Grieving mother of Air India crash victim is dealt agonising blow after being sent the WRONG body
Amanda Donaghey lost her son Fiongal Greenlaw-Meek, 39, and his husband, Jamie, 45, when the Boeing 787 Dreamliner bound for London Gatwick crashed just seconds after takeoff on June 12 - claiming the lives of 260 people.
The couple had been returning to Britain after celebrating their wedding anniversary in India when the plane unexpectedly crashed, killing all but one passenger onboard.
The aircraft had turned into a huge fireball on impact but Ms Donaghey, 66, was determined to bring back her son's remains, handing over a sample of her blood in a bid to find matching DNA, The Sunday Times reports.
Things did not look promising, however, and three days came and went without a word from officials handling the bodies.
In the meantime, Jamie's remains were identified and sent home to the UK.
But just as the mother was losing hope, they got back to her with news that there had been a 'match' for Fiongal.
Ms Donaghey was relieved - the discovery meant she could bring her son's remains back and lay them next to his husband's.
The family set about organising funerals for the two men with the mother assured on her return to the UK that Fiongal's remains were in the casket.
Then, a heartbreaking development. The British coroner had conducted another DNA test which found that the remains in her son's coffin were not his after all.
Ms Donaghey said that the identity of the remains is still unknown, describing the confusion as 'appalling'.
Fiongal studied at the Royal College of Art and went on to work as a fashion designer, fronting design houses in London and Asia.
He then got into sprituality, yoga and reiki and established the Wellness Foundry, dedicated to such topics, in 2018.
The business founder married Jamie in 2022 and had taken to social media to describe their 'magical experience' in India the night before they caught the fateful flight.
They even posted a short clip from the airport departure lounge just hours ahead of the journey back, which would see them sit in seats 22A and 22B, bidding farewell to the country.
His mother was not aware he was on the plane, believing Fiongal to have flown back to the UK two days prior.
After taking a ride on her horse, she got a phone call from Fiongal's father who told her the pair had been travelling back on the aircraft.
Two days later, Ms Donaghey took a tricky trip to India from her home in the south of France, where she had moved 22 years ago.
She was greeted by a British High Commission crisis management team on her arrival in Ahmedabad in Gujarat.
Despite being exhausted, the mother headed straight to the nearby Civil Hospital to take a DNA test in a converted classroom.
Ms Donaghey then paid a visit BJ Medical College hostel, which had been hit by the Air India plane, but was not allowed to go through the final cordon as the aircraft's tail was still lodged in a building there.
'It was like a bomb site,' she said. 'You would think it was from a war scene, but there were still these small birds twittering.'
Also out there was Miten Patel who was determined to bring home his parents Ashok and Shobhana, who had been married since the 70s.
The financial advisor and retired microbiologist had been in the country for a yatra, a religious visit geared towards helping people to find peace when they die.
Ashok and Shobhana, pictured, had been married since the 70s and were in the country for a yatra, a religious visit geared towards helping people to find peace when they die
Mr Patel was handed several of his parents' items including Ashok's shirt and Shobhana's swan necklace.
After successfully retrieving the couple's remains, he later discovered 'other remains' in the casket said to contain his mother's body.
He was finally able to bury her last week, describing the successful end to the process as a 'miracle'.
Ms Donaghey has been going through a similar ordeal, but one that remains unresolved.
After initially being informed of the 'match' on June 20, she spoke with the British High Commission and hospital representatives, as well as an Avon and Somerset Police officer, acting as a disaster victim investigator.
She said: 'I was told they had found part of Fiongal but not all of him. I said I wanted to stay until they had finished looking.'
But on her return to the crash site, Ms Donaghey was handed the devastating news that there was nothing left to be found in the wreckage.
Things took an even more concerning turn when she was told about Shobhana's case, which had seen various remains get mixed up.
On June 28, she headed back to Gatwick on an Air India flight in a bid to get Fiongal's remains to a British hospital with better preserving standards than those in India.
They were handed over to Dr Fiona Wilcox, senior coroner for Inner West London, and in the meantime Ms Donaghey was given support by her sister in Cambridgeshire, as well as police family liaison officers.
Six days after her return, the mother was handed the heart-wrenching news that the remains in her son's coffin were not his at all.
At a meeting attended by Fiongal's father, sister and brother, family liaison officers said: 'We don't have Fiongal. We have carried out the DNA tests and we do not have Fiongal.'
Amanda said: 'I had my doubts but to be told that was heartbreaking.'
Despite realising that their ambition to bury Fiongal and Jamie alongside one another was now impossible, Ms Donaghey and her family have not given up on trying to locate his remains, ringing the Foreign Office each day looking for answers.
Some 53 of the 242 people on the ill-fated flight were British but, as many were of Indian heritage and thus buried in the country of the crash, just 12 sets of remains were delivered back to the UK.
The remaining 10 were all matches, but it is still not known for sure whether the identities of the bodies that stayed in India are correct.
James Healy-Pratt, an international aviation lawyer and partner with Keystone Law, is representing 20 bereaved families and confirmed they were in contact with Sir Keir Starmer, the Prime Minister's office and Foreign Secretary David Lammy.
A government spokesperson said: 'We understand that this is an extremely distressing time for the families, and our thoughts remain with them. Formal identification of bodies is a matter for the Indian authorities.
'We continue to liaise with the government of Gujarat and the government of India on behalf of the Inner West London senior coroner to support the coronial process.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
3 hours ago
- Telegraph
Plane makes emergency landing at Heathrow ‘after smoke fills cabin'
A United Airlines flight made an emergency landing at Heathrow on Wednesday after smoke reportedly filled the cabin. Flight UAL949 to San Francisco returned to Heathrow shortly after taking off early in the afternoon, the Daily Mirror reported. Sources told the the tabloid that police cars and an ambulance were seen 'on the runway'. A Heathrow source said the United flight had landed safely and that there were no reports of casualties. Airport operations were not disrupted by the unscheduled landing, the source added. The Telegraph understands that it is routine procedure for emergency services vehicles to greet any aircraft coming back to the airport sooner than planned. The incident has now been stood down. Aircraft was Boeing 777 The aircraft involved is a Boeing 777, which is not the same type of Boeing airliner involved in the recent Air India crash. That was a Boeing 787 Dreamliner, which is not related to the 777 design other than being a twin-engined, long-range airliner made by the same company. Returns to departure airports are routine during the summer months when airlines and their aircraft are at their busiest. There is no evidence that the aircraft itself, registered N229UA, has been involved in any similar return-to-base incidents this month.
Daily Mail
4 hours ago
- Daily Mail
United Airlines plane makes 'emergency landing' at Heathrow amid reports of smoke in the cabin
A United Airlines plane was forced to make an emergency landing at Heathrow Airport folloing reports of smoke in the cabin. Emergency services rushed to the United Airlines flight UA949 after it landed back at the airport and reportedly stopped the aircraft on the taxiway. The plane had been due to fly to San Francisco and was over Milton Keynes when it was forced to make an emergency landing. It was reported that the plane stopped climbing at around 15,000 feet after leaving Heathrow Airport at around 2pm today. The Boeing 777-200 aircraft then made a U-turn to make an emergency landing back at the airport, where it was escorted to the gate by three fire engines. The return London was due to a technical fault, AirLive reported. Heathrow Airport confirmed the plane landed safely and there was no wider impact on operations. United Airlines has been contacted for comment. Jerry Dyer from Big Jet TV, who was filming at Heathrow when the plane returned back to the airport, told Metro that there was no smoke when the place landed 'safely.' The steps were taken to the aircraft shortly after it landed to allow passengers to leave the plane He said the plane had used a general emergency code, which could be anything from 'minor technical issues to a problem with a passengers like a health issue.' Jerry praised the emergency services, the plane crew and Heathrow for their response, saying the fire engines and ambulances were already on the tarmac as a precaution.
Telegraph
6 hours ago
- Telegraph
Maybe it's the snob factor, but I can't bring myself to AstroTurf my garden
When I bought my house a few summers ago, one of the only nice things about it was in the back garden. It boasts an enormous magnolia tree with beautiful pink blossoms in spring, and a thick canopy of leaves in summer. We completely redid the house from top to bottom, including the garden, which was reduced to rubble and mud after a side and rear kitchen extension. We laid a new grass lawn (against the advice of our gardener), which looked lush and healthy until the autumn. That was when the trouble started. The magnolia shed hundreds of leaves daily over our small lawn, creating a thick carpet of them which, if we didn't religiously rake and scoop up each night, would lead to a horrible slimy layer underneath. I confess, we didn't keep up with the raking, and our lovely lawn perished. Come spring, the grass looked so dreadful we simply had to replace it, and we faced the classic modern middle-class dilemma: install real grass or throw in the towel and go for AstroTurf. We were shown photographs of upmarket artificial grass in high-end gardens that looked pretty realistic, and of course, the practical benefits were hugely attractive. It would need no watering, no cutting, and crucially, it would still look perfectly lush even after an autumn of heavy leaf fall. And yet, we still couldn't bring ourselves to do it. A huge factor was the price. Suppliers of 'premium' fake lawns in London clearly know it's big business, and they charge through the nose for it. I suspect the fake grass industry has turned into a bit of a racket, as we could barely believe the price of the quote, which was thousands of pounds. We could have laid fresh turf every year for at least five years for the same price as laying artificial lawn once. There's also undeniably a snob factor around fake grass, since some view it as aesthetically and environmentally inferior to real grass. I have never been a huge fan of the modern 'Love Island' pristine garden aesthetic, with lots of white wash, clean lines and immaculate bright green lawns. For my own space, I had in mind an imperfect English country garden with a real lawn, beds of pretty hydrangeas and clematis, and jasmine climbing the fence. I wouldn't care if someone judged my lawn for being fake if I thought it was the right choice for my garden, but I do worry whether the stigma could affect our house price if we were to sell eventually. Perhaps that's another reason why I resisted. Overall finish matters hugely when calculating house prices in our area, and I worry that while splashing out on hugely expensive fake grass wouldn't add any value, installing poorly-fitted AstroTurf might actually reduce the asking price. This is especially pertinent since the entire lawn is extremely visible through large Crittall-style doors at the back of the house. Whether to fake it or not is a hot debate among friends in my local area. Busy middle-class parents love to moan about the poor health of their grass lawns, which when they're trying to hold down demanding jobs, raise children, exercise, eat healthily and have a social life, really are some way down the list of priorities and a complete and utter pain in the backside to maintain. I'd probably find it easier to give in and go artificial if I hadn't grown up in the countryside with views of grass fields, trees and hedgerows as far as the eye could see. Now, living in a place dominated by concrete and bricks, giving up on having a real lawn feels painful. We've vowed to be better at picking up leaves this autumn, and to reseed the lawn in the spring, and for now we will carry on watering it during dry spells. We've learnt the hard way that keeping a real lawn is a labour of love, but whether our efforts will be enough to save our latest batch of turf remains to be seen. If not, then we might just have to get over ourselves, and the cost, and install some plastic grass.
