‘Alive because of pride': Father of Kashmir ‘ponywallah' who died fighting terrorist in Pahalgam
His son Syed Adil Hussain Shah's heroic act caught national attention after Jammu and Kashmir chief minister Omar Abdullah visited his funeral on Wednesday to participate in a prayer (Fatiha) with hundreds of mourners. Shah was laid to rest at his ancestral graveyard at Hapatnard village in Pahalgam.
Follow live updates on Pahalgam terror attack
The deceased's father stood inconsolable when the chief minister hugged him to share grief and express solidarity. 'I am very proud of him and his sacrifice. I am alive because of the pride I am feeling. Otherwise, I would have died the moment I saw his young, dead body. I am happy because of his bravery. Some people were saved because of him, and I am proud of it,' Hyder Shah told ANI on Thursday.
Syed Naushad, the deceased's brother, said that Shah had gone to Pahalgam for work, where terrorists shot him thrice in his chest. "He used to take tourists on pony rides to Baisaran. On Tuesday, when terrorists attacked tourists, my brother tried to stop them. A tourist whose father was killed in the attack told me about the heroic act of my brother at SMHS hospital,' he said.
Abdullah hailed Shah's courageous act to defend tourists he had ferried on horseback from the parking area to Baisaran meadow. 'Met his grieving family and assured them of full support — Adil (Shah) was the sole breadwinner, and his extraordinary bravery and sacrifice will forever be remembered. We are with them and will help them as much as we can,' he wrote on X.
Also read | PM Narendra Modi's warning to Pahalgam terrorists in English: 'End of Earth' | Top quotes
Shah's funeral prayers were led by a local, Ghulam Hassan, who lauded the pony ride operator's sacrifice. 'He will be rewarded by Allah for his deeds. I pray nobody sees their loved ones die like this. We should always be ready to die for others, whether a Sikh, Pandit or a Muslim. That is what our religion teaches us,' Hassan said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
28 minutes ago
- India.com
WATCH: Indian Muslim Girls Stand Tall In London, Repel Pakistani Harassment Over Tricolour
A London's street witnessed a tense encounter as celebrations for India's Independence Day unfolded. Indian citizens had gathered to mark the occasion, waving the tricolor and raising patriotic slogans. A group of Pakistanis attempted to disrupt the celebrations and harass the participants. The confrontation targeted a group of Indian girls, including Muslim students, who were peacefully celebrating with friends. When Pakistanis tried to snatch the tricolor, the girls responded firmly. Their courage forced the intruders to retreat, while the girls continued to chant 'Hindustan Zindabad'. A video capturing the episode circulated widely on social media, showing the girls standing their ground against the harassers. The video highlights a Muslim girl holding the tricolor and celebrating with her friends. Several Pakistanis approached to intimidate the group, but she did not flinch. She answered back resolutely, compelling the intruders to leave. UK: Pakistani goons harass Indian Muslim girls on the streets of London during India's Independence Day celebrations — OSINT Updates (@OsintUpdates) August 18, 2025 Social media users praised her bravery, applauding her for confronting the troublemakers with confidence. Such tensions between Indian and Pakistani citizens in London are not unprecedented. Previous incidents, including clashes following the Pulwama terrorist attack and Operation Sindoor, had seen similar confrontations. Demonstrations by people supporting their respective governments often escalated into disputes, requiring police intervention. Independence celebrations in both countries are just a day apart. Pakistan observes its Independence Day on August 14, while India celebrates on August 15. The close timing of these events sometimes leads to heightened emotions and occasional confrontations among diaspora communities.
Time of India
38 minutes ago
- Time of India
PM, CMs, mins to go if held for 30 days on serious charges: Bills
NEW DELHI: In a significant move, home minister will on Wednesday move a set of three bills providing for mandatory resignation or removal of the Prime Minister, chief ministers and ministers at the Centre and in states/UTs, if they have spent 30 consecutive days under arrest or detention, on an allegation of committing offences punishable with imprisonment extending to five years or more. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now However, nothing will prevent such PM, CMs or ministers from being subsequently appointed to the same office by President or governor, upon their release from custody. The timing of the amendments, two days before the end of Parliament's Monsoon session, and their implications caught political circles by surprise. The Representation of the People's Act, 1951 provides for the disqualification of members of state legislatures and Parliament if they are convicted with a sentence of two years or more. Convictions for serious offences such as corruption and drug trafficking result in disqualification irrespective of the duration of the sentence. There was so far no bar on ministers holding on to their offices after their arrests: something that was justified on the ground that no one deserves to be punished until proven guilty. Until a few years ago, ministers and CMs facing arrests, resigned. But the convention was of late followed more in breach with several ministers continuing in their posts after their arrests. The SC recently sought to reinstate the practice by forcing Tamil Nadu minister Senthil Balaji to step down. Shah, in the statement of objects and reasons of the bills, says the elected representatives, who represent hopes and aspirations of the people, are expected to act only in public interest and have character and conduct that is beyond any ray of suspicion. Ministers facing criminal charges hinder good governance, says Shah A minister, who is facing allegations of serious criminal offences, arrested and detained in custody, may thwart or hinder the canons of constitutional morality and principles of good governance and eventually diminish the constitutional trust reposed by people in him, Union minister Amit Shah said. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The bills may be sent to a parliamentary panel for detailed scrutiny of provisions. The Constitution (One Hundred and Thirtieth Amendment) Bill states the PM, if under arrest or detention for 30 days on allegation of committing an offence punishable with jail term that may extend to five years or more, shall tender his resignation by the 31st day. "If he does not tender his resignation, he shall cease to be PM with effect from the day falling thereafter," it adds. The same provisions will apply in case of a state or UT CM - the latter covered by two separate bills, Govt of Union Territories (Amendment) Bill, 2025 and Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation (Amendment) Act, 2025 - arrested for a straight 30 days for an offence carrying a prison sentence of five years or more. Even the ministers in the Council of States at Centre and in states/UTs will be bound by the same provisions. While a Union minister shall be removed from office by the President on advice of the PM, state or UT ministers shall be removed by the governor on advice of the CM. In recent past, then Delhi chief minister Arvind Kejriwal had refused to resign after he was arrested in a liquor 'scam' case and spent several months in jail. It was only after he was let out on bail that he stepped down and named Atishi as CM.
News18
an hour ago
- News18
Trump imposed sanctions on India to end Russia-Ukraine war: White House
Washington DC [US], August 20 (ANI): US White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt on Tuesday (local time) said that US President Donald Trump imposed tariffs on India to deter Russia from pursuing the Ukraine conflict. Trump has doubled India's tariff to 50 per cent by imposing an additional 25 per cent levy on the previously announced 25 per during her press briefing, said that the intent behind the sanctions was to put secondary pressure on Russia.'Look, the president has put tremendous public pressure to bring this war to a close. He's taken actions, as you've seen, sanctions on India and other actions as well. He's made himself very clear that he wants to see this war end, and he has scoffed at the ideas of others that have been raised that we should wait another month before any meeting takes place," she Trump met Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky at the White House, with the former signalling his openness to a trilateral meeting with Putin to negotiate an end to the war in said that he had a very successful day, while Zelensky noted that this was the 'best conversation" he had with the US President so further said that Trump wishes to bring peace as soon as possible.'The president wants to move and he wants to bring this war to an end as quickly as possible… With all of those European leaders leaving the White House, including the NATO Secretary General, they all agree that this is a great first step. And it's a good thing that these two leaders are going to be sitting down together, and the president expects that to happen," she further said, 'I can assure you that the United States government and the Trump administration are working with both Russia and Ukraine to make that bilateral happen as we speak."Leavitt said that Trump's relentless efforts at brokering peace led to the European leaders being present at the White House within 48 hours of his meeting with Putin.'The President met with all of these European leaders at the White House 48 hours after sitting down with President Putin on American soil. In fact, there was so much progress in the readout that was given to these European leaders immediately following his meeting with President Putin that every single one of them got on a plane 48 hours later and flew to the United States of America," she said. 'So these leaders who this war is in their backyard are very grateful that the president took that call and that he was there to provide them with a readout of Russia's thinking on this, something that was not done by the previous administration at all," she reinstated the White House's claim that if Trump were the president, the war would have never happened when a reporter asked a question in that regard.'The president often says that this war would not have started if he were in office and and Putin confirmed that," the reporter has repeatedly stated that the war wouldn't have started if he were in office, and surprisingly, Putin seems to agree. When asked about this, Leavitt confirmed that Putin did indeed say that.'True. Do you accept that as true? The European leaders do. Well, and President Putin himself said that, by the way," Leavitt said.A reporter asked what Trump plans to do to ensure security guarantees last beyond his presidency. Leavitt responded that Trump understands the need for lasting peace and is engaging in discussions with European leaders and NATO to achieve this highlighted Trump's dedication to bringing the war to an end, saying he has spent a significant amount of time and energy on this effort. Trump has been in talks with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and European leaders to brief them on the situation.'Well, he understands the need for that, which he spoke to yesterday. It's why he's engaging in numerous discussions and conversations with both sides of this war with our European allies. The President himself was discussing with European leaders and NATO how to ensure lasting peace and bring an end to the conflict. He has expended an incredible amount of time, energy and effort into bringing this war to an end, and he remains determined to do that," Leavitt answered. (ANI)
