Oil prices hold steady on expected minimal sanctions impact
Brent crude futures dropped 12 cents, or 0.2 per cent, to $69.16 a barrel by 0800 GMT after settling 0.35 per cent down on Friday. U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude was flat at $67.34 after a 0.3 per cent decline in the previous session.
The European Union on Friday approved the 18th package of sanctions against Russia over the war in Ukraine, which also targeted India's Nayara Energy, an exporter of oil products refined from Russian crude.
"The latest round of EU sanctions aren't necessarily going to change the oil balance. That's why the market is not reacting much," said Harry Tchiliguirian at Onyx Capital Group. "Russians have been very good at circumventing these kinds of sanctions."
Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said on Friday that Russia had built up a certain immunity to Western sanctions.
The EU sanctions followed U.S. President Donald Trump's threats last week to impose sanctions on buyers of Russian exports unless Russia agrees to a peace deal within 50 days.
ING analysts said the part of the package likely to have an impact is the EU import ban on refined oil products processed from Russian oil in third countries, though it said it could prove difficult to monitor and enforce.
Iran, another sanctioned oil producer, is due to hold nuclear talks with Britain, France and Germany in Istanbul on Friday, an Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson said on Monday. That follows warnings by the three European countries that a failure to resume negotiations would lead to international sanctions being reimposed on Iran.
In the U.S., the number of operating oil rigs fell by two to 422 last week, the lowest total since September 2021, Baker Hughes said on Friday.
U.S. tariffs on European Union imports are set to kick in on August 1, though U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said on Sunday that he was confident the United States could secure a trade deal with the bloc.
"Tariff concerns will continue to weigh in the lead up to the August 1 deadline, while some support may come from oil inventory data if it shows tight supply," said IG market analyst Tony Sycamore.
"It feels very much like a $64-$70 range in play for the week ahead."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
8 minutes ago
- Business Times
Prosus set to win EU nod for US$4.74 billion Just Eat deal: sources
[BRUSSELS] Dutch technology investor Prosus is set to win EU antitrust approval for its 4.1 billion euros (S$6.1 billion) bid for Just Eat Takeaway, after agreeing to sell down its stake in Delivery Hero, sources with direct knowledge of the matter said. Amsterdam-headquartered Prosus, which is majority owned by South Africa's Naspers, announced the deal in February, banking on its artificial intelligence capability to boost Just Eat Takeaway, Europe's biggest meal delivery company. Prosus last month offered to incrementally sell down its 27.4 per cent stake in Delivery Hero and to give up its board seat to address EU competition concerns, other sources familiar with the matter had told Reuters. Delivery Hero and Just Eat Takeaway compete with each other in Austria, Bulgaria, Italy, Poland and Spain. The European Commission, which is now seeking market feedback to Prosus' offer and will decide on the deal by Aug 11, declined to comment. Prosus also declined to comment. The deal would make Prosus the world's fourth-largest food delivery company after Meituan, DoorDash and Uber, according to ING analysts. Delivery Hero and its Spanish unit Glovo were fined 329 million euros by the EU antitrust watchdog in June for taking part in a cartel which included an agreement to divide up markets among themselves and not to poach each other's employees. REUTERS
CNA
a day ago
- CNA
Commentary: How the US weaponised Pakistan against India
NEW DELHI: Many in New Delhi welcomed President Donald Trump's return to power, expecting him to take the Indo-US relationship to new heights. They must wonder where it all went wrong, given that Trump launched an unprecedented broadside against India this week – threatening tariffs of 25 per cent and warning that a surcharge would be added unless India stops buying Russian oil and weapons. He even expressed dissatisfaction with the nation's participation in the 'anti-US' BRICS grouping. Normally, Prime Minister Narendra Modi might just overlook a few social media posts. It may be humiliating to wind up with higher tariff rates than India's peers after wooing Trump, but that can be shrugged off as well. Yet the president didn't stop at trade. He twisted the knife by announcing a tariff deal with Pakistan on the very same day – and added that US companies would help India's troubled neighbour extract oil from recently discovered reserves, and that 'maybe they'll be selling oil to India one day.' I'm not sure Trump knows what he's playing with. Yes, the government was looking forward to a more transactional era: For New Delhi, almost everything is negotiable. But not its relationship with Pakistan. Citizens already resented Trump claiming credit for a ceasefire between the nuclear-armed nations earlier this year. Nothing is more likely to cause any Indian leader to dig in his heels and stop talking about economic ties than a mention of Pakistan. INDIA HAS LITTLE LEVERAGE Policymakers are grimly absorbing some unpalatable truths. Has New Delhi overestimated its geopolitical importance? The tariff threat was bad enough: 25 per cent is higher than the 19 per cent agreed with the Philippines and Indonesia, and much higher than the 15 per cent offered to US allies like the European Union, Korea and Japan. For some reason, India expected it was so indispensable to the US that it would receive a better deal than long-term allies – even one that preserved the barriers it has erected around industry and agriculture. Instead, unless it gives away far more than planned, it might wind up as one of the few countries that emerged from Trump's tariff 'pause' with a higher, not lower rate than was originally threatened. New Delhi has learned, too late, that it has very little actual leverage in Washington. The Chinese may be granted another extension because they have things that they can threaten the US economy with. The Europeans and East Asians can promise to buy American-made weaponry or invest in the US. India can neither threaten nor bribe. For years, it has nevertheless managed to punch above its actual economic weight by tacitly promising to be part of Washington-led attempts to contain a rising China. Tacitly, not openly, mind – India doesn't believe that closeness to the US precludes it from participating in China-dominated groupings or supporting Beijing's clients in Moscow. But Trump's ire demonstrates that this balancing act has may finally have run its course. Russia might not be his top priority, but its second-largest client's refusal to fall in line will still irritate him. He received fulsome praise from Pakistan's leaders after he announced a ceasefire; the Indians pointedly ignored him. This White House wants homage, not defiance. There was certainly a cantankerous edge to his remark that, for all he cared, India and Russia could 'take their dead economies down together'. INDIA'S US POLICY IS IN SHAMBLES Had he merely demanded more distance between Delhi and Moscow – and done so, if possible, without insulting India's economic prospects – leaders might well have quietly given in. The discount on Russian oil is only between US$6 and US$10 a barrel, and according to research from Standard Chartered, the impact on inflation of switching to US sources would be negligible. Sure, the government would have to somehow convince its nationalist base that the switch would be in the country's interest after spending two years claiming the opposite. But trust in the prime minister is high enough for him to pull that off. What voters won't accept, however, is any dilution of the government's hard line on Pakistan. Capitulation to Trump after he has signalled he prefers their neighbours would be a tough sell, even for Modi. In less than 24 hours, New Delhi's policy for the Trump era, and its carefully cultivated strategic ambiguity amid US-China tension, were both left in shambles. I expect Modi will still be able to push through some sort of deal, if with more concessions and domestic political damage than he would like. But Trump is clearly asking himself exactly what India brings to the table as a partner. Equally, citizens will wonder if the US is once again making the mistake – as it has so often before – of trusting Pakistan's establishment while ignoring India. New Delhi's confidence that it could navigate the Trump era has been well and truly shattered; it will take a long time for the relationship to recover from this tumultuous week.
CNA
a day ago
- CNA
Mistral in talks with VC firms, MGX to raise funds at $10 billion valuation, FT reports
French artificial intelligence startup Mistral is in talks with investors, venture capital firms and Abu Dhabi's MGX to raise $1 billion at a valuation of $10 billion, the Financial Times reported on Friday, citing people familiar with the matter. The company launched in June Europe's first AI reasoning model, which uses logical thinking to create a response, as it tries to keep pace with American and Chinese rivals at the forefront of AI development. The funding would accelerate the commercial rollout of Mistral's Le Chat chatbot and support continued development of its large language models, the report said. MGX and Mistral did not immediately respond to Reuters requests for comment. The startup raised 600 million euros in a Series B funding round that valued the company at 5.8 billion euros last year. Industry observers consider Mistral as Europe's best-positioned AI company to rival Silicon Valley leaders, though the French firm has yet to achieve comparable market traction or revenue scale.
