
PIP changes explained with fears it will hugely impact Wales
What the PIP changes could mean for benefits claimants in Wales ahead of crunch vote
Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall arrives in Downing Street for today's cabinet meeting ahead of the crucial welfare reform vote
(Image: PA )
MPs will tonight vote on UK Government plans to reform welfare payments. It comes after a climbdown by the Labour administration after huge public outcry and facing a huge rebellion from its own MPs.
At its height more than 100 Labour MPs said they would vote against their own government, but that has reduced to 39 Labour backbenchers since changes were announced. Wales' four Plaid Cymru MPs have also backed the amendment, which will be voted on.
The proposals were hugely controversial. While the UK Government say reform is needed, critics said they were being rushed through and had not consulted charities or disabled people who will be impacted. For our free daily briefing on the biggest issues facing the nation, sign up to the Wales Matters newsletter here .
Work and pensions secretary Liz Kendall told the Commons: "Welfare reform, let's be honest, is never easy, perhaps especially for Labour governments. Our social security system directly touches the lives of millions of people and it is something we all care deeply about.
"We have listened to the concerns that have been raised to help us get these changes right. The Bill protects people already claiming PIP, it protects in real terms the incomes of people already receiving the UC (universal credit) health top-up from that benefit and their standard allowance, and it protects those with severe lifelong conditions who will never work, and those near the end of their life as we promised we would."
The Welsh Government had criticised the plans, with senior minister Jane Hutt writing to Ms Kendall saying there needed to be a review of the plans. Once the climbdown was announced, it was welcomed by First Minister Eluned Morgan. She said: "Around 200,000 people could have been in real trouble, and they've listened, they've learned and they've acted – and that is something I think we should welcome."
Article continues below
What is PIP?
Personal Independence Payment (PIP) is a non-means-tested benefit intended to help with extra costs arising from long-term disability or ill-health which was introduced in 2013. It replaced Disability Living Allowance for people of working age.
PIP is made up of two components:
a mobility component, based on an individual's ability to get around; and
a 'daily living' component, based on ability to carry out other key activities necessary to be able to participate in daily life.
Each component can be awarded at either standard, enhanced, or nil (where they receive nothing).
What was proposed?
The UK Government had proposed sweeping changes that were deeply unpopular there were two main elements:
Increasing the basic 'standard allowance' of Universal Credit that all claimants receive, while reducing the generosity of the additional amounts for claimants with disabilities and health conditions that affect their capability for work
In terms of PIP, changes to the way eligibility is calculated - claimants would need to score four or more points for at least one of the 'daily living' activities that determine entitlement to the daily living component
Now what is happening?
The UK Government announced two major changes
the new Personal Independence Payment daily living 'four-point' requirement will only be implemented for new claimants from November 2026
existing recipients of the Universal Credit health element, and any new claimant meeting the criteria for the most severe and lifelong conditions, will "have their incomes fully protected in real terms"
Why is it so important in Wales?
There was a lack of official government data about exactly who would be impacted in Wales but it was widely commented that there would be a disproportionate impact in Wales because Wales has higher rates of disabled people of working age than the UK average.
The Joseph Rowntree Foundation highlighted the constituencies where cuts to sickness and disability benefits will fall most heavily which showed of the top 20 constituencies in England and Wales with the highest proportion of the working age population in receipt of health-related social security, eight are in Wales (and 10 out of the top 30) which suggested changing PIP would have a disproportionate impact on disabled people in Wales.
In fact, Welsh Government minister Jane Hutt wrote to her UK Government counterpart and said that element needed to be reviewed. "The proposed changes to Personal Independence Payments should be reviewed before any changes are made," she wrote.
Policy in Practice estimated there will be substantial increases in poverty and financial hardship for working age households in Wales.
The original plans would have impacted an estimated 190,000 people in Wales (6.1% of the population) and see £470m lost from the Welsh economy.
Victoria Winckler, director of The Bevan Foundation, said it would "increase social inequality, and exacerbating already entrenched poverty in Wales".
Are the changes better news?
There are still concerns that the row back is going to create a two-tier system and younger disabled people and those who become disabled in the future will be disadvantaged and denied access to work and education.
The concessions by the UK Government have seen a number of the Welsh MPs who had signed an amendment which looked set to sink the government plans has decreased. While Plaid Cymru's four MPs have signed the amendment, only one of the five Labour MPs who had originally put their names to it have kept there, that's Steve Witherden, the MP for Montgomeryshire and Glyndwr.
However, a huge number of charity groups say the changes don't go far enough. Since the revisions, groups and charities including Citizens Advice, The Poverty Alliance and The Salvation Army have co-signed a letter saying they want the bill withdrawn. There has not, the groups say, been enough consultation.
That was echoed by Luke Young, head of policy at Citizens Advice who asked MPs to vote against the bill. "The UK government's own impact assessment says the cuts will plunge 150,000 people into poverty by the end of this Parliament. Even this is an underestimate of the potential impact. If this Bill is passed, then by 2030 it will have cut PIP for more than 400,000 disabled people and Universal Credit for more than 700,000 people who are disabled or have a long-term health condition.
Article continues below
"We know Wales will be disproportionately affected, with communities such as Blaenau Gwent, Caerphilly and Neath Port Talbot being hardest hit. It will push more people toward already stretched public services and into to food banks, as they find even less support available under a new three tier system."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
15 minutes ago
- Telegraph
The British political class have shown themselves at their worst
The result should never have been in doubt. That whips and ministers were nervous at all should be testament enough as to how badly this government is being run. The welfare reform Bill was finally passed with a majority of 75, about 100 less than Labour's notional majority. But there is something missing from ministers' and MPs' reactions to this 'victory': the cheers, such as they were, sounded forced. The smiles were wan. The congratulations looked half-hearted. Because this is a Bill whose passage means many losers and zero winners – a rare achievement in parliamentary politics. Of course, the real losers are those future claimants of Personal Independence Payments (PIP) who, depending on the detail of the latest concessions granted by Keir Starmer, will find it much more difficult to have their claims approved. But there are many more political losers. There are the rebels themselves, at least some of whom might have hoped for personal advancement in their political careers and who must now face years of being nominated for the crummiest, dullest standing committees – the traditional punishment for those who won't take their whips' advice. Then there are the Conservatives, who voted against a measure many of them clearly supported. There was even a shadow cabinet meeting last week at which Kemi Badenoch asked each member how the party should vote. That such a question even needs to be asked suggests there was at least some support for a more principled, less cynical stance. Then of course there is the Government, which, before this debate and vote, was in a slightly stronger, slightly more popular position than this evening and which now has achieved the passing of a measure that even ministers can no longer see the point of. It has spent a lot of its political credibility in securing a Bill that was originally sold as a genuinely reformist measure (it is not) and which would save the Treasury billions (it will not). Not the Commons' finest moment. A damaged legislature, a damaged government and, most importantly, a damaged prime minister. Happy anniversary, Sir Keir.


Scotsman
15 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Disability benefit cuts: Sir Keir Starmer forced to make late concession in biggest Labour rebellion
Sir Keir Starmer was forced to abandon a key plank of his welfare reform agenda to get the legislation through its first Commons test. Sign up to our Politics newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... In a late climbdown as MPs prepared to vote, the UK government shelved plans last night to restrict eligibility for the personal independence payment (Pip), with any changes now only coming after a review of the benefit. The move will cause a headache for Chancellor Rachel Reeves, who has seen a forecast £4.8 billion saving from the welfare budget whittled away through a series of concessions, leaving her to seek extra money through spending cuts, tax hikes or borrowing to balance the books. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The decision to remove the Pip changes from the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill was announced just 90 minutes before MPs voted. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer delivers a speech during a reception for public sector workers, at 10 Downing Street, London. Picture: Carl Court/PA Wire The legislation cleared its first hurdle by 335 votes to 260 – a majority of just 75. Despite the late concession, there were 49 Labour rebels in what was the largest revolt so far of Sir Keir's premiership. Labour's Brian Leishman, the MP for Alloa and Grangemouth who was among the rebels, said ministers should still withdraw the Bill despite the legislation passing its second reading. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The Scottish MP had also voted in favour of a cross-party amendment that would have stopped the Bill before its second reading. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer delivers a speech during a reception for public sector workers, at 10 Downing Street, London. Picture: Carl Court/PA Wire He said: 'Today was a prime example in how not to legislate. A shambolic afternoon with policy being made up off the cuff and on the notion of promises to come. 'The government should do the honourable and decent thing and withdraw this dreadful Bill.' Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall insisted the Labour Party was '100 per cent' behind the Prime Minister, but acknowledged there were 'lessons to be learned' after the rebellion. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad She also appeared to express regret over the handling of the issue, saying: 'I wish we had got to this point in a different way.' The decision to remove key parts of the Bill is remarkable for a government with a working majority of 165 and after just under a year in office. This personal independence payments is devolved in Scotland as the adult disability benefit. But any cuts at UK-level would affect how much money the Scottish Government receives from the Treasury for the payments. Other Scottish Labour MPs who had opposed the original Bill had included Patricia Ferguson, Tracy Gilbert, Dr Scott Arthur, Kirsteen Sullivan, Richard Baker, Euan Stainbank, Lillian Jones, Elaine Stewart, Martin Rhodes and Irene Campbell. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Tory leader Kemi Badenoch accused ministers of 'utter capitulation' and said the legislation was now 'pointless'. She said: 'They should bin it, do their homework, and come back with something serious. Starmer cannot govern.' SNP Westminster leader Stephen Flynn said: "From start to finish, Labour's disability cuts Bill has been a shambles – and it defines their chaotic first year in office. "The cause of that chaos, and the blame for it, falls directly at the doors of Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves. Tonight, the Labour Party owe an apology to disabled people. Their daily lives have been subjected to a cruel Westminster political game. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad "The final U-turn they deserve tonight is an apology from the Prime Minister and for this shambolic Bill to be scrapped. "The only option left for the Labour Party is to stop their attack on disabled people, remove the threat of a two-tier disability system and for them to finally scrap this bill." The government's concessions mean it will not make any savings as a result of its welfare reforms by 2029/30, but could in the longer term, think-tank Resolution Foundation said. The organisation's chief executive Ruth Curtice said: 'The government originally hoped to save £4.8bn from its welfare reforms in the crucial year of 29/30. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'The upshot of all the concessions this week is it will now not make any net savings in that year. The changes to universal credit are nonetheless important for recipients and their work incentives, and are expected to save money in the longer term.' Earlier, a Labour rebel attempt to halt the legislation was defeated by 179 votes. A total of 44 Labour MPs including two tellers backed the bid by rebel ringleader Rachael Maskell, who described the Bill as 'unravelling' and 'a complete farce'. A previous effort to kill the Bill had attracted more than 120 Labour supporters, but was dropped after the first partial U-turn on the legislation last week, which restricted the Pip changes to new claimants from November 2026. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad That date has now been abandoned in the latest climbdown, with any changes now only coming after disability minister Sir Stephen Timms' review of the Pip assessment process. Sir Stephen announced the climbdown in the middle of the debate on the legislation. He acknowledged 'concerns that the changes to Pip are coming ahead of the conclusions of the review of the assessment that I will be leading'. He said the government would now 'only make changes to Pip eligibility activities and descriptors following that review', which is due to conclude in the autumn of 2026. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The concession came after frantic behind-the-scenes negotiations in Westminster involving the Prime Minister, his Cabinet and wavering Labour MPs. Charlotte Gill, head of campaigns and public affairs at the MS Society, said: 'We thought last week's so-called concessions were last minute. But these panicked 11th hour changes still don't fix a rushed, poorly thought-out Bill.' But Jon Sparkes, chief executive of learning disability charity Mencap, said: 'The last-minute change relating to the review Sir Stephen Timms is leading sounds positive and we are pleased that the Government has listened.' He added: 'Disabled people should not have to pay to fix black holes in the public finances.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The government's concessions have gutted the reforms, leaving only parts of the current Bill still on the table. Proposals to cut the health element of universal credit by almost 50 per cent for most new claimants from April 2026 remain in place, along with an above-inflation increase in the benefit's standard allowance.


Telegraph
28 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Labour's ‘clusterf--- of Godzilla proportions' ... so whose head will roll?
The benefits reforms passed in the House of Commons on Tuesday are a pale imitation of the package first announced by the Government in March. Two significant concessions to rebels by Sir Keir Starmer have shaved billions off the savings the Bill was estimated to make from tightening up benefit rules. The claimants his Work and Pensions Secretary once said were 'taking the Mickey' out of the system will not see any change to their entitlement, and new claimants will be accepted under the existing rules until at least autumn 2026. The revolt of dozens of Labour MPs has left Sir Keir with an angry party, far fewer reforms than he hoped, and a black hole in the public finances worth billions of pounds. 'It makes the entire thing a total clusterf--- of Godzilla proportions,' said one MP on Tuesday night. 'Only the Gods know how this cobbled-together Bill does anything it's supposed to anymore.' A morose minister added: 'Today is not a good day.' Downing Street is expected to make some changes to its operation as a result of the carnage. Labour rebels are divided on who is responsible for the debacle. But the list of those in the dock is lengthy. Sir Keir Starmer Some Labour MPs say the Prime Minister himself is responsible for the failure to keep his party in line. They argue that it has been clear since March, when the plans were first announced by Liz Kendall, the Work and Pensions Secretary, that they were never going to fly with the Labour backbenchers. Sir Keir has been accused of failing to keep in touch with his MPs, refusing to attend the Commons for votes, and trying to railroad his party into backing reforms without first earning their loyalty. 'Talking to colleagues and backbenchers, he has been very absent,' one minister said. 'This has been a problem all along.' There are few in the party who would call for Sir Keir to stand down – even privately – but there is a sense among MPs that he must take overall responsibility for mismanaging one of the most important policies of his administration so far. He worsened the situation at the weekend, when he told The Sunday Times that the rebellion had only been allowed to grow because he was too concentrated on what was happening in the Middle East. 'There's a lot of resentment in the party towards Keir,' one Labour MP admitted. Rachel Reeves The self-described 'Iron Chancellor' is also receiving a lot of flak from Labour insiders as the politician who most resisted making changes to the welfare reforms. When the original 'wrecking' amendment emerged early last week, insiders say it was Ms Reeves who urged No10 to hold off on making any concessions. But that strategy only enraged MPs more, blowing the rebellion up into a crisis and triggering talk of an existential challenge for Sir Keir. In the end, she was visiting a JCB factory when the decision was made to concede and let existing benefit claimants keep their entitlement. The fact she was not in the room when a fresh hole was blown in her Budget does not bode well for the Chancellor. Ms Reeves is now in an unenviable position. She will have to increase taxes significantly later in the year to account for a total shortfall of about £40bn – including about £3bn created by these about-turns on welfare policy. That will only make her more unpopular with the public, and there are now few Labour MPs who would go out and defend her. Liz Kendall The Work and Pensions Secretary was not a popular figure among the Labour faithful before taking office last July, having finished fourth in her run for the party leadership in 2015. She is viewed as a Blairite, and while her politics matches the more Right-leaning instincts of Sir Keir and his advisers, she has not broken into the clique of senior ministers who receive greater access to the Prime Minister, insiders say. Since the beginning of the year, Ms Kendall has been given the 'hospital pass' of implementing Labour's welfare reforms – a much-needed brake on the relentless increase of Britain's social security budget. Back in March, the proposals leaked to the media before they could be properly 'pitch-rolled' by Downing Street, stoking an almighty row with Left-wing backbenchers. MPs then claimed the Bill was rushed and poorly drafted, allowing senior Labour figures including Dame Meg Hillier, the chairman of the Treasury select committee, to rip them apart. There was a curious sense of history repeating itself on Tuesday, as Labour old-timers remembered the biggest rebellion of Sir Tony Blair's first premiership, when 47 MPs voted against changes to lone parent benefit. His social security secretary was Baroness Harman, who had employed Ms Kendall as a special adviser to manage her relationship with MPs and the press. Morgan McSweeney The Irish svengali at the heart of the Downing Street operation was blamed, as usual, when something went seriously wrong with one of Sir Keir's flagship policies. Mr McSweeney is widely regarded as a campaigning genius, but his critics say he would be better deployed in a more political role at Labour headquarters, than running the nexus of government as Downing Street chief of staff. On Tuesday morning, Sir Keir was forced to tell the Cabinet to stop briefing against his closest adviser, after negative stories about McSweeney reached a fever pitch at the weekend. 'We will not resile from our record of achievement and we will not turn on our staff – including our chief of staff – without whom none of us would be sitting around this cabinet table,' he told ministers, according to The Times. Speaking to The Telegraph, one minister said Mr McSweeney was responsible for the 'woeful' management of MPs and had 'been in a bunker with his head down'. Many MPs say they don't know Mr McSweeney, but think of him as a sinister and arrogant figure, controlling the Government from the inside. His supporters say he attracts criticism and media coverage simply because he is better known than his colleagues. Claire Reynolds On paper, it is easiest to blame Claire Reynolds for the disastrous 'political management' of the backbenchers in the lead-up to Tuesday's vote. The little-known Downing Street appointee is responsible for liaising between Labour MPs and the Government, suggesting ways for the Cabinet to engage with the party and, in short, keeping everyone happy. But the failure to persuade MPs that they should remain loyal to No10 was the most significant issue for Sir Keir in passing his reforms, which now lie in tatters. 'They now have a smoking ruin of a Bill that they've had to shred to head off a rebellion,' one Labour MP said. 'How did a 100-plus majority come to this?' Some MPs say they have never met or spoken to Ms Reynolds, a former Labour official (and wife of Jonathan Reynolds, the Business Secretary) who is in charge with assuaging their concerns. One Labour rebel said that simply being invited into Downing Street occasionally might have made them less likely to vote against the Government – which she could have organised.