Fact Check: Posts claim Green Bay Packers rejected ad for Musk's Tesla electric vehicles at Lambeau Field. Here are the facts
Claim:
The Green Bay Packers rejected an ad for tech billionaire Elon Musk's Tesla electric vehicles at Lambeau Field.
Rating:
A rumor that circulated online in May 2025 claimed the Green Bay Packers rejected an advertisement for Tesla CEO Elon Musk's electric-vehicle company at the team's historic Lambeau Field in Green Bay, Wisconsin.
Snopes received email from readers asking about the rumor. One reader inquired, "Is the claim that the Packers rejected a Tesla ad the truth?" Another reader asked, "Is there any validity to the claim that the Green Bay Packers rejected Elon Musk's Tesla ad at Lambeau Field?"
On May 11, a Facebook page named Green and Gold Legacy posted (archived), "HOLY S***: Green Bay Packers Reject Elon Musk's Tesla Ad at Lambeau Field! Packers Give Elon Musk a Very Good Reason for Rejection…"
(Green and Gold Legacy/Facebook)
That post and several others each included page manager comments that linked to articles hosted on generic-looking WordPress blogs. For instance, the Green and Gold Legacy page displayed a link to an article on the blog tintinhthanh.online. The story reported the Packers supposedly rejected the offer because they believed "associating with Tesla at Lambeau Field did not align with their core values or the expectations of their deeply loyal fanbase." The article also cited the Packers' alleged concerns about the safety of Tesla vehicles.
However, searches of Bing, DuckDuckGo and Google found no news media outlets reporting on this matter. Rather, the story of the Packers rejecting a Tesla ad — or being offered the chance to promote any such ad in the first place — was false.
A representative for the Packers communications team had not yet responded to a request for comment by publication time.
Much like the posts promoting the false claim about the Packers, posts from similar Facebook pages claimed other NFL teams also rejected Musk's Tesla ad, including the Buffalo Bills, Minnesota Vikings, San Francisco 49ers, Detroit Lions, Denver Broncos and Dallas Cowboys. Additionally, Facebook pages promoted the rumor about rejecting Musk's ad for leagues other than the NFL, including the NHL's Winnipeg Jets, MLB's Detroit Tigers and NCAA college football's Ohio State Buckeyes. In other words, the people promoting such rumors simply created posts for numerous teams to increase their chances of one of the posts taking off and virally spreading.
The posts promoting the rumor each included a link in the first comment leading to an article on an ad-filled blog. Scans of the tintinhthanh.online article with the artificial intelligence-detection websites Copyleaks, QuillBot and ZeroGPT concluded it was extremely likely that someone generated the text using one or more AI tools.
People in countries outside the U.S. target Americans with false rumors such as these with the goal of making money, specifically seeking to earn advertising revenue from the generic-looking WordPress blogs that host the articles featured in the Facebook comments. For example, the page transparency tab for the Green and Gold Legacy Facebook page lists its manager as residing in Vietnam, and the tintinhthanh.online website displays numerous ads in several different placements on its pages. The Facebook page managers possibly also seek to build up their social media follower count with the promotion of inauthentic content in order to one day sell the pages for additional revenue.
For further reading, a previous fact check examined another false rumor originating from the same kind of inauthentic sports-focused Facebook pages alleging the NBA, NCAA, NFL, NHL or other organizations fired referees for bribery or other misconduct.
"AI Detector." QuillBot, https://quillbot.com/ai-content-detector.
"AI Detector - Free AI Checker for ChatGPT, GPT-4, Gemini & More." Copyleaks, https://copyleaks.com/ai-content-detector.
"AI Detector - Trusted AI Checker for ChatGPT, GPT4 & Gemini." ZeroGPT, https://www.zerogpt.com/.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Stock Market Today: Indexes Show Slow Start; IPO Name Jumps After Surprise Earnings Release (Live Coverage)
The Dow Jones wavered on the stock market today amid more China trade talks. Tesla stock rallied while new issue eToro sold off.
Yahoo
40 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Here's How Much It Costs To Maintain a Tesla vs Other Electric Vehicles
Teslas and other EVs don't need oil changes, but that doesn't mean they're maintenance-free. And when service is needed, the costs still add up. Learn More: Try This: So, how do Tesla's long-term maintenance costs compare to those of other electric vehicles? Let's take a closer look at what you can expect. When it comes to maintenance, EVs and combustion engines have some similarities. According to CarEdge, they both require: Tire monitoring and replacement Battery replacement HVAC maintenance Brake maintenance Cabin air filter replacement But there are also key differences. EVs don't require oil changes, timing belts, radiator fluids or fuel filters. There are fewer moving parts, which means there's less of a chance of mechanical failure, and brakes wear more slowly due to regenerative braking. Trending Now: On the other hand, tires wear out more quickly, and battery or motor work will need to be done at the automaker's service center. EV maintenance can vary depending on the brand, model, how you drive and even where you live. Tesla notes that aggressive driving can wear down tires faster and put more strain on the brakes. If you live in an area with rough roads or colder weather, you might see more frequent maintenance needs. And if service centers are limited in your area, that can drive up both wait times and costs. According to Consumer Reports and CarEdge, Tesla has the lowest maintenance costs over a 10-year period compared to other major car brands, with an estimated average of $5,050. Here are CarEdge's estimated 10-year maintenance costs for different Tesla models: Tesla Model 3: $3,257 Tesla Model S: $3,974 Tesla Model Y: $3,994 Tesla Model X: $4,847 Tesla Cybertruck: $5,359 However, there are other brands and models with similar maintenance costs. According to CarEdge, the estimated 10-year maintenance cost for the Toyota Mirai is $3,222 — slightly lower than the Tesla Model 3. Here is the complete list of EVs, besides Tesla, and their estimated 10-year maintenance costs: Toyota Mirai: $3,222 Nissan LEAF: $3,236 Toyota bZ4X: $3,496 FIAT 500e: $3,549 Hyundai IONIQ 6: $3,930 Honda Prologue: $4,600 Nissan ARIYA: $4,671 Hyundai Kona Electric: $4,727 Volkswagen ID.4: $4,811 Subaru Solterra: $4,825 Kia EV6: $5,029 Hyundai IONIQ 5: $5,043 Chevrolet Equinox EV: $5,096 Volkswagen ID. Buzz: $5,102 Hyundai IONIQ 5 N: $5,265 Kia EV9: $5,285 Ford Mustang Mach-E: $5,331 Chevrolet Blazer EV: $5,403 GMC HUMMER EV SUV: $5,821 GMC HUMMER EV Pickup: $6,384 GMC Sierra EV: $6,253 Ford F-150 Lightning: $6,574 Chevrolet Silverado EV: $6,653 Ford E-Transit-350 Cargo Van: $6,876 RAM ProMaster 3500 EV: $11,649 More From GOBankingRates 7 Things You'll Be Happy You Downsized in Retirement This article originally appeared on Here's How Much It Costs To Maintain a Tesla vs Other Electric Vehicles
Forbes
42 minutes ago
- Forbes
What's Happening With Dogecoin?
CANADA - 2025/02/23: In this photo illustration, the Dogecoin logo is seen displayed on a smartphone ... More screen. (Photo Illustration by Thomas Fuller/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images) Dogecoin (DOGE) has recently experienced a significant price decline, plummeting over 50% from its January 2025 highs of $0.40 to current levels around $0.18. This sharp downturn underscores the inherent volatility of the cryptocurrency market and highlights Dogecoin's particular susceptibility to external, often non-fundamental, influences. Separately, see – What's Better – Circle Stock or Bitcoin? And, if you are looking for upside with less volatility than individual stocks or cryptocurrencies, the Trefis High Quality portfolio offers an alternative, having outperformed the S&P 500 and delivering returns that exceed 91% since its launch. Dogecoin's price movements are largely driven by a unique interplay of factors that distinguish it from many other cryptocurrencies. Historically, prominent figures, most notably Elon Musk, have exerted immense influence over Dogecoin's price. His tweets and public statements have frequently triggered substantial price surges, establishing a direct correlation between his pronouncements and market performance. This phenomenon extends to other celebrities and viral social media moments, demonstrating the power of community-driven hype in the Dogecoin ecosystem. Also, Dogecoin's low individual unit price and its origin as a "meme coin" have made it attractive to a broad base of casual investors and first-time cryptocurrency buyers. While this accessibility contributes to its widespread popularity, it also creates a potentially unstable investor base, as these investors may be more prone to speculative trading and less concerned with underlying technological advancements or long-term utility. Like all cryptocurrencies, Dogecoin is subject to the broader trends and sentiment of the crypto market. Bearish market conditions or significant downturns in major cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum can exert downward pressure on Dogecoin's price. But the current market tells a different story: Bitcoin is nearing its lifetime highs, whereas Dogecoin is nowhere close to its. A recent and significant development introducing substantial risk to Dogecoin's near-term prospects is the political fallout between Elon Musk and President Donald Trump. Musk's public criticism of Trump's fiscal policies has led to escalating tensions, with Trump reportedly threatening retaliation against Musk-affiliated companies. This political conflict is particularly concerning for Dogecoin due to Musk's established role as its primary celebrity endorser. His departure from Trump's advisory circle and the potential for policy repercussions against his business interests could significantly diminish his willingness or ability to publicly promote Dogecoin. The reliance on a single, influential individual for jumps in price creates a vulnerability, and any perceived withdrawal of that support can lead to a loss of investor confidence and further price depreciation. Dogecoin is currently trading around $0.18, reflecting a significant 50% decline from its January highs. This decline can be attributed to a combination of broader cryptocurrency market pressures and the specific, intensified risk stemming from its dependence on celebrity endorsement, particularly the unfolding Musk-Trump political conflict. The political rift represents a significant headwind that could further suppress Dogecoin's price performance and limit its recovery potential in the near future. Cryptos at large, including Dogecoin, remain a risky asset. As a long-term investment option, you can explore the Trefis High Quality (HQ) Portfolio, which is rooted in quality that seeks reliability, predictability, and compounding growth. With a collection of 30 stocks, it has a track record of comfortably outperforming the S&P 500 over the last four-year period. Why is that? As a group, HQ Portfolio stocks provided better returns with less risk versus the benchmark index; less of a roller-coaster ride, as evident in HQ Portfolio performance metrics.
