Rarely seen ‘supergiant' deep-sea cousin of woodlice is actually quite common, study finds
The deep-sea creature, Alicella gigantea, which can grow up to 34cm long, is the largest-known species of the amphipods.
Amphipod is among the most diverse group of crustaceans, with over 10,000 extant species, including woodlice, shrimps, and lobsters. Amphipods are known to inhabit all aquatic environments worldwide.
Alicella gigantea, commonly known as the 'supergiant amphipod', has long attracted attention due to its gigantism. It was first filmed in the 1970s at a depth of over 5,300m in the North Pacific but no records of the species were made for nearly two decades after, signifying low population densities.
Infrequent sightings only served to buttress the belief that the giant crustacean was rare.
There have been only seven studies so far detailing the DNA sequence data of the species.
The latest study, published in the journal Royal Society Open Science, analyses nearly 200 records of Alicella gigantea from 75 locations on the seabed, spanning the Pacific, Atlantic and Indian Oceans.
Researchers from the University of Western Australia now suggest the species may well be inhabiting over half the world's deep oceans.
The study notes the crustacean thrives at extreme depths in 59 per cent of the world's oceans, indicating that it is far more widespread than previously thought.
The research examines 195 records of the supergiant species, including genetic data from mitochondrial and nuclear DNA, from 75 locations worldwide to map its distribution and evolutionary history.
It concludes that while the creature is rarely collected, it is 'remarkably widespread'.
'There is an ever-growing body of evidence to show that A gigantea should be considered far from rare,' the research says.
Although the crustacean's population density may be relatively low compared to other deep-sea amphipods, it inhabits an extraordinarily large geographical range, researchers say.
'Our results show that this species may occupy around 59 per cent of the world's oceans, indicating that the infrequently collected supergiant isn't 'rare' but instead represents a widely distributed deep-sea amphipod with an exceptional global range,' they write.
The findings also point to insufficient research of creatures inhabiting the ocean at depths greater than 5,000m. This is in line with another recent study finding that humans have observed less than 0.001 per cent of the deep seafloor.
'We need a much better understanding of the deep ocean's ecosystems and processes to make informed decisions about resource management and conservation,' study lead author and marine explorer Katy Croff Bell says.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
7 hours ago
- BBC News
'Communities' of strange, extreme life seen for first time in deep ocean
Beds of clams, mats of bacteria that look like ice and fields of tube worms - these are just some examples of the strange, extreme life that an expedition to the deepest parts of the ocean has observed, filmed and in a human-occupied submersible to ocean trenches in the northwest Pacific Ocean, a Chinese-led research team captured pictures of life at depths of more than 9km (5.6miles).The deepest marine life filmed before this expedition was at 8,336m - a snailfish that was filmed swimming in a deep ocean trench off the coast of Japan in new observations are published in the journal Nature. Although it was accepted among marine scientists that there would be life at these depths, scientists on this mission say the abundance of animals they saw from the windows of their submersible was "amazing".The scientific expedition covered more than 2,500km - exploring trenches at depths ranging from 5,800 to 9, travelled in a submersible vehicle called Fendouzhe, which can operate at depths of more than 10km for several hours at a team, led by researchers from the Chinese Academy of Sciences' Institute of Deep Sea Science and Engineering, discovered what they describe as "thriving communities" of creatures. "It's exciting - especially for a deep sea scientist - to go to a place that human beings have not explored," one of the lead researchers, Dr Xiaotong Peng, told BBC News. "It's a great opportunity to discover new things. And what we saw was quite amazing."Scientists photographed and filmed what looked like fields of marine life - dominated by various different types of tube worm and mollusc. These animals live in the pitch dark and under vast no sunlight, life at these depths is fuelled by chemicals that seep out of the ocean floor. Hydrogen sulfide and methane seep out of faults - or cracks - in the Earth's scientists say they have recorded species never seen before. In future studies, they hope to work out how the bodies of these so called "chemosynthetic" or chemical-fuelled creatures convert these chemicals into energy."They must [also] have a trick to adapt to life in super high pressure," added Dr Megran Du, also from China's Institute of Deep Sea Science and Engineering. "That's another question we need to answer." The findings challenge "long-standing assumptions" about life's potential at such extreme depths and pressures. They also suggest that these communities of animals, rather than extreme rarities, are actually Andrew Sweetman, a senior scientist from the Scottish Association for marine science told BBC News that the discovery showed that whole "ecosystems driven by methane may exist in the deepest parts of the ocean".And how did it feel, for a scientist, to descend to such extreme, pitch-black depths?Dr Du told BBC News: "Some people might find it frightening, but I always encourage my students - look through the window at the bottom of the sea," she said. "You will be inspired."
BBC News
10 hours ago
- BBC News
Why did Russian mega earthquake not cause more tsunami damage?
Another important element is the development of early warning systems. Due to the high occurrence of earthquakes in the Pacific region, many countries have tsunami centres. They send out warnings via public announcements for populations to evacuate. No such system was in place when the 2004 Boxing Day tsunami occurred - leaving many people without time to evacuate. More than 230,000 people died across 14 countries in the Indian Ocean. Early warning systems are important because of the limited ability of scientists to predict when an earthquake will occur. The US Geological Survey recorded an earthquake measuring 7.4 in the same region ten days before. This may have been a foreshock - an early release of energy - but it is not a predictor of exact timing of a future earthquake, explained Prof McNeill. "Although we can use how fast the plates are moving, GPS to measure current movements and when previous earthquakes occurred, we can only use this information to make forecasts of probability of an earthquake," she said. The Geophysical Survey of the Russian Academy of Sciences (GS RAS) will continue to monitor the region as it anticipates aftershocks could continue for the next month.
Daily Mail
13 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Scientists reveal exactly how many microplastic particles we inhale in our homes and cars every day – it's 100 times MORE than previous estimates
From the depths of The Mariana Trench to the summit of Everest, microplastics can be found almost everywhere on Earth. Now, a study has revealed just how many toxic particles are lurking in our homes and cars. Scientists from the University of Toulouse collected air samples from their own homes as well as their cars in realistic driving conditions. Their analysis revealed that adults inhale about 68,000 microplastics measuring 10 micrometers across or less every day – 100 times more than previous estimates suggested. Worryingly, these particles are small enough to penetrate our lungs, according to the experts. 'Everywhere we look, we find microplastics, even in the air we breathe inside our homes and cars,' the team said. 'The biggest concern is how small these particles are – completely invisible to the naked eye. We inhale thousands of them every day without even realizing it. 'Deep inside our lungs, microplastics release toxic additives that reach our blood and cause multiple diseases.' Previous studies have detected microplastics suspended in the air across a wide range of outdoor and indoor environments. However, most research has focused on particles ranging in size from 20 to 200 micrometers. In their new study, the team decided to focus on smaller particles ranging in size from one to 10 micrometers – which are more likely to penetrate the lungs. The researchers collected air samples from their own apartments and cars, before using a technique called Raman spectroscopy to measure the concentrations of microplastics. Their analysis revealed that the average concentration of microplastics in a home is 528 particles per cubic metre, while in cars it is 2,238 particles per cubic metre. Almost all (94 per cent) of the particles were smaller than 10 micrometres. By combining these results with previously published data on exposure to indoor microplastics, the researchers estimate that the average adult inhales about 3,200 microplastic particles ranging in size from 10 to 300 micrometres every day. We also breathe in an estimated 68,000 particles of one to 10 micrometres – 10 times more than we previously thought. 'We found that over 90% of the microplastic particles in indoor air across both homes and cars were smaller than 10 µm, small enough to be inhaled deep into the lungs,' the researchers said. 'This was also the first study to measure microplastics in the car cabin environment, and overall, we detected indoor concentrations up to 100 times higher than previous extrapolated estimates, revealing indoor air as a major and previously underestimated exposure route of fine particulate microplastic inhalation.' Currently, research investigating how microplastics affect human health is in its infancy, but there is a growing body of evidence suggesting they could be harmful. Since plastics contain chemicals known to be toxic or carcinogenic, scientists are concerned that a buildup of microplastics could damage tissues in our bodies. In rodent studies, exposure to high levels of microplastics has been found to damage organs, including the intestines, lungs, liver, and reproductive system. In humans, early studies have suggested a potential link between microplastic exposure and conditions such as cardiovascular disease and bowel cancer. HOW MUCH PLASTIC POLLUTION DO WE BREATHE IN PER DAY? Plastic pollution has become so widespread that we may be inhaling up to 130 tiny pieces a day, research found. Fibres from fleece and polyester clothing and particles from urban dust and car tyres are the biggest sources of so-called microplastics in the air. The tiny specks are lighter than air and could cause asthma, heart disease and auto-immune conditions, the research, published in December 2017, found. The study, a review of a number of recent plastics studies, revealed washing a single polyester garment can produce 1,900 plastic fibres. This plastic pollution is on the rise as more and more synthetic clothing is produced. While only people working with plastic fibres are known to develop respiratory problems, experts say the pollution is so widespread that it may now pose a risk to everyone's health. The study's author, Dr Joana Correia Prata, of Fernando Pessoa University in Portugal, said: 'The evidence suggests that an individual's lungs could be exposed to between 26 and 130 airborne microplastics a day, which would pose a risk for human health, especially in susceptible individuals, including children.
