Speed limit set to be cut on residential streets in Sheffield
The initial consultation and design work for the strategy would cost £128,000, Another £11,000 is proposed to pay for feasibility and design works to investigate road safety measures at Shepcote Lane, Tinsley at the T-junction of the road with the entrance to Great Bear Distribution.
A report to the committee states: "There have been eight collisions at this location, four involved right turn movements into Great Bear Distribution."One solution being considered is the installation of a speed camera at the location.A further £6,000 would be spent to investigate installing road safety works at the junction of Carwood Road and Petre Street in Burngreave, where there have been eight collisions over a five-year period. According to the Local Democracy reporting Service the committee will also be asked to approve a budget of £29,000 to undertake feasibility and design works on Ecclesfield Road, Shiregreen, from the junction with Bellhouse Road to the junction with Deep Lane.There have been 13 collisions over a five-year period in the area and collision data showed there were issues at both junctions, a report to the committee states.
Listen to highlights from South Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Labour drops plans to restrict LTNs in ‘secret war on motorists'
Labour has renewed its ' war on motorists ' by dropping plans to limit new Low Traffic Neighbourhoods and 20mph zones. Ministers have quietly ditched reforms that would have curbed council powers to restrict traffic and levy 'unfair' fines and parking charges. The Conservatives, which drew up the changes, branded the move 'a kick in the teeth to motorists' and warned it would hit struggling high streets. But Labour ministers dismissed the proposals as 'speculative suggestions' and said they 'would have made no positive difference for drivers'. Sir Keir Starmer has been repeatedly accused of pursuing heavy-handed policies against motorists, most notably in London and Wales. In the latest example, Labour-run Southwark council on Sunday was forced to admit it illegally fined thousands of people for driving in bus lanes. Richard Holden, the shadow transport secretary, said scrapping the Tory plans represented a 'secret war on drivers' that was not in Labour's manifesto. 'Labour has been caught red handed as it steps up its targeted war on motorists,' he said. 'Conservatives led the charge against unfair and over-zealous enforcement but our work has been ripped up in underhand attacks without any public consultation or manifesto pledge. 'This is a kick in the teeth to motorists, set to punish beleaguered local high streets and will slam the brakes on the economy even more than Rachel Reeves has done so far.' Rishi Sunak announced a 'Plan for Drivers' in October 2023, which would have made it harder for local councils to introduce anti-car schemes. It included draft guidance on the introduction of LTNs, which would have forced councils to focus more on the views of local residents and businesses. As a 'minimum' authorities would have had to hold a series of public meetings with residents and to leaflet every household in the affected area. The changes were planned over concerns councils have been railroading through LTNs on the back of support by green and pro-cycling groups. Ministers have now confirmed that the draft guidance, which was not formalised in time for last year's general election, has been effectively shelved. Lilian Greenwood, the roads minister, said that as a result, work had been 'put on hold and the Government is now considering appropriate next steps'. 'As has always been the case, local authorities are responsible for managing their roads and are accountable to their communities,' she said. Lord Hendy, a transport minister, also suggested that the Government does not plan to change the current guidance in force on LTNs. 'Traffic management measures such as low traffic neighbourhoods are a matter for local authorities as they know their areas best,' he said. The last Tory government had planned a series of pro-driver reforms, including new guidance to 'prevent inappropriate blanket use of 20mph zones'. The Tories sought to roll out more pro-driver policies in the wake of the Labour administration in Wales controversially enforcing a default 20mph zone across all formerly 30mph areas in 2023. Following a huge outcry the Senedd is now reviewing the policy, with the architect of the scheme admitting 'more common sense' should have been deployed. Ms Greenwood said the Government has 'no current plans' to review the guidance around the setting of 20mph speed limits in England. 'We believe that traffic authorities are best placed to decide where lower limits will be effective on the roads for which they are responsible, and that consultation and community support should be at the heart of the process,' she added. Other planned Tory measures that would have limited the use of '15-minute cities' have also been ditched. Under those measures, Conservative ministers would have revoked council's access to DVLA data, which they use to enforce traffic filters. The 15-minute city concept were designed so residents could access all basic services within a quarter of an hour walk or bike ride from home. It has become controversial with some on the Right who see the car as pivotal to freedom and attempts to curb driving as the spread of state control. 'No positive difference' Mr Sunak also pledged to reduce 'unfair' traffic fines, such as yellow box penalties, including by restricting councils' ability to raise revenue from them. Under the measures new guidance would have been brought forward giving residents the formal right to challenge their council's parking policies. Labour ministers confirmed that all three proposals had been dropped. 'Those policies in 'The Plan for Drivers' that would have made no positive difference for drivers have been discontinued,' Ms Greenwood said. Mr Holden said that Sir Sadiq Khan would be 'licking his lips now he has been given the green light to hammer drivers even more'. The Mayor of London has overseen a rapid expansion of LTNs in the capital and the introduction of blanket 20mph limits across the city. The Department for Transport was approached for comment.
The Sun
3 hours ago
- The Sun
Best used cars with biggest price drops in 2025 revealed – including three Ford models £1,000s cheaper than last year
A NUMBER of the nation's most popular used cars has seen significant price reductions this year - including a sought-after luxury EV. Data from AA Cars reveals some of the best deals drivers can find on vehicles aged three and four years old, reflecting increased stock and softened demand in the used car market. 3 3 3 Experts at AA Cars believe buyers now have more choice and negotiating power compared to just a year ago. Leading the list is the Tesla Model 3, which has experienced a dramatic 27% drop in average price year-on-year. The sleek EV, one of the world's best-selling cars, has fallen from £21,905 in 2024 to £15,993 in 2025, saving buyers an impressive £5,912. This sharp depreciation highlights a broader trend in falling EV prices, driven by increased supply, the introduction of more affordable models and the maturation of the used EV market. In second place is the Ford Ranger, a rugged pickup truck available in both single and double cab configurations. Its price has dropped by 18%, offering buyers savings of more than £4,000. Another standout luxury vehicle is the Range Rover Evoque, down 16%, with average prices falling from £24,714 to £20,712. Other notable four-year-old models include the Ford Kuga, Ford Focus, BMW X1 and Toyota Yaris, all showing reductions of 10 to 13%. For three-year-old vehicles, the Ford Ranger and Range Rover Evoque again lead the savings, with price cuts of 17 to 18%. SUVs such as the Volvo XC40, Ford Puma and Ford Kuga continue to offer excellent value for families, while smaller cars like the Fiat 500, Toyota Yaris and Ford Focus remain ideal for those looking to be a little more economical. One clear trend emerging is the growing appeal of affordable EVs and hybrids. As the cost gap between traditional and greener cars narrows, more drivers are considering making the switch. However, buyers are urged to shop wisely, ensuring vehicles are thoroughly inspected and come with verified service histories. AA Cars recommends choosing dealers with AA Inspected accreditation or opting for independent inspections starting at £99 to ensure peace of mind. James Hosking, Director of AA Cars, said: 'With many three-year-old cars now up to 20% cheaper than they were this time last year, drivers in the market for a used vehicle are in a strong position to find real value. 'This sharp correction in prices, especially on popular models, means buyers can now access premium features and newer designs at far more affordable prices. 'We're seeing a particularly favourable landscape for those upgrading from smaller or older models. 'The combination of increased stock and softened demand is giving consumers far more choice and better negotiating power than they've had in years. 'There are also encouraging signs for those considering electric or hybrid options, with more used low-emission vehicles entering the market and bringing prices down. As the cost gap between traditional and greener cars narrows, making the switch is becoming a more realistic option for many. 'Still, it's important to be well-informed. Shoppers should take time to compare listings, check what a fair market price looks like for their preferred spec, and factor in how things like mileage and vehicle condition could affect value over time. 'That's why it's so important to buy from a trusted dealer who can offer reassurances like a detailed inspection, verified service history, and third-party approvals. These are the things that help motorists buy with confidence.'
Telegraph
4 hours ago
- Telegraph
Why manual gearboxes are still king
In car sales terms, the automatic gearbox is king. Last year four in five cars (78 per cent) left UK showrooms with a self-shifting transmission. It's a dramatic fall from grace for the traditional manual gearbox: sales of cars with clutch pedals were only overtaken by autos in 2020. What's more, AA Driving School figures show that in 2024 one in five new drivers chose to take their test in an automatic. This was nearly double the number from five years previously. Red Driver Training's chief executive Seb Goldin added: 'We've seen a marked increase in automatic-only drivers taking the test, typically in urban areas.' There are multiple reasons for the shift towards autos. For a start, manufacturers are increasingly following customer demand for autos and not offering manual gearboxes on some or even all of their models. Automatics are becoming more affordable and more widely available, too. And the default transmission for electric vehicles is effectively an automatic. But despite the manual gearbox seemingly having had its day, drivers are still divided on its benefits. Here we look at the case for and against changing gear yourself. Manual pros Driving enthusiasts love them Driver coach Ivan Thompsett from Total Car Control is a fan: ' A manual gear change is so much more fun. On a good, open and flowing road, an auto is never as engaging, as stirring, as a manual gear stick. 'Get a good manual in the right car on a good road and you'll struggle to find a more satisfying driving experience.' They are great for performance cars Andreas Preuninger, the head of Porsche's GT division, says: 'For me personally, it has always been super important to have a manual gearbox. A manual gearbox is lighter, which helps with fuel efficiency and reduces emissions. 'It also allows for more horsepower because the internal resistance is significantly lower than in a PDK [semi-automatic] transmission.' They are cheaper to buy The big-selling Vauxhall Corsa 1.2 Turbo with a manual gearbox is £21,555; the same car with an auto costs £23,285. Manual technology has been around for years and manufacturers have been able to spread the development costs over time and vehicles. In addition, manuals are less complex: the driver changes gear by pressing the clutch pedal and moving the lever rather than relying on electronics or twin clutches, now featured on many autos, for controlling and ensuring seamless changes. Learning to drive is cheaper than with an auto Although being taught with a manual will give you a more versatile driving licence, it will also cost less than qualifying for an automatic-only licence. Driving schools charge a premium for automatic-only lessons. Seb Goldin, the chief executive of Red Driver Training, explains: 'On average, a lesson costs £35 an hour and we'll charge £5 more for lessons in an automatic. This reflects the additional cost of a vehicle with an automatic gearbox.' Cheaper insurance for manuals than autos Admiral insurance says: 'Automatics can be more expensive to insure due to higher claims costs, while automatic gearboxes cost more to replace than a manual. 'The Admiral pricing team did some research by looking at the average premium for both automatics and manual cars. Interestingly, we found the average premium was 5.63 per cent higher for automatic cars.' Stops drivers becoming lazy With a manual gearbox, you have no choice but to engage with the car. Driver coach Thompsett reveals: 'So many cars now do so much that drivers become lazy. People don't drive any more. They travel. 'A manual gearbox makes people think about their driving. That might make them safer than someone who is completely switched off.' Manual cons It's easier to design cars for automatics Now car makers have worked out that they can replace the clunky old gear lever with little more than a switch, it has given designers greater freedom. Matthias Hossann, Peugeot's head of design, told us: 'With a gear lever, a lot of the cockpit environment was occupied. Now we can think about how we can re-engineer a new experience for our customers. We can provide places to rest your arm and storage. 'It opens up many interesting options regarding the touch and feel of the car.' Clutch control can be a turn-off With the increasing number of auto-only EVs around, young drivers are increasingly viewing changing gear as irrelevant. 'I think the only barrier to larger scale take-up of automatics has been, and is, cost,' said Red Driver Training's Goldin. 'I think it will be a while until the second-hand market for accessible small automatics catches up with manuals. But it will happen. And when it does, even more young drivers will go auto only.' They can feel a bit clunky in traffic No matter how much drivers love the experience of manuals, it's a reality in this country that everyone spends some time in stop-start traffic. And constantly pushing in the clutch pedal in stop-start traffic can become rather tedious. With an automatic, on the other hand, you're simply dabbing the accelerator and brake to creep forward at a snail's pace. Automatics are more fuel efficient On the face of it, manual transmissions are more efficient. For example, the Volkswagen Polo 1.0 95PS with a five-speed manual gearbox returns 55.3mpg, the identical car with a seven-speed automatic gives 53.1mpg. The auto Vauxhall Corsa is thirstier than the manual model, too. But that doesn't tell the whole story. Volkswagen's Trevor Rickwood explains: 'Small manual cars can offer better fuel economy when driven in the best possible way – and the official numbers quoted are always 'best case scenario' – but few people use manual gears in the perfect way. 'While official figures are correct in saying that manual cars such as the Polo 1.0 are more fuel efficient than their automatic counterparts, an automatic gearbox is still usually the most economical choice for most drivers.' Verdict Although the manual gearbox has a lot going for it, the automatic has one great benefit: convenience. And, as the statistics suggest, for most drivers, that's key.
