SG60: Watch brands collaborate and partner on special editions
The style of these SG60 special editions by watch brands ranges, and expresses in particular ways the identities of the watchmakers behind them. Perhaps the most interesting is the one undertaken by Vacheron Constantin, which celebrates 270 years of continuous watchmaking this year. The manufacturer works on an exclusive, rarefied level, exemplified by its slogan 'one of not many'. Courtesy of Vacheron Constantin
Instead of a watch, Vacheron Constantin has chosen to partner with Delugs, the Singapore brand of handmade watch straps, on a collection of limited edition straps for its timepieces. It's a reflection of how much the Swiss brand cares for savoir-faire, and a well-made choice to partner with a Singaporean brand for a distinctly Singaporean occasion.
Just as impressive: a watch crafted especially for Singapore's 60th anniversary, and a good cause to boot. Case in point: Audemars Piguet quietly created a special edition of its Code 11.59 Starwheel for the National Museum of Singapore's fundraiser auction. The dinner and auction, to be held on 15 August, will see proceeds go towards the ongoing revamp of the museum's permanent galleries, as well as restoring and upgrading its 138-year-old Stamford Road building. Courtesy of Audemars Piguet
1 / 4 Audemars Piguet's Code 11.59 Starwheel Singapore edition
This August, the National Museum of Singapore holds its first major fundraising event in 15 years to support the revamp of its permanent galleries in premises. Part of the fundraiser will include an auction, to which the Swiss watchmaker Audemars Piguet has crafted a special edition watch to mark Singapore's 60th anniversary.
The Code 11.59 by Audemars Piguet Starwheel taps into the wandering hours, a connoisseur's complication that tells the time in a beautiful, intriguing way. This pièce unique is crafted in white gold and black ceramic, and features a special red lacquer dial in homage to Singapore's national colours. On the back, a 22-carat pink gold oscillating weight designed with a 60th anniversary motif. Courtesy of Bell & Ross
2 / 4 Bell & Ross's BR-05 Sincere White Lum
Bell & Ross has partnered with Sincere Fine Watches, one of Singapore's leading, and oldest, watch retailers, on a special edition that takes inspiration from Singapore's red and white colours. The BR-05 model comes from the watchmaker's urban collection, and features for the first time a full lum dial with red indices. That means, come evening or nighttime, the entire dial itself and the hands (enhanced with high-tech Super-LumiNova X2) will emit a luminous glow. Courtesy of Bvlgari
3 / 4 Bvlgari's Octo Roma WorldTimer SG60
The Roman luxury brand recently staged a pop-up exhibition at Paragon Shopping Centre to display and celebrate its timepieces. At the centre of it all was the launch of the Octo Roma WorldTimer SG60, a Singapore-exclusive limited edition model.
It builds on the house's signature Octo collection, defined by an architecturally-inspired eight-sided octagonal silhouette. This special edition comes, unsurprisingly, with red accents. What's perhaps coolest is that the WorldTimer function—which typically uses another city to represent our GMT +8 time zone—features Singapore marked distinctly in red. Courtesy of Vacheron Constantin
4 / 4 Vacheron Constantin's limited edition straps with Delugs
Delugs, the Singapore brand of watch strap makers, is on the rise. It had a buzzy moment in 2024 when Ed Sheeran, in town for a concert, put a Delugs strap on his Patek Philippe watch. This year, the brand opened a first-of-its-kind boutique in Raffles Hotel dedicated solely to watch straps.
Vacheron Constantin sharply took to the brand, and has worked with Delugs on a collection of 60 pairs of collectible straps for its timepieces. They come crafted in Epsom green and Baranil gold leather, colours selected for subtle contrast and timelessness. Each one comes stamped with 'Delugs for Vacheron Constantin' on the reverse, red and white stitching at the buckle end, and individual numbering to mark each pair.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
4 hours ago
- Straits Times
We love our dogs and cats. But are they bad for the environment?
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Pets come with environmental costs. Cats and dogs eat a lot of meat, for example, and they also kill wildlife. NEW YORK – Our dogs and cats provide all kinds of benefits. They improve physical health, reduce stress and can fend off loneliness. Research shows that interacting with pets can lower blood pressure. Dogs need walks and playtime, which helps people stay active. And both dogs and cats can form deep bonds with humans. Basically, they enrich people's lives. 'There's a whole body of literature supporting that,' said Mr Pieter De Frenne, a bioscience engineer at Ghent University in Belgium. Yet for all the good, pets come with environmental costs. Cats and dogs eat a lot of meat, for example. They also kill wildlife. So, how can you get all those tangible and intangible benefits and keep the environmental, um, pawprint, as low as possible? Here is what the experts have to say. A whole lot of meat Mr Gregory Okin, a geographer at University of California, Los Angeles, calculated in a 2017 study that the estimated 163 million cats and dogs in the United States consume a whopping quarter of the country's animal-derived calories. 'If US dogs and cats were their own country, they would rank fifth in global meat consumption,' he said in an interview. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore I want to divorce my husband and be a single mother: More victims speaking up on emotional abuse World Trump drops Ukraine ceasefire demand after Putin summit Singapore Buying hope: Inside S'pore's love affair with the lottery Singapore She won big in Genting, but getting $240k winnings back to Singapore was dicey Opinion Confessions of a born-again Singaporean Business Manage your household finances like a business for clarity, say entrepreneurs Singapore Minor Issues: Are ghosts real? And other pesky questions kids ask Singapore Singapore congratulates Indonesia on 80th Independence Day Pet food, Mr Okin estimated, accounts for about a quarter of agriculture-related fossil fuel emissions in the US. Globally, another study found that dry pet food was responsible for up to 2.9 per cent of carbon dioxide emissions from agriculture and 1.2 per cent of agricultural land use. Pets fed human-grade meat have greater effects. A 20kg dog on a raw food diet has a higher food-related environmental toll than most meat-eating humans, said Dr John Harvey, a veterinarian and doctoral researcher at the University of Edinburgh in Scotland. To reduce these effects, Mr Okin recommends pet food brands that meet dietary requirements but contain less animal-derived protein. Pet food made from chicken is generally better than pork, and both tend to be better than beef. Dry food, on average, has a lower environmental impact than wet food. Vegan pet foods should be approached with caution because of potential nutritional inadequacies. That is especially true for cats. Moreover, in the US, most cats and dogs are overweight. So reducing the amount of food those animals are given would be a boon for both pet health and the environment, Dr Harvey said. And a whole lot of something else The nutrient-rich pet foods people feed their animals come out the other end as nutrient-rich pee and poop. 'It's basically a hyper-fertiliser,' Dr Harvey said of dog and cat waste. High levels of nitrogen and phosphorus in pet waste have been linked to soil contamination and water pollution. In parks and other natural areas where dog walking is popular, this influx of nutrients can even lead to biodiversity loss, Mr De Frenne said. If owners would be more responsible about cleaning up after their dogs, these effects would be lessened, said Ms Kim Maya Yavor, a doctoral candidate in sustainable engineering at the Technical University Berlin. 'With urine, there's not much to do about it, but half of this problem can be reduced by picking up your dog's faeces and throwing it away.' Those hunting instincts Free-roaming pets can also disturb or kill wildlife. 'Dogs just going through an area can have dramatic impacts on biodiversity,' Dr Harvey said. Pet predation can also have knock-on effects for other species. 'When a cat kills a mouse or vole, that animal can't be eaten by a native predator like an owl or marten,' said Professor Arie Trouwborst, a professor of nature conservation law at Tilburg University in the Netherlands. Many of these problems can be solved or mitigated, he added, by keeping cats indoors and leashing dogs. The point here is not that you cannot have a companion animal or two. Being careful about pet food and pet waste, and keeping animals under your control, can help a lot. Adopt, don't shop Finally, if you are considering adding a pet to your home, it is important to consider where you are sourcing that new friend. Of the 5.8 million cats and dogs that went into US shelters and rescue centres in 2024, 607,000 were killed, according to the Shelter Animals Count, a non-profit organisation. The number of unwanted pets presents both environmental and animal welfare concerns. Adopting a pet from a shelter or rescue group, rather than buying from a breeder, can help offset these issues. 'Instead of creating a new thing, you're taking something that's already there,' said Dr Lena DeTar, a veterinarian at Cornell University. And if you are specifically looking for a pet that takes a lower environmental toll, then go for something small, Dr Harvey said. Cats and dogs also are not the only pets available, Mr Okin said. For example, rabbits and guinea pigs wind up at shelters and rescues in high numbers too. And unlike cats and dogs, they are vegetarian. NYTIMES
Straits Times
6 hours ago
- Straits Times
Companies are pouring billions into AI. It has yet to pay off.
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Corporate spending on artificial intelligence is surging as executives bank on major efficiency gains. So far, they report little effect to the bottom line. Nearly four decades ago, when the personal computer boom was in full swing, a phenomenon known as the 'productivity paradox' emerged. It was a reference to how, despite companies' huge investments in new technology, there was scant evidence of a corresponding gain in workers' efficiency. Today, the same paradox is appearing, but with generative artificial intelligence (Gen AI). According to recent research by McKinsey & Co, nearly eight in 10 companies have reported using Gen AI, but just as many have reported 'no significant bottom-line impact'. AI technology has been racing ahead with chatbots such as ChatGPT, fuelled by a high-stakes arms race among tech giants and super-rich startups, and prompting an expectation that everything from back-office accounting to customer service will be revolutionised. But the payoff for businesses outside the tech sector is lagging behind, plagued by issues including an irritating tendency by chatbots to make stuff up. That means that businesses will have to continue to invest billions to avoid falling behind – but it could be years before the technology delivers an economy-wide payoff, as companies gradually figure out what works best. Call it the 'gen AI paradox,' as McKinsey did in its research report. Investments in Gen AI by businesses are expected to increase 94 per cent in 2025 to US$61.9 billion (S$79.5 billion), according to IDC, a technology research firm. But the percentage of companies abandoning most of their AI pilot projects soared to 42 per cent by the end of 2024, up from 17 per cent the previous year, according to a survey of more than 1,000 technology and business managers by S&P Global, a data and analytics firm. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore I want to divorce my husband and be a single mother: More victims speaking up on emotional abuse World Trump drops Ukraine ceasefire demand after Putin summit Singapore Buying hope: Inside S'pore's love affair with the lottery Singapore She won big in Genting, but getting $240k winnings back to Singapore was dicey Opinion Confessions of a born-again Singaporean Business Manage your household finances like a business for clarity, say entrepreneurs Business Silence does not work when dealing with job loss blues Singapore Singapore congratulates Indonesia on 80th Independence Day Projects failed not only because of technical hurdles, but often also because of 'human factors' like employee and customer resistance or lack of skills, said S&P Global senior analyst Alexander Johnston. Gartner, a research and advisory firm that charts technological 'hype cycles', predicts that AI is sliding towards a stage it calls 'the trough of disillusionment'. The low point is expected next year, before the technology eventually becomes a proven productivity tool, said Gartner chief forecaster John-David Lovelock. That was the pattern with past technologies such as personal computers and the internet – early exuberance, the hard slog of mastering a technology, followed by a transformation of industries and work. The winners so far have been the suppliers of AI technology and advice. They include Microsoft, Amazon and Google, which offer AI software, while Nvidia is the runaway leader in AI chips. Executives at those companies have bragged how AI is reshaping their own workforces, eliminating the need for some entry-level coding work and making other workers more efficient. AI will eventually replace entire swaths of human employees, many predict, a perspective that is being widely embraced and echoed in the corporate mainstream. At the Aspen Ideas Festival in June, Mr Jim Farley, chief executive of Ford Motor, said: 'Artificial intelligence is going to replace literally half of all white-collar workers in the US.' Whether that type of revolutionary change occurs, and how soon, depends on the real-world testing ground of many businesses. 'The raw technological horsepower is terrific, but it's not going to determine how quickly AI transforms the economy,' said Mr Andrew McAfee, a principal research scientist and co-director of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology's (MIT) Initiative on the Digital Economy. Still, some businesses are finding ways to incorporate AI – although in most cases the technology is still a long way from replacing workers. One company where AI's promise and flaws are playing out is USAA, which provides insurance and banking services to members of the military and their families. After several pilot projects, some of which it closed down, the company introduced an AI assistant to help its 16,000 customer service workers provide correct answers to specific questions. USAA is tracking its AI investments, but does not yet have a calculation of the financial payoff, if any, for the call centre software. But the response from its workers, the company said, has been overwhelmingly positive. While it has software apps for answering customer questions online, its call centres field an average of 200,000 calls a day. 'Those are moments that matter,' said Mr Ramnik Bajaj, the company's chief data analytics and AI officer. 'They want a human voice at the other end of the phone.' That's similar to an AI app developed more than a year ago for fieldworkers at Johnson Controls, a large supplier of building equipment, software and services. The company fed its operating and service manuals for its machines into an AI program that has been trained to generate a problem summary, suggest repairs and deliver it all to the technician's tablet computer. In testing, the app has trimmed 10 to 15 minutes off a repair call of an hour or more – a useful efficiency gain, but hardly a workplace transformation on its own. Fewer than 2,000 of the company's 25,000 field service workers have access to the AI helper, although the company is planning an expansion. 'It's still pretty early days, but the idea is that over time, everyone will use it,' said Mr Vijay Sankaran, the chief digital and information officer at Johnson Controls. The long-term vision is that companies will use AI to improve multiple systems, including sales, procurement, manufacturing, customer service and finance, he said. 'That's the game changer,' said Mr Sankaran, who predicts that shift will take at least five years. Two years ago, JPMorgan Chase, the nation's largest bank, blocked access to ChatGPT from its computers because of potential security risks. Only a few hundred data scientists and engineers were allowed to experiment with AI. Today, about 200,000 of the bank's employees have access to a general-purpose AI assistant – essentially a business chatbot – from their work computers for tasks such as retrieving data, answering business questions and writing reports. The assistant, tailored for JPMorgan's use, taps into ChatGPT and other AI tools, while ensuring data security for confidential bank and customer information. Roughly half of the workers use it regularly and report spending up to four hours less a week on basic office tasks, the company said. The bank's wealth advisers are also employing a more specialised AI assistant, which uses bank, market and customer data to provide wealthy clients with investment research and advice. The bank says it retrieves information and helps advisers make investment recommendations nearly twice as fast as they could before, increasing sales. Ms Lori Beer, the global chief information officer at JPMorgan, oversees a worldwide technology staff of 60,000. Has she shut down AI projects? Probably hundreds in total, she said. But many of the shelved prototypes, she said, developed concepts and code that were folded into other, continuing projects. 'We're absolutely shutting things down,' Ms Beer said. 'We're not afraid to shut things down. We don't think it's a bad thing. I think it's a smart thing.' Mr McAfee, the MIT research scientist, agreed. 'It's not surprising that early AI efforts are falling short,' said Mr McAfee, who is a founder of Workhelix, an AI consulting firm. 'Innovation is a process of failing fairly regularly.' NYTIMES
Straits Times
6 hours ago
- Straits Times
Trump drops Ukraine ceasefire demand after Putin summit
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox US President Donald Trump dropped his push for a ceasefire in Ukraine in favour of pursuing a full peace accord, following his summit with Russian leader Vladimir Putin. WASHINGTON - US President Donald Trump on Aug 16 dropped his push for a ceasefire in Ukraine in favour of pursuing a full peace accord – a major shift announced hours after his summit with Russian leader Vladimir Putin yielded no clear breakthrough. Prior to the high-stakes meeting in Alaska , securing an immediate cessation of hostilities had been a core demand of Mr Trump – who had threatened 'severe consequences' on Russia – and European leaders, including Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelensky, who will now visit Washington on Aug 18. The shift away from ceasefire would seem to favour Mr Putin, who has long argued for negotiations on a final peace deal – a strategy that Ukraine and its European allies have criticised as a way to buy time and press Russia's battlefield advances. Mr Trump spoke with Mr Zelensky and European leaders on his flight back to Washington, saying afterwards that 'it was determined by all that the best way to end the horrific war between Russia and Ukraine is to go directly to a peace agreement which would end the war'. Ceasefire agreements 'often times do not hold up', Mr Trump added on his Truth Social platform. This new development 'complicates the situation', Mr Zelensky said on Aug 16. If Moscow lacks 'the will to carry out a simple order to stop the strikes, it may take a lot of effort to get Russia to have the will to implement far greater – peaceful coexistence with its neighbours for decades,' he said on social media. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore I want to divorce my husband and be a single mother: More victims speaking up on emotional abuse Singapore Buying hope: Inside S'pore's love affair with the lottery Singapore She won big in Genting, but getting $240k winnings back to Singapore was dicey Opinion Confessions of a born-again Singaporean Business Manage your household finances like a business for clarity, say entrepreneurs Business Silence does not work when dealing with job loss blues Singapore Singapore congratulates Indonesia on 80th Independence Day 'Harsh reality' In the call, Mr Trump expressed support for a proposal by Mr Putin to take full control of two largely Russian-held Ukrainian regions in exchange for freezing the frontline in two others, an official briefed on the talks told AFP. Mr Putin 'de facto demands that Ukraine leave Donbas', an area consisting of the Donetsk and Lugansk regions in eastern Ukraine, the source said. In exchange, Russian forces would halt their offensive in the Black Sea port region of Kherson and Zaporizhzhia in southern Ukraine, where the main cities are still under Ukrainian control. Several months into its full-scale invasion of Ukraine, Russia in September 2022 claimed to have annexed all four Ukrainian regions even though its troops still do not fully control any of them. 'The Ukrainian president refused to leave Donbas,' the source said. Mr Trump notably also said the US was prepared to provide Ukraine security guarantees, an assurance German Chancellor Friedrich Merz hailed as 'significant progress'. But there was a scathing assessment of the summit outcome from the European Union's top diplomat Kaja Kallas, who accused Mr Putin of seeking to 'drag out negotiations' with no commitment to end the bloodshed. 'The harsh reality is that Russia has no intention of ending this war any time soon,' Ms Kallas said. Zelensky back in White House The main diplomatic focus now switches to Mr Zelensky's talks at the White House on Aug 18. An EU source told AFP that a number of European leaders had also been invited to attend. The Ukrainian president's last Oval Office visit in February ended in an extraordinary shouting match, with Mr Trump and US Vice-President J.D. Vance publicly berating Mr Zelensky for not showing enough gratitude for US aid. Mr Zelensky said on Aug 16 after a 'substantive' conversation with Mr Trump about the Alaska summit that he looked forward to his Washington visit and discussing 'all of the details regarding ending the killing and the war'. In an interview with broadcaster Fox News after his sit-down with Mr Putin, Mr Trump had suggested that the onus was now on Mr Zelensky to secure a peace deal as they work towards an eventual trilateral summit with the Russian leader. 'It's really up to President Zelensky to get it done,' Mr Trump said. European pressure The leaders of France, Britain and Germany are due to host a video call on Aug 17 for their so-called 'coalition of the willing' to discuss the way forward. In an earlier statement, they welcomed the plan for a Trump-Putin-Zelensky summit but added that they would maintain pressure on Russia in the absence of a ceasefire. Meanwhile, the conflict in Ukraine raged on, with Kyiv announcing on Aug 16 that Russia had launched 85 attack drones and a ballistic missile during the night. Back in Moscow, Mr Putin said his summit talks with Mr Trump had been 'timely' and 'very useful'. In his post-summit statement in Alaska, Mr Putin had warned Ukraine and European countries not to engage in any 'behind-the-scenes intrigues' that could disrupt what he called 'this emerging progress'. AFP
