Exact date millions of phones will stop working as UK's biggest network provider turns off 3G access in huge shake-up
Some customers might be left with no data at all to access the internet or message friends on WhatsApp when they're away from home.
The network provider details
All of the UK's biggest mobile networks have been slowly turning off access to 3G and that means devices that can't connect to newer 4G and 5G signals could lose access to data and all-important services.
O2 alerted its 23 million customers of the changes earlier this year.
But now three more locations set to wave goodbye to the old network in just a few days.
O2 is the last of the big networks to make the change, as part of an objective agreed with the Government in 2021.
After more than 20 years, the company is stripping out 3G to make way for more faster 4G and 5G services.
The shake-up will also impact Tesco Mobile, GiffGaff and Sky Mobile, which rely on O2's network technology.
When it will happen
3
For most people, the demise of 3G shouldn't be a problem but for a small number of users it will result in a data blackout.
Because some older handsets aren't able to handle 4G or 5G.
They'll still be able to make calls and send texts, but without 3G they won't be able to get online when out and about.
However, they can technically still go online when using Wi-Fi.
O2's 3G Shutdown: Is Your Phone Ready?
The next areas where O2's 3G will be switched off on July 16 are:
Norwich
Telford
Guildford
It's already ended in the city of Durham.
Torquay will follow on August 4 and the whole of the UK should then lose access by the end of the year.
How to save on your mobile phone bill
NOT happy with your current mobile phone deal?
If you're outside the minimum term of your contract then you won't need to pay a cancellation fee - and you might be able to find a cheaper deal elsewhere.
But don't just switch contracts because the price is cheaper than what you're currently paying.
Take a look at how many minutes and texts, as well as how much data you're using, to find out which deal is best for you.
For example, if you're a heavy internet user it's worth finding a deal that accommodates this so you don't end up spending extra on bundles or add-ons each month.
Also note that if you're still in your contract period, you might be charged an exit fee.
Ready to look elsewhere? Pay-as-you-go deals are better for people who don't regularly use their phone, while monthly contracts usually work out cheaper for those who do.
It's worth using comparison websites, such as MoneySupermarket and uSwitch.com, to compare tariffs and phone prices.
Billmonitor also matches buyers to the best pay-monthly deal based on their previous three months of bills.
It only works if you're a customer of EE, O2, Three, Vodafone or Tesco Mobile and you'll need to log in with your online account details.
There's also MobilePhoneChecker, which has a bill monitoring feature that recommends a tariff based on your monthly usage.
If you're happy with your provider then it might be worth using your research to haggle a better deal.
Customer support
3
The closure is part of O2's longer-term plans to deliver faster and more reliable 4G and 5G connectivity for customers.
Vodafone, Three and EE have already completed their 3G switch-off with customers no longer able to access this slower signal.
Virgin Media O2 said: '3G services in those areas will be switched off in the coming weeks, and those who currently don't have a 4G or 5G device must upgrade to a compatible handset in order to retain access to mobile data services.
"While we know that the vast majority of our customers already have a 4G or 5G device and will not have to take any action, our priority is to provide support to those who need it," said Jeanie York, Virgin Media O2's Chief Technology Officer, said
steps.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
6 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Retirees pull billions from pension pots to escape Reeves's tax raid
Middle-class Britons risk a retirement 'disaster' after a record £5bn was pulled from pension pots in the wake of Rachel Reeves's inheritance tax raid. Official figures showed 672,000 retirees, representing roughly 5pc of all pensioners, pulled £5bn from their pots in the first three months of this year. HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) said the amount taken from retirement funds was 25pc higher than the same quarter a year ago, with 13pc more people withdrawing money. It means withdrawals during the period were the highest since George Osborne introduced pension freedoms a decade ago. It comes after the Chancellor announced in her maiden Budget last October that pension pots would no longer be exempt from inheritance tax from April 2027, making them subject to a levy of up to 40pc. Baroness Altmann, a former Tory pensions minister, urged the Chancellor to reverse the policy, warning that many more people would choose to withdraw money from their retirement pot as soon as possible, creating a 'pensioner poverty time bomb'. Sweeping changes mean retirees can now withdraw unlimited amounts from their pot as soon as they hit 55. The figures also revealed a 50pc increase in the number of octogenarians taking money out of their pensions over the course of last year with the amount withdrawn by those aged 81 and over up by 80pc to £360m. 'It's a disaster' The Chancellor hopes to raise £1.5bn from her decision to bring pensions within the scope of inheritance tax. Pension withdrawals from defined contribution pots above the 25pc tax-free lump sum incur an income tax charge of 20pc for basic rate taxpayers and a 40pc levy at the higher rate. The changes mean heirs will be subject to both inheritance and income tax at the marginal rate from 2027. 'It's a disaster,' Lady Altmann said, adding that she expected withdrawals to accelerate as more people became aware of the looming inheritance tax charge. She added that the 'draconian' way the policy was introduced was storing up a crisis for the future, and said she was pushing for changes in the Lords that would see beneficiaries charged a maximum 20pc 'pension recovery tax' instead on inherited pots. Lady Altmann said: 'This policy could end up being as damaging to workplace pensions as Gordon Brown's tax rate was for DB [defined benefit] pensions. 'I honestly think this is an existential threat to the long-term survival of our DC [defined contribution] pensions, because there's a clear incentive to take the money out as soon as you possibly can.' She added that this would leave many middle-class families in danger of not leaving themselves enough to fund their retirement. Lady Altmann said: 'This IHT [inheritance tax] imposition will ensure that more and more people – especially those who don't have massive amounts of money – will just say, 'Why on earth would I want to lose two thirds of my pension to the taxman? I'll just take it out as soon as I can.' 'Those who build up, say, between £200,000 and £300,000 over their working life are now in danger of having a real financial incentive not to keep money in their pensions for their later life and then end up in poverty.' 'Taking a big hit' Guy Opperman, another former pensions minister, said: 'Pensions are taking a big hit from the Government's actions. 'The consequences of this policy are clear: people will save less for their pension and will withdraw more. This will also affect the ability to pass money on. There is time for the Government to think again and they should. It is very short-term.' Jamie Jenkins, director of policy at pensions giant Royal London, which manages more than £170bn of client cash, said there was already clear evidence that people were changing their retirement planning ahead of the changes. He said: 'There is increased interest from advisers and their clients in how they can mitigate the potential inheritance tax bill.' Claire Trott, at wealth managers St James's Place, added: 'Every individual's circumstances are different, but IHT changes to pensions have certainly triggered more conversations about gifting strategies and whether it makes sense to start drawing from pensions earlier.' An HM Treasury spokesman said: 'We continue to incentivise pensions savings for their intended purpose – of funding retirement instead of them being openly used as a vehicle to transfer wealth – and more than 90pc of estates each year will continue to pay no inheritance tax after these and other changes.'
Telegraph
36 minutes ago
- Telegraph
The British public deserves to know what Miliband discussed with Beijing
When the Government signed a deal on net-zero co-operation with Canada, the text of the memorandum was published. So too were the texts of deals with Ireland, Norway, South Korea and Chile. Five months after the Energy Secretary Ed Miliband signed a similar memorandum with the Chinese government, however, we are still in the dark as to precisely what was agreed. Chinese media have asserted that the Energy Secretary agreed to co-operation on power grids, battery storage, offshore wind power and carbon capture, among other areas; it is understood that Chinese investment in the UK was not discussed by Mr Miliband. The role of the Chinese state in Britain's net-zero ambitions may well be an uncomfortable issue for the Labour Government to discuss. While the Defence Secretary is insisting that Britain is 'ready to fight' over the future of Taiwan and the Foreign Secretary is explicitly referring to China as a 'sophisticated and persistent threat' that requires hundreds of millions of pounds in additional funding for the intelligence services, Chancellor Rachel Reeves has been courting Chinese investment, and Mr Miliband's drive to meet his net-zero targets is heavily dependent on Chinese industry. Both the switch to electric vehicles and the decarbonisation of the energy grid will make heavy use of Chinese products. One study commissioned by the German defence ministry recently warned that this position at the heart of Western energy systems could result in Beijing enjoying the power to trigger remote shut-downs as 'an instrument of economic warfare'. Such concerns are less hypothetical than we might wish. Earlier this year, undocumented communication devices were located in Chinese-made power inverters exported to the United States, triggering fears that Beijing could use compromised equipment to 'physically destroy the grid'. This would be fully in line with the current approach of the People's Liberation Army to warfare as a clash between systems, and the extensive Volt Typhoon operation carried out by Chinese state-sponsored actors. Even given the understandable desire to avoid a sudden break with China, the delicacy of the balance between trade and reliance is such that the British public deserves to know what Mr Miliband has discussed with Beijing.
The Sun
2 hours ago
- The Sun
Shark IZ202UKT review: a sleek, chic dust-buster
THE cordless vacuum revolution is in full swing, and Shark's IZ202UKT has swaggered onto the scene promising to banish dust bunnies and pet hair with ease and style. I've put the Shark IZ202UKT to the test to see if it's all flash and no substance, or if it's the sleek domestic godsend we've been praying for. Shark IZ202UKT Cordless Vacuum Cleaner, £279.99 from Amazon BUY HERE Pros: 40-minute battery life Good-sized dustbin (0.7L) Quiet on hard floors Sleek and premium design Lights that highlight missed dirt Powerful boost trigger Compact to store Easy to use Anti-hair wrap technology Cons Heavier than other models Can struggle in tight corners with the main attachment Rating: 8.5/10 How I tested Shark IZ202UKT Cordless Vacuum Cleaner, £279.99 from Amazon I tested the Shark cordless vacuum out for two months on long- and short-pile carpets and three types of hard floors: laminate, vinyl and engineered wood. During the testing period, I used each of the attachments and tested the battery by seeing how long it took to run down from a full charge using the normal power (39 minutes) and boost functions (seven and a half minutes). I used it as my only vacuum during this period to see how well it fares in everyday life, including on stairs and in my car. I took into consideration the design, ease of use and its innovative functions like the flexology, anti-hair wrap technology and LED headlights. Shark IZ202UKT review: Quickfire Q&A How much is the Shark IZ202UKT? The Shark IZ202UKT cordless vacuum cleaner's RRP is £350. However, you can often find it for less. Who's it best for? This is a great option for those with pets, anyone with a mixture of hard and soft flooring and anyone looking for a powerful cordless vacuum with a long battery life. What I loved: The Shark has a large dustbin and 40-minute battery life, giving me plenty of time to thoroughly vacuum my whole house. I also love its sleek design, headlight that illuminates missed dirt, how easy it is to use and how quiet it is on hard floor mode. What I didn't: It's heavier than my former vacuum (Dyson V8 Animal), and I found that my arm ached after vacuuming for a while. I also noticed that the main attachment didn't get as tightly into corners as the Dyson's, and I had to switch to the crevice tool. Shark IZ202UKT review: The Nitty Gritty First impressions Shark IZ202UKT Cordless Vacuum Cleaner, £279.99 from Amazon Pulling the Shark IZ202UKT out of its box, I could immediately tell it was a solid, well-constructed bit of kit. It came with four attachments (main anti-hair wrap, upholstery, pet and crevice tools), and assembling the vacuum was a breeze, a testament to Shark's genuinely logical design. Everything clicked satisfyingly into place, no head-scratching required. After charging the vacuum, it took seconds to assemble it before I was ready to tackle the dust bunnies that had taken up residence on my floors. Does it deliver? Shark IZ202UKT Cordless Vacuum Cleaner, £279.99 from Amazon One of the first things I noticed about the Shark is how quiet it is in hard floor mode. It glides effortlessly across laminate, vinyl and wood, sucking up everything from fine dust to larger debris without a fuss. I could definitely hear and feel the difference in the power when I switched to carpet mode, and then hear it level up again when I squeezed the trigger for max power. The max power setting is really effective at sucking up those stubborn bits of fluff and pet hair ingrained in the carpet. Battery life The Achilles' heel of many cordless vacuums is battery life. I've had vacuums in the past that would conk out halfway through my vacuuming session, leaving me with a half-clean house. This is not an issue I experienced with the Shark IZ202UKT. I used it in multiple rooms, switching between hard floor and carpet modes, and I managed to vacuum the entire house with battery still left over. Shark claims up to 40 minutes of run time, and during my tests, it consistently delivered between 37-40 minutes, on standard power settings. When I tested it using Max power only, it lasted seven and a half minutes, which I think is relatively impressive. If used on the standard settings with a few bursts of max power when needed, I'm optimistic most people will be able to tackle a substantial portion of their home, if not the whole thing, without needing to pause for a recharge. If you have a larger home, you could opt to purchase a spare battery to swap out when needed. Dustbin capacity, Flexology wand and LED lights Another unsung hero of the IZ202UKT is its nice big bin — I was able to vacuum most of the house before needing to empty it. This might sound like a small thing, but anyone whose vacuum forces them to constantly empty a tiny dustbin will appreciate the sheer convenience of this. The bin is also quick, easy and mess-free to empty. Shark has designed something called the Flexology wand, which is a very handy feature for multiple reasons. With a simple press of a button, the wand bends in half, making it super easy to vacuum under furniture, beds, and sofas without having to contort yourself or move heavy items. It's also ideal for compact storage as it more than halves the height of the vacuum, making it easy to tuck into cupboards. Another feature I really liked, and one you likely won't realise you need until you have it, is the integrated LED lights. They illuminate dust, crumbs, and pet hair that you would otherwise completely miss, especially under furniture, in dimly lit corners, or even just in a room with poor natural light. This is also a feature my colleague Aaron raved about in his Dyson V15 Detect review. Downsides In terms of cons, there are two things I noticed which are worth bearing in mind. The cordless vacuum cleaner weighs 5.16kg, which may not sound like a lot, but when you're vacuuming for 40 minutes straight, you'll likely feel your arm start to ache. I was especially aware of the added weight, as my former vacuum (Dyson V8 Animal) weighs less than half the Shark, at 2.54kg. The other downside is its agility. The main attachment is quite large, and I noticed that it struggles to get right into the corners, occasionally leaving bits of fluff behind. Again, I found this especially noticeable compared to the Dyson Animal V8 I was using previously, which is a lot slimmer and more nimble. It was easily solved by switching to the crevice tool, but it caused a slight inconvenience. How much is the Shark IZ202UKT vacuum cleaner? The Shark IZ202UKT Anti Hair Wrap Cordless Stick Vacuum Cleaner retails in the UK for £350; however, it's often on sale and has been spotted for as low as £189. It can currently be found on sale for £189 at Go Electrical, or you can buy a refurbished model for £169 on Shark's eBay store. Where to buy the Shark IZ202UKT You can find the Shark IZ202UKT at a variety of retailers across the UK, both online and in physical stores, including: Alternatives There are a few strong contenders in the cordless stick vacuum market that offer similar features to the Shark model. Dyson V8 Absolute: Although an older model, the Dyson V8 Absolute is often available at a more affordable price point than newer Dysons, and it still offers excellent suction and the premium Dyson build quality. It's lighter than the Shark IZ202UKT, which might appeal if arm ache is a concern. However, it lacks the Flexology wand and automatic hair detangling of the Shark. It's currently priced around £250, £100 less than the RRP of the Shark. Vax Blade 4 Classic Plus Cordless Vacuum Cleaner: This model is frequently praised for being an affordable all-rounder. It offers impressive pick-up capabilities on various floor types and comes with a good range of tools, making it a solid choice for everyday cleaning. You can often find it for between £140 and £230. Shark PowerPro Pet Cordless Stick Vacuum: If you're looking for an alternative within the Shark family, then the PowerPro Pet is a great option. It has a lot of the same features with a slightly longer run time than the IZ202UKT (50 mins), but is slightly heavier at 5.68kg (vs 5.13kg). It can be found for around the same price point (£190-280), too. Dyson V12 Detect: For a bit more money, you could get the Dyson V12 Detect, which has 60 minutes of battery life, hair detangling, and a laser which illuminates invisible dust. It's a lot lighter than the Shark but does have a smaller bin. The RRP is £499.99, but it's currently on sale for £380. Read our Dyson V15 Detect review here.
