How lawmakers want to give Ohioans tax relief
COLUMBUS, Ohio (WCMH) — Republicans and Democrats at the Ohio Statehouse want to put more money in your pocket. But the question is: should lawmakers pass property tax relief, state income tax cuts, or can the state do both?
'The simple truth is — we've got to get work done,' State Sen. Hearcel Craig (D-Columbus) said.
'People in my area are getting inundated with huge property valuation increases,' State Rep. Josh Williams (R-Sylvania) said.
Lawmakers on both sides of the aisle agree that Ohioans need property tax relief, but even with consensus that something needs to be done, efforts have been stalled for years.
Family accuses pet sitter of cremating dog without permission
Ohio Senate President Rob McColley (R-Napoleon) said that is, in part, because of how bogged down and 'screwed up' the system has gotten.
'The legislature, over the past three to four decades, has done a really good job at screwing up our property tax system, I'm willing to admit that,' McColley said.
There are already more than a dozen bills that have been introduced to try and bring Ohioans relief — everything from a system that would allow Ohioans to defer their payments to expand the homestead exemption and just bring more clarity to everything.
'It's a very complicated issue,' Craig said. 'So, I would submit to you that all of those things need to be looked at, clearly, thoughtfully.'
Craig, who served on a property tax study committee, thinks the priority for passing relief needs to first be for Ohioans who are low income, marginalized and seniors.
Some lawmakers suggest starting from scratch and rebuilding the system. McColley said it is going to take several revisions to bring meaningful relief.
'The system, when it was put in place, was meant to be largely anti-inflationary,' he said. 'Through changes over the last three to four decades, it has become incredibly inflationary, where you're having unvoted tax increases happening every single time there's a revaluation. People are seeing the sticker shock in some cases of seeing a 30% increase in their property taxes.'
He said that, at the very least, things need to be easier to understand for the average taxpayer.
COTA program for residents with disabilities faces criticism for late arrivals, no shows
'We need to have a serious conversation ultimately to provide a system that, at the bare minimum, is more transparent and accountable to the taxpayers,' McColley said. 'I would say it should be universally agreed, for the most part, that our property tax system is very difficult to understand, it's very complicated.'
The concern with property tax relief is that it takes money away from local programs and public schools, which are partly funded by those means. Democratic leaders said state lawmakers need to ensure public schools are funded properly in the state budget.
'We need to invest in our schools and in our workforce, so we can provide property tax relief. And we should. But that should be our focus,' State Rep. Dani Isaacsohn (D-Cincinnati) said.
Some property tax relief may be added to the state operating budget, which needs to pass by the end of June. Ohio House Speaker Matt Huffman (R-Lima) said passing something that really brings Ohioans relief could take the better part of two years.
'This is essentially a 30- or 40-year problem that [has been] created, and so I think it'll probably take us, not only this budget cycle but the rest of the general assembly to work our way through that,' Huffman said.
As lawmakers debate the most effective way to bring Ohioans property tax relief, they also wonder if they can make progress in flattening the state income tax.
In 2023, lawmakers brought the highest state income tax rate down from nearly 4% percent to 3.75% and eliminated a tax bracket completely but some want to go even further.
Ohio University pauses Celebrate Women conference
'I think we need to continue down this path of getting to a zero-income tax here in the state of Ohio,' Williams said.
A total phaseout of the personal state income tax would result in nearly $14 billion in revenue lost to the state. Williams argued that a phase-out of the income tax would make Ohio more 'economically viable' in the long run.
'More Ohioans should be able to keep more of their paycheck in their own pockets and decide what they want to invest in by purchasing items in the consumer market,' Williams said.
Ohio House Minority Leader Allison Russo (D-Lakewood) said she worries that the loss of revenue to the state will have to be made up by 'over-reliance' on sales and use taxes.
'We know that that disproportionately affects low- and middle-class Ohioans at the check-out counter,' she said.
McColley argued that a reduced income tax makes Ohio more attractive to companies, like Intel or Honda, looking to bring their business here. He said flattening or eliminating the income tax will bring economic development wins to the state.
'There's a good public policy justification for reducing the tax burden on Ohioans,' McColley said.
There is a bill to bring the state income tax rate down to a flat 2.75%, no matter how much you earn. Democratic leaders question if it is really in the best interest of Ohioans to focus on that legislation and overall effort.
Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine gives 2025 State of the State address
'Nobody is calling my office regarding income taxes, but we get lots of calls in my office regarding property taxes,' Craig said. 'And so, we've got to be able to look at that issue clearly.'
'We desperately need property tax relief, but we can't fund it on the back of cutting income taxes for the wealthiest Ohioans,' Isaacsohn said. 'It is not what people are clamoring for. It's not what our office is hearing about we're hearing about the desperate need for property tax relief, especially among our seniors.'
As that is being debated, Republican lawmakers are looking ahead to the viability of creating new programs or expanding others, like the state's child tax credit.
'Every tax credit we introduce or every tax deduction that we introduce makes it harder for us to get to our ultimate goal, that being, eliminating the income tax or having a flat income tax in the state of Ohio,' McColley said.
The state operating budget must pass by the end of June, when some of these tax policies could be included.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
AOC's 6-Word Response To The Donald Trump And Elon Musk Breakup Is Going Viral
We're on day two post-breakup. At this point, we need to remember the "good times." Six months is quite the accomplishment, and honestly, waaay longer than we all thought it would last. One person who had some thoughts about it was AOC. Related: This Senator's Clap Back Fully Gagged An MSNBC Anchor, And The Clip Is Going Viral Here six-word response about it is going viral: 'The girls are fighting, aren't they?' — George Conway 👊🇺🇸🔥 (@gtconway3d) June 6, 2025 Spectrum News/gtconway3d/Twitter: @gtconway3d "The girls are fighting, aren't they?" Related: This Republican Lawmaker's Embarrassing Lack Of Knowledge Of The Term "Intersex" Went Viral After He Proposed An Amendment To Cut LGBTQ+ Funding People in the replies are loving it. "I generally don't care for it when pols do snide, but AOC's charm is so through the roof that she gets away with it," this person commented. "Gonna lib out for a second and say I love her a lot," another person wrote. And this person joked, "Men are too emotional to lead." I'd ALSO like to point out what this person said: "I like how this meme originated with azealia banks chiming in on nicki vs cardi beef in 2018 lol." IYKYK. Also in In the News: People Can't Believe This "Disgusting" Donald Trump Jr. Post About Joe Biden's Cancer Diagnosis Is Real Also in In the News: Republicans Are Calling Tim Walz "Tampon Tim," And The Backlash From Women Is Too Good Not To Share Also in In the News: "We Don't Import Food": 31 Americans Who Are Just So, So Confused About Tariffs And US Trade


Bloomberg
20 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Trump, Musk's Public Feud
The Pulse with Francine Lacqua Elon Musk signaled he would move to cool tensions with US President Donald Trump, after differences between the two exploded Thursday into an all-out public feud. Earlier in the day, Musk called for Trump's impeachment and insinuated he was withholding the release of files related to disgraced New York financier Jeffrey Epstein because of his own presence in them. Trump, in turn, proposed cutting off the billionaire's government contracts, following his onetime adviser's repeated exhortations for Republicans to vote against the president's signature tax legislation. Musk's olive branch came after Tesla Inc. shares tanked 14% and his personal wealth dropped by $34 billion. Today's guests: Emmanuel Cau, Barclays European Equity Strategy Head, Gregory Peters, PGIM Fixed Income Co-CIO, Maria Demertzis, The Conference Board Economy, Strategy & Finance Center Europe Lead. (Source: Bloomberg)
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Elon Musk-Trump spat on X is a distraction from the failures of DOGE
Elon Musk stepped down from his position as head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) on May 30, only months after promising to transform government by cutting trillions of dollars from the federal budget and eliminating so-called 'waste, fraud and abuse.' Just a week later, Musk's relationship with President Donald Trump ― the man Musk spent nearly $300 million to elect — went up in flames, as Americans watched the drama unfold in real time on X and Truth Social. Trump publicly denounced Musk as 'disloyal' for criticizing the president's signature legislative effort, the 'One Big Beautiful Bill,' while Musk called the bill a 'disgusting abomination' and openly called for Trump's impeachment. The spectacle of the richest man in the world and the president of the United States exchanging insults online may be remembered as DOGE's final chapter in the public imagination. But it should not obscure the damage Musk wrought when he commanded one of the most powerful positions in the Trump administration. More from Freep Opinion: Democrats better hope Michigan Gov. Whitmer changes her mind about presidential run To start, Musk's promised savings never came. The DOGE website currently claims to have saved the public $175 billion through a range of actions like eliminating 'fraud and improper payment' and cancelling grants. But even that sum — which is believed to be falsely inflated through a combination of guesswork and suspect arithmetic — is less than 3% of the federal budget, and less than 9% of the $2 trillion in cuts Musk promised upon assuming his role. In other words, DOGE failed on Musk's own terms. What did materialize is an unprecedented attack on public institutions, beginning with the people who carry out the work of public service. According to the latest data, around 260,000 federal employees have either been forced out, been slated for cuts, or chosen to leave their posts since DOGE began its work. These aren't faceless 'bureaucrats.' They are the people who test our water for contaminants, inspect our food for harmful bacteria, and ensure air travel is safe, among other public services. The department with the highest number of planned terminations is Veterans Affairs, with up to 80,900 personnel serving our nation's veterans slated for future cuts, according to the New York Times. Many of these jobs are health care workers who care for veterans directly. More from Freep Opinion: I'm a gay man in Detroit. Celebrating Pride feels more important than ever In cutting both people and programs that provide essential services, DOGE attempted a bargain that Michiganders are painfully familiar with: treat government like a business, and attempt to cut public services to balance the books no matter the risks to public health, the economy or democracy. During our state's era of emergency management, decision-making power in several cities and school districts like Flint and Detroit shifted from democratically elected local officials to appointees of the governor. In Flint, a series of emergency managers focused on cost-cutting to address the city's financial crisis, including the ill-fated decision to switch the city's water source. The result was the worst man-made environmental catastrophe in American history. Flint should have been a warning to the country that 'efficiency' without regard for public welfare is a dangerous proposition. Yet DOGE was a far more extreme expression of this logic. Like Flint, the DOGE experiment is a grave warning about what happens when democracy is treated as a private enterprise rather than a public trust, when billionaires think they know best what people need in their own communities. And while it may take decades to account for the potential harms DOGE's actions might produce, we are already seeing some. Here in Michigan, DOGE reportedly canceled $394 million in federal public health grants, money that ultimately supports local health initiatives statewide. These cuts are not abstract. They will be felt in people's bodies and the broader society. Local health providers will have to cut back on critical services such as vaccine administration and interventions for substance use disorder. According to a 2019 study, every dollar invested in public health departments yields as much as $67 to $88 of benefits to society. DOGE also cut $15 million in AmeriCorps funding for our state, impacting programs that offered tutoring, support for seniors, and assistance for homeless residents. At a time when Michigan ranks 34th in the nation in overall child wellbeing, students in more than 60 school districts may see tutoring support disappear. This begs the question: Who ultimately benefited from Musk's relentless cutting? The clear answer is Elon Musk, who is $170 billion richer since endorsing Trump in the summer of 2024, even accounting for the drop in Tesla's stock attributed to the public backlash over DOGE's actions. (How this most recent fiasco will affect Musk's bottom line remains to be seen.) Meanwhile, DOGE spent months attempting to 'delete' entire agencies like the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), which stops predatory banks from scamming veterans, seniors, and consumers in general. And it destroyed the IRS' ability to audit wealthy tax cheats, forcing workers and families to shoulder more of the nation's tax responsibility. DOGE has also made us less free. The initiative's most significant legacy may be what the writer Julia Anguin described as 'a sprawling domestic surveillance system for the Trump administration ― the likes of which we have never seen in the United States.' In agency after agency, Musk and his lieutenants accessed the most sensitive data about Americans and handled it with reckless disregard. Information like Social Security numbers and bank accounts that once stood in the relative safety of government silos are now being merged to create more sweeping surveillance tools than ever before. They could be used to further crack down on immigrants' speech, or to simply make it easier to target political enemies. This is what we're left with. A public more exposed to harm — from preventable diseases, from corporate predation and scams, from toxins in our air and water—and a small group of wealthy elites more empowered to dominate our government and our democracy. Perhaps this is why a solid majority of Americans disapprove of Musk's job performance, arguably accelerating his departure from government. The American public deserves a government that is fit for purpose and delivers on its promises. But Elon Musk never intended to create that. DOGE was built on the fiction of Musk's mastery of all things, one of the many myths attributed to the ultra-wealthy. What it concealed was a public sector novice who failed to understand the basic mechanics of the institutions he railed against. On the day Musk announced his departure, a lawsuit against him and DOGE was cleared to proceed, accusing him of wielding unlawful power over federal agencies, contracts and data without democratic oversight. It was a fitting coda. Musk left behind no durable reform, only institutions hollowed out, public trust frayed, and a template for how easily government can be turned against the people it exists to serve. Even this spectacular fallout with Trump should not distract from the wreckage he leaves behind. Bilal Baydoun is Director of Democratic Institutions at the Roosevelt Institute, a national policy think tank devoted to building on the legacy of FDR. A version of this column was previously published on the Roosevelt Institute's Substack. Submit a letter to the editor at and we may publish it online and in print. Like what you're reading? Please consider supporting local journalism and getting unlimited digital access witha Detroit Free Press subscription. We depend on readers like you. This article originally appeared on Detroit Free Press: Elon Musk-Trump spat is a distraction from DOGE failures | Opinion