Christopher McQuarrie has plot for Top Gun 3 'already in the bag', Entertainment News
The writer and producer of 2022's Top Gun: Maverick said it "wasn't hard" to come up with a story for a threequel to the hugely popular action-adventure franchise, which follows fighter pilot Pete 'Maverick' Mitchell, played by Tom Cruise, 62.
Speaking to YouTuber Josh Horowitz on the latest episode of the Happy Sad Confused podcast, Josh asked Christopher, 56: "Is Top Gun 3 harder to crack in some ways than Top Gun: Maverick?"
To which he replied: "No, it's already in the bag."
Following up on the Mission: Impossible — The Final Reckoning director's answer, he then said: "You've cracked it?"
Confirming that an idea for Top Gun 3 was nailed, Christopher added: "Yeah, I already know what it is."
The filmmaker then went on to explain how F1 screenwriter Ehren Kruger, 52, suggested an idea for the upcoming third instalment to the Top Gun series, of which a release year has not been announced, and it ticked the "framework" boxes.
Christopher said: "It wasn't hard. I thought it would be, and that's a good place to go from is you walk into the room going, 'Come on, what are we going to do?' and Ehren Kruger pitched something, and I went, 'Mhm actually,' and we had one conversation about it and the framework is there.
"So, no, it's not hard to crack. The truth of the matter is, none of these are hard to crack."
The original Top Gun movie — which shot Cruise to stardom in 1986 — follows Maverick as he is sent to the prestigious Fighter Weapons School in the wake of his dad's death, where he later battles through a "challenging training regimen", competes against rival Iceman (Val Kilmer) to clench the coveted Top Gun trophy, and strikes up a romance with civilian flight instructor Charlotte 'Charlie' Blackwood (Kelly McGillis).
Top Gun: Maverick saw Cruise reprise his alter ego 36 years later, where Maverick trained TOPGUN graduates for a "high-profile" mission as Maverick "battles his past demons".
But for Christopher, the key to a successful movie is emotion rather than action or intensity.
He said: "It's as you start to execute it, and as you start to interrogate it, as you start [to think] why these movies are made the way they are.
"It's not the action, it's not even the level of or intensity of or the scope and scale of the action [or] the engineering around the action, it's none of those things — it's the emotion."
[[nid:718364]]
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
01-08-2025
- Business Times
Brad Pitt has a lesson for Formula 1's green makeover
Every film star entering their seventh decade knows they've reached an age when they have to play to type. If only venerable sports franchises had the same self-awareness. F1: The Movie, the Brad Pitt-Formula 1 crossover currently in cinemas, illustrates this contradiction perfectly. Pitt used to appear as romantic leads and sword-and-sandals heroes, and in comedy turns and art-film roles. As he's aged into his sixties, that range has been boiled down to its original essence, leaving him typecast as a pretty, and increasingly rugged, maverick. Audiences don't seem to mind. F1: The Movie saw the biggest US opening for a Pitt vehicle since 2013's World War Z. F1, the sport, is taking a different approach. It wants to broaden its appeal – to younger people, women and particularly to Americans, who've long favoured the IndyCar and Nascar championships instead. That charm offensive has spawned the latest film, as well as a Netflix documentary series now in its seventh season. More absurdly, it's led F1 into the claim that it's going to reduce its carbon footprint to net zero by 2030. The latest update came last week. The sport has cut emissions by 26 per cent since 2018, a press release proclaimed, mostly by using sustainable fuels for its cars and transport operations, changing the ways it moves staff around the world and using renewable energy to power its sites. An accompanying promotional video is full of images of solar panels, race fans on bicycles, and trucks and aircraft powered by zero-carbon fuel. This earnest ambition is ridiculous, for a couple of reasons. Primarily, it's so light on detail as to be next to meaningless. While F1 boasts about the CO2 it's saving by using sustainable fuels in race cars, by far the biggest part of the carbon footprint for sporting events comes from all the fuel that's burnt getting fans to the event – and that's not counted. A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU Friday, 2 pm Lifestyle Our picks of the latest dining, travel and leisure options to treat yourself. Sign Up Sign Up Meanwhile, the sustainable aviation fuel that it's using to cut its carbon budget isn't necessarily going into the planes that fly the cars, crew and equipment to the 24 races held each year. Instead, it comes in the form of tradable certificates, stating that somewhere in the world the sustainable aviation fuel exists. Sustainable aviation fuel currently costs three to five times more than traditional jet fuel, and needs to be cost-competitive if it's to take a bite out of aviation's carbon footprint. F1's spending is far too small a share of the total to make much of a difference on that front. You can justify all these decisions, to be sure, but the choice of metrics puts a thumb on the scales. Whether to count fan travel towards your own carbon footprint is a grey area in most greenhouse reporting standards. Major events like the Olympics and Fifa World Cup declare it, but you can still ignore it and remain within the letter of the regulations. Similarly, there are so many loopholes and dubious assumptions around emission-reduction certificates that the market for carbon credits has been collapsing in recent years. Sustainable aviation fuel, however, is a frontier industry, where scrutiny tends to be less exacting. Such skirting within the regulations is very much in keeping with the spirit of F1, where mastery of race strategy and the rule book can often be as decisive as mastery of the track. In F1: The Movie, it's Pitt's nerdy ability to deploy safety cars and red flags to his team's advantage without getting disqualified, rather than his simplistic 'drive-fast' dictum, that actually determines his success. That just highlights the second problem with the sport's net-zero drive. Because this is F1, for God's sake! A sport built from the ground up on the roar of internal combustion engines, the stink of burning petrol and rubber, and the adrenalin produced when you round a corner at about 260 kilometres per hour. The chief sponsor is Saudi Arabian Oil, the world's biggest crude oil producer. A more sensible explanation for the current emissions-reduction drive is that the sport has long depended on car manufacturers using it as a test bed for their engine research and development, a pool of money that's been dwindling as the industry focuses on electric vehicles (EVs). The current focus on hybrid drivetrains and alternative fuels isn't about F1's own net-zero ambitions, under that theory, but a way of tempting back carmakers like Ford and Honda, which have been losing interest as the energy transition accelerates. To the extent F1 will really make it to net zero, it will come from the decline of the sport itself. That doesn't look like happening any time soon: The EVs in the rival Formula E, for all their superior acceleration and top speed, can't yet match the average pace of a hydrocarbon-powered single seater. In the meantime, an industry that accounts for roughly one two-thousandth of 1 per cent of the world's fossil fuel emissions should just accept that the fate of climate change won't be decided by whether Lewis Hamilton is using refined crude or used cooking oil to power his Ferrari. Pitt isn't going to remain relevant by giving himself a Timothee Chalamet makeover. F1, similarly, should quit pretending it's part of the climate solution. It's noisy, smelly, fast and dirty. That's the whole point. BLOOMBERG
Business Times
27-07-2025
- Business Times
Paramount Global says Skydance merger should close in two weeks
[LOS ANGELES] Paramount Global said on Friday (Jul 25) it expects to complete its merger with Skydance Media by Aug 7, following government approval for the US$8.4 billion deal. After the deal closes, the company will be renamed Paramount Skydance and its Class B shares will trade under the ticker symbol PSKY. Skydance CEO David Ellison is prepared to assume the helm at Paramount Skydance, home to the venerable Paramount Pictures, the CBS broadcast network, and a collection of cable television channels. The new chief executive is already confronted with questions from investors about the future of the Paramount+ streaming service, plans for Paramount's declining television assets, and forecasts for spending on content, including professional sports. 'Now that the long, drawn-out sale process is finally nearing its end, Skydance leadership is poised to take control,' wrote MoffettNathanson media analyst Robert Fishman. 'With that, the real work begins – rebuilding Paramount, addressing the critical strategic questions ahead, and charting a path towards a more sustainable and competitive future.' Announced more than a year ago, the merger will unite Paramount's prized film and TV library, including classics such as Ferris Bueller's Day Off and Breakfast at Tiffany's, with films it produced with Skydance, including Top Gun: Maverick and Mission: Impossible – Dead Reckoning. Ellison was not available for comment. He has previously said that he plans to expand Paramount's technological capabilities, rebuild the Paramount+ platform and grow the streaming business, and reorganise the business to prioritise cash flow. A year ago, he said the team had identified US$2 billion in cost savings. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) cleared the deal on Thursday, just weeks after Paramount settled a lawsuit filed by US President Donald Trump over CBS' editing of a 60 Minutes interview with his Democratic opponent, former vice-president Kamala Harris. A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU Friday, 2 pm Lifestyle Our picks of the latest dining, travel and leisure options to treat yourself. Sign Up Sign Up The US$16-million settlement drew criticism that Paramount had effectively bought regulatory approval, with the Democratic dissenter in the FCC's 2-1 vote calling it a 'cowardly capitulation' to the Trump administration. The agency has repeatedly said its review was independent of the lawsuit. The deal marks the end of media mogul Shari Redstone's control over Paramount parent National Amusements. Redstone, long hesitant to part with the studio her late father, Sumner Redstone, acquired in 1994, relinquishes the reins of a media empire her family built over decades. As part of FCC negotiations, Skydance agreed to appoint an ombudsman to address complaints about editorial bias or other concerns at CBS. The company also pledged to end diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives that Trump claimed were discriminatory. CBS News named Tanya Simon its top producer for '60 Minutes' on Thursday, replacing Bill Owens, who stepped down citing a lack of editorial independence amid Trump's lawsuit. Since announcing the deal, Paramount has undergone several changes that include internal restructuring, significant cost-cutting and management changes. CFO Naveen Chopra exited the company in June to take on a similar role at video game company Roblox. REUTERS
AsiaOne
23-07-2025
- AsiaOne
'I'm so angry': Christopher Lee shares thoughts about son Zed sharing bed with Fann Wong, Entertainment News
Christopher Lee recently expressed his thoughts about his spot on the bed being taken over by his son Zed. Speaking to Taiwanese media in an interview published on July 19, the 54-year-old, who is currently promoting his new drama Islanders, was asked if he still shares a bed with his actress wife Fann Wong. "My son is taking up my space [on the bed] now. I'm so angry," he said. Christopher, who films in Taiwan often, added that he has been asking when Zed, nine, is going to return to his own room, because the boy has been sleeping on his spot for too long. A reporter also asked him if Zed would return the space to him when he returns home from a long overseas trip. "He wouldn't budge. But I already told my wife, it's time to chase him back to his own room. It's all due to him and not because my wife and I can't [share a bed]," Christopher added. In Islanders, Christopher plays charismatic and powerful entrepreneur Li Xianhong, who is entangled in three relationships with his wife, longtime mistress and a much younger girlfriend. His downfall comes when he makes an offhand remark, which goes viral on social media and sparks public backlash, placing him and his relationships in public scrutiny which could cost him everything. Christopher was also asked if he has any worries about his age gap with Zed as the latter grows up. [[nid:719973]] He responded: "No, those of his generation have their ways of handling matters. Instead, I feel that as I grow older, I will need to learn more from them. In that way, I can live more comfortably. "I hope that when my son goes out in the future, he will bring me along... I keep telling him that he should bring me along when he goes out to play in the future." A reporter also asked if he would wish to go to a bar with Zed in the future, to which he said yes. "We don't have to sit together; I can drink by myself... I want to see how he has fun," Christopher said, adding that he may just bring Zed to a bar when he turns 18 years old. Islanders, which also stars Golden Horse Award-winning actor Wu Kang-ren, is now available on Prime Video and releases new episodes every Friday. [[nid:720332]] No part of this article can be reproduced without permission from AsiaOne.
