of sand on Adelaide beaches REGIONS *$45 million for emergency fruit fly response *$44 million over four years to replace a coastal research vessel *$11.8 million over five years for biosecurity response measures
The Advertiser
an hour ago
- The Advertiser
Enhanced Games' Aussie boss flags aquatics legal action
World Aquatics' ban on anyone involved in Enhanced Games is "downright disgusting behaviour" and likely illegal, the Australian founder of the drug-friendly games says. Melbourne-born entrepreneur Aron D'Souza is flagging legal action against swimming's global governing body and its new by-law. "We are assessing our legal options and look forward to pursuing all remedies that are available to us," D'Souza told AAP. "It is clearly restraint of trade." World Aquatics enacted a fresh by-law on Wednesday giving it powers to ban anyone involved in Enhanced Games, a multi-sports event with no drug testing. The by-law covers "any individual who supports, endorses or participates in sporting events that embrace the use of scientific advancements or other practices that may include prohibited substances and/or prohibited methods". "(They) will not be eligible to hold positions with World Aquatics or to participate in any World Aquatics competitions, events or other activities," World Aquatics said. The move didn't surprise D'Souza, a lawyer who is president of Enhanced Games. "I always expected that the governing bodies or the International Olympic Committee would take such a step," he said. "The legal case law is not supportive of their position. "This is exactly what they did against the International Swimming League and this is what the PGA Tour did against LIV Golf. "And European courts, American courts, have routinely ruled that this is an abuse of monopoly power. "World Aquatics' move is designed to impoverish the greatest athletes in the world and that is such inappropriate and downright disgusting behaviour." The aquatics governing body stated in its fresh by-law that any appeal against a ban could only be heard by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS). "Let's be clear, the Court of Arbitration for Sport is not a court," D'Souza said. "And the use of the term court, I have always felt, is an abuse of that term and certainly possibly unconstitutional in the United States. "That tribunal is an internal organisation of the International Olympic Committee, it hasn't been constituted by statute in any country nor has it been constituted by a treaty. "And so it's legal standing to be the ultimate arbitration body for sport is only on a contractual level between parties. "If they think that matters related to the Enhanced Games can somehow be decided in CAS, it's a farce because we're not a participant in that system nor do they have any legal authority." World Aquatics' ban on anyone involved in Enhanced Games is "downright disgusting behaviour" and likely illegal, the Australian founder of the drug-friendly games says. Melbourne-born entrepreneur Aron D'Souza is flagging legal action against swimming's global governing body and its new by-law. "We are assessing our legal options and look forward to pursuing all remedies that are available to us," D'Souza told AAP. "It is clearly restraint of trade." World Aquatics enacted a fresh by-law on Wednesday giving it powers to ban anyone involved in Enhanced Games, a multi-sports event with no drug testing. The by-law covers "any individual who supports, endorses or participates in sporting events that embrace the use of scientific advancements or other practices that may include prohibited substances and/or prohibited methods". "(They) will not be eligible to hold positions with World Aquatics or to participate in any World Aquatics competitions, events or other activities," World Aquatics said. The move didn't surprise D'Souza, a lawyer who is president of Enhanced Games. "I always expected that the governing bodies or the International Olympic Committee would take such a step," he said. "The legal case law is not supportive of their position. "This is exactly what they did against the International Swimming League and this is what the PGA Tour did against LIV Golf. "And European courts, American courts, have routinely ruled that this is an abuse of monopoly power. "World Aquatics' move is designed to impoverish the greatest athletes in the world and that is such inappropriate and downright disgusting behaviour." The aquatics governing body stated in its fresh by-law that any appeal against a ban could only be heard by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS). "Let's be clear, the Court of Arbitration for Sport is not a court," D'Souza said. "And the use of the term court, I have always felt, is an abuse of that term and certainly possibly unconstitutional in the United States. "That tribunal is an internal organisation of the International Olympic Committee, it hasn't been constituted by statute in any country nor has it been constituted by a treaty. "And so it's legal standing to be the ultimate arbitration body for sport is only on a contractual level between parties. "If they think that matters related to the Enhanced Games can somehow be decided in CAS, it's a farce because we're not a participant in that system nor do they have any legal authority." World Aquatics' ban on anyone involved in Enhanced Games is "downright disgusting behaviour" and likely illegal, the Australian founder of the drug-friendly games says. Melbourne-born entrepreneur Aron D'Souza is flagging legal action against swimming's global governing body and its new by-law. "We are assessing our legal options and look forward to pursuing all remedies that are available to us," D'Souza told AAP. "It is clearly restraint of trade." World Aquatics enacted a fresh by-law on Wednesday giving it powers to ban anyone involved in Enhanced Games, a multi-sports event with no drug testing. The by-law covers "any individual who supports, endorses or participates in sporting events that embrace the use of scientific advancements or other practices that may include prohibited substances and/or prohibited methods". "(They) will not be eligible to hold positions with World Aquatics or to participate in any World Aquatics competitions, events or other activities," World Aquatics said. The move didn't surprise D'Souza, a lawyer who is president of Enhanced Games. "I always expected that the governing bodies or the International Olympic Committee would take such a step," he said. "The legal case law is not supportive of their position. "This is exactly what they did against the International Swimming League and this is what the PGA Tour did against LIV Golf. "And European courts, American courts, have routinely ruled that this is an abuse of monopoly power. "World Aquatics' move is designed to impoverish the greatest athletes in the world and that is such inappropriate and downright disgusting behaviour." The aquatics governing body stated in its fresh by-law that any appeal against a ban could only be heard by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS). "Let's be clear, the Court of Arbitration for Sport is not a court," D'Souza said. "And the use of the term court, I have always felt, is an abuse of that term and certainly possibly unconstitutional in the United States. "That tribunal is an internal organisation of the International Olympic Committee, it hasn't been constituted by statute in any country nor has it been constituted by a treaty. "And so it's legal standing to be the ultimate arbitration body for sport is only on a contractual level between parties. "If they think that matters related to the Enhanced Games can somehow be decided in CAS, it's a farce because we're not a participant in that system nor do they have any legal authority." World Aquatics' ban on anyone involved in Enhanced Games is "downright disgusting behaviour" and likely illegal, the Australian founder of the drug-friendly games says. Melbourne-born entrepreneur Aron D'Souza is flagging legal action against swimming's global governing body and its new by-law. "We are assessing our legal options and look forward to pursuing all remedies that are available to us," D'Souza told AAP. "It is clearly restraint of trade." World Aquatics enacted a fresh by-law on Wednesday giving it powers to ban anyone involved in Enhanced Games, a multi-sports event with no drug testing. The by-law covers "any individual who supports, endorses or participates in sporting events that embrace the use of scientific advancements or other practices that may include prohibited substances and/or prohibited methods". "(They) will not be eligible to hold positions with World Aquatics or to participate in any World Aquatics competitions, events or other activities," World Aquatics said. The move didn't surprise D'Souza, a lawyer who is president of Enhanced Games. "I always expected that the governing bodies or the International Olympic Committee would take such a step," he said. "The legal case law is not supportive of their position. "This is exactly what they did against the International Swimming League and this is what the PGA Tour did against LIV Golf. "And European courts, American courts, have routinely ruled that this is an abuse of monopoly power. "World Aquatics' move is designed to impoverish the greatest athletes in the world and that is such inappropriate and downright disgusting behaviour." The aquatics governing body stated in its fresh by-law that any appeal against a ban could only be heard by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS). "Let's be clear, the Court of Arbitration for Sport is not a court," D'Souza said. "And the use of the term court, I have always felt, is an abuse of that term and certainly possibly unconstitutional in the United States. "That tribunal is an internal organisation of the International Olympic Committee, it hasn't been constituted by statute in any country nor has it been constituted by a treaty. "And so it's legal standing to be the ultimate arbitration body for sport is only on a contractual level between parties. "If they think that matters related to the Enhanced Games can somehow be decided in CAS, it's a farce because we're not a participant in that system nor do they have any legal authority."
