
Ugly, mortifying – and addictive? Tim Dowling's week in the world's most divisive shoes
The freaky-chic shoe in question is the toe shoe – a lightweight, thin-soled trainer with separate, articulated toes. They come in a number of brands and styles, and while they may be popular, I can safely say they are not 'everywhere'. Walking in them in public every day for a week, I never ran across another person wearing them. Anywhere.
The original toe shoe is the Vibram FiveFingers, which has actually been with us since 2006. The model I've chosen, the V-Alpha Hydro, has a 3mm rubber outsole and a 2mm foam insole, offering a close-to-barefoot walking experience. They're primarily designed for outdoor training, hiking, barefoot running and general fitness, but they are not designed to look cool. The five separate pockets allow one's toes to splay out more naturally, if not more attractively. Not for nothing did Vogue call FiveFingers 'the fitness world's most divisive shoe'.
Vibram is the market leader in a complex footwear category – not all toe shoes are barefoot shoes, and not many barefoot shoes have articulated toes. Some have only a separate big toe, for a more cloven-hoofed look. But they're all meant to represent an improvement on traditional footwear.
The putative benefits listed for my FiveFingers include 'zero heel drop keeping you naturally planted to the ground', 'fantastic proprioception and feedback from the feet to the brain' and 'as much natural foot movement as possible'.
The FiveFingers may provide a more natural fit, but that doesn't mean they fit naturally. My toes don't automatically slide into their corresponding pouches; they have to be coaxed and prodded in. And yes, if you're going to wear socks, you'll need toe socks, adding another layer of complexity to getting dressed in the morning. Even after I think I have my left shoe all the way on, a cursory squeeze of each toe pocket reveals that the second one along is empty. Where did that toe go? It turns out it's sharing a pouch with its nextdoor neighbour.
When both shoes are finally on properly, I take them for a brief trial spin. At first, I feel like a circus clown. My splayed toes look like two hands of miniature bananas, and the rubber soles slap against the pavement like duck's feet. New wearers are advised to transition gradually from regular shoes, because it's a different style of walking (or running, if that's your intention). After a cautious 50 metres or so, I settle into a more barefoot stride – mid-foot strike rather than heel strike, and less noisy. Meanwhile, I'm very in touch with the ground beneath me: my toes grip the pavement; I can feel every tiny bump and crack.
The overwhelming sensation, however, is one of horrifying self-consciousness – these are very weird-looking shoes. No one comments as I walk down a busy shopping street, and after a while I begin to hope no one has noticed – after all, I don't tend to notice other people's shoes when I'm out and about. Then I look down and think: yeah, but I would notice these.
Any remaining hope that my toe shoes are unremarkable is dispelled as soon as I walk into my own kitchen, where my middle son is sitting at the table.
'What the hell are you wearing?' he says.
'On my feet, you mean?' I say.
'Yes, on your feet,' he says.
'The hot girl shoe of summer,' I say.
My oldest son walks in with his girlfriend.
'My God, what are those?' she says.
'The future,' I say.
'They're hideous,' he says.
'They come in other colours,' I say.
'What are they like to walk in?' she says.
'Honestly?' I say. 'They're exhausting.'
This is true: after just a few hours my feet are incredibly tired – not sore or achy, just bone-weary. It takes three days to build up enough tolerance to wear them from morning until night. After that, I hardly notice them. The fact that I have them on keeps catching me by surprise: hey! I think. I'm driving in toe shoes! I'm in a supermarket in toe shoes! I am at one with the earth, intensely aware of tiny changes in the terrain – the grout between the tiles, the dry grass poking between my toes. I'm also getting used to the idea that everyone – everyone – notices.
My wife is not happy, though, especially when she sees me wearing them just as we're about to set off for a restaurant.
'You said a week,' she says.
'Today is a week,' I say.
'You really don't have to wear them tonight,' she says. 'You're just being perverse.'
The truth is, toe shoes are a little bit addictive: comfortable and light, while also offering a Spider-Man-level of grip. They're also so difficult to put on I'm reluctant to take them off.
Once we're in the restaurant, the shoes stay under the table, and I feel perfectly normal. It's only as we're leaving, when I pass a waitress and smile, and she smiles back and looks down, and I see her face change, that I know I can't go on like this.
The next day, as I'm posing for Alicia the photographer in my local park, a man comes running over to stop his dog getting into the shot. He apologises, and then looks over at me: a middle-aged man sitting on a bench in the watery morning light.
'Is it about the shoes?' he says.
'Of course it's about the shoes,' I say.
Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publication in our letters section, please click here.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
28 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Pregnant Sophie Habboo cradles her growing baby bump in a grey co-ord before cosying up to husband Jamie Laing in sweet summer snaps
Sophie Habboo proudly showed off her blossoming baby bump on Thursday in a series of Instagram snaps from her summer. The Made In Chelsea star, 30, wowed in a fitted grey cropped co-ord that offered a glimpse of her growing bump. She also shared a sweet selfie with husband Jamie Laing, who was pictured kissing her hand. In another photo, Sophie turned heads in a white co-ord as she posed in their stunning garden. She also posted a mirror selfie in a black two-piece and a touching shot of her latest baby scan. Sophie captioned the snaps: 'English summer.' The Made in Chelsea star, 30, shared a sweet selfie with husband Jamie Laing , who was pictured kissing her hand It comes just a week after Sophie enjoyed a night out with Jamie at an Oasis concert. The radiant mother-to-be oozed class as she enjoyed the band's latest gig at Wembley Stadium in London. Sophie could be seen rocking out to Liam and Noel's iconic setlist with Jamie, 36, while being hosted at a luxury box. In one snap, Sophie could be seen cradling her bump, wearing an embroidered white silk minidress for the night out. Looking the part, she donned a bucket hat along with black shades, while putting on a black leather jacket to keep warm towards the end of the night. Jamie kept it casual, wearing a pair of black chinos and overshirt that featured colourful dices. Sharing the pictures with fans, Sophie said the concert 'was a 10/10 all round'. Commenting under her post, Jamie playfully replied: 'Baby's first concert.' Last month Sophie showed off her changing figure during a romantic holiday with Jamie as she displayed her bump. The stunner certainly appeared to be loving her new pregnancy shape, slipping into a white midi dress for one mirror snap. Sophie previously revealed on her and Jamie's newly named podcast NearlyParents, that she has struggled with some aspects of her pregnancy. She confessed that when her second trimester hit, she felt like she was 'dying' and was dealing with a lot of hormones that made her frequently feel irritated. 'This girl has gone from a bit of a b***h to don't come near me,' she quipped. 'Up until week eight, I was smooth sailing. No good aversions, no sickness, so much energy, I was like what is every talking about this is unbelievable. 'Week eight hit and everyone's starting to grate to me a bit. Like that man sat next to me on the plane breathing, like is it illegal if I punch him in the face?' Sophie previously showed her Chelsea roots by sharing with fans how her craziest craving so far is caviar. Fans flooded Sophie with supportive messages as they gushed over the pregnant star Also speaking on their podcast, Jamie explained they eventually found a caviar store only to discover a single pot cost £240, as he declared: 'I was like "Well that craving has to stop there and then". Back in April, Jamie and Sophie spilled the beans about their future plans on building a family during a chat with The Times. Jamie explained: 'I was really scared about kids. It's something you can't control. Sophie would then carry a baby, all these different things that I can't control and, "Oh God, what happens if this happen or that happens?" 'But I saw a clip on Instagram where someone said, "The best thing I ever had is being called Dad." I was like, "Oh, wouldn't that be cool?" So now I'm so down for it. I would like to have loads.' Jamie added he would be up for four kids, with Sophie sweetly agreeing.


The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Sweaty knee-highs in summer is celebrity style crime we need to give the boot… they should only be worn in open field
WHAT are the must-haves this summer on your holiday packing list? Cossie? Tick. Suncream? Tick. Boots?! 8 For me, and most of us, there's not enough room in my 55x40x20cm cabin bag to cram in a pair of knee-highs. In a small footwear triumph, I don't mean Ugg boots. Thankfully that fugly trend seems to have been killed off for now. What I am referring to is heavy, clompy, sweat-inducing leather boots. An autumn perennial, knee-highs are a hit with celebrities and fashionistas. They're also on the pins of youngsters at various summer events and dance floors. While I'm all for getting the most wear out of clothes — because, let's face it, the majority of boots are pretty expensive — slipping into leather during a 30C-plus heatwave is my idea of hell. So why am I seeing the style set stomp around in them everywhere? The trend is a result of 'concert core'. Cast your mind back to last year when Taylor Swift, was prancing around in a bejewelled bodysuit and boots on her Eras tour. Beyonce sends fans into a frenzy with surprise Destiny's Child reunion during final Cowboy Carter show And pint-size pop star Sabrina Carpenter donned Sixties-style PVC go-go boots during her Short n' Sweet shows. A key look Then earlier this year, Beyonce line-danced in chaps and thigh-high, tasseled cowboy boots during her Cowboy Carter tour. All of these extravagant shows saw thousands of fans turn up in copycat footwear. According to PrettyLittleThing, online searches for western boots rose 85 per cent in in the run up to Beyonce's shows. So, the 'Beyonce effect' has cemented boots as a key look for summer. Meanwhile, the trend has been championed by the catwalk. Luxury brand Chloe, responsible for the boho revival, gave it a twist with biker boots and slouchy suede styles on its summer runway. And supermodel Bella Hadid was spotted wearing brown boots in sunny London in May — but she is in her cowgirl era, thanks to dating real-life cowboy Adan Banuelos. A forgivable style crime for someone who lives and breathes that way of life, I suppose. 8 8 8 Even model Alexa Chung — known for vintage ballet flats and loafers — is getting in on the act, pairing black patent boots with what looks like a nighty and barn jacket. This mish-mash styling is popular among Gen-Z. TikTok fashion influencers also advocate for the 'wrong shoe theory,' which translates to wearing an unlikely shoe with your outfit. For instance, a delicate, lace white dress with Hells Angels biker boots. Think Olivia Rodrigo performing at Glastonbury this year. Or an oversized blue shirt with clompy buckled boots, like Kourtney Kardashian out and about with her one-year-old son Rocky. I can get on board with the aesthetic, but can you imagine the horrid hot and sweaty congestion of your calf encased in a cheap high street pair, which are probably made from plastic? And just think of the blisters. Dua Lipa went for a similar buckled pair when attending a festival recently. At £1,840, the Miu Miu boots are unattainable for most of us, but at least they looked practical for stomping through fields and complemented the singer's denim shorts. Hollywood star Kate Hudson wore dalmatian-print cowboy boots with hot pants and a blouse to Coachella festival — and she didn't look out of place. Along with boots at festivals, my millennial brain can forgive those who wear ankle boots in the summer. It was a strong look from our glory days paired with a skinny jean or mini-skirt. But anything higher than the lower calf breaks me out in a sweat. I appreciate navigating what to wear in summer is never easy. Is it going to rain? Will you be fainting in commuter heat? Will you need a puffer jacket for the Arctic air-con? 8 8 But now we've thrown knee-high boots into the mix. If a rainy day is on the cards then winner-winner with your practical footwear. But if not, and the day turns out to be a scorcher, your feet will be squelching around in sweat while your legs chafe. For festivals, camping and fly-fishing, boots are the right call. If I get a whiff of the rising odour from someone's sticky sweat buckets it best be in an open field. Anywhere else is unacceptable.


Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
JONATHAN BROCKLEBANK: Trapped in a web of misery thanks to the new Spider-Man blockbuster (and why I wish he'd swoop off)
The long arm of the law had the good grace to look embarrassed as it was extended to block my passage across the street and force me on a detour. 'I'm sorry, I know it's daft, but I can't let you past,' said the police officer. 'No, it's fine,' I said, feeling his pain. 'You're just doing your job.' It was, in fact, insanely daft. It wasn't remotely fine. On this day the policeman's job was to stop members of the public going about their business so that Spider-Man could go about his. There was no getting around it. Spider-Man had this city cop in his pocket. The constable didn't like it. Neither did I. In the centre of Glasgow, that's been the way of it for a fortnight – a comic book superhero not saving the day but commandeering it for profit. They're closing off whole streets for him, stopping people getting to their work for him, restricting parking for him, telling pedestrians where they may and may not walk for him … and Police Scotland, undermanned and overstretched, are among the many drafted in to do his bidding. On some days Peter Parker's alter ego has run amok. Great balls of fire have been seen yards from our office. There goes yon Spider-Man again: a law unto himself. For those perplexed by any of the above, let me confess that I share much of your confusion. Little of it makes any sense to me. But the apparent explanation for a fictional, arachnid-crazed crime fighter having dominion over a key area of my home city is they are making another Spider-Man movie. You may wonder, as I do, whether there might be enough movies out there already about a spandex-clad do-gooder who catches criminals by shooting webs at them. The answer seems to be no. The existing 10 are insufficient. You may also wonder what brings Spider-Man to Glasgow when everybody (who bothers about such matters) knows that his hood is New York. Well, he is wreaking chaos here in Glasgow because it is too expensive to put him in a movie in his native city. Think of the levels of inconvenience it would bring to the Big Apple having Spider-Man scaling buildings, swinging above the traffic, jumping onto speeding tanks … Understandably, the costs involved in gaining the city fathers' sanction for extreme disruption of this mature are prohibitive. So, what then? Is Spider-Man on holiday in Scotland in this movie? No, silly, Glasgow's role here is to kid on that it is New York, to put on a disguise as any stunt double might do and pretend. And the costs involved in gaining our city fathers' sanction to turn its busiest district into a movie set? Minimal. We're just charmed that they want to be here. Aren't we? You may be aware that Glasgow has quite the filmography to its name as understudy for cities which were unavailable for the role. It pretended to be Philadelphia for the 2013 movie World War Z in which marauding zombies swept across George Square. Fair enough. It was a decent movie. It has acting credits for playing Gotham City, the crime-ridden metropolis where Batman does his caped crusading. Gotham doesn't really exist, which makes Glasgow's participation more understandable. The Batgirl film shot here in 2022 was so dreadful it never saw the light of day, which makes it less so. The city has been asked to play New York so many times it should have a complex about typecasting. Credits include doubling as vintage New York for Indiana Jones and as futuristic New York for the forthcoming Ghostwriter. Nothing if not versatile, the Dear Green Place pretends to be London too. Several instalments of the Fast and Furious franchise have given our financial district the car chases, the crashes, bangs and wallops to avoid the hassle and expense of saddling the capital with them. Aren't we the lucky ones? In short, Glasgow is out the door with offers to play cities other than itself. Why? Because it is happy to work for peanuts. Because, like some naïve teen starlet in need of a hard-nosed agent, it will go to the most extraordinary lengths to accommodate the most unreasonable demands of the movie business. Run that by us again. You want us to jam up the city centre, shut down our busiest streets, re-route our buses, make it virtually impossible for emergency vehicles to get anywhere near emergencies, allow weeks of disruption to offices and shops, have our council tax and rate payers shunted out of the way by film set security types who suddenly think they own the place and see if the police will help out on crowd control? Shouldn't be a problem. Where do we sign? And all to save Hollywood the expense of shelling out for the real McCoy. I might weather the inconvenience more stoically if Glasgow were the actual setting of these movies rather than the bargain basement stand-in for the locations the production couldn't afford. It would trouble me less if I could tell myself we were suffering for someone's art. But an 11th Spider-Man movie? Fast and Furious 9? Let's us be frank. We are suffering for junk. It would, of course, be disingenuous to suggest the whole of the city centre feels the way I do. Much of it is awestruck. Behind every metal barrier stopping people getting where they need to be an army of rubberneckers demonstrate there is nowhere else they need to be. What could be more important than standing there for hours, phone cameras in hand, in the hope of bagging a grainy picture of actor Tom Holland in a Spider-Man suit? I've seen parents with infants dressed up as the superhero himself, which is cute, but I cannot imagine how the reality of a day on the edge of a film set – very little happening for too long from too far away to see it anyway – can match up to the magic they had in mind. There are, I am assured, clear economic benefits to the Glasgow City Council strategy of charging Hollywood next to nothing to stage invasions at regular interviews. Think of all the extra business for hotels, bars and shops the film crews bring. Think of the footfall resulting from those turning up to stare at them all day. There are claims Glasgow's niche role in masquerading as other cities in the movies has earned it £500 million in recent years. If true, someone is making a profit. But it isn't the council which, in common with every other one in Scotland, is pleading poverty. It isn't the businesses whose staff can't get to work because work is in this next shot. And it certainly isn't the majority of city centre users, displaced for an extended period by a comic book character. If Glasgow thinks it is going places in the movie business, shouldn't it drive a harder bargain? Must our gridiron streets and the Victorian treasures lining them work for buttons on every script that comes along, however moronic?