
How to deal with debt after a loved one's death
After losing a loved one, the last thing on anyone's mind is financial admin.
Yet for those who are in the midst of grief, the financial consequences of debt can be both immediate and emotionally charged.
From understanding your liabilities to navigating a will and knowing when not to pay, two financial experts break down how to deal with debt after losing a loved one.
First steps: Pause, notify and organise
Handling financial matters after a loved one's death can feel both overwhelming and daunting.
'In England and Wales, obtaining grant of probate or letters of administration should be the priority, as banks and lenders will normally only take instruction from an executor or administrator,' explains head of private clients at St. James's Place, Iain McLeod.
Securing this legal documentation allows the estate to be managed properly – and prevents delays when dealing with financial institutions.
External relations manager at Money Wellness Daniel Woodhouse echoes the need for clarity and swift communication. 'The first thing we'd suggest is letting any creditors know that the person has passed away,' he says, 'they'll usually pause the account while things are sorted, which gives you some breathing space.'
He advises obtaining several official copies of the death certificate early on, as creditors may request one.
Once notifications have been made, it's time to assess the full scope of the deceased's financial obligations. 'Start pulling together any paperwork that shows what debts or accounts were in their name,' says Woodhouse.
Accessing a credit report is also helpful for building a complete picture of what's owed.
Who pays: The state or the family?
Who owes what when it comes to a deceased person's debt is possibly the most common question.
'Debts are not inherited in the UK,' says McLeod. 'Family members can only be responsible for a deceased person's debts if it was a joint loan or agreement, or provided a loan guarantee, for example.'
However, the rules are strict. 'If someone dies, their debt becomes a liability of their estate,' he explains.
'The Personal Representative of the estate will use the assets of the estate to help settle the debt. If the estate does not have sufficient funds, it becomes an insolvent estate. In that situation, there is a prescribed order for how the debts are to be repaid.'
What happens to joint debts?
Responsibilities are different for shared debts however.
'If you had a joint loan or shared overdraft with the person who passed away, you'll usually become responsible for the remaining balance,' says Woodhouse.
'It's really important to speak to the lender and let them know what's happened. Most will be understanding and may be able to offer more manageable repayment options.'
Credit card debt, however, is more nuanced. 'With credit cards, these are only ever in one name – however, the credit provider may allow a second card for a partner or spouse to use,' says McLeod.
'The debt is the responsibility of the estate of the deceased primary cardholder. Additional card holders may consider applying for a new credit card in their own name if eligible.'
But being an additional cardholder on someone's credit card isn't the same as a joint debt. 'You wouldn't normally be liable for the balance in that case,' says Woodhouse.
Can inheritance be claimed by creditors?
The short answer is yes, but only indirectly.
'Creditors can't go after beneficiaries directly,' says Woodhouse. 'But debts must be paid from the estate before any inheritance is passed on.
'If money is handed out too soon, there's a risk it could be claimed back to pay off outstanding debts. That's why it's so important to follow the right process.'
McLeod underscores the legal implications: 'Great care should be taken in the administration of an estate which may be insolvent, and seeking legal guidance where appropriate is advised.
'Executors are strongly advised to receive written confirmation that any debts are repaid or written off before any distributions can be made to beneficiaries.'
If assets have been distributed without settling all the estate's debts, McLeod warns that the executor could be personally liable.
Mistakes to avoid
There are common mistakes that are important to avoid when it comes to managing posthumous debt.
' One of the most common mistakes is paying debts out of your own pocket straight away, thinking you have to – when in many cases, you don't,' says Woodhouse.
'Another is putting it off completely because it all feels too overwhelming. The best thing you can do is take it one step at a time, keep a record of who you've spoken to, and get the right support early on. You don't have to go through it alone.'
If you're struggling with debt after the loss of a loved one, there are support systems available.
' Charities like Cruse or Marie Curie can provide emotional support when you're grieving,' says Woodhouse.
'It's also worth checking if you're eligible for the Bereavement Support Payment, especially if you were the partner of the person who died. It's a tax-free payment that could make a real difference. You can find more information on GOV.UK.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
31 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Family faces shock £1,400 demand for meter switch-off or face having no heating
An energy firm tried to charge a Scots family £1,400 to change their meter before it is switched off this month, it has emerged. MSPs and consumer groups last night issued a warning to families that their energy supplier must pay the cost of replacing Radio Teleswitching Systems (RTS) meters. It follows revelations that a supplier tried to charge one Orkney household £1,400 to replace their meter, including £200 for a hotel booking, £382 for a ferry and £820 for a day's work. The supplier – which has not been named – only backtracked from forcing the family to pay when challenged by Liam McArthur, Liberal Democrat MSP for Orkney. It triggered a warning that customers should never pay for work which needs to take place before the RTS system is shut down at the end of this month. As of last month, 124,864 of the RTS meters still needed to be replaced in Scotland. Mr McArthur, said: 'I am deeply concerned to hear reports of some energy suppliers attempting to charge constituents to have their RTS meters replaced with smart meters. 'It is the obligation of suppliers to ensure customers have a working meter, and that there are no upfront costs for customers, including businesses, who pay for their meters through billing. 'Suppliers should also not be telling customers in places such as Orkney that they are required to cover costs related to accommodation or travel for engineers. This is simply not the case.' Mr McArthur said he contacted the supplier and it dropped the demand for payment. The RTS system – a feature of older electricity meters linked to heating and hot water usage – uses a longwave radio frequency to switch between peak and off-peak rates. But the technology is becoming obsolete and energy firms have a deadline to change customers' meters by June 30. It has led to concerns that some households could lose their heating and hot water if their meter is not replaced in time. Andrew Bartlett, chief executive of Advice Direct Scotland, which runs said: 'Suppliers should install smart meters at no cost. If that is not possible, they still have a duty to replace RTS meters with a suitable alternative, and customers should not be charged.' Advice Direct Scotland supported one customer who faced a £700 kitchen repair bill following a meter replacement, and another quoted £1,290 to move a fuse by an inch for a smart meter. Energy UK, which represents most suppliers but not the one responsible for imposing the £1,400 charge in Orkney, said: 'Customers should not expect to pay for an RTS meter replacement. We also urge customers to look out for scammers pretending to be suppliers.' A spokesman for Ofgem said: 'We will look into this and hold to account any supplier that breaches our rules.'


Telegraph
38 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Miliband's latest misstep will pile unnecessary costs upon developers
Ed Miliband's attempt to lead this country was resoundingly rejected at the ballot box in 2015. Given his influence within the present Government, he may have had the last laugh. The Energy Secretary appears to have emerged triumphant in a clash with embattled Chancellor Rachel Reeves, securing the future of a £13 billion funding allocation for insulating properties across Britain, and very possibly triggering further tax rises this autumn. Having secured access to the fruits of your wallet, Mr Miliband has now turned his sights to redefining British architecture. Under plans revealed today, developers will be forced to install solar panels in the 'vast majority' of new houses, and gas boilers will effectively be banned in newbuilds in favour of heat pumps. The Energy Secretary claims that the moves could save households £500 a year on their energy bills, but appears to have neglected to consider the likely effect on development costs. There are few objections to people choosing to install solar panels, or choosing to buy a house with a heat pump. That builders confronted with market demand are not already supplying them suggests, however, that any premium people are willing to pay for these features will not cover the costs of installing them. The last thing Britain's capacity constrained housing market needs is another effort to pile unnecessary costs upon developers. Measures to ease building are drastically needed. Regrettably, Mr Miliband seems to think otherwise.


Daily Mail
39 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
How far would you go to avoid your personal tax raid? This is Money Podcast
Tax is an increasingly taxing subject for many people who feel hard done by as Britain's complicated system catches them out. From quirks of the system, such as the 60 per cent tax trap and child benefit removal, to the childcare cliff edge, frozen thresholds, and pensions soon to be dragged into inheritance tax, there's a whole host of things to drive us mad. And, it's getting worse. The Tories and now Labour have both chosen to ratchet up the things that trip people up to raise money, rather than sort out a tax system that most economists say is a total mess. So how far would you go to avoid your personal tax raid? And is tax changing people's behaviour? Lee highlights how. On this podcast, Georgie Frost, Lee Boyce and Simon Lambert dive into how the British tax tail is wagging the dog. Plus, as the Switch 2 arrives and the video game industry goes from strength to strength, should you invest in video game firms? How much do you need for a comfortable retirement – and what does that get you? And finally, you put up an 8 foot fence for privacy, your neighbour has gone from non-plussed to threatening to call the council over a planning breach, what do you do? The team have some answers. And for all the listeners that Simon directed to the gem that is the comments section of the story, here's the link. Listen to the This is Money podcast We publish the podcast every Friday on This is Money and at Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Amazon Music and more. Search for it at your favourite podcast platform. To download Apple Podcasts go to the App store. On Android devices, go to the Google Play store to download the podcast app of your choice. You can press play to listen to this week's full episode on the player above, and wherever you get your podcasts please subscribe and review us if you like the podcast. You can also listen to the latest episode, find the archive and join in the debate in reader comments on the This is Money podcast page.