SEND assessment delay 'prolonged injustice' for mum
The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman ordered Slough Borough Council to pay her £1,000 for delays and lack of communication.
Its report said the council's faults had caused her "significant distress and frustration".
The council said it acknowledged the findings of the report and had complied with all of its recommendations.
The mother, named as Ms X in the ombudsman's report, asked the council to update her son B's education health and care plan (EHCP) in March 2024.
This is a legal document reviewed annually that sets out what a council has to do to meet a child's special educational needs.
She wanted the council to update B's EHCP with information from a private occupational therapist's assessment she had sourced, and asked if it could reimburse her for the cost.
Ms X then complained "shortly after" about the time the council had taken to update B's EHCP after a review in October 2023, and asked for a personal budget to pay for his occupational therapy.
The council replied that B's annual review would take place in April, that she could discuss a personal budget then, and that it might need to take 14 weeks to reassess his needs.
The council also said it had "not yet decided" whether to reimburse Ms X for the private occupational therapist's assessment.
B's annual review took place in April and the council wrote to Ms X in June saying it had prepared an amended plan, that it would reimburse her for the occupational therapist's assessment and reassess B's needs.
In response to her complaint, Slough Borough Council said it would consider her request for a personal budget.
It accepted there had been delays in updating B's plan and securing a decision around the private occupational therapist funding.
When the council did issue an updated ECHP in September 2024 the reassessment had still not taken place – and was ongoing at the time of the ombudsman's decision in March this year.
The council 'said waiting for the outcome of the private OT's review, had delayed this consideration'.
The ombudsman ruled this delay was "especially severe" and the the council should pay Ms X £750.
In addition, the ombudsman said there was a "lack of communication! from the council in explaining its decision whether to award Ms X a personal budget, and that there was a delay in deciding whether to reimburse her for the private assessment.
It said the council should pay Ms X a further £250 for these.
The council said: "We are conscious of historic failings and delays within parts of our SEND service and recognise the impact this has had on some families.
"In response, we have taken clear steps to strengthen the service — including increasing staffing capacity, improving oversight, and ensuring Education, Health, and Care (EHC) needs assessments are completed in a more timely and consistent way."
It added: "We remain committed to improving outcomes for children and young people with SEND and to working closely with families to provide the support they need."
You can follow BBC Berkshire on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram.
Authority to pay £11,750 over special needs case
Council to pay £6,500 after failing autistic child
SEND delay 'horrible' for boy, 11
Mother awarded £9,400 over education battle for son
Slough Borough Council
Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Does Being a "Boy Mom" Shorten Your Life?
The research behind whether parents of boys actually have shorter lifespans, worse health, and age faster Most of the content for parents of sons on social media seems to be very negative, especially the content for 'boy moms.' As a mother to two boys myself, I find some of this content sweet and relatable, but a lot of it is, frankly, obnoxious and verging on toxic. Recently I have seen posts circulating on social media claiming that boy moms don't live as long and age faster than girl moms. My initial response to these posts was annoyance at yet another negative message being spread about being a parent to boys. However, when I dug into the research, I was surprised to find that there may be some truth to this claim— but it's more complicated than you may think. Main Research Findings Research consistently finds that having sons is linked to a shorter lifespan and worse health in mothers. One study found that a mother's risk of death per year increased by 7% for each son that they had (two sons would mean a 14% increase, 3 sons a 21% increase, etc.). A previous study conducted by the same authors found that, for every son a woman had, their lifespan decreased by 34 weeks while daughters were associated with a slightly increased lifespan (although this was not statistically significant). Interestingly fathers may not experience the same decrease in lifespan. Another study found that mothers reported worse health in old age with each son they had. Specifically, mothers had an 11% increased odds of reporting poor health in old age with each son that they had. Finally, a recent study found that parents of sons (both mothers and fathers) showed faster cognitive decline in old age. Why Might This Be? One theory that researchers have is that sons take more of a toll on a mother's body (aka the expensive son hypothesis). The idea is that pregnancy, birth, and lactation of sons depletes maternal reserves more than daughters do and therefore the mother's health may be negatively impacted. Supporting this idea, research finds that boys require more energy during pregnancy and lactation than girls. Research also finds that having sons may increase inflammation that contributes to degenerative diseases. In particular, research finds that having boys increases the risk for cardiovascular disease in mothers. There may also be social factors at play, in addition to biological factors. For example, grandmothers are more involved in the care of their daughter's children than their son's children and being more involved in child care is linked to better health in old age. Daughters are also more likely than sons to provide care to their elderly parents, so parents of daughters may get better quality care in old age which could result in a longer lifespan and better health in old age. However, there is no research finding that this association is caused by boys being more challenging or stressful than girls, as social media would suggest. Why Parents of Boys Shouldn't Be Too Worried This research is all correlational so we cannot definitively say that having boys actually causes a shorter lifespan and more health problems. It may be that an underlying factor makes a person more likely to have a boy and more likely to have health problems. For example, higher levels of testosterone may make you more likely to have a boy and more likely to have health problems (and of course not all boy moms have higher levels of testosterone). Some Positivity for Parents of Boys As I said at the beginning of this article, I hate the negativity around being a 'boy mom' or a parent of boys more generally. Although I always strive to accurately report the research, I do not want to further this narrative. Of course, on a personal level, I can say that I love so many aspects of being a mother to my boys and even if they do shorten my lifespan, they more than make up for it in all of the joy they bring to my life. But what about the research? Does research find any benefits of being a parent to boys? Unfortunately, the research on this topic is limited but we do have some evidence for positive outcomes associated with having boys. Mothers who only have sons are the most likely to report the highest level of happiness in their marriage and there is some evidence that parents with sons may be less likely to divorce. The birth of a son may also be linked to an easier transition to being parents than the birth of a daughter. A reason for all of this may be that fathers are more involved in caring for sons than daughters. Fathers of sons also make more money than fathers of daughters. Research does find that girls show higher levels of positive emotions, and boys show higher activity levels and lower fear on average. The people who are negative about being a parent to boys may frame these personality traits as burdens or stressors, but an active and brave child can also be a lot of fun! In addition, although pregnancies with boys may be harder on your body, mothers pregnant with boys may show better working memory and spatial skills than mothers pregnant with girls. The myth of morning sickness being worse when pregnant with girls is also true— women pregnant with boys show less severe nausea and vomiting during pregnancy. You may have also heard that sons are more likely to grow distant from their mothers in adulthood but fear not because research finds that unmarried sons are the most likely group to live with their mother in adulthood! Overall Translation There is some evidence that being a parent to boys is linked to a slightly shorter lifespan, an increased risk for health problems, and faster aging. While it is not completely clear why these associations occur, researchers speculate that sons may take more out of the mother during pregnancy and lactation and that sons may have different relationships with their parents in old age. However, the most important point here is that these statistics are based on averages and have no predictive power for your life. This topic is a great example of how research typically only informs us about what is most likely to happen based on averages and not what will happen in your life. Just because the average mother of boys has a shorter lifespan does not mean that you will (or your partner will) die younger and just because daughters are more likely to provide care for elderly parents does not mean that you son won't step up and be an incredible caretaker for you in old age. These stereotypes are not always true and you have a lot of power in deciding the type of relationship you have with your son. Solve the daily Crossword
Tom's Guide
35 minutes ago
- Tom's Guide
Apple Watch needs this sleep feature to compete with Garmin, Oura, and Whoop — but it might be coming soon
Since my son was born, I'm more obsessed than ever with tracking my sleep. Did I get the recommended 1.5-two hours of deep sleep needed, and how many times did I actually wake up? Most nights, I'll go to sleep wearing my Apple Watch 10 and my Oura Ring 4, because despite being one of the best fitness trackers on the market, the Apple Watch falls short of one sleep feature nearly every other tracker on the market has had for years — a sleep score. Apple has been able to expertly track your different sleep stages for years, as well as your total time in bed and total time asleep. That said, you do need to remember to put your watch into sleep mode before falling asleep, and ensure it's got enough charge to record your sleep all night. If you have the vitals app pinned to your Smart Stack, you can see a breakdown of your sleep each morning, but unlike Garmin, Oura, and Whoop, Apple doesn't give you an overall sleep score. However, according to rumors, we might not have long to wait. Writer Steve Moser uncovered a graphic named 'Watch Focus Score' from deep within the code of Apple's Health app (reported by MacRumors). This score shows an Apple Watch with the number 84 in it, surrounded by three bars that curve to form a circle. The colors of the bars are red, light blue, and purple, which correspond to the sleep stages shown in the Health app — red reflecting time awake, light blue showing REM sleep, and purple reflecting time spent in deep sleep. Few more notes:1) Some other versions of this graphic have a thermometer icon which says to me that this feature will be available on old and new Apple Watches.2) Maybe this is why the sleep icon is changing from light blue to purple.3) I imagine the watch face complication… 23, 2025 It's not clear whether this feature would be part of the watchOS 26 update coming this fall (although it's not available on the public beta), or a feature launched with the rumored Apple Watch 11. Why does every other brand use a sleep score? In simple terms, it helps you see quickly what those different stages mean. For example, last night, my Apple Watch 10 recorded my 7 hours and 34 minutes of sleep (my kid slept through the night for the first time ever, a fact worth celebrating), but my Oura ring 4 gave me a sleep score of 89, and told me that yes, this was outstanding compared to my typical range. Of course, I know I slept better than I have in the past 18 months since my son was born, but I appreciate seeing the quality of sleep in the form of a sleep efficiency number. With Oura, I can also see how my sleep score changes over time, and why my sleep score might be lower from one day to the next. It allows me to make healthier decisions, such as not doom-scrolling Instagram before trying to sleep, or drinking a glass of wine too close to bedtime. Garmin and Whoop also have similar sleep features. The best Garmin watches give you a score out of 100, which is then incorporated into the watch's daily readiness number, reflecting how ready you are for a hard workout. Whoop, on the other hand, gives you an overall sleep performance score, as well as a breakdown of different metrics, all of which have their score out of 100. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. It's a metric Apple Watch users have been dreaming about for years, and hopefully one that'll roll out onto watches sooner rather than later. Follow Tom's Guide on Google News to get our up-to-date news, how-tos, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button.
Washington Post
4 hours ago
- Washington Post
Carolyn Hax: Parent concerned about 30-year-old daughter's lax housekeeping
Adapted from an online discussion. Dear Carolyn: My daughter is single, early 30s and lives in a lovely apartment. When I visit, I notice her place is not very clean. It's neat, but not clean: cat hair on bathroom rug, dirt and hair gathering in corners of bathroom floor, greasy counter appliances and stovetop. As a student of Carolyn Hax, I just keep my mouth shut and truly enjoy the company of my wonderful daughter. However, I can't help wondering whether she doesn't see the dirt or just doesn't care about it. At some point, is there a health issue here? Would it be weird if I offered a housecleaning service for a one-time once-over? Or am I just a fuddy-duddy with high expectations who was over-influenced by TV commercials in my youth showing happy homemakers mopping their floors? I know I did not help my mom clean my house growing up, nor did she ever discuss with me its value. But for some reason, I've always cleaned as an adult. Am I the weird one? — Housekeeping Housekeeping: Yeah, I see no role for you here. Anything can be a 'health issue at some point' — including excessive cleanliness — so it's not a magic portal into her business. And no to the cleaning-service offer. There's only one context in which it's not judgy, and that's when there's a life-event connection. New home (housewarming gift), new child, surgery, huge project, etc. Or, of course, if she complains about having to clean. Re: Housekeeping: My mom's addendum to the 'keep your mouth shut' advice is 'and your wallet open.' Obviously this is only if you are financially secure enough, but I think a one-time, 'You work so hard. I would love to help. If you want to book a cleaning service once a month, I'd be happy to cover it,' would be okay. Best delivered if/when she herself shows some frustration. — Anonymous Anonymous: Ehhh, I'm still not there. I envision 'some' frustration, like: 'Ugh, I forgot this morning's dishes.' Then: 'OMG HERE LET ME BUY YOU A CLEANING SERVICE.' If anyone can suss out a parental critique being restrained by nothing more than a membrane that has been stretched to translucence, it's a grown child. With a tight-lipped parent visiting her dirty kitchen. Now, if it's, 'Ugh, I'm so overwhelmed lately, my apartment is filthy,' then go for it. Readers' thoughts: · My daughter was thrilled when I offered to pay for housekeeping. I waited until she brought it up by apologizing for how dirty her apartment was — but once she opened that door, I told her that I understood how busy she was, how hard keeping up must be and offered to pay for a one-time service. She accepted. Twenty years later, she has a busy job and two kids, so I still offer to pay for a housekeeper once in a while. It's what she requests for Christmas. · Please do not say anything. I'm speaking from experience with a mom with different cleanliness expectations. If the cleanliness of the apartment is a problem — bug infestation, breathing problems from mold or dust, people avoiding coming to her place — then she'll be the first to know about it, and you don't need to tell her. Only exception might be a potential mental health issue, but then the message shouldn't be, 'Your apartment is messy,' but, 'Are you okay? I've noticed you're acting differently and wonder whether I can do anything to support you.' · The desire to not be judged for petty housekeeping stuff is the No. 1 reason I dread my neat-freak mother-in-law's visits. If you want her to want you to visit, then keep your yap shut.
