Georgia Arrests Ex-Aide of Ruling Party Founder
Giorgi Bachiashvili used to be the right-hand man to Bidzina Ivanishvili, the billionaire founder of the Georgian Dream ruling party, who is widely believed to be the de facto ruler of the mountainous Caucasus nation.
Bachiashvili, who once headed the tycoon's Co-Investment Fund, fled Georgia in early March amid mounting legal troubles.
He has called his former boss Ivanishvili a 'power-drunk criminal' who 'is trading away the future of our country.'
Sentenced in absentia to 11 years in prison for alleged embezzlement and money laundering, he has accused Ivanishvili of threatening to 'crush' him in prison.
On Tuesday, Georgia's State Security Service said Bachiashvili 'a dual Georgian-Russian national, wanted on an Interpol Red Notice, was arrested on Monday after an anonymous tip placed him near the neutral zone' at the border with Azerbaijan.
But Bachiashvili's lawyers claimed that he was 'forcibly returned' to Georgia under murky circumstances and now faces an 'imminent risk of torture.'
His lawyer, Robert Amsterdam, condemned the arrest, accusing Georgian authorities of misusing international legal mechanisms to target political opponents.
The dramatic arrest comes amid renewed scrutiny of Ivanishvili's influence in Georgian politics and business.
Georgia has been rocked by protests since Ivanishvili's Georgian Dream party claimed victory in October parliamentary elections rejected as rigged by the pro-Western opposition, then shelved talks on joining the European Union.
Critics also accuse the government of sliding into authoritarianism and tilting the former Soviet republic back towards Russian influence -- an allegation it denies.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
2 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Lassana Diarra seeks €65 million from Fifa, Belgian FA
PARIS: Former France international Lassana Diarra is seeking €65 million (US$76 million) from Fifa and the Belgian football association as part of a long-running legal battle, his lawyer announced on Monday. Diarra's challenge to Fifa prompted the world football governing body to amend its transfer rules after a landmark legal ruling last year, but he has been unable to reach a settlement. His lawyer, Martin Hissel, said the claim was for "compensation for damage caused by Fifa rules" on transfers, which the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) ruled to be contrary to European law last October. "Following a ruling by the CJEU, in the absence of an amicable solution, it is natural to return to the national courts so that they can implement the CJEU ruling," Hissel said in a statement. "That is what we are doing today, on the basis of a very clear ruling by the CJEU, which has settled all the essential legal points. The Belgian courts should deliver their decisions within 12 to 15 months." The CJEU in October found that Fifa rules impede the free movement of players by "imposing considerable legal risks, unforeseeable and potentially very high financial risks as well as major sporting risks on those players and clubs wishing to employ them", thereby disrupting the transfer system. At the request of the Belgian courts, the Luxembourg-based CJEU examined the case brought by Diarra, who 10 years ago had contested the conditions of his departure from Russian club Lokomotiv Moscow. In August 2014, Lokomotiv Moscow terminated Diarra's contract, citing contractual breaches by the player. The Russian side also sought €20 million in compensation from him. Diarra refused and requested that Lokomotiv pay him compensation, but the now 40-year-old was eventually ordered to pay his former club €10 million by Fifa, a fine that was upheld by the Court of Arbitration for Sport. Diarra also received a backdated 15-month suspension. As a result, Belgian club Charleroi ultimately decided not to sign the midfielder for fear of having to pay part of these penalties, in accordance with Fifa regulations examined by the CJEU. Following the CJEU's ruling, Fifa announced last December it had adopted an "interim regulatory framework" regarding player transfers. "I waited a few months before restarting the national proceedings in Belgium, thinking that, particularly following the efforts of FIFPRO Europe (the European players' union), Fifa and the Belgian football association would at least have the decency to contact me to propose an amicable settlement of the dispute (this was, in fact, the tone of the messages I received from Fifa)," Diarra said in a statement. "This was not the case. It is their right, but it reflects a persistent culture of contempt for the rule of law and for players, despite the very clear message sent by the CJEU. "To my great regret, we will therefore once again have to go before the judges, as I have no other choice." Capped 34 times by France, Diarra also played for Chelsea, Arsenal, Portsmouth and Real Madrid before ending his career at Paris Saint-Germain in 2019.
The Star
3 hours ago
- The Star
Factbox-What does Ukraine's constitution say about territorial changes?
A drone view shows the ruins of residential buildings in the abandoned town of Marinka (Maryinka), which was destroyed in the course of Russia-Ukraine conflict in the Donetsk region, a Russian-controlled area of Ukraine, August 7, 2025. REUTERS/Alexander Ermochenko/File Photo KYIV (Reuters) -Territorial questions are certain to be a key area of focus when Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy and European leaders meet U.S. President Donald Trump for talks on Monday to map out a possible peace deal to end Russia's war in Ukraine. Russia occupies around a fifth of Ukraine and the U.S. president has said "land-swapping" and changes to territory will be crucial for any settlement. Two sources briefed on Russian thinking said on Saturday that Putin and Trump have discussed a proposal requiring Ukraine to fully withdraw troops from the Ukrainian-controlled parts of the eastern Donetsk region. UKRAINE'S CONSTITUTION ON THE ISSUE OF TERRITORY Any changes to Ukraine's territory would have to be settled in Ukraine by a referendum, according to the country's constitution. "Issues of altering the territory of Ukraine are resolved exclusively by an All-Ukrainian referendum," Article 73 says. The question can be put to a referendum by popular initiative if the signatures of three million eligible Ukrainian voters are gathered from at least two thirds of the country's regions, it says. UKRAINIAN GOVERNMENT STANCE Ukraine, like its European allies, strongly opposes the idea of legally recognising any Ukrainian territory as Russian. But it has tacitly acknowledged it will almost certainly have to accept some de facto territorial losses. Zelenskiy has said talks to end the war should take the current front line as their starting point and cannot begin by Kyiv having to withdraw its troops from parts of its own sovereign territory that Russia does not control. He has said he does not have a mandate to give away any of the country's territory, and that tracts of state land cannot be traded around as if they were his private property. Zelenskiy has also said that if Kyiv withdrew troops from the heavily fortified eastern Donetsk region, it would open up Ukraine to the threat of Russian advances deeper into less well-defended Ukrainian territory. TRUMP'S STANCE The U.S. president has publicly criticized Zelenskiy for saying he could not violate the constitution by agreeing to give away territory. "I was a little bothered by the fact that Zelenskiy was saying: 'Well, I have to get constitutional approval'. I mean, he has got approval to go into war, kill everybody but he needs approval to do a land swap. Because there will be some land swapping going on", he told the press on August 11. UKRAINIANS' VIEW A clear majority of Ukrainians want a negotiated settlement, according to opinion polls, but they also oppose recognising Ukrainian land as Russian. The Kyiv International Institute of Sociology says that an opinion poll it conducted in June showed that 68% of those questioned oppose the idea of officially recognising "some parts" of occupied land as Russian, while 24% are open to this. The same survey showed that 78% are against the idea of giving up on land that Kyiv's troops still control. The pollster did not survey opinions in areas occupied by Russia. (Reporting by Yuliia DysaWriting by Tom BalmforthEditing by Frances Kerry)
New Straits Times
3 hours ago
- New Straits Times
New alliance emerging to challenge Western accounts of Gaza
AMID the rubble of journalists' tents and the unceasing wail of ambulances, the world is witnessing not merely death but also the murder of meaning. Israel's assault on Gaza can no longer be concealed behind euphemisms like "conflict" or "retaliation". However, Western mainstream media continues to deploy language that obscures the crime. In a world flooded with information, the denial of meaning is the most insidious and dangerous form of violence. Mainstream alternative media such as Middle East Monitor, Al Jazeera and TRT World have consistently rejected this narrative. Journalists like Anas al-Sharif were killed not because they bore arms, but because they bore witness — reviving Gaza's sufferings for the world to see. The world is no longer reliant on the Western media's selective framing as a new narrative alliance is emerging. From the Islamic world, BRICS, Africa, Latin America and digital activists, a coordinated media movement is reshaping the global map of meaning. Outlets such as RT (Russia), PressTV (Iran), TRT World (Turkiye) and networks across Africa and Latin America portray Palestinian suffering as a symbol of resistance against Western hegemony and moral hypocrisy. Beyond the established alternative media platforms such as Democracy Now, The Intercept, and Grayzone, more contrarian outlets like Unz Review have also entered the fray, amplifying voices that frame Israel's actions in Gaza as genocidal and morally indefensible. This reflects the widening spectrum of dissent in Western discourse. On digital platforms, influencers like Motaz Azaiza and thousands of activists have become "field journalists" who build global empathy. They stream live footage, testimonies and humanitarian appeals that transcend linguistic and cultural boundaries. Hashtags like #GazaGenocide, #EndIsraeliApartheid and #FreePalestine have become narrative battlegrounds that rival official propaganda. In Australia, a historic wave of mobilisation has swept across Sydney and Melbourne. Up to 300,000 people recently joined the "March for Humanity" across Sydney Harbour Bridge to demand a ceasefire, sanctions on Israel and recognition of Palestinian statehood. Writers like Omar El Akkad and activists like Nidzara Ahmetasevic have criticised the moral duplicity of the West, which failed to learn from the genocide in Bosnia. Malaysian media has the potential to bridge the voices of the Global South with Western consciousness. On the issue of Palestine, we must no longer rely on Western news agencies whose coverage often favours Israel and marginalises the Global South. Renowned academic and thinker Professor Datuk Dr Ahmad Murad Merican has urged Malaysian media to lead efforts in declaring Asean a "Genocide-Free Zone", with deep reporting and regional advocacy. Our media can elevate historical witnesses like Gaza's journalists as icons of humanity; embed narratives of compassion, inclusivity and sustainability in its coverage; and build regional networks that unite voices from Asean, BRICS+, D-8 and the Global South. Thus, Malaysia joining The Hague Group and supporting South Africa's legal action against Israel at the International Court of Justice is not merely a diplomatic gesture, it is also a narrative declaration that Malaysia stands with truth. The genocide in Gaza is not just a humanitarian tragedy — it is also a test of global honesty, media courage and the resilience of meaning. The multipolar media alliance — rising from the Islamic world, BRICS, Africa and Latin America — has forged a battleground not of weapons, but of witness, empathy and interpretation. They do not merely report — they resurrect the meaning that was meant to be erased.
