‘Stop procrastinating': Large Manly ferry languishes two years after it was retired
The double-ended Collaroy, which is the youngest of the four renowned Freshwater-class ferries, is tied up indefinitely at Cockatoo Island in Sydney Harbour as the state government decides its future.
One of the other large Manly ferries – the Freshwater – has also been bumped from a planned dry docking at Sydney's Garden Island in August by the navy, delaying its overhaul until next March.
The Collaroy was retired from service on the Manly-Circular Quay route in September 2023, after the government deemed it 'prohibitively expensive' due to its 'one-of-a-kind build'.
Despite expressions of interest in the Collaroy originally being due to close in May, Transport for NSW said a final decision had yet to be made about the vessel's future, adding that it would be managing any interim berthing arrangements.
Loading
'The expression of interest for future options regarding the Collaroy remains an open and confidential procurement activity. Further details cannot be disclosed at this time,' it said in a statement.
Action for Transport ferry expert Graeme Taylor said it would be difficult to find a buyer or a community group for the Collaroy because a new owner would need to develop a business model generating sufficient revenue to cover the operating costs of the 70-metre ocean-going ferry. 'You would need two or three charters a day to begin to pay the bills. You might be lucky to get one a week,' he said.
Taylor said the government should retain the Collaroy for ferry services, arguing that its mechanical differences to the other three Freshwater-class vessels were overstated, while its steel hull was in top condition.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News AU
07-08-2025
- Sky News AU
Nearly two-foot-long rat ‘almost the size of a small cat' discovered inside family North Yorkshire home: ‘Growing problem'
Exterminators discovered a gargantuan, nearly 2-foot-long rat inside an English home, and officials are warning the cat-sized rodent is 'not a one-off' but part of an increasingly out-of-control infestation in the area, according to local officials. The rat measuring 'over 22 inches long from nose to tail' was found cozying up in a North Yorkshire home, Eston Ward Councillors David Taylor and Stephen Martin posted on Facebook. Photos taken by the unidentified resident showed the massive critter curled up in a plastic bag to be tossed. 'It's almost the size of a small cat. And it's not a one-off,' Taylor and Martin said in the post last Monday, calling its size 'shocking' and 'a growing problem.' Rodents have been spotted in increasing numbers around the area, traipsing alleyways, trash bins, overgrown land, and now inside homes, the local officials said. Taylor and Martin proposed more funding and collaboration with landlords to tackle the hair-raising infestation. 'As your local councillors, we're calling on the Council administration to take this seriously, the people on the ground who do work extremely hard but we need this all round the borough,' the post read. 'The longer this is ignored, the worse it will get. We need action — not just advice.' Originally published as Nearly two-foot-long rat 'almost the size of a small cat' discovered inside family North Yorkshire home: 'Growing problem'
ABC News
16-07-2025
- ABC News
Humpback whale makes its way through Sydney Harbour, pauses ferries during morning commute
A humpback whale making its merry way through Sydney Harbour resulted in ferries having to temporarily pause during the morning commute. The juvenile whale first entered the harbour about 8am on Wednesday. At approximately 9am, "ferries paused their services" briefly following advice of the National Parks and Wildlife Service (NPWS), spokesperson Mel Hall said. Footage taken from a passenger inside one ferry showed the whale's tail out of the water as it swam near the vessel. "Transport for NSW Maritime is managing ferry and other boat traffic to allow safe passage of the whale through the harbour," the spokesperson for Transport for NSW said. The whale did not appear to be entangled or injured and instead may have "taken a detour" on its migration north. NPWS and Maritime NSW crews said they were escorting the humpback on its journey in a bid to protect both the animal and the public. Transport for NSW said whale scientist Vanessa Pirotta from Macquarie University was also on board the crew vessel to provide expertise. Given how busy the harbour can be, the crew's vessels marked an exclusion zone around the freely travelling whale to prevent other boats from getting too close. Prior to the crew's intervention, the whale had been heading towards Circular Quay. "Since that time it has gradually been making its way east, and we believe now around lunchtime it has exited the harbour or its lingering at the harbour entrance," Ms Hall said. "This is a reasonably common event now in Sydney Harbour. "When a whale does come into the harbour, the government organisations in the harbour then step up to escort the whale." Each year about 40,000 humpback whales journey north from Antarctica up to Queensland. As per Transport For NSW, boaters are advised to keep a minimum 100 metres from adult whales and 300m from a calf at all times and follow directions of control vessels. Boaters are not permitted to stop and wait in the path of the whale. NPWS thanked the public and the transport system for their cooperation.
The Advertiser
10-07-2025
- The Advertiser
Get stuffed. Can fast food outlets stop taking over our towns?
When a Macca's opened not far from my house, I panicked. My kids were still little and I worried about the impact of golden arches on their tiny bodies. Sure, I was the kind of mother who could easily say no to whingeing children, but how much easier is it if you don't have to have that conversation in the first place. Now it turns out that I am joined on my own personal crusade (which included walking around the long way) by folks all over the world. They want their local areas to just say no to fast food outlets for very good reasons. Gateshead Council, in England's north-east, banned any existing non-fast-food commercial property from being converted into a hot fast-food takeaway. What happened next? British researchers found that those planning policies led to fewer overweight and obese children in that area. They even compared the health of kids from one area to others which had much higher densities of fast food outlets, just to make sure their evidence stacked up. It did. Australians are good at that, too. I came across Monash University's Elizabeth Taylor's work which documents protests against fastfoodification in Ballarat as early as 1977 and Victoria's Clifton Hill in 1987. The best known of all the resident fightbacks is, as Taylor writes, was the "Mountains against McDonald's" campaign by NSW Blue Mountains groups against three proposed McDonald's outlets in the region between 1995 and 2003. Now those campaigns are on the rise again. Proposals for two McDonald's outlets in suburban Sydney are facing backlash over potential noise impacts, "antisocial behaviour", traffic congestion and perceived health risks. Nearly 4000 people signed a petition in opposition to these developments. In Tamworth, the vibe is so similar. Residents are not pleased at the prospect of a third Hungry Jack's in the area, especially when the second one hasn't even been completed. One reader wrote to Tamworth's Northern Daily Leader: "We're known as the fattest town in Australia, and the prevalence of unhealthy takeaways is a big reason why." No one wanted Hungry Jack's in Wallsend either. It's nice to see a politician involved. Last month The Canberra Times's Jasper Lindell reported that ACT City City Services Minister Tara Cheyne wants fast food outlets to move on from the main retail strip in Belconnen which she has dubbed her "problem child". "I'd love the business mix to change. ... They all have a place, but I don't think the best place for them is across from one of the most beautiful, picturesque lakes and vistas that we've got." And let's not forget the drama at ACT's Chisholm shops. So why does it matter? So much tells us why we shouldn't let this happen. US researchers tell us adolescent males who live in environments with very high numbers of fast food restaurants eat at fast food restaurants more often compared to their peers. Other research says neighborhood-level fast-food outlet regulation might work to reduce inequalities in diet and obesity. Plus poverty adds to the pressure, according to international studies. Where there is food insecurity, young people are more likely to turn to fast food. So what can we do? All those residents who pushed back had the right idea. The University of Wollongong's Katherine Kent, a nutrition researcher, says it's really hard for people to walk out into their community and make a healthy food choice. "There's growing access to unhealthy food outlets all across Australia and what that means is even if somebody wants to eat a healthy diet, they're confronted with various unhealthy food outlets," she says. Of course, it's much easier to make a speedy food decision when it's there in front of you and doesn't require any preparation. Kent says: "We know that where you live matters, so if you're living in a region where there's minimal access to fast food, you're just much less likely to have an unhealthy diet versus somebody who might walk out of their home and be confronted with six or seven fast food outlets in a concentrated hub." And this is where local councils have an important part to play in urban planning. But as Kent points out, they are small organisations in the scheme of things. She's had lots of conversations with councils. "They're really acutely aware of this problem of this overabundance of fast food outlets, but when we talk to them they feel that their hands are tied with regards to urban planning. They feel that they are unable to push back on applications for new and healthy food outlets that are being put in for application into local councils." Plus it also relies on residents being the activists, having the agency to take matters into their own hands. READ MORE JENNA PRICE: "What we have found is that sometimes people don't have a lot of agency. They can be unhappy with their own environment but not know what to do in order to change that food environment," she says. And Kent admires the many communities who've pushed back. "The idea that communities is are taking charge over their own health is really wonderful but what it does signal is that urban planners or councils or even state governments are a little bit out of touch with what communities want." Amen to that. Kent admires the actions of the Redfern community in resisting McDonald's. It was a whole bunch of different groups coming together. But she says what residents everywhere need is the unity of the state to provide more stringent laws and regulations and policies that actually allow urban planners to say this: "We cannot have another fast food outlet here because the ratio of healthy to unhealthy food is too high." As it already is. When a Macca's opened not far from my house, I panicked. My kids were still little and I worried about the impact of golden arches on their tiny bodies. Sure, I was the kind of mother who could easily say no to whingeing children, but how much easier is it if you don't have to have that conversation in the first place. Now it turns out that I am joined on my own personal crusade (which included walking around the long way) by folks all over the world. They want their local areas to just say no to fast food outlets for very good reasons. Gateshead Council, in England's north-east, banned any existing non-fast-food commercial property from being converted into a hot fast-food takeaway. What happened next? British researchers found that those planning policies led to fewer overweight and obese children in that area. They even compared the health of kids from one area to others which had much higher densities of fast food outlets, just to make sure their evidence stacked up. It did. Australians are good at that, too. I came across Monash University's Elizabeth Taylor's work which documents protests against fastfoodification in Ballarat as early as 1977 and Victoria's Clifton Hill in 1987. The best known of all the resident fightbacks is, as Taylor writes, was the "Mountains against McDonald's" campaign by NSW Blue Mountains groups against three proposed McDonald's outlets in the region between 1995 and 2003. Now those campaigns are on the rise again. Proposals for two McDonald's outlets in suburban Sydney are facing backlash over potential noise impacts, "antisocial behaviour", traffic congestion and perceived health risks. Nearly 4000 people signed a petition in opposition to these developments. In Tamworth, the vibe is so similar. Residents are not pleased at the prospect of a third Hungry Jack's in the area, especially when the second one hasn't even been completed. One reader wrote to Tamworth's Northern Daily Leader: "We're known as the fattest town in Australia, and the prevalence of unhealthy takeaways is a big reason why." No one wanted Hungry Jack's in Wallsend either. It's nice to see a politician involved. Last month The Canberra Times's Jasper Lindell reported that ACT City City Services Minister Tara Cheyne wants fast food outlets to move on from the main retail strip in Belconnen which she has dubbed her "problem child". "I'd love the business mix to change. ... They all have a place, but I don't think the best place for them is across from one of the most beautiful, picturesque lakes and vistas that we've got." And let's not forget the drama at ACT's Chisholm shops. So why does it matter? So much tells us why we shouldn't let this happen. US researchers tell us adolescent males who live in environments with very high numbers of fast food restaurants eat at fast food restaurants more often compared to their peers. Other research says neighborhood-level fast-food outlet regulation might work to reduce inequalities in diet and obesity. Plus poverty adds to the pressure, according to international studies. Where there is food insecurity, young people are more likely to turn to fast food. So what can we do? All those residents who pushed back had the right idea. The University of Wollongong's Katherine Kent, a nutrition researcher, says it's really hard for people to walk out into their community and make a healthy food choice. "There's growing access to unhealthy food outlets all across Australia and what that means is even if somebody wants to eat a healthy diet, they're confronted with various unhealthy food outlets," she says. Of course, it's much easier to make a speedy food decision when it's there in front of you and doesn't require any preparation. Kent says: "We know that where you live matters, so if you're living in a region where there's minimal access to fast food, you're just much less likely to have an unhealthy diet versus somebody who might walk out of their home and be confronted with six or seven fast food outlets in a concentrated hub." And this is where local councils have an important part to play in urban planning. But as Kent points out, they are small organisations in the scheme of things. She's had lots of conversations with councils. "They're really acutely aware of this problem of this overabundance of fast food outlets, but when we talk to them they feel that their hands are tied with regards to urban planning. They feel that they are unable to push back on applications for new and healthy food outlets that are being put in for application into local councils." Plus it also relies on residents being the activists, having the agency to take matters into their own hands. READ MORE JENNA PRICE: "What we have found is that sometimes people don't have a lot of agency. They can be unhappy with their own environment but not know what to do in order to change that food environment," she says. And Kent admires the many communities who've pushed back. "The idea that communities is are taking charge over their own health is really wonderful but what it does signal is that urban planners or councils or even state governments are a little bit out of touch with what communities want." Amen to that. Kent admires the actions of the Redfern community in resisting McDonald's. It was a whole bunch of different groups coming together. But she says what residents everywhere need is the unity of the state to provide more stringent laws and regulations and policies that actually allow urban planners to say this: "We cannot have another fast food outlet here because the ratio of healthy to unhealthy food is too high." As it already is. When a Macca's opened not far from my house, I panicked. My kids were still little and I worried about the impact of golden arches on their tiny bodies. Sure, I was the kind of mother who could easily say no to whingeing children, but how much easier is it if you don't have to have that conversation in the first place. Now it turns out that I am joined on my own personal crusade (which included walking around the long way) by folks all over the world. They want their local areas to just say no to fast food outlets for very good reasons. Gateshead Council, in England's north-east, banned any existing non-fast-food commercial property from being converted into a hot fast-food takeaway. What happened next? British researchers found that those planning policies led to fewer overweight and obese children in that area. They even compared the health of kids from one area to others which had much higher densities of fast food outlets, just to make sure their evidence stacked up. It did. Australians are good at that, too. I came across Monash University's Elizabeth Taylor's work which documents protests against fastfoodification in Ballarat as early as 1977 and Victoria's Clifton Hill in 1987. The best known of all the resident fightbacks is, as Taylor writes, was the "Mountains against McDonald's" campaign by NSW Blue Mountains groups against three proposed McDonald's outlets in the region between 1995 and 2003. Now those campaigns are on the rise again. Proposals for two McDonald's outlets in suburban Sydney are facing backlash over potential noise impacts, "antisocial behaviour", traffic congestion and perceived health risks. Nearly 4000 people signed a petition in opposition to these developments. In Tamworth, the vibe is so similar. Residents are not pleased at the prospect of a third Hungry Jack's in the area, especially when the second one hasn't even been completed. One reader wrote to Tamworth's Northern Daily Leader: "We're known as the fattest town in Australia, and the prevalence of unhealthy takeaways is a big reason why." No one wanted Hungry Jack's in Wallsend either. It's nice to see a politician involved. Last month The Canberra Times's Jasper Lindell reported that ACT City City Services Minister Tara Cheyne wants fast food outlets to move on from the main retail strip in Belconnen which she has dubbed her "problem child". "I'd love the business mix to change. ... They all have a place, but I don't think the best place for them is across from one of the most beautiful, picturesque lakes and vistas that we've got." And let's not forget the drama at ACT's Chisholm shops. So why does it matter? So much tells us why we shouldn't let this happen. US researchers tell us adolescent males who live in environments with very high numbers of fast food restaurants eat at fast food restaurants more often compared to their peers. Other research says neighborhood-level fast-food outlet regulation might work to reduce inequalities in diet and obesity. Plus poverty adds to the pressure, according to international studies. Where there is food insecurity, young people are more likely to turn to fast food. So what can we do? All those residents who pushed back had the right idea. The University of Wollongong's Katherine Kent, a nutrition researcher, says it's really hard for people to walk out into their community and make a healthy food choice. "There's growing access to unhealthy food outlets all across Australia and what that means is even if somebody wants to eat a healthy diet, they're confronted with various unhealthy food outlets," she says. Of course, it's much easier to make a speedy food decision when it's there in front of you and doesn't require any preparation. Kent says: "We know that where you live matters, so if you're living in a region where there's minimal access to fast food, you're just much less likely to have an unhealthy diet versus somebody who might walk out of their home and be confronted with six or seven fast food outlets in a concentrated hub." And this is where local councils have an important part to play in urban planning. But as Kent points out, they are small organisations in the scheme of things. She's had lots of conversations with councils. "They're really acutely aware of this problem of this overabundance of fast food outlets, but when we talk to them they feel that their hands are tied with regards to urban planning. They feel that they are unable to push back on applications for new and healthy food outlets that are being put in for application into local councils." Plus it also relies on residents being the activists, having the agency to take matters into their own hands. READ MORE JENNA PRICE: "What we have found is that sometimes people don't have a lot of agency. They can be unhappy with their own environment but not know what to do in order to change that food environment," she says. And Kent admires the many communities who've pushed back. "The idea that communities is are taking charge over their own health is really wonderful but what it does signal is that urban planners or councils or even state governments are a little bit out of touch with what communities want." Amen to that. Kent admires the actions of the Redfern community in resisting McDonald's. It was a whole bunch of different groups coming together. But she says what residents everywhere need is the unity of the state to provide more stringent laws and regulations and policies that actually allow urban planners to say this: "We cannot have another fast food outlet here because the ratio of healthy to unhealthy food is too high." As it already is. When a Macca's opened not far from my house, I panicked. My kids were still little and I worried about the impact of golden arches on their tiny bodies. Sure, I was the kind of mother who could easily say no to whingeing children, but how much easier is it if you don't have to have that conversation in the first place. Now it turns out that I am joined on my own personal crusade (which included walking around the long way) by folks all over the world. They want their local areas to just say no to fast food outlets for very good reasons. Gateshead Council, in England's north-east, banned any existing non-fast-food commercial property from being converted into a hot fast-food takeaway. What happened next? British researchers found that those planning policies led to fewer overweight and obese children in that area. They even compared the health of kids from one area to others which had much higher densities of fast food outlets, just to make sure their evidence stacked up. It did. Australians are good at that, too. I came across Monash University's Elizabeth Taylor's work which documents protests against fastfoodification in Ballarat as early as 1977 and Victoria's Clifton Hill in 1987. The best known of all the resident fightbacks is, as Taylor writes, was the "Mountains against McDonald's" campaign by NSW Blue Mountains groups against three proposed McDonald's outlets in the region between 1995 and 2003. Now those campaigns are on the rise again. Proposals for two McDonald's outlets in suburban Sydney are facing backlash over potential noise impacts, "antisocial behaviour", traffic congestion and perceived health risks. Nearly 4000 people signed a petition in opposition to these developments. In Tamworth, the vibe is so similar. Residents are not pleased at the prospect of a third Hungry Jack's in the area, especially when the second one hasn't even been completed. One reader wrote to Tamworth's Northern Daily Leader: "We're known as the fattest town in Australia, and the prevalence of unhealthy takeaways is a big reason why." No one wanted Hungry Jack's in Wallsend either. It's nice to see a politician involved. Last month The Canberra Times's Jasper Lindell reported that ACT City City Services Minister Tara Cheyne wants fast food outlets to move on from the main retail strip in Belconnen which she has dubbed her "problem child". "I'd love the business mix to change. ... They all have a place, but I don't think the best place for them is across from one of the most beautiful, picturesque lakes and vistas that we've got." And let's not forget the drama at ACT's Chisholm shops. So why does it matter? So much tells us why we shouldn't let this happen. US researchers tell us adolescent males who live in environments with very high numbers of fast food restaurants eat at fast food restaurants more often compared to their peers. Other research says neighborhood-level fast-food outlet regulation might work to reduce inequalities in diet and obesity. Plus poverty adds to the pressure, according to international studies. Where there is food insecurity, young people are more likely to turn to fast food. So what can we do? All those residents who pushed back had the right idea. The University of Wollongong's Katherine Kent, a nutrition researcher, says it's really hard for people to walk out into their community and make a healthy food choice. "There's growing access to unhealthy food outlets all across Australia and what that means is even if somebody wants to eat a healthy diet, they're confronted with various unhealthy food outlets," she says. Of course, it's much easier to make a speedy food decision when it's there in front of you and doesn't require any preparation. Kent says: "We know that where you live matters, so if you're living in a region where there's minimal access to fast food, you're just much less likely to have an unhealthy diet versus somebody who might walk out of their home and be confronted with six or seven fast food outlets in a concentrated hub." And this is where local councils have an important part to play in urban planning. But as Kent points out, they are small organisations in the scheme of things. She's had lots of conversations with councils. "They're really acutely aware of this problem of this overabundance of fast food outlets, but when we talk to them they feel that their hands are tied with regards to urban planning. They feel that they are unable to push back on applications for new and healthy food outlets that are being put in for application into local councils." Plus it also relies on residents being the activists, having the agency to take matters into their own hands. READ MORE JENNA PRICE: "What we have found is that sometimes people don't have a lot of agency. They can be unhappy with their own environment but not know what to do in order to change that food environment," she says. And Kent admires the many communities who've pushed back. "The idea that communities is are taking charge over their own health is really wonderful but what it does signal is that urban planners or councils or even state governments are a little bit out of touch with what communities want." Amen to that. Kent admires the actions of the Redfern community in resisting McDonald's. It was a whole bunch of different groups coming together. But she says what residents everywhere need is the unity of the state to provide more stringent laws and regulations and policies that actually allow urban planners to say this: "We cannot have another fast food outlet here because the ratio of healthy to unhealthy food is too high." As it already is.
