
On eve of Nilambur bypoll, ruling CPI(M) and Congress-led UDF lock horns over past ties with RSS
The row erupted after CPI(M) general secretary M.V. Govindan, during a TV interview, referred to a post-Emergency alliance involving the RSS, drawing sharp criticism from the Opposition, which accused the Left of hypocrisy even as it targets the UDF for accepting Jamaat-e-Islami's support in the Nilambur assembly bypoll.
Thiruvananthapuram: Hours before the crucial Nilambur bypoll, the ruling Communist Party of India (Marxist) and the Congress-led United Democratic Front (UDF) are locked in a war of words over past ties with the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS).
'RSS was formed in 1925. But we never supported their stand. After the Emergency in 1967, didn't we join hands with the RSS? That was the situation then. The RSS is a communal force, but during the Emergency, when the country was heading towards fascism, everyone opposing it stood together, in Kerala and across India,' Govindan said in the interview to Mathrubhumi Wednesday.
The Janata Party, formed in 1977 to oppose Indira Gandhi's regime, had brought together the Jan Sangh, Bharatiya Lok Dal, and Socialist Party—an alliance that saw cooperation from the CPI(M) as well. The coalition's landslide win saw Morarji Desai become the first non-Congress Prime Minister.
But the statement triggered a political firestorm in Kerala, a state where BJP, which considers RSS as its ideological parent, is aggressively trying to find footing, but still struggling.
Leader of Opposition V.D. Satheesan said the timing of the statement was not a coincidence. 'It may seem untimely, but this was a calculated move. Why is the CPI(M) remembering this past now? It's a coded call for help—a signal to the RSS–BJP that they can be partners again,' he alleged Thursday. Satheesan said BJP's initial reluctance to field a candidate in Nilambur hinted at tacit coordination with the Left. He also accused the CPI(M) of running a communal, Islamophobic campaign to win RSS support.
Incidentally, the CPI(M) has been attacking the Congress-led UDF for accepting the support of Jamaat-e-Islami in the aftermath of the 2024 Lok Sabha elections, terming the organisation 'communal'. The party renewed its attack recently after the organisation openly supported the Congress in the Nilambur bypoll. Being conducted months before the state's Assembly election, the bypoll is considered a preview of the larger electoral battle ahead. Voting is to be held Thursday.
Satheesan alleged that the CPI(M) had colluded with BJP to defeat the Congress's Rajiv Gandhi again in 1989. He produced a photograph of Atal Bihari Vajpayee, L.K. Advani, Jyoti Basu, and E.M.S. Namboodiripad together to support his claim.
The 1989 general election saw significant changes in the Indian political and coalition history. With the Bofors scandal marring its image, the Congress's seats came down to 197 from the 404 it got in 1984, followed by V.P. Singh's Janata Dal (142) and the National Front. The Opposition led by the Janata Dal, formed the coalition government with the support of BJP and the left parties.
'One of the primary explanations for the success of the Dal was its ability to work out a significant number (89) of effective electoral seat adjustments with the other major opposition parties—the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) in northern and western India and the Left Front (the two Indian Communist parties and two small Marxist parties, the Forward Bloc and the Revolutionary Socialist Party) in eastern India. On 2 December 1989, V.P. Singh, the JD leader, was sworn in as Indian Prime Minister, and on 21 December 1989, the Janata Dal/National Front Government won a vote of confidence in the Lok Sabha by a voice vote,' writes Lewis P. Fickett in the Asian Survey's 1993 journal The Rise and Fall of Janata Dal.
'We have always maintained a single stand against the RSS. The allegations are just to create a controversy ahead of polls,' CPI(M) MLA from Malappuram's Ponnani, P. Nandakumar, told ThePrint. However, Nandakumar refused to respond to the Congress's allegation about the left alliance with the RSS and the BJP after the Emergency.
Govindan holds press conference
As the controversy gained traction, Govindan Wednesday held a press conference in Thiruvananthapuram, saying his words were being distorted to make him appear sympathetic to communal forces.
'The Emergency was a period of semi-fascism. The Janata Party, which we supported, was not just the Jana Sangh. It was a broad front of socialists, democrats, and Emergency opponents. Yes, Jana Sangh was part of it—but RSS was not a prominent force in that alliance,' he clarified. 'CPI(M) has never formed and will never form a partnership with the RSS—past, present, or future,' Govindan said.
Earlier in the day, Nilambur candidate M. Swaraj also reiterated that the alliance in 1977 was necessitated by circumstances, but once the RSS's influence in Janata Party grew, the CPI(M) backed off.
He said in the consecutive bypolls in Kasargode, Thalassery, Thiruvalla, and Parassala, Namboodiripad famously said the party doesn't need RSS votes, reinforcing the Left's commitment to secularism.
'We won all four seats. That statement boosted secular forces in Kerala,' Swaraj said.
The CPI(M) also pushed back by accusing the Congress of its own ties with the RSS during the 1958–59 Liberation Struggle. The Liberation Struggle was an anti-communist movement against the first Kerala government, backed by the Syro-Malabar Church, Nair Service Society, the Muslim League, and the Congress.
Congress candidate for the Nilambur bypoll Aryadan Shoukath too jumped into the debate, saying, 'In 1977, the Congress lost power for the first time because the Left openly aligned with the Jan Sangh. We all know these alliances can return. Remember, L.K. Advani inaugurated V. Sivadasa Menon's election convention in Palakkad.'
The Congress had earlier accused the CPI(M) of diluting its stand against BJP after the party's draft resolution ahead of the 24th Party Congress used the word 'neo-fascist' for the BJP. However, CPI(M) Polit Bureau member clarified that the resolution referred to 'neo-fascism' and 'neo-fascist tendencies' as they represented an ideological trend distinct from the 'classical fascism' that emerged globally in the early 20th century.
In the party's state conference in Kollam earlier this year, Prakash Karat said Modi government's 11-year rule is showing 'neo-fascistic characteristics' in its aggressive push for Hindutva and neo-liberal agendas, warning that it will develop into 'full-fledged fascism, if not resisted'.
(Edited by Viny Mishra)
Also read: Nilambur bypoll: How Anvar, once Kerala's richest MLA, is adding twist to crucial LDF-UDF contest
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hindu
a few seconds ago
- The Hindu
NDA's Vice-Presidential candidate C.P. Radhakrishnan pays tributes at Prerna Sthal before filing nomination
Maharashtra Governor C.P. Radhakrishnan, who was named the National Democratic Alliance's Vice-Presidential candidate on Sunday (August 17, 2025), paid tributes at Prerna Sthal, which houses statues of iconic personalities in Parliament complex, ahead of filing his nomination on Wednesday (August 20, 2025). Mr. Radhakrishnan, whose election is a certainty, was accompanied by Union Ministers and other leaders from the BJP-led alliance. He first bowed before the giant statue of Mahatma Gandhi and then proceeded to paying tributes to other noted personalities.


Hans India
a few seconds ago
- Hans India
Stern action against CEC, ECs when INDIA forms govt
Gaya Ji (Bihar): Asserting that "vote chori" is an attack on 'Bharat Mata', Congress leader Rahul Gandhi on Monday warned the chief election commissioner and the two election commissioners of stern action when the INDIA bloc forms government. Intensifying his attack on the Election Commission, Gandhi also said the whole country would ask the poll body for an affidavit and if given time, his party would bring out the "vote chori" in every assembly and Lok Sabha constituency. The fresh attack on the EC by the Congress leader came a day after CEC Gyanesh Kumar served a seven-day ultimatum on him to submit a signed affidavit to back his vote theft claims, else his allegations will be considered baseless. Gandhi said that just like Prime Minister Narendra Modi talks about special package, the poll body also brought in a "new special package" for Bihar, which is named SIR (Special Intensive Revision), a "new form of vote theft". "I want to tell the EC that the whole country will ask you to give an affidavit. Give us some time, we will catch your theft in every assembly and Lok Sabha seat, and put it before the people," he said. "What did they do? Like PM (Narendra) Modi ji talks of a special package, the EC has brought a new special package for Bihar named SIR, which means a new form of vote theft," Gandhi said as he wound up the second day of the yatra at Khalees Park Chowk, Gaya Ji along with his Mahagathbandhan allies. The former Congress chief also launched a direct attack on CEC Kumar and election commissioners Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi. "Whatever I say, I do it. You have seen that I don't lie from the three election commissioners... I want to tell them that it is Modiji's government right now... Tejashwi (Yadav) ji said that you (election commissioners) have taken BJP membership and are working for them.


Hans India
a few seconds ago
- Hans India
Excavations in Dharmasthala sites yield no evidence
Mangaluru: Excavations in Dharmasthala, ordered after allegations of mass burials in the temple town, have so far yielded no evidence, with searches across 17 sites drawing a blank. The development has prompted sharp criticism in the Karnataka Assembly, where the opposition Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has accused the government of succumbing to pressure from leftist groups and 'urban naxals' in constituting a Special Investigation Team (SIT). Officials confirmed that despite weeks of digging at various locations in Dharmasthala, no skeletal remains have been recovered. The complaint that triggered the probe was filed anonymously three weeks ago by an individual wearing a mask, who is said to have produced a skull while registering the case. The authenticity of the skull remains unverified, further clouding the case. In the Assembly, BJP leaders charged the Congress government with acting in haste. They argued that the SIT's formation was politically motivated, under pressure from left-aligned activists seeking to 'desecrate' Hindu religious centres. 'This is not merely an investigation. It is an attempt to discredit centuries-old faith and its institutions,' said Leader of the Opposition R. Ashoka. The debate intensified when Gangavati MLA Gali Janardhan Reddy alleged that a former IAS officer, now a Member of Parliament from Tamil Nadu and associated with the CPI(M), had a role in pushing the complaint. Coastal Karnataka MLAs Dr. Bharath Shetty, Sunil Kumar, Vedavyas Kamath, and Yashpal Suvarna also spoke, insisting the SIT must expand its remit to investigate what they described as a 'deep-rooted conspiracy' to target Hindu temples and their spiritual leadership. 'The same forces were active in controversies surrounding Shani Singanapur, Tirupathi, and Sabarimala. Dharmasthala is their latest target,' one legislator said. The Congress, however, has defended the SIT's formation, maintaining that the government cannot ignore serious allegations, irrespective of the outcome of excavations. Senior ministers stressed that the SIT would continue its inquiry until all aspects of the complaint are examined. Dharmasthala, a revered temple town in Dakshina Kannada district, attracts thousands of devotees each year. The allegations of mass graves shocked residents and devotees, casting a shadow over the institution's reputation. With excavations proving fruitless, the focus has now shifted to the political battlelines being drawn over the episode. As the SIT presses on, questions remain not only about the veracity of the claims but also about the motives behind them—whether they stem from genuine concern or political agendas seeking to inflame religious sensitivities.