By Ali Khamenei's logic, he did beat the US — by surviving
As American and British troops tore through Iraq in 2003, Saddam Hussein's information minister briefly became a celebrity for his loyal, if increasingly unhinged, optimism.
'Baghdad Bob', as Muhammad Saeed Al-Sahhaf was nicknamed by the press corps, was still vividly describing the overwhelming defeats Iraqi troops were inflicting on the enemy even as American tanks rolled into the city.
It is easy to see statements like that on Thursday of Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, in a similar light.
• Iran intel leak: who is the 'low-level loser' who exposed Trump?
In his first public appearance since the strikes, he claimed victory, despite the undoubted destruction of at least large parts of his nuclear programme. 'The Islamic Republic won, and in retaliation dealt a severe slap to the face of America,' he said.
The 'retaliation' was a volley of missiles fired at America's Al-Udeid air base in Qatar, none of which hit their target thanks to the United States' Patriot interceptors.
His declared refusal to 'surrender' to Trump also looks unwise. Israel destroyed all Iran's own aerial defence systems last year, leaving it unable to protect itself should attacks resume one day.
However, the US invasion of Iraq, initially so successful, turned into a much longer and grimmer 'asymmetric' war. It was Khamenei's lieutenants who funded and organised many of the Iraqi militias that wreaked such devastating harm on US and British troops with their roadside bombs and ambushes over the coming years.
• 'If the bombing failed, people died for nothing'
So there is also an asymmetric aspect to Khamenei's propaganda. Of course, there is no doubt that he hoped that Iran's own defence forces, and those of the Iran-backed Hezbollah in Lebanon last year, would have put up more severe resistance to Israel than they did.
However, Khamenei and Hezbollah are still there, just as Hamas is still operational in Gaza, despite the much longer, bloodier and more intense war that Israel has waged there.
The victory Khamenei really seeks is the survival of his regime and its ideology of 'resistance' against Israel.
Whether or not he or his successors actually one day give the order to build a nuclear weapon, the nuclear programme was always a symbol of that resistance. But it was not the only one.
If he now agrees to give it up for the sake of his long-suffering people and their desire for a revived economy, he will certainly no longer be able to claim to have won the war.
But neither the US nor Israel has carried out their threats to kill him, while on Thursday his defence minister was consulting his Russian and Chinese counterparts on his next steps, and he clearly feels there is still fight in his 86-year-old body. That, for him, may be victory enough.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
13 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE The stunning number of Gen Z Americans who side with Iran against Israel
Nearly a quarter of Gen Z voters said they would side with Iran over Israel - an eyebrow-raising statistic from the latest Daily Mail/J.L Partners poll. Overall, American voters overwhelmingly sided with Israel in the country's recent conflict with Iran. A poll of 1,025 registered voters conducted on Tuesday and Wednesday of this week found that 55 percent sided with Israel whereas just 9 percent selected Iran. Another 36 percent said they were unsure how to answer the question. But when age groups were broken down, the youngest respondents sided with Iran the most. Among 18 and 29-year-olds, 22 percent selected Iran, while 41 percent said Israel, whereas 37 percent indicated that they were unsure. Young people have been the most vocal about how Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has responded to Hamas ' October 7, 2023 terror attack - by bombing Palestinians living in Gaza. 'Looking at these results it's hard to avoid the conclusion that many young Americans have a problem with the Jewish state of Israel,' J.L. Partners pollster James Johnson said. 'It isn't that young people have a positive view of Iran per se - they don't - but that they have such a negative view of Israel that a significant portion of them are ready to side with almost any entity that is against them,' Johnson added. The oldest voting bloc was the most pro-Israel, with 71 percent of those 65+ saying they sided with Israel and just 2 percent with Iran. Voters ages 50 to 64, also sided with Israel significantly. Fifty-five percent chose Israel, while 5 percent said Iran. Those voters would be more likely to remember the Iranian Revolution during the late 1970s and early 80s, in which the country's pro-Western Shah was pushed out, with the current Islamic Republic taking its place. The Iran Hostage crisis, in which U.S. embassy employees were taken hostage in Tehran, became a pivotal issue in the 1980 presidential election, helping Republican President Ronald Reagan win the race. Voters between the ages of 30 and 49 came in somewhat in-between their younger and older peers, with 46 percent backing Israel and 15 percent saying they supported Iran. Party identification also showed a split. Among Republicans, 72 percent said they supported Israel, while 5 percent said Iran. With Democrats - a party that has generally been more critical of Netanyahu and the Gaza war - 44 percent said Israel and 14 percent said Iran, with another 42 percent of Democrats saying they were unsure. When voters were asked to if Iran's 'regime is evil and intent on the destruction of Israel' or Iran 'may have differences with Israel, but is ultimately a friendly actor in the region,' the youngest voting bloc was most likely to choose the latter. Overall, 58 percent of voters called Iran 'evil' while 15 percent made the 'friendly actor' choice. Among 18 to 29-year-olds, 36 percent labeled Iran 'evil' while 28 percent said it was a 'friendly actor' in the region. Meanwhile, of those 65 and older, 75 percent labeled Iran's regime 'evil' while just 5 percent said that Iran was a 'friendly actor.'
The Independent
25 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump can't understand why Iran's ‘Supreme Leader' isn't saying thanks: ‘Saved him from ugly death'
President Donald Trump on Friday lashed out at Iran 's supreme leader for continuing to beat the rhetorical war drum rather than express gratitude for Trump's decision not to order his assassination at the hands of American and Israeli forces during his country's 12-day war with Israel this month. In a Truth Social post, the president groused that Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the octogenarian cleric who has headed Iran's religious fundamentalist government since 1989, had boasted publicly of having won that short conflict, calling the Iranian leader's claim 'a lie.' 'As a man of great faith, he is not supposed to lie. His Country was decimated, his three evil Nuclear Sites were OBLITERATED, and I knew EXACTLY where he was sheltered, and would not let Israel, or the U.S. Armed Forces, by far the Greatest and Most Powerful in the World, terminate his life,' Trump said. He added: 'I SAVED HIM FROM A VERY UGLY AND IGNOMINIOUS DEATH, and he does not have to say, 'THANK YOU, PRESIDENT TRUMP!'' Trump also suggested that Khamenei should be expressing gratitude for the president's role in pressuring Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to recall Israel Air Force fighters in the hours before a cease-fire between Israel and Iran went into effect earlier this week, claiming that those planes 'were heading directly to Tehran, looking for a big day, perhaps the final knockout!' 'Tremendous damage would have ensued, and many Iranians would have been killed. It was going to be the biggest attack of the War, by far,' Trump added. Continuing, Trump claimed that he'd spent 'the last few days' working on how to lift longstanding — and in his words, 'BITING' — U.S. sanctions on Tehran to enable the country to have 'much better chance to Iran at a full, fast, and complete recovery.' But he further complained that Khamenei's 'statement of anger, hatred, and disgust' had caused him to have 'immediately dropped all work on sanction relief, and more.' 'Iran has to get back into the World Order flow, or things will only get worse for them. They are always so angry, hostile, and unhappy, and look at what it has gotten them - A burned out, blown up Country, with no future, a decimated Military, a horrible Economy, and DEATH all around them,' he said, adding later that Tehran's leadership had 'no hope' and things would 'only get worse' until they 'realize that you often get more with HONEY than you do with VINEGAR.' The president's pugnacious outburst against Iran's de facto leader came just days after American B-2 stealth bombers dropped more than a dozen 30,000 pound bunker-busting bombs onto a trio of Iranian nuclear sites in what was the largest military action against Tehran since a failed mission to rescue hostages held at the then-American embassy there in 1979. Trump has claimed the bombing runs — plus dozens of cruise missiles launched from an American guided missile submarine — 'obliterated' the Fordow, Natanz and Esfahan nuclear facilities as part of what American officials called 'Operation Midnight Hammer.' The Trump administration has hoped that the strikes that it conducted could force Iran to accept US conditions and stop taking steps toward obtaining a nuclear weapon. But the Iranian parliament voted on Wednesday to fast-track a proposal to effectively stop cooperation with International Atomic Energy Agency, the United Nations' nuclear oversight agency. The United States had initially planned to conduct a sixth round of negotiations before Israel struck Iran. Ahead of the Trump administration conducting its strikes on Saturday, it notified Iran through intermediaries that the strikes would be limited to notify the regime that strikes would be limited and that the United States would not accept any uranium enrichment. At the same time, administration officials have discussed a plan to lure Iran back to the negotiating table including an option to have Arab nations investing $20-30 billion in a non-enrichment nuclear program for Iran for energy purposes while also allowing Iran to access $6 billion sitting in foreign bank accounts that it current cannot access, as well as lifting some foreign sanctions.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Trump has Putin trapped, and the Kremlin knows it
It has now been almost a week since US forces struck Iranian nuclear facilities and Russia is still sitting on the sidelines. Beyond the strongly worded condemnations of the US attacks and promises of unspecified help to the Iranian people, Vladimir Putin has not announced deliveries of any specific military hardware to Tehran. That, despite the fact that, in January, Moscow and Tehran signed a 20-year comprehensive strategic partnership treaty, which includes military-technical cooperation. What gives? For now, the heat appears to have gone out of the conflict, but Putin still faces a conundrum. The Iranian regime remains in a precarious position, and it is uncertain that the current ceasefire will hold. Failing to deliver tangible support to Iran could result in Russia losing an ostensibly valuable ally, friendship with whom Moscow likes to brandish as a bogeyman whenever it wants to threaten the West. But if Putin were to decide to help Tehran re-arm, perhaps providing new air defence systems to replace the ones destroyed over the past few months, it would likely anger Donald Trump, who may decide to beef up supplies of lethal aid to Ukraine in its fight against Russia. In an interview with the Russian publication The Gazette, Fyodor Lukyanov, prominent Russian political scientist, revealed the thinking behind Putin's decision to do nothing. 'Russia has a strategic partnership with Iran, and very fragile and significant relations with the American administration have begun to develop.' In addition, however, Putin has working relations with the Israeli leadership. Making a choice was 'clearly not part of the Kremlin's plans,' he said. Indeed, a realpolitik-minded Putin maintained cordial relations with Israel's Benjamin Netanyahu, a fellow pragmatist, until former US president Biden caused a rift between Moscow and Tel Aviv by pressuring Israel to provide lethal weapons to Ukraine. Putin has long maintained a careful balance between Iran and Israel, by keeping an open partnership with the ayatollahs and an undeclared alliance with Israel. He views both as strategically valuable to Russia's geopolitical influence in the Middle East. Putin's decision calculus is also shaped by the fact that Israel has one of the largest Russian-speaking populations outside of Russia. The transactionally-minded Russian strongman is carefully threading the needle by paying lip service to Tehran via a diplomatic song and dance. Before the strikes, Putin offered to Trump to mediate an end to the hostilities between Israel and Iran, an offer that the US leader promptly rebuffed. A day after the strikes, having met with Abbas Araghchi, the Iranian Foreign Minister, in the Kremlin, Putin promised to make 'efforts from our side to provide support to the Iranian people,' without authorising the provision of specific war-fighting capabilities. Dmitry Peskov, Putin's spokesperson, responding to questions from journalists about the kind of assistance Russia was willing to provide to Iran, was equally cryptic and non-committal: 'Everything will depend on what Iran will need.' When pressed on whether Russia is ready to supply weapons to Iran, including the S-300 and S-400 air defence systems, Peskov repeated 'everything depends on what the Iranian side, what our Iranian friends say'. On Monday, during the annual St Petersburg international economic forum, Putin tried to justify Russia's neutral stance on the conflict by saying 'almost two million people from the former Soviet Union and the Russian Federation reside in Israel,' calling it an almost Russian-speaking country'. He accused those who call Russia an unreliable ally of being 'provocateurs'. Some Russian media outlets have sought to portray Putin's decision-making as having nothing to do with Washington. But others have revealed concerns about Trump's potential retaliation. One publication expressed fears that, if the Israel-Iran ceasefire holds, Trump will have leverage to pressure Putin on a Russia-Ukraine settlement. Putin's decision not to directly aid Iran – at least for now – is especially significant in light of the fact that Iran sent substantial deliveries of weapons to Russia for its war against Ukraine. They include short-range or close-range ballistic missile systems, the Fath 360 missile system, and 'kamikaze' drones, Shahed-136 and Shahed-131. Iran's assistance enabled Russia to reserve more advanced missiles with longer ranges for other purposes, allowing Moscow to better use its arsenal throughout the battlefield in Ukraine. Lack of reciprocity by Moscow suggests that Putin is gravely concerned about the possibility of US ratcheting up support to Ukraine. It also indicates that Trump is quietly building a deck of cards to play against Putin when the time is right. Perhaps they will help him to finally fulfil his promise of ending the Russia-Ukraine war. Rebekah Koffler is a strategic military intelligence analyst, formerly with the US Defense Intelligence Agency. She is the author of 'Putin's Playbook', Regnery 2021. Her upcoming book 'Trump's Playbook' will be published later this year. Rebekah's podcast Trump's Playbook is running on her channel Censored But Not Silenced and is available on most social media platforms @Rebekah0132.
