logo
‘Ounce of prevention worth pound of cure': tensions arise in hearings on Mills' budget plan

‘Ounce of prevention worth pound of cure': tensions arise in hearings on Mills' budget plan

Yahoo11-02-2025

The Appropriations and Financial Affairs Committee and the Criminal Justice and Public Safety Committee hear testimony on the biennial budget on Feb. 4, 2025. (Emma Davis/ Maine Morning Star)
Feedback on Gov. Janet Mills' proposed biennial budget so far has revealed tensions across issue areas between requests to expand state programs versus investments that supporters say would prevent reliance on state government long term.
The Appropriations and Financial Affairs Committee held a series of public hearings in conjunction with the Legislature's other committees last week on Mills' plan to close the projected gap of $450 million in the next biennium. Responses ranged from excitement for maintaining some of the state's existing commitments to criticism for proposed program cuts and tax hikes.
One example of the strain over where to funnel new funding emerged between state spending for corrections and housing. If the state invests more in housing, less would be needed for corrections, Rep. Grayson Lookner (D-Portland) argued.
'An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure,' Lookner said. 'We want to ensure that we're not spending money in broken systems and we want to prevent people from entering these systems wherever possible.'
Lookner's comments put a finer point on a tension that ran throughout the hearings last week on sections of the budget also related to taxes, labor, the environment and education. This week the budget committee will hold hearings on items related to the judiciary and the Department of Health and Human Services.
While the hearings focused on state money, new restrictions being handed down at the federal level came up in discussion, notably President Donald Trump's executive orders rolling back efforts to support Diversity, Equity and Inclusion.
Rep. Sheila Lyman (R-Livermore Falls) asked Commissioner of Education Pender Makin on Friday for an itemized breakdown of any state funding that is being used to support DEI or Social Emotional Learning, otherwise known as SEL.
Other testimony underscored the need for state support in light of an uncertain future for federal dollars.
Yellow Light Breen, president and CEO of the Maine Development Foundation, a nonpartisan, nonprofit focused on driving economic growth in the state, warned lawmakers on Wednesday about challenges the foundation is facing with its efforts to ensure a robust future workforce by reaching communities that haven't historically participated in certain industries. .
'We're trying to make our programs truly intentional in terms of being accessible, equitable and valuable and frankly, regardless of your politics, it's very tough right now because of the prohibitive language on the federal side,' Breen said. 'Many of our grants are federal.'
Click on the committee to jump ahead to coverage of individual budget hearings:
Criminal Justice and Public Safety
Housing
Education
Environment
Taxation
Labor
The Department of Public Safety wants lawmakers to approve the funding the governor has proposed for increased technology costs, several new positions and reclassifying some others.
However, some emergency services employees flagged a proposed transfer of $44 million meant for personnel into the general fund, which they argued could exacerbate existing issues with understaffing and mandatory overtime currently being deployed to fill gaps.
Anna Massefski, program coordinator with EMS ConnectME, praised Department of Public Safety Commissioner Mike Sauschuck's leadership but said 'he's steering a sinking ship.'
'My coworkers and I go to work everyday to protect the people of Maine,' Massefski said. 'Not in the hot blooded hero sense you would think of for most first responders. No, we're the ones behind the scenes making sure people across Maine have the same access and right to safety no matter where they are.'
Massefski said that work — licensing ambulances, conducting background checks, issuing concealed weapons permits — is being done while the department is understaffed, under-resourced and underpaid.
Others argued increased allocations, specifically for new police positions, would be better spent on efforts to build stronger communities, such as through affordable housing and reducing barriers to health care.
Alicia Rea, a fellow for the ACLU of Maine, made this plea to lawmakers on Tuesday.
'In the context of revenue shortfalls, this proposed budget makes some commendable investments,' Rea said, pointing to funding for therapeutic foster care and intensive homes as a necessary step to transition away from incarcerating youth.
However, Rea urged lawmakers to reject increased allocations for the Department of Public Safety to instead maintain the state's prior commitment to build more crisis receiving centers and create mental health support positions, which the governor's plan would cut.
Testimony regarding funding for the Maine Department of Corrections revealed a similar dynamic — balancing prevention with expansion.
The DOC says more funding is needed to run efficiently. On the other hand, some argued that preventative measures to keep people out of prison are being cut from the budget in order to provide such allocations.
DOC Commissioner Randall Liberty said the department's priorities are ensuring there is funding for its new data management system — which is set to launch in 2026 — as well as for fuel and raises for staff.
'We have much safer communities when people are programmed, trained, treated with dignity and respect and less victimization that happens in the community,' Liberty told the budget and Criminal Justice and Public Safety committees on Tuesday. 'What we ask for are our needs.'
Other allocations for the DOC include funds for substance use disorder treatment for residents under the department's care, food and electricity costs, and allocations for specific prisons, jails and juvenile facilities. Andre Cushing, president of Maine County Commissioners Association, and Tim Curtis, the Somerset County administrator who also serves on the Jail Standards Council, testified that their groups both believe the proposed allocations for jails and hold facilities to be inadequate.
Jan Collins, assistant director of the Maine Prisoner Advocacy Coalition, urged the committees to consider more funding for programs that prevent incarceration, such as education, job training, health care and housing.
'The proposed cuts to Head Start, child care, food assistance, medical care, direct care workers, and state workers do not save money in the long run,' Collins said. 'They have long term and expensive consequences for the future. These cuts are poor policy.'
The Maine Emergency Management Agency is seeking more funding to address the increase in severe storms causing damage across the state, particularly in light of federal funding stagnation. Gen. Dianne Dunn, commissioner of the Department of Defense, Veterans and Emergency Services, said budget deficits related to federal funding have already resulted in MEMA leaving two positions vacant.
Three programs of the Maine Coalition to End Domestic Violence have shut down in the past 18 months due to insufficient funding, leaving three counties without programming, said Executive Director Francine Stark when urging lawmakers to increase the coalition's funding. The coalition is a statewide network of domestic violence intervention programs, which state law requires courts mandate participation in when people are sentenced to probation for domestic violence-related crimes.
Housing groups applauded recent investments the state has made to expand affordable options, as well as the additional funds proposed in the next biennium for the Mobile Home Park Preservation Fund, which was created in the 2024 supplemental budget to support residents in purchasing their mobile home parks, but overall said more investment is needed.
Laura Mitchell, executive director of Maine Affordable Housing Coalition, said the 3,000 affordable homes currently under construction are a good start but only a fraction of the units needed, which is at least 84,000 new homes by the end of the decade, according to a study released last year.
'These investments were only one time investments that were made over the last few years and without additional funding in this budget the construction of affordable new homes will dramatically decrease,' Mitchell said.
Molly Feeney, representing a coalition of emergency shelter directors from across the state, asked lawmakers for an additional $5 million. The state currently contributes $2.5 million for these shelters.
'Emergency shelter beds are the front line emergency rooms for Maine's housing crisis,' Feeney said. 'If we do not address this funding gap, the first communities impacted will be those experiencing the greatest poverty and are often those living in the most rural parts of our state.'
Many people are staying unhoused for longer periods of time, according to a report released last week.
Erik Jorgensen, director of government relations at MaineHousing, the state's housing finance agency, criticized the governor's proposed $10 million cut for the Home Fund, which is MaineHousing's only discretionary funding source.
Fatuma Hussein, executive director of the Immigrant Resource Center, also urged lawmakers to provide MaineHousing with more funding so the quasi-governmental agency can adequately support the Gap Rental Assistance Program, which helps asylum seekers meet the difference between what general assistance pays and what actual rent is, which often do not match.
This gap is further exacerbated by the fact that many asylum seekers don't fit the definition of homelessness when it comes to federal assistance, Hussein said.
Educators and students overwhelmingly voiced their support for the part of the budget that would continue Maine's free community college scholarship during a joint hearing with the budget and education committees on Friday.
However, Maine's private colleges urged lawmakers to cut a proposal that would no longer allow their students to be eligible for the Maine state grant program, which provides need-based assistance.
Currently, all Maine public and private universities, colleges and technical schools that administer federal financial aid, such as the Pell Grant and Direct Loans, are eligible for the state grant program.
Cathryn McIntyre, a student at Thomas College studying to be a teacher, said the program was a crucial part of her ability to afford higher education.
'Without it I might have looked elsewhere for my education but this financial support gave me the confidence to continue my studies right here in my home state,' McIntyre said. 'I'm paying for my own college education, and every dollar matters.'
This was also the case for another state grant recipient, Riley Tellier, a student at Husson University seeking a degree in occupational therapy, who told the committees that changing eligibility would hurt the future of Maine's health care workforce.
'Husson is one of the best schools for occupational therapy in Maine, and without financial support, many students like me wouldn't have the opportunity to pursue this career,' Tellier said, explaining that even with the grant she's had to work two jobs to afford her education.
'I plan to stay in Maine, using my degree to give back to the community that raised me,' Tellier added, 'but without Maine state grants, fewer students will have this choice. We are the future of Maine's workforce. Please continue to invest in us.'
Representatives from the University of Maine System also called on lawmakers to up their funding. UMaine Chancellor Dannel Malloy voiced support for the 4% increase to Maine's public universities Mills proposed but told lawmakers it falls short of the 6% the system requested.
'Our universities are contracting, losing faculty and areas of study, all because of unsustainable funding,' said Michael Grillo, a history of art professor for UMaine.
UMaine and other higher education institutions also argued the funding the governor proposed to help cover the costs for state-supported positions related to the new Paid Family and Medical Leave Program, which took effect on Jan. 1, is not sufficient.
Mills' supplemental budget plan initially sought to provide some of this funding, but the budget committee removed those portions when revising the change package last week.
President of the Maine Community College System David Daigler had advocated for this funding during hearings for the supplemental and called on lawmakers to include that funding in the biennial, in addition to the allocations already proposed for the next biennium.
'We do assume that the employee's share of the premiums will become a negotiated item going forward but we do not feel it is appropriate or feasible to reopen the agreements at this time,' Daigler said.
Environmental groups and state employees turned out to voice support for the governor's proposal to create eight new positions within the Department of Environmental Protections and continue some temporary positions, specifically two that support the safer chemicals program, which helps address contamination from per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, or PFAS.
While testifying in support of the funding, Beth White, director of politics and legislation for the Maine Service Employees Association, argued it is not enough.
'While the addition of two new positions at the DEP will help address this pollution crisis, much more must be done to ensure the DEP has the staffing and resources necessary to prevent, abate and control air, water and land pollution,' White said.
The state and union have had a long-running dispute over state worker wages.
A DEP employee of eight years, Robert Leighton, who manages the environmental analysis database that stores all sampling data, said his team has been short staffed and unable to hire due to low wages.
That database is used across agencies as part of Maine's overall statewide PFAS investigation and provided data that recent legislation relied on to set PFAS limits, Leighton explained.
'We really need to see action as well as leadership that is willing to invest in workers by offering a wage that matches our private sector counterparts,' Leighton said. 'Now is not the time for even more fiscal austerity at the expense of Maine workers, especially given the chaos and uncertainty happening in Washington [D.C.] right now.'
Testimony before the budget and Taxation committees on Monday underscored arguments lawmakers and advocacy organizations have been voicing since the governor first revealed the slate of tax changes in January.
Most of the public testimony on the proposed tax changes focused on Mills' plan to raise the cigarette tax from $2 to $3.
Taxes take center stage in budget debates
Echoing Mills' comments when she first released her budget, public health entities cited health benefits and reduced public health expenses in the long term when voicing support for the increased cigarette tax. Meanwhile, retailers argued the tax would hurt sales and low-income people, pointing to data that shows those with lower-incomes are more likely to smoke.
Other smoke shop owners similarly said they are concerned increasing cigarette taxes in Maine will drive customers out of state, as the hike will make Maine's tax rate almost double that of nearby New Hampshire. Another common concern from retailers, as well as some law enforcement entities, is increased prices driving underground markets.
Adam Hoffer, director of excise taxation for the Tax Foundation, also argued the excise taxes will not benefit the state long-term.
'Revenues from excise taxes tend to decrease over time while revenues needed for government services tend to grow,' Hoffer said.
Two aspects of labor-related state funding drew the most concern during the public hearing on Monday: pensions and the Workers' Compensation Board.
In 2011, former Gov. Paul LePage froze cost-of-living adjustments on pensions for three years and reduced the maximum for such adjustments for future years.
Lawmakers have made some changes since, but attempts to fully reinstate what had been cut have failed due to the ultimate cost to the state that would result.
'Ever since then, everybody says it would cost too much. We know it's wrong, but it costs too much to fix,' said former state employee Jane Gilbert. 'I know it costs too much to fix, but I hope you can do something anyway.'
A number of other former state employees who are seeing their retirement benefits dwindle also urged lawmakers to include some changes in the budget to help their pensions keep up with inflation.
'I expected a certain standard of living after giving 35 years of my life to the state of Maine,' said Bob Glindon, who worked in child welfare, 'and the state of Maine, basically, almost turned their back on me.'
A proposal from Mills to change a provision of law governing the Workers' Compensation Board Administrative Fund also drew criticism from business groups, which argued it's not necessary.
At the request of a 4-3 vote from the Worker's Compensation Board, Mills proposed removing current statutory language that places a specific dollar amount on the maximum value of assessments that may be levied from insured employers.
Lawmakers tried to make this change last session but that bill died when the governor declined to sign any bills sent to her desk on the final day of session.
Peter Gore, a government relations consultant with the firm Main Street Solutions, representing the Maine Council of Self Insurance and Workers Compensation Coordinating Council, said eliminating the assessment cap is unnecessary because the board can and has gone to the Legislature to get cap increases approved before.
'But the cap serves as a compelling safety valve to the business community,' Gore said. 'It also represents certainty, and by eliminating that cap, you insert uncertainty.'
The Maine Auto Dealers Association, American Property and Casualty Insurance Corporation and Maine Chamber of Commerce also voiced opposition to such a change.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Rally for LGBTQ+ rights to convene at historic site in Washington
Rally for LGBTQ+ rights to convene at historic site in Washington

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Rally for LGBTQ+ rights to convene at historic site in Washington

By Daniel Trotta WASHINGTON (Reuters) -LGBTQ+ people will gather on Sunday at the Lincoln Memorial in Washington, site of Martin Luther King's 1963 "I Have a Dream" speech, for a political rally aimed at preserving decades of progress while protesting setbacks under President Donald Trump. After the festive nature of a parade on Saturday through the streets of the capital, the political demonstration may be the main event of the weeks-long WorldPride celebration, which moves around the globe every two years. It occurs in Washington at a time of high tension over LGBTQ+ rights in the U.S. Speakers are certain to rail against Trump, who has issued executive orders limiting transgender rights, banned transgender people from serving in the armed forces and rescinded anti-discrimination policies for LGBTQ+ people. The White House has defended its dismantling of diversity, equity and inclusion programs, calling DEI a form of discrimination, and said its transgender policy protects women by keeping transgender women out of shared spaces. The Trump administration has also touted its appointment of a number of openly gay people to cabinet posts and judgeships as evidence that Trump aims to serve all Americans. Before the main rally, transgender supporters will hold their own march to protest Trump's rhetoric and myriad state laws around the country that ban transgender healthcare services for minors. Backers of those laws say they are attempting to protect minors from starting on a path they may later regret. The transgender rally will march from the offices of the Human Rights Campaign, the largest LGBTQ+ organization in the U.S., toward the Lincoln Memorial, which is considered hallowed ground in the U.S. civil rights movement as the site of the King speech and the March on Washington that preceded historic legislation such as the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965.

Justice Jackson Just Helped Reset the D.E.I. Debate
Justice Jackson Just Helped Reset the D.E.I. Debate

New York Times

time2 hours ago

  • New York Times

Justice Jackson Just Helped Reset the D.E.I. Debate

At the heart of the debate over diversity, equity and inclusion is a question: How much should the law treat a person as an individual rather than as a member of a group? For a very long time, American law and American institutions answered that question unequivocally. People were defined primarily by the group they belonged to, and if they happened to be Black or Native American or a woman, they were going to enjoy fewer rights, fewer privileges and fewer opportunities than the people who belonged to the categories white and male. That was — and remains — a grievous injustice. At a minimum, justice demands that a nation and its institutions cease and desist from malicious discrimination. But doesn't justice demand more? Doesn't it also require that a nation and its institutions actually try to provide assistance to targeted groups to help increase diversity in employment and education and help targeted groups overcome the systemic effects of centuries of discrimination? On Thursday, the Supreme Court unanimously decided a case that was directly relevant to the latter question, and while the outcome wasn't surprising, the court's unanimity — and the identity of the author of the court's opinion — certainly was. The facts of the case, Ames v. Ohio, are simple. In 2004, the Ohio Department of Youth Services hired a heterosexual woman named Marlean Ames to work as an executive secretary. By 2019, she'd worked her way up to program administrator and set her sights higher — applying for a management position in the agency's Office of Quality and Improvement. The department interviewed Ames for the job but decided to hire someone else, a lesbian. The department then demoted Ames and replaced her with a gay man. Believing she'd been discriminated against on the basis of her sexual orientation, she filed suit under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

Corporations pull back from LGBTQ Pride sponsorships, affecting South Florida events
Corporations pull back from LGBTQ Pride sponsorships, affecting South Florida events

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Corporations pull back from LGBTQ Pride sponsorships, affecting South Florida events

FORT LAUDERDALE, Fla. — The LGBTQ Pride month parades and festivals will go on. But in the current political environment, organizers of the events in South Florida and across the nation are feeling pressure. Hostility from President Donald Trump's administration toward anything touching on diversity, equity and inclusion is having an effect, financially. Some sponsors, whose contribuitons help defray the costs of parades and festivals are pulling back, wanting to avoid the spotlight and any potential controversy. Each of this year's major South Florida events — Palm Beach Pride in Lake Worth Beach in March, Miami Beach Pride in April, and Stonewall Pride in Wilton Manors in June — have seen some sponsor departures. The nation's biggest LGBTQ Pride parades and festivals are seeing the same phenomenon during this year's June Pride month, with some experiencing major falloffs. 'I don't believe there's a single Pride organization in this country that has not seen a drop in financial contributions,' said Rob Legere, director of sponsorships at Miami Beach Pride. 'It's happening around the country. From New York City to D.C. World Pride, to Chicago, to Miami Beach Pride, down to the small ones, Naples Pride or Space Coast Pride in Florida. Everyone has seen the same thing.' The last major South Florida Pride event of the spring is Stonewall in Wilton Manors on June 14. 'It does have an impact with Stonewall,' said Jameer Baptiste, events division president at Hotspots Happening Out, the organization that organizes the festival and parade. 'We are seeing fewer corporate sponsorships.' At the same time money is getting tighter for Pride events, they are being hit with much higher costs for security. Police and sheriff's deputies seen at the events are paid for by the organizations that run them, which hire off-duty law enforcement officers. Julie Seaver, executive director of the Compass LGBTQ+ Community Center in Lake Worth Beach, said Palm Beach Pride, which works 'very closely' with the Sheriff's Office, had to spend an extra $15,000 for extra water-filled barricades for enhanced security. That was not directly related to the political climate for LGBTQ events, she said. It was was part of the security enhancements that came after the New Year's Day attack in which a man drove a pickup into a crowd on Bourbon Street in New Orleans, killing 14 people and injuring 57. And Wilton Manors, at the recommendation of the city's police chief, is requiring metal detectors at all entrances to the Stonewall Street Festival and Parade this year. Budget documents the organization prepared for the city said the metal detectors would add $35,000 to the event's already heavy security costs. The budget presented to city officials in May showed police, deputies and fire-rescue personnel plus metal detectors taking up about a quarter of the $761,000 budget for the event. The total does not include another estimated $324,000 of in-kind donations of goods and services. Sponsors typically don't explicitly draw a straight line between the political environment and their decisions to end or pull back their support, executives of South Florida Pride organizations said. 'Nothing specific. Just very generic responses like, 'Unfortunately, this year our budget doesn't allow for it.' Things of that nature,' Baptiste said. 'We definitely don't want to assume. … We can only deduce that that's a possibility because we never experienced that with our corporate sponsors before. Some that we've had continuously for years upon years have all of a sudden backed out.' Palm Beach Pride experienced a related phenomenon this year, Seaver said. Seaver cited how a company, a public sponsor in the past, continued this year — but this time didn't want that support publicized. She said a company representative said it would 'continue to sponsor and support Pride events.' When she asked where the company wanted its sponsorship logos, she was told, 'We don't want to see any of that because we're trying to pull back from anything political right now.' Seaver declined to name that sponsor, but said it was 'a longt-ime, reputable company that used to promote that they were sponsoring Pride events.' There can be other reasons for curbing sponsorships, including economic uncertainty. Legere said sometimes companies change their marketing strategies or decide to concentrate on different parts of the country. 'Sometimes sensors just have a natural life cycle. They sponsor for a couple of years. They move on to something else,' said Todd Delmay, executive director of the political organization SAVE LGBT, who has held leadership in other LGBTQ organizations. People who don't rely on sponsorships for funding aren't worried about offending people whose support they might seek in the future. 'Corporations have been pulling back on sponsorship of Pride rallies in response to the (Trump) administration's attacks on diversity,' said Stephen Gaskill, a strategic communications consultant and former president of the Florida LGBTQ+ Democratic Caucus. Charles Zelden, a professor of history and legal studies at Nova Southeastern University, also said what is happening is clear. 'It's a sign of the trends that have happened since the election of Donald Trump,' Zelden said. Companies that have supported Pride events in the past don't want to get caught up in controversy — or risk becoming the one or two that become examples, as has happened with some prominent law firms and universities, he said. 'Government can do a lot to affect business,' Zelden said. 'They're scared because it's disfavored, scared because the federal government has become retributive. … 'You do what we say or we're going to make you hurt.' So these companies are basically backing away in an overabundance of caution. It's chicken. But it's also rational in the current environment.' The 2025 Pride Pulse Poll of executives in major companies conducted by Gravity Research, a consulting company that advises companies on reputation and risk management, found 39% plan to reduce Pride-related engagement in 2025, and none reported plans to increase it. Gravity also found 61% of executives cited potential pressure from the Trump administration as the top reason for rethinking their Pride strategies. The change is welcome to Anthony Verdugo, executive director of the Christian Family Coalition of Florida, who said via email that 'the public, and especially parents, are fed up with having LGBT propaganda shoved down their throats.' Verdugo applauded the Trump administration's moves to halt federal government deliberations of LGBTQ Pride and the message being sent. 'The Trump administration is listening to the voters by putting an end to Pride celebrations, and the private sector fortunately is beginning to come along.' Leaders of the three major South Florida Pride events said there hasn't been a mass exodus. Baptiste and Stonewall's website and advertising show past sponsors returning for its June 14 event. They include airlines JetBlue and Spirit, health systems Holy Cross Health, Baptist Health and Cleveland Clinic, and Fiserv, a payments financial services tech company. Also returning is Target, the retail chain that has generated controversy after scaling back on its diversity, equity and inclusion efforts. After protests in the past from conservative activists, Target has also scaled back Pride merchandise in some stores. 'We are happy to say that Target has come back. It was one of the ones that we thought wasn't going to because of the climate that's out there and the nature of what they're going through right now. But we're very happy and pleased to say that they're back with us,' Baptiste said. Among those who haven't returned are American Airlines, Amazon and Florida Power & Light Co. American and FPL didn't respond to requests for comment. Amazon also didn't comment, but provided a link to a statement on its website explaining inequitable treatment of anyone, including LGBTQ people, 'is unacceptable.' Not commenting on the subject is common among former corporate sponsors. CNBC, CNN and The New York Times all reported that multiple major companies did not respond to requests to discuss their Pride month plans. A new Stonewall sponsor this year is Stiles, the big construction and property management company headquartered in Fort Lauderdale. In December, Stiles and a North Carolina-based real estate company bought the Shoppes of Wilton Manors, where some of the city's most prominent LGBTQ businesses are the biggest tenants. In South Florida, which is in many ways politically and culturally different from the rest of the state, local governments have largely been supportive of Pride events in their communities — especially in places known for their LGBTQ population. Seaver said Lake Worth Beach, Palm Beach County government, and the Sheriff's Office provide some goods and services, but not money. The Broward County Cultural Division is providing $25,000 this year to Stonewall in Wilton Manors under a new county cultural festival and events sponsorship program, said Phil Dunlap, division director. Last year, the county provided financial support for Stonewall via its tourism marking agency. This year, Visit Lauderdale CEO Stacy Ritter said, the agency is providing some social media marketing support, but not money. Data showed 2024 attendees 'were very, very, very local and our money has to be spent on marketing the destination to visitors.' Ritter, a longtime supporter of the LGBTQ community when she was a state representative and county commissioner, said it was 'absolutely not' a county avoidance of supporting Pride. Wilton Manors, the unofficial capital of the LGBTQ community in South Florida, is spending $50,000 of city money on Stonewall and what the city manager told commissioners was $48,000 in additional support in the form of expenses it covers, including water trucks and the time of city employees. One government agency that sponsored Stonewall with $5,000 in cash and $5,000 of in-kind support in 2024 but nothing in 2025 is Memorial Healthcare System. Although it's widely known by that brand name for its network of hospitals and health services in the southern third of the county, it is actually a government agency, the South Broward Hospital District, which is governed by a board appointed by the governor. 'They didn't give us a specific reason, other than budget,' Baptiste said. 'All we know is that they didn't come.' Tania Ordaz, the system's director of corporate communications, said via email that Memorial Healthcare focuses on investments 'that drive our mission as a healthcare provider. Our sponsorship committee regularly reviews and rotates sponsorship investments to ensure we are supporting stakeholders in our primary service area and sometimes beyond. As resources are limited, we are unable to sponsor every initiative each year.' Under Gov. Ron DeSantis, the state enacted the Parental Rights in Education Law, called the 'Don't Say Gay' law by critics, which restricts instruction on sexual orientation or gender identity in schools. It has imposed age restrictions on audiences for drag shows. And it banned light displays on state-managed bridges, except on official government holidays using red, white and blue, which effectively blocks rainbow-colored lights during Pride month. In February, DeSantis announced a Florida version of DOGE would review local governments, inspired by the so-called Department of Government Efficiency that was led by Trump's ally-turned-enemy Elon Musk to end federal programs and fire employees. With that backdrop, Delray Beach commissioners debated whether continuing the city-sponsored and -financed Pride festival and concert could attract the attention and ire from the state government. Delray Beach Commissioner Juli Casale told her colleagues at an April meeting that she'd heard from the city's lobbyist that the city should be cautious. 'There could be financial ramifications,' Casale said. 'What I'm hearing is that we could be penalized.' Commissioner Rob Long argued the city should not be 'at the whim of whatever winds are blowing from Tallahassee.' 'At a time when LGBTQ-plus communities are under increasing attack, it sends the wrong message for Delray Beach to even consider or even talk about pulling our modest support for an event that celebrates inclusion, Pride and community spirit,' Long told his colleagues. The next day the city manager asked the lobbyist, Mat Forrest of Ballard Partners, to elaborate. Via email, Forrest told city leaders that when the state assesses funding for Delray Beach it 'would likely consider, as one of many factors, the City's sponsorship of any event. … The City should keep that responsibility, or vulnerability, in mind when allocating funds to any externally produced event.' Ultimately, the City Commission maintained the $15,000 for Pride Fest and $15,000 for a Pride concert that evening, part of an annual Delray Beach special events budget totaling $951,000 for more than 30 events. Pride Fest and the concert are on June 14.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store