Daughter of a former England cricketer died from sepsis, pneumonia and Chron's disease after paramedics failed to alert doctors to her symptoms
The tragic daughter of a former England cricketer would have survived if medics had treated her properly, a coroner ruled today.
Bethan James, 21, daughter of ex-England and Glamorgan batsman Steve James had visited hospital multiple times in the days leading up to her death - but she continued to be ill when released home.
Paramedics were called to her house when she deteriorated at home - but a coroner found delays in her treatment and a lack of urgency.
By the time she was seen at hospital Bethan was gravely ill and died with sepsis within hours of being admitted to the emergency department.
Her sports journalist father had been covering the Six Nations rugby match between Wales and Ireland in Dublin when his daughter was taken seriously ill.
But due to weather delays was unable to get home and see her before she died.
The inquest heard ambulance staff attending Bethan's home had not requested emergency backup, struggled to insert an IV line, and did not issue a pre-alert to the hospital to warn them of her serious condition before she was admitted.
On arrival to University Hospital Wales, Cardiff, Bethan was admitted to the less serious 'majors' unit rather than to resus where medics held a 'cognitive bias' to more immediate treatment.
The hearing was told that a lactate reading obtained an hour after her arrival eventually prompted more senior doctors to become involved in her care.
Senior Coroner Patricia Morgan said: 'I find that if earlier recognition and prompt action in response to Bethan's condition by ambulance services had occurred this would have resulted in a pre-alert to the emergency department.
'This would, and ought to have, resulted in direct admission to resus with clinical staff waiting for her.'
She added: 'Earlier treatment would and ought to have commenced' and that 'the involvement of other specialists would and ought to have occurred at an earlier stage.'
'Cognitive bias towards resus patients, as described by Dr Thomas, would have been directed in Bethan's favour from the time of her arrival rather than once the lactate result was available.
'On balance, I find that had this direct admission to resus and prompt recognition and treatment occurred, then cardiac arrest would not have occurred when it did, which would have enabled more time for other specialities to become involved in Bethan's care.
'On balance I find that Bethan would not have died.'
A post-mortem examination found Bethan died from a combination of sepsis, pneumonia and Crohn's disease.
Bethan had been diagnosed with Crohn's in the previous months and had been admitted to hospital on a number of occasions in the days leading up to her death but sepsis was never diagnosed.
During the hearing, her mother Jane James the court she felt medical staff missed opportunities to treat journalism student Bethan for sepsis and had been 'dismissive' of her condition.
She said: 'It's heartbreaking as a mum to know that her life could have been saved.'
Mrs James described Bethan as a 'caring and beautiful' beautiful person who would have made a 'brilliant' journalist.
Giving a narrative conclusion the coroner said Bethan had attended hospital 'multiple occasions' between 27/1/2020 and 6/2/2020 but was repeatedly sent home.
Ms Morgan said: 'Bethan was reluctant to return hospital due to her lack of confidence arising from earlier attendances at hospital.'
When her condition deteriorated on February 8, 2020 her mother Jane dialled 999 and a rapid responder arrived at her home.
Ms Morgan said: 'The rapid responder identified Bethan was in need of admission to hospital and request a back up ambulance at a non-urgent grade of P3, Bethan's condition warranted an emergency response.
'There was no pre-alert issued to hospital to make them aware of the seriousness of her condition.
'Bethan was transferred to the UHW majors area of the department when she should admitted directly to resus.
'There was an extended transfer between ambulance and hospital and a delay in recognising Bethan's critical condition once she was admitted.
'This delayed the escalation of her treatment and the input of specialty doctors into her care.
'Bethan sadly went into cardiac arrest and died.'
Following the ruling Ms Morgan offered her condolences to Bethan's parents who had sat through the hearing.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
Assisted dying ‘could be Trojan Horse that breaks NHS'
Assisted dying 'could become the Trojan horse that breaks the NHS,' the Commons has heard. MPs are due to vote on the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill on Friday, which could see it either progress to the House of Lords or fall. It will be the first time the Bill has been voted on in its entirety since the historic vote in November when MPs supported the principle of assisted dying for England and Wales by a majority of 55. On Tuesday, Wes Streeting, the Health Secretary, was questioned about the availability of money to fund such moves. Last year, Mr Streeting voted against the Bill and has since indicated he remains opposed, reiterating that the Government is taking a neutral stance on it. Dame Siobhain McDonagh, a Labour MP opposed to the Bill, said an assisted dying service could 'rob our stretched NHS of much-needed resources'. She said: 'When asked in the House of Commons, the Secretary of State for Health made clear to MPs that there is no money allocated to the NHS to fund the assisted dying Bill. 'It's now clear that the assisted dying Bill will rob our stretched NHS of much-needed resources and could become the Trojan horse that breaks the NHS, the proudest institution and the proudest measure in our Labour Party's history. 'We already know from the impact assessment that this new system could cost tens, if not hundreds of millions of pounds, making our mission to cut waiting times and rebuild our NHS harder. I urge Labour MPs not to vote for the assisted dying Bill to protect the vulnerable and our NHS.' Mr Streeting was asked by the Labour MP Katrina Murray, who opposed the Bill, whether the NHS had the money to fund assisted dying on top of its other priorities. She said: 'If passed, the assisted dying Bill would make thousands of terminally ill people every year eligible to end their lives on the NHS. Does our health service have the money to fund this service as well as its priority of bringing down waiting lists?' Mr Streeting responded: 'Of course, the Government is neutral [on assisted dying]. It's for the House to decide. 'There isn't money allocated to set up the service in the Bill at present, but it's for members of this House and the Lords, should the Bill proceed, to decide whether or not to proceed and that's a decision that this Government will respect either way.' Mr Streeting said last year that there were 'choices and trade-offs', adding that 'any new service comes at the expense of other competing pressures and priorities'. Last week, Mr Streeting said the NHS was 'in a fight for its life' as he described his mission to turn the health service around. 'Not about pounds or pence, but the human cost' An impact assessment published by the Government last month estimated that the operational costs of setting up an assisted dying service could be up to £13.6 million a year. The assessment suggested there could be up to 4,500 assisted deaths in a decade, saving the taxpayer up to £90 million in healthcare and benefits and pensions payments. Kim Leadbeater, the Bill sponsor, has said the proposed legislation is about giving dying people choice at the end of their lives, saying it is 'about the human cost' and 'not about pounds and pence'. She has described her Bill as the 'most robust piece of legislation in this area in the world'. Dozens of Labour MPs called for Friday's overall vote to be delayed, asking Lucy Powell, the Commons Leader, for more time to scrutinise a Bill they say is 'perhaps the most consequential piece of legislation that has appeared before the House in generations'. But a Government spokesman pointed out that it is a private members' Bill and 'the amount of time for debate is therefore a matter for the House'. Supporters of the Bill say it is coming back to the Commons with better safeguards after more than 90 hours of parliamentary time spent on it to date. But opponents claim the process has been rushed and that the Bill is weaker than it was when first introduced last year. A key change was the replacement of a High Court judge requirement for sign-off of applications from terminally ill people, with a panel featuring a social worker, senior legal figure and psychiatrist. As it stands, the proposed legislation would allow terminally ill adults in England and Wales, with fewer than six months to live, to apply for an assisted death, subject to approval by two doctors and the three-member panel. While the Bill has the backing of some MPs from medical backgrounds, concerns have been raised by the Royal Colleges of Physicians and Psychiatrists.
The Sun
3 hours ago
- The Sun
MPs vote to decriminalise women ending their own pregnancies in step towards abortion reform
A HISTORIC vote to decriminalise women terminating their own pregnancies has been passed by MPs. Labour MP Tonia Antoniazzi's amendment to the Crime and Policing Bill was supported, with MPs voting 379 to 137, majority 242. 3 3 The Gower MP said it will remove the threat of "investigation, arrest, prosecution, or imprisonment" of any woman who acts in relation to her own pregnancy. A push for change came after she saw how women had been proved by cops over suspected illegal abortions. MPs passed an amendment to the Crime and Policing Bill with a majority of 242. Under current law in England and Wales, abortion is allowed up to the first 24 weeks of pregnancy - and beyond that in certain circumstances. However, abortion is still considered a criminal offence under the Offences Against the Person Act 1861 and the Infant Life (Preservation) Act 1929 - and it has to be approved by two doctors. The result of the vote has not become official law as of yet. But it has been added to the government's flagship Crime and Policing Bill that is making its way through parliament. It will then become law once that bill receives royal assent. During the Bill's report stage, Ms Antoniazzi assured her colleagues the current 24-week limit would remain and that abortions would still require the approval and signatures of two doctors. Fellow Labour MP Stella Creasy said she faced "unforgivable abuse" outside Parliament ahead of the vote. The Labour MP also maintained that healthcare professionals "acting outside the law and abusive partners using violence or poisoning to end a pregnancy would still be criminalised, as they are now". On issues such as abortion, MPs usually have free votes, meaning they take their own view rather than deciding along party lines. During a Westminster Hall debate earlier this month, justice minister Alex Davies-Jones said the Government is neutral on decriminalisation and that it is an issue for Parliament to decide upon.
The Independent
3 hours ago
- The Independent
‘Cruel' criminalisation of women over abortion must end, says MP ahead of vote
The 'cruelty' of women facing prosecution over terminating a pregnancy must end, an MP has told Parliament as she argued for a change in the law to decriminalise abortion. Labour MP Tonia Antoniazzi said her amendment to the Crime and Policing Bill would remove women from the criminal justice system in relation to their own pregnancies, ensuring they could not face investigation, arrest, prosecution, or imprisonment. She said the UK's 'Victorian' abortion law is 'increasingly used against vulnerable women and girls' and that her amendment is the 'right change at the right time' and a 'once-in-a-generation' opportunity to bring change. Abortion in England and Wales remains a criminal offence but is legal with an authorised provider up to 24 weeks, with very limited circumstances allowing one after this time, such as when the mother's life is at risk or the child would be born with a severe disability. It is also legal to take prescribed medication at home if a woman is less than 10 weeks pregnant. Efforts to change the law to protect women from prosecution follow repeated calls to repeal sections of the 19th-century law, the 1861 Offences Against the Person Act, after abortion was decriminalised in Northern Ireland in 2019. Ms Antoniazzi said her proposed 'narrow, targeted' measure does not change how abortion services are provided or the rules under the 1967 Abortion Act. She said: 'This piece of legislation will only take women out of the criminal justice system because they are vulnerable and they need our help. As I have said it before, and I will say it again, just what public interest is this serving? This is not justice, it is cruelty and it has got to end.' She added that her amendment is backed by 180 MPs from across the Commons and 50 organisations including the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). The MP assured her colleagues the current 24-week limit would remain, abortions would still require the approval and signatures of two doctors, and that healthcare professionals 'acting outside the law and abusive partners using violence or poisoning to end a pregnancy would still be criminalised, as they are now'. A separate amendment has also been put forward by Labour MP Stella Creasy and goes further by not only decriminalising abortion, but also seeks to 'lock in' the right of someone to have one and protect those who help them. Ms Creasy's amendment will also be debated but 'will fall' if Ms Antoniazzi's is passed by MPs, the Commons heard. Referring to Ms Creasy's amendment, Ms Antoniazzi said while she agreed 'more comprehensive reform of abortion law is needed', such change of that scale should take place through a future separate piece of legislation. Conservative MP and Father of the House Sir Edward Leigh, speaking against both amendments, described them as 'not pro-woman' and argued they 'would introduce sex-selective abortion'. DUP MP Carla Lockhart insisted 'both lives matter', saying the proposed amendments 'would be bad for both women and unborn children'. Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood, who is not present for Tuesday's vote, outlined her opposition to both amendments in a letter to constituents, saying while she believes safe and legal abortions are part of female healthcare, the amendments 'unnecessary' and 'dangerous'. The issue of women investigated by police over suspected illegal abortions has come to the fore in recent times with prominent cases such as those of Nicola Packer and Carla Foster. Ms Packer was cleared by a jury last month after taking prescribed abortion medicine when she was around 26 weeks pregnant, beyond the legal limit of 10 weeks for taking such medication at home. She told jurors during her trial, which came after more than four years of police investigation, that she did not realise she had been pregnant for more than 10 weeks. The case of Ms Foster, jailed in 2023 for illegally obtaining abortion tablets to end her pregnancy when she was between 32 and 34 weeks pregnant, eventually saw her sentence reduced by the Court of Appeal and suspended, with senior judges saying that sending women to prison for abortion-related offences is 'unlikely' to be a 'just outcome'. MPs had previously been due to debate similar amendments removing the threat of prosecution against women who act in relation to their own pregnancy at any stage, but these did not take place as Parliament was dissolved last summer for the general election. The Society for the Protection of Unborn Children (SPUC) has urged MPs to vote against both amendments, saying they would bring about 'the biggest expansion of abortion since 1967″. Alithea Williams, the organisation's public policy manager, said: 'Unborn babies will have any remaining protection stripped away, and women will be left at the mercy of abusers. 'Both amendments would allow abortion up to birth, for any reason. A separate amendment, tabled by Conservative MP Caroline Johnson proposes mandatory in-person consultations for women seeking an abortion before being prescribed at-home medication to terminate a pregnancy. She said her amendment aims to make sure women and girls are safe when they access abortion services. She told the Commons: 'I'm not trying to limit people's access to what is clinically legally available. I'm trying to make sure that people are safe when they do so.' She said the change she has proposed would be to protect women who have been trafficked and forced into sex work or those who have been sexually abused and where a perpetrator is attempting to cover up their crimes by causing a termination. But Ms Antoniazzi said remote access to abortion care was 'safe, effective and reduces waiting times', and that such a change would 'devastate abortion access in this country'. The changes being debated this week would not cover Scotland, where a group is currently undertaking work to review the law as it stands north of the border. On issues such as abortion, MPs usually have free votes, meaning they take their own view rather than deciding along party lines. The Government has previously said it is neutral on decriminalisation and that it is an issue for Parliament to decide upon.
