BBC admits lapse over discussion of Prince Harry interview
The issue arose in the Saturday edition of the flagship Radio 4 programme, which aired the day after the Duke of Sussex had told the corporation in a television interview that he was the victim of a 'a good old-fashioned establishment stitch-up'.
The claims were repeated during the interview with Richard Aitch, a former close protection officer, but were not 'properly challenged' by the presenter.
'I think Prince Harry has nailed it … it is an establishment stitch-up. It's clear that the entire process had been caught up in emotion and appears to be nothing other than spite from the royal household,' Aitch said. 'It's retributive justice for Megxit, not any balanced, formalised approach to assessment of threats and risks.'
On its corrections and clarifications website, the BBC admitted that it was remiss in not including the government's view in its report. 'This case is ultimately the responsibility of the Home Office and we should have reflected their statement,' it said.
It also noted that Today had failed to reflect Buckingham Palace's response.
In his interview with the BBC Harry addressed losing his final appeal to maintain his right to taxpayer-funded police security when he is in the UK.
The Home Office said: 'We are pleased that the court has found in favour of the government's position in this case. The UK government's protective security system is rigorous and proportionate. It is our long-standing policy not to provide detailed information on those arrangements, as doing so could compromise their integrity and affect individuals' security.'
Harry also appeared to blame both the King and the former Conservative government for stripping him of his police protection. 'There is a lot of control and ability in my father's hands,' he said. 'Ultimately, this whole thing could be resolved through him. Not necessarily by intervening, but by stepping aside, allowing the experts to do what is necessary.'
In a statement responding to the interview a Buckingham Palace spokesman said: ''All of these issues have been examined repeatedly and meticulously by the courts, with the same conclusion reached on each occasion.'
Aitch, who now works in the private security sector, reiterated the comments he made during his interview.
'There should not be any need [for the BBC] to apologise for opinion-based interviews,' he posted on X. 'Absence of a threat and risk assessment on Prince Harry, where the focus is on legal process influenced by the recommendations of a committee that is not independent, defines 'stitch-up'.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Powys County Times
29 minutes ago
- Powys County Times
Ministers braced for further legal challenges after High Court Epping decision
Ministers could face further legal challenges over asylum hotels after a council was granted a temporary injunction blocking migrants from being housed there. Reform UK leader Nigel Farage hailed the High Court decision in Epping as a 'victory' and said he hopes it 'provides inspiration to others across the country', while the shadow home secretary argued that residents have 'every right to object' to people being housed in their area. The 12 councils where Reform UK is the largest party are understood to be exploring the prospect of legal challenges following Tuesday's ruling. The Home Office had warned the judge that an injunction could 'interfere' with the department's legal obligations, and lawyers representing the hotel's owner argued it would set a 'precedent'. Epping Forest District Council had asked a judge to issue an interim injunction stopping migrants from being accommodated at the Bell Hotel. The hotel has been at the centre of a series of protests in recent weeks after an asylum seeker who was staying there was charged with sexually assaulting a 14-year-old girl. Reacting to the news, Mr Farage said that 'young, undocumented males who break into the UK illegally should NOT be free to walk the streets anywhere. They must be detained and deported'. 'I hope that Epping provides inspiration to others across the country,' he said. Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch suggested that the migrants housed at the hotel 'need to be moved out of the area immediately', while her shadow home secretary Chris Philp said that 'residents should never have had to fight their own government just to feel safe in their own town'. He said: 'Local residents have every right to feel safe in their own streets and every right to object when their community is treated as a dumping ground.' A Labour source said the move by the Tory-led council, who did not challenge the Conservative government when they were housing asylum seekers, was politically motivated and authority leaders were 'scared' of Reform. Asked on Tuesday why the council did not previously take legal action, Epping Forest District Council leader Chris Whitbread told the PA news agency: 'It goes back to 2020 when we were in the pandemic originally, and at that time, it was used for young families, women and children, which is completely different to having it used for single males. 'Obviously, we have always raised our concerns with the Home Office, whether it be the previous government or this government, we raised our concerns.' Border security minister Dame Angela Eagle said the Government will 'continue working with local authorities and communities to address legitimate concerns'. She added: 'Our work continues to close all asylum hotels by the end of this Parliament.' Meanwhile, the council leader for Borough of Broxbourne Council, Corina Gander, told PA the High Court's injunction set a 'massive precedent' and the council would gather 'more detail about what Epping has done' before considering a bid to shut down another hotel housing asylum seekers. Lawyers for the Home Office had warned the court that an injunction 'runs the risk of acting as an impetus for further violent protests'. Edward Brown KC also said the injunction would 'substantially interfere' with the Home Office's statutory duty in potentially avoiding a breach of the asylum seekers' human rights. Several protests and counter-protests have been held in the town since a then-resident at the hotel was accused of trying to kiss a teenage girl. Hadush Gerberslasie Kebatu has denied the charges against him and is due to stand trial later this month. A second man who resides at the hotel, Syrian national Mohammed Sharwarq, has separately been charged with seven offences, while several other men have been charged over disorder outside the hotel. In a ruling on Tuesday, Mr Justice Eyre granted the temporary injunction, but extended the time limit by which the hotel must stop housing asylum seekers to September 12. He also refused to give Somani Hotels Limited, the hotel's owner, the green light to challenge his ruling, but the company could still ask the Court of Appeal for the go-ahead to appeal against the judgment. Piers Riley-Smith, for the company, asked the judge to be allowed to appeal against the ruling, citing its 'wide-reaching ramifications'. He said that there was a 'compelling reason for the appeal to be heard', including the 'precedent that would be set' by the ruling and the impact that it could have 'on the wider strategy of the (Home Secretary) in relation to the housing of asylum seekers in hotels as part of meeting their statutory duties'.
ITV News
29 minutes ago
- ITV News
Could the Epping asylum hotel injunction set a precedent for other councils?
Ministers are bracing for the potential of further legal challenges over asylum hotels, after Epping Forest District Council was granted a temporary injunction blocking migrants from being housed there. Reform UK leader Nigel Farage hailed the High Court decision in Epping as a 'victory', saying he hopes it 'provides inspiration to others across the country,' while the shadow home secretary argued that residents have 'every right to object' to people being housed in their area. But those inside the Home Office are said to be "furious" about the court's decision, with one source telling ITV News' Home Editor Paul Brand that the move was a "dangerous judgement". Could the decision in Epping set a precedent for other councils? The 12 councils where Reform UK is the largest party are understood to be exploring the prospect of legal challenges following Tuesday's ruling. The prospect of countless other councils bringing their own legal cases against hotels housing migrants would prove to be a logistical headache for the government. But there are many who feel this is a sign that the court is in line with feelings among the general population. Reacting to the news, Mr Farage said that 'young, undocumented males who break into the UK illegally should NOT be free to walk the streets anywhere. They must be detained and deported'. 'I hope that Epping provides inspiration to others across the country,' he said. Lancashire County Council, which is under the control of Reform UK, is said to the most advanced in its stage of planning to bring a court case. Members of the Conservative Party also welcomed the High Court's decision, with Tory councils potentially looking at legal cases themselves. Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch suggested that the migrants housed at the hotel 'need to be moved out of the area immediately', while her shadow home secretary Chris Philp said that 'residents should never have had to fight their own government just to feel safe in their own town'. He said: 'Local residents have every right to feel safe in their own streets and every right to object when their community is treated as a dumping ground.' How has the Labour Party responded? The Home Office had warned the judge that an injunction could 'interfere' with the department's legal obligations, and lawyers representing the hotel's owner argued it would set a 'precedent'. It accuses judges of meddling in asylum policy, as with immigration cases where criminals have been allowed to stay in the UK under human rights rulings by judges. ITV News' Paul Brand said that sources within the party feel that councils are going to waste taxpayers' money fighting a government that is already working to end use of hotels by asylum seekers. And the government has pointed to the reaction of other parties as political game-playing. The Home Office has insisted it has reduced the number of asylum seeker hotels from 402 to 210. It has also been keen to point out that the Bell Hotel, the subject of the High Court injunction, was opened under the Conservative Party although the Conservatives say that they closed it again. But look, whether it's in the channel, whether it's in Parliament or whether it's now here at the courts, new fronts are opening up all the time now in this battle that the government's facing over immigration. What was the reaction to the injunction in Epping? The leader of Epping Forest District Council said the government does not have a plan to accommodate asylum seekers and did not listen to concerns that they should not be housed at the Bell Hotel. The council had asked a judge to issue an interim injunction stopping migrants from being accommodated at the Bell Hotel. The hotel has been at the centre of a series of protests in recent weeks after an asylum seeker who was staying there was charged with sexually assaulting a 14-year-old girl. Chris Whitbread, who also leads the Conservative group at the Essex authority, said that failures to improve the system for processing asylum applications were also causing distress 'up and down the country'. Speaking on Tuesday after the judgement, he said: "We have always raised our concerns with the Home Office, whether it be the previous government or this government, we raised our concerns. 'This government decided to start using the hotel again without consultation and purely by instruction; they didn't listen to our concerns. 'Five schools are in close proximity, a residential care home, lots of residential homes nearby, they didn't listen to us at all, that is the fundamental difference.'Reacting to the judgment, border security minister Dame Angela Eagle said: 'This government inherited a broken asylum system, at the peak there were over 400 hotels open. 'We will continue working with local authorities and communities to address legitimate concerns. Our work continues to close all asylum hotels by the end of this Parliament. 'We will carefully consider this judgment. As this matter remains subject to ongoing legal proceedings it would be inappropriate to comment further at this stage.' The government has also stressed that the injunction handed down today is an interim judgment, which will be tested again in the coming months.
The Independent
29 minutes ago
- The Independent
Swinney: My focus is on the future and Scotland – not Sturgeon's book
Scotland's First Minister said he has to 'focus on the country and the future' as he refused to comment on claims Nicola Sturgeon made about her predecessor. John Swinney said while he has read some extracts from the former first minister's memoirs, Frankly, which were published last week, he has not yet read yet the entire book. But he refused to comment on her claims about Alex Salmond, with the current SNP leader saying: 'For me, in my role today, and what I have got to do for Scotland just now, I have got focus on the country and the future.' He insisted: 'That's what is driving everything I do in my political life, what is the future of Scotland, what is the best future for Scotland. 'That is what I am best to concentrate my thinking on.' Mr Swinney was pressed on the matter by Chris Deerin, director of the think tank Enlighten, which was formerly known as Reform Scotland. At an event in Edinburgh on Tuesday, Mr Deerin said Ms Sturgeon had portrayed her predecessor 'at times as a bully, a bit of a drunk, as a man who was detached from the details'. In her book, Ms Sturgeon, who was first minister in Scotland and SNP leader between 2014 and 2023, set out how her relationship with her predecessor Mr Salmond deteriorated – claiming in the book that after she took on the top job her former mentor had wanted to 'destroy' her. She insisted her relationship with the late politician began to started to sour after she became leader of Scotland. She added that her infamous falling out with her predecessor was a 'bruising episode', as she claimed Mr Salmond had created a 'conspiracy theory' to defend himself from reckoning with misconduct allegations, of which he was cleared in court. Mr Swinney said, on Tuesday, that the memoirs gave a 'fascinating insight into Scottish political history', as he praised Ms Sturgeon for her leadership during the Covid pandemic. The SNP leader, who was deputy first minister at that time, told the audience at the Enlighten event: 'We were all taking big decisions in difficult circumstance.' He added: 'In a moment of absolutely unparalleled difficulty for the country, in which there was no manual, there was no precedent, I saw Nicola Sturgeon deliver considered and careful leadership as we moved our way through the pandemic, under enormous strain of delivering against those expectations, those difficulties.' He went on to state that 'leadership is not easy', with Mr Swinney explaining: 'I feel that way, it is not straight forward, the decisions I take are invariably contested decisions.' As a result, he said, making such decisions was 'inevitably' a 'very lonely place'. The First Minister added: 'Ultimately, it is your call, you have got to decide. 'And I think some of that is explained in Nicola's book about what she felt at times.'
