logo
Vic homebuyer risks losing deposit after ‘stratum' mistake in VHF

Vic homebuyer risks losing deposit after ‘stratum' mistake in VHF

News.com.au23-07-2025
A Victorian first-home buyer has revealed they might lose their $43,000 deposit after trying to use a recently extended state government support program.
And it's not yet clear if the soon-to-be implemented federal program that mirrors it will contain the same trap.
Earlier this month state Treasurer Jaclyn Symes announced access to the Victorian Homebuyer Fund would be extended beyond its June 30, 2025, deadline — until an $800m funding top up provided in the 2024 budget is exhausted.
Melbourne first-home buyers share tips on how they're getting ahead
Call to give Boomers $1m housing tax cut
But a Reddit user over the weekend has revealed missing a fine print clause while trying to use the scheme could be set to cost them their home deposit.
The VHF specifically prohibits purchases for homes that have a stratum title.
This refers to a home where common areas are owned by a company, and buyers receive shares in that company.
It is different from strata homes, which are typically accepted by the VHF, in which you share ownership of the land underpinning common areas.
The Reddit user's post revealed they were now seeking ways to try and avoid forefitting their deposit, after committing to a purchase contract, but were becoming worried this might not be possible.
The government was unable to confirm exact numbers of buyers who have had applications rejected by the scheme, but said it was rare as the bank lenders that back it typically spotted issues ahead of a contract being signed or a formal application being made.
Prominent buyer's advocate Cate Bakos said even most banks would not lend more than 60 per cent of the cost of a stratum titled property — meaning first-home buyers rarely purchased them.
'And the VHF are very fussy and particular; if there are any quirks, you need to make sure they are comfortable before buying,' Ms Bakos said.
While noting the government co-buying scheme would suit some buyers, she said issues with stratum purchases was just one of a number of reasons it was better for homebuyers to seek alternative support programs.
'You are in bed with the government, and if that can be avoided and you can buy something under tour own steam, that would be my preference for people,' Ms Bakos said.
Her advice for first-home buyers considering it was to look at alternatives, such as the First Home Guarantee – which could help you buy a home with a more modest 5 per cent deposit.
Ms Bakos said the Victorian government should be reconsidering its current stamp duty concession thresholds, noting that it was now lower than that offered in Tasmania, where first-home buyers pay no stamp duty for homes worth up to $750,000.
'We need to redefine our caps on stamp duty concessions, we have not kept up with the pace of growth,' she said.
'It is fantastic for first-home buyers, but not if it's out of date. Finding something suitable for under $600,000 is getting very challenging.'
In this year's budget the state government did announce a $61m top up to the stamp duty concession program in order to continue funding it, but did not extend the caps on purchase prices — which remain the same as in 2017.
While there are potential pitfalls to co-buying schemes with the government, Victorians might be among a limited few nationwide to potentially have their choice of purchasing alongside the state or federal government.
The VHF had been slated to end on June 30, 2025, but with an extension the government expects to help another 2600 more Victorians — over the next few months.
Treasurer Jaclyn Symes said the extension was a 'massive win for young families and young Victorians'.
'Extending the fund will make a real difference and help more Victorians get into a home sooner,' Ms Symes said.
However, a similar federal scheme called Help To Buy is slated to commence in the second half of this year.
Depending when that happens it is possible Victorians might be able to choose between the two programs for a short time.
While they both offer a shared-equity arrangement with the government, there are significant differences.
The Victorian scheme is available for those with an at least 5 per cent deposit and could have up to 25 per cent of the home paid for buy the government.
The figures are a 3.5 per cent deposit for an up to 35 per cent buy-in from the government for those of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Island descent.
Purchase prices are capped at $950,000 in Melbourne and Geelong, or $700,000 around the rest of the state — an increase from when the program was first implemented.
It is not limited to first-home buyers and has supported a number of those who sold homes during divorces and were unable to repurchase a residence, but buyers cannot earn more than $140,230 a year income as singles, or $224,370 as a couple or single parent.
There are also limits on the types of homes barred, such as those subject to stratum titles (not strata, a common title for apartments, units and townhouses).
Since its launch, the typical purchase price has been $615,000, and it has assisted 15,400 Victorians to purchase a home — more than two thirds of them first-home buyers.
The federal scheme is still listed to commence in the second half of 2025 and will offer an even more generous support, covering up to 40 per cent of the purchase price for a new build and 30 per cent for an established home.
In the lead up to the May election had its price caps raised to $950,000 in metropolitan areas and $650,000 in regional ones.
It is likely to be more competitive than the Victorian scheme has been, offering 40,000 places over four years nationwide. In order to get the same number of places as they have typically used a year since the VHF commenced, Victorians would need to claim about 40 per cent of the annual 10,000 total.
Income caps are also lower than the Victorian scheme, topping out at $100,000 for singles and $200,000 for couples and single parents.
However, the federal scheme only requires a 2 per cent deposit.
It specifically prohibits applications for those using other shared equity schemes, but it is not yet known if it will bar the purchase of fine print terms such as stratum.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Leaked emails reveal National Trust SA's dispute with volunteers over 'service fee'
Leaked emails reveal National Trust SA's dispute with volunteers over 'service fee'

ABC News

time38 minutes ago

  • ABC News

Leaked emails reveal National Trust SA's dispute with volunteers over 'service fee'

A group of South Australian National Trust branches is protesting a new "service fee" on their earnings, imposed by the heritage group's head office. Then-chief executive Simon Ambrose contacted the state's 45 volunteer-run branches in April, advising the organisation would invoice them for 10 per cent of their gross annual revenue. According to Mr Ambrose's email, the annual fee would "address the increasing demands of our operating environment", including auditing and tax compliance. However, an email obtained by the ABC between Kingston SE branch chair Alison Stilwell and her counterparts from other branches indicated a pushback from the volunteer base. On July 7, Ms Stilwell wrote that a meeting with the NTSA Council — its board of directors — "did not offer any change to the service fee arrangement". "I am disappointed and have expressed that to the president, vice-president and interim CEO," Ms Stilwell wrote. "I've spoken at length with [President] Millie Nicholls, and she is going to ring or visit branches to explain and discuss." Ms Stilwell, also a council member, is understood to be mediating between management and volunteers. She said she received feedback about the plan from 31 branches. It is not suggested all feedback was negative, but Ms Stilwell said it indicated there was "a lot of work to be done" and she was "continuing to push for a better outcome". "My feeling is that despite things not being as we'd have hoped now, there will be changes not far away," she concluded. Ms Stilwell referred questions to the NTSA head office. The National Trust maintains more than 100 heritage-listed properties across the state, including landmarks such as Ayers House, Stangate House and Z Ward Glenside. It is currently attempting to secure UNESCO World Heritage status for the Cornish mining sites in Moonta and Burra, and has campaigned to keep Mintaro's Martindale Hall in public ownership. In a statement, NTSA president Millie Nicholls said the service fee was "part of an internal effort to ensure the ongoing success of the trust by supporting essential functions such as consolidated auditing, insurance, and financial compliance". "While the fee has been issued, we are continuing open discussions with branches to address concerns and clarify the benefits of centralised support," Ms Nicholls said. "Feedback is being incorporated and further engagement is planned over the next few months." The ABC also became aware that the trust this year sold an empty parcel of land in Moonta and was in discussions about the future of the 19th-century National Australia Bank building in Burra. In response, Ms Nicholls said the charity was aiming to "strengthen its financial sustainability" by "reviewing under-utilised assets", as well as seeking income through events, accommodation and donations. The ABC spoke with volunteers from 10 National Trust branches, none of whom wished to be identified. Branches said their biggest costs were insurance, utilities bills and general maintenance, and the service fee invoices ranged between several hundred dollars and five digits. None reported any preliminary consultation, but Ms Nicholls said branch meet-ups and communications occurred several months prior. One volunteer said they believed the need for a new charge was not properly communicated. "We were willing to acknowledge that they might have to operate differently, but they haven't explained how they calculated this figure," they said. "That means that we can't explain it to our members … so that level of accountability is missing." Ms Nicholls said the overall amount was "tied to the workload for managing each branch's operations". Several volunteers said they were holding off on paying in anticipation of a compromise.

Jonesy and Amanda reveal their radio future
Jonesy and Amanda reveal their radio future

News.com.au

time38 minutes ago

  • News.com.au

Jonesy and Amanda reveal their radio future

Longtime radio duo Brendan 'Jonesy' Jones and Amanda Keller have made a major announcement about their radio future. The pair, who host the Gold FM breakfast show in Sydney, have confirmed that from next year they will host a show in the afternoon instead. 'Brendan and I are going to go to the drive shift,' Keller said at the beginning of Friday's show. The hosts said they were hoping to keep the news quiet for a bit longer, but felt compelled to make the announcement on today's show because rumours of the move had been published in the press this week. 'Radio's about being authentic and real and that's what we are,' Jonesy said. Keller added, 'to be authentic and real, we could have stayed doing the breakfast hours for longer, but as long as you guys come with us and listen to us in drive … we're excited! 'To be  given a chance after a 20-year-old show to try something new, I'm looking forward to that,' Keller said. Breakfast replacement It's all but confirmed that The Christian O'Connell Show, which airs on Gold FM in Melbourne, will be networked into Sydney breakfast as well from 2026 onwards. O'Connell was a huge radio star in the UK before he emigrated to Melbourne in 2018 to host the Gold 104.3 breakfast show. It didn't take long for listeners to warm to the Brit, and within 18 months his show was number one. His show, which features Patrina Jones and ex-Channel 9 presenter Alex Cullen, is currently rated the number two FM breakfast show in Melbourne behind Nova's Jase and Lauren. Former radio executive and host of the Game Changers podcast, Craig Bruce, told Media Week that O'Connell should be able to win over Sydney listeners. 'If anyone can come into a market and really embrace it, we've seen what Christian has been able to do in Melbourne, and I'm sure that will happen in Sydney,' he said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store