Turkey dumps Russia's S-400, resumes F-35 fighter jet talks with US, India and Pakistan names come up for...
Ankara: Turkey President Recep Tayyip Erdogan and United States President Donald Trump met briefly on the sidelines of the NATO summit in The Hague. That meeting has now become a flashpoint in Washington's shifting military ties with Ankara. On the sidelines of the NATO summit, which was held in Hague, Turkey President Recep Tayyip Erdogan and United States President Donald Trump met and discussed on several crucial issues. After reaching Turkey, President Erdogan stated that his country had not cancelled the F-35 fighter jet deal with America. These remarks come days after Ankara announced it to upgrade its air defence system – 'Steel Dome'.
Trump, on the other hand, informed a small group of Republican donors that Turkey's return to the F-35 deal was 'being worked out'. Without giving a timeline, he said conversations had moved further to the technical phase. What Is Turkey's F-35 Story
F-35 fighter jet is a very sensitive topic for Turkey as well as the US. it all started in 2019 when Ankara purchased Russian S-400 air defence system for USD2.5 billion. The US put several sanctions on Turkey following the deal. The US also casted out Turkey from the F-35 consortium. However, the diplomats of both countries called it a low point. Why Shifting Of Moods?
While speaking off the record with aides after the NATO summit, the US President reportedly said Turkey's 'signals are encouraging' and that 'we have got momentum'.
Notably, Turkey has not used the Made in Russia S-400 air defence systems. They remain locked up in a military base. That is what Washington may want.
A shift in Turkey's stance regarding its S-400 missile system has been described as a significant change by a former US official involved in the discussions. This official suggests Turkey might forgo the S-400s to regain access to Western technology. Further supporting this assessment, US envoy Tom Barrack indicated on June 29th that sanctions on Turkey's defence industry could be removed by year's end, citing efforts by both President Erdogan and
As per experts, Turkey can be among the countries that will receive F-35, and it can leave the S-400 in the military bases or sell them to a third country. Is India And Pakistan In The Race?
President Erdogan can sell the S-400 to other countries. The list of interested countries may have and the names of India and Pakistan.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
21 minutes ago
- Indian Express
When US bought Alaska for $7.2 million and why Trump and Putin's meeting revives the story
When Donald Trump said on Monday that he would meet his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin 'in Russia' this Friday, it sounded like another of the US President's verbal slips. But 158 years ago, he would have been right. Alaska, with its onion-domed churches, fur trade legacy and once Russian-named capital Novo-Arkhangelsk, was part of the Tsar's empire until 1867, when it was sold to the United States for just $7.2 million. The deal was mocked by Washington and mourned in St Petersburg, only to become one of history's most spectacular bargains. As Putin prepares to land in Alaska this week, traces of Russia's past are still visible. From the wild, rugged shores of Baranof Island to Anchorage's Orthodox churches, the legacy endures. In Sitka, the green dome of St Michael's Cathedral rises against a backdrop of glaciers, still standing on the same spot where it was built more than 150 years ago. Russia's presence in Alaska began with fur traders, not armies. In the mid-18th century, merchants and adventurers pushed east across Siberia in search of lucrative sea otter pelts. By the 1780s, Catherine the Great had authorised the creation of the Russian-American Company, granting it a monopoly over trade and governance in the territory. Alexander Baranov, a merchant, tightened Russia's grip in the late 18th century, expanding settlements and crushing native resistance, most famously from the Tlingit, who called him 'No Heart.' Russian Orthodox priests soon followed, building missions and churches. By the mid-19th century, the Russian empire saw Alaska as more liability than prize. The Crimean war had weakened the empire financially, and the growing reach of Britain's navy in the Pacific heightened fears that Alaska could be seized in a future conflict. As per a report by The Guardian, in July 1867, Eduard de Stoeckl, Russia's envoy in Washington and chief negotiator of the sale, confided to a friend: 'My treaty has met with strong opposition … but this stems from the fact that no one at home has any idea of the true condition of our colonies. It was simply a matter of selling them, or watching them being taken from.' The sale was intended as a diplomatic win for both sides. Russia gained much-needed cash and a potential ally across the Atlantic while avoiding a clash with Britain. The US acquired new territory that would push back European influence and extend its reach into the Pacific. At the time, neither country celebrated the deal as a triumph. In St Petersburg, many believed the price was insultingly low. As per a report by The Guardian, the liberal newspaper Golos condemned it as 'deeply angering all true Russians' and asked, 'Is the nation's sense of pride truly so unworthy of attention that it can be sacrificed for a mere six or seven million dollar[s]?' In the US, Secretary of State William H Seward, who negotiated the treaty, was ridiculed for spending what critics considered a fortune on an icy wilderness. The New-York Daily Tribune as per The Guardian, dismissed Alaska as 'the nominal possession of impassable deserts of snow' and wrote, 'We may make a treaty with Russia … but we cannot make a treaty with the North Wind or the Snow King.' Some suspected Russia had sold land of little value. 'Russia has sold us a sucked orange. Whatever may be the value of that territory and its outlying islands to us, it has ceased to be of any to Russia,' the New York World wrote on 1 April 1867. Within decades, those doubts vanished. Gold rushes in the late 19th century and the discovery of vast oilfields in the 20th century turned Alaska into one of America's most resource-rich territories. What critics once called Seward's folly became a symbol of strategic foresight. Yet the sale price remained a sore point in Russian memory. In 1974, during American protests over the low price the USSR paid for wheat, Soviet trade official Vladimir Alkimov drily noted that Alaska had been sold for only $7 million. In 1867, the deal briefly opened a period of warmth between Russia and the United States. The New York Herald wrote that 'the cession of Russian Alaska becomes a matter of great importance. It indicates the extent to which Russia is ready to carry out her entente cordiale with the United States.' That goodwill reached its peak in 1871 when Grand Duke Alexei Alexandrovich visited New York with a naval squadron, receiving parades, receptions and civic honours. When Trump and Putin meet in Alaska this week, the historical parallels will be hard to ignore. For Ukraine, the hope is that any renewed warmth between Washington and Moscow will not come at the expense of another nation's territory, and that the days of trading land like currency in great power deals remain firmly in the past. (With inputs from The Guardian)
Time of India
21 minutes ago
- Time of India
Putin rings up North Korea's Kim Jong Un ahead of Trump summit in Alaska, discusses US-Russia talks
North Korean leader Kim Jong Un held a phone call with Russian President Vladimir Putin to discuss the development of bilateral ties under a strategic partnership agreement signed last year, North Korea's state-run television KRT said on Wednesday (August 13). KRT said both leaders confirmed their will to strengthen cooperation in the future while not mentioning Putin's planned summit with U.S. President Donald Trump in Alaska this week, which the Kremlin said the Russian leader had briefed Kim about during the call that was held on Tuesday (August 12). According to KRT, Putin expressed appreciation for North Korea's help in 'liberating' the Kursk region in western Russia in the war against Ukraine, praising the 'bravery, heroism and self-sacrificing spirit' of Korean People's Army troops. Show more Show less
The Hindu
21 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Russia makes biggest 24-hour Ukraine advance in over a year
The Russian Army made its biggest 24-hour advance into Ukraine in over a year on Tuesday (August 12, 2025) just ahead of the Trump-Putin summit, according to an AFP analysis of data from the U.S.-based Institute for the Study of War. The Russian Army took or claimed 110 square kilometres (42.5 square miles) on August 12 compared to the previous day. It was the most since late May 2024. In recent months, Moscow has typically taken five or six days to progress at such a pace, although Russian advances have accelerated in recent weeks. The U.S. and Russian presidents, Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin, are to meet in Alaska on Friday. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky acknowledged Tuesday that Russian troops had advanced by up to 10 kilometres (six miles) near the eastern coal mining town of Dobropillia, but that Kyiv would soon "destroy them." Russia said Wednesday that it had taken two villages close to Dobropillia. About 70% of Russia's advances in Ukraine so far this year are in the Donetsk region in eastern Ukraine, which the Kremlin claimed to have annexed in September 2022. As of August 12, Moscow controlled or claimed to control 79 percent of the region, up from 62 percent a year ago. The Russian Army has also been attempting to seize the mining town of Pokrovsk for more than 18 months, following its capture of Bakhmut in May 2023. The last two major cities held by Kyiv in the region are also at risk. They are Sloviansk and Kramatorsk, which is an important logistical hub for the front. Russian progress in Ukraine has accelerated every month since April. Between August 12, 2024 and August 12, 2025, the Russian army captured more than 6,100 square kilometres, four times more than the previous year, according to the AFP analysis of the institute's data. However, these Russian advances account for less than 1 percent of pre-war Ukraine's territory, including Crimea and Donbass. Russia currently has full or partial control over 19 percent of Ukrainian territory.
