Trump Says It'll Be ‘Sort Of Biden' If GDP Keeps Dropping—After Blaming Him For Shrinking Economy
President Donald Trump on Wednesday blamed a quarterly drop in the U.S. gross domestic product on former President Joe Biden and said a drop in the second quarter could also be the former president's fault, passing the blame for the latest economic woes even though he has taken credit for stock market surges as far back as 2024.
US President Donald Trump looks on during a cabinet meeting in the Cabinet Room of the White House ... More in Washington, DC, on April 30, 2025. (Photo by JIM WATSON/AFP via Getty Images)
Trump said in a televised Cabinet meeting that the GDP's 0.3% decrease in the first quarter of 2025 is 'Biden, not Trump,' claiming the quarterly numbers do not apply to his administration since it came into power in January.
Trump added 'you could even say the next quarter is sort of Biden.'
The president also said in a Truth Social post Wednesday morning 'This is Biden's stock market,' saying the former president 'left us with bad numbers' and claiming the positive effects of his sweeping tariff policies, which have created concerns of an impending recession, 'will soon start kicking in, and companies are starting to move into the USA in record numbers.'
The comments from Trump contradict his own claims from last January, when he said 'THIS IS THE TRUMP STOCK MARKET' and took credit for market gains under the Biden administration.
Trump claimed the stock market was performing well because investors were projecting he would win the presidential election.
The president also took credit for the stock market surge during the leadup to his inauguration, saying at a rally, 'It's too braggadocious, but we'll say it anyway, the Trump effect. It's you. You're the effect.'
Get Forbes Breaking News Text Alerts: We're launching text message alerts so you'll always know the biggest stories shaping the day's headlines. Text 'Alerts' to (201) 335-0739 or sign up here.
The GDP slid 0.3% in the first quarter, marking the weakest economic performance the U.S. has recorded since the first quarter of 2022. Outside of Wednesday's drop, negative GDP growth has happened just three times over the past decade, with two of the occurrences happening during 2020, when the COVID-19 pandemic routed global markets.
While the economy has faltered in recent months as the Trump administration implements tariffs, cuts down on government spending and slashes the federal workforce, the president has insisted that returns on his economic policies will take time. Trump addressed his tariffs in a joint speech to Congress last month, saying, 'There'll be a little disturbance, but we're OK with that. It won't be much.' As markets continued reeling in March, Trump blamed poor stock performances on 'the really bad four years that we had.' By April, economists provided varying outlooks on the possibility of a recession, with Torsten Slok, the chief economist at Apollo Global Management, saying there was a 90% probability the U.S. will fall into a 'Voluntary Trade Reset Recession.'
Trump Offers Automakers Tariff Reprieve—Latest Big Tariff Flip-Flop Since 'Liberation Day' (Forbes)
Key Inflation Measure Slowed To Multiyear Low In March—But Tariff Bump On The Horizon (Forbes)
U.S. Economy Shrank During 2025's First Quarter As GDP Slipped 0.3% (Forbes)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
28 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Celebrities React to LA Riots
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Celebrities including Lisa Rinna, Halle Berry and Mark Ruffalo have been sharing their reactions to the Los Angeles riots on social media. The Context Protests erupted in the California city beginning on Friday following federal immigration raids from U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). President Donald Trump's deployment of National Guard troops further heightened tensions. What To Know Hollywood rarely stays silent when it comes to current events—like the Los Angeles wildfires, TikTok ban and Trump's 2024 election win. Now, stars are taking to social media platforms like Instagram to voice their opinions on the L.A. riots. On Sunday, Finneas O'Connell—the brother of nine-time Grammy Award winner Billie Eilish—said he was tear-gassed at the Los Angeles protests. "Tear gassed almost immediately at the very peaceful protest downtown—they're inciting this," the singer-songwriter wrote via his Instagram Stories, adding: "F*** ICE." On Truth Social on Monday, Trump spoke out about the riots: "Looking really bad in L.A. BRING IN THE TROOPS!!!" Police stand outside of the city hall building after clashes with protestors on June 8, 2025, Downtown Los Angeles, California. The clashes come after ICE raids swept throughout the city over the weekend. In the... Police stand outside of the city hall building after clashes with protestors on June 8, 2025, Downtown Los Angeles, California. The clashes come after ICE raids swept throughout the city over the weekend. In the left inset image, Lisa Rinna attends the FASHION TRUST U.S. Awards 2024 on April 9, 2024, in Beverly Hills, California. In the right inset image, Halle Berry attends the Jury photocall at the 78th annual Cannes Film Festival at the Palais des Festivals on May 13, 2025, in Cannes, France. More; Axelle/Bauer-Griffin/FilmMagic;What People Are Saying The Real Housewives of Beverly Hills star Lisa Rinna wrote via her Instagram Stories: "He wants to declare martial law. So be careful in LA. He wants protests. Don't give him what he wants which is violence." Eva Longoria reposted a slew of protest-related clips and messages to her Instagram Stories, one of which from @brownissues read: "Cost of groceries keep going up! Gas keeps going up! Rent up! And, this administration decides to spend millions of our tax dollars to scare people from schools, abduct parents from work sites, and wait outside of Immigration Court to punish people 'doing it the right way!'" Singer-songwriter Gracie Abrams shared several reposts to her Instagram Stories too, including a message from her mom, Bad Robot Productions CEO Katie McGrath: "LA is afraid right now because their coworkers were kidnapped at work. Because the guy who sold them dinner was snatched by masked men. And because a bunch of neighbor's parents straight up never came home. As Trump gleefully escalates this with the National Guard, violence is inevitable. But just know this protest started from a place of protection. A place of love. We love our neighbors. We love our family. We love our community." Actor Mark Ruffalo, who has criticized President Trump in the past, shared a lengthy message to Instagram with the caption: "When you have working class people going after the poor and other working class people you know you are living in an oligarchy." In his viral post, which racked up over 175,000 likes—including from Jennifer Garner and Rachel Zegler—he said: "The billionaire up at the top is stealing you blind, and you are worried about the poorest of the poor ruining your life? You are pointing your guns in the wrong direction... The president is a grifter." In the comments underneath Ruffalo's post, Halle Berry posted a red heart emoji, which received 511 likes. My Cousin Vinny star Marisa Tomei replied with three clapping hands emojis, which received 338 likes. Orange Is the New Black actress Natasha Lyonne responded with two purple heart emojis, which received 264 likes. Melanie Griffith added in a note several red heart, clapping hands and flexed biceps emojis, which received 130 likes. The Bold Type star Katie Stevens posted: a single red heart emoji. What Happens Next In a message posted to X, formerly Twitter, on Monday, California Governor Gavin Newsom said he plans to file a lawsuit against Trump over his National Guard deployment. "This is exactly what Donald Trump wanted. He flamed the fires and illegally acted to federalize the National Guard. The order he signed doesn't just apply to CA [California]. It will allow him to go into ANY STATE and do the same thing. We're suing him."
Boston Globe
28 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Trump charts new territory in bypassing Newsom to deploy National Guard
Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Trump invoked a section of the US code that allows the president to bypass a governor's authority over the National Guard and call those troops into federal service when he considers it necessary to repel an invasion or suppress a rebellion, the law states. California's Democratic governor, Gavin Newsom, has sharply criticized the move, saying state and local authorities have the situation under control and accusing Trump of attempting to create a 'spectacle.' Advertisement The directive, announced by the White House late Saturday, came after some protests against immigration raids turned violent, with protesters setting cars aflame and lighting fireworks, and law enforcement in tactical gear using tear gas and stun grenades. Trump claimed in his executive order that the unrest in Southern California was prohibiting the execution of immigration enforcement and therefore met the definition of a rebellion. Advertisement Legal experts said they expect Trump's executive order to draw legal challenges. On Sunday, Newsom asked the Trump administration to rescind his deployment of the National Guard, saying the administration had not followed proper legal procedure in sending them to the state. Trump said the National Guard troops would be used to 'temporarily' protect Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers and 'other United States Government personnel who are performing Federal functions, including the enforcement of Federal law, and to protect Federal property, at locations where protests against these functions are occurring or are likely to occur based on current threat assessments and planned operations.' Goitein called Trump's exercise of the statute an 'untested' departure from its use by previous presidents. She said presidents have in the past invoked this section of federal law in conjunction with the Insurrection Act, which Trump did not. The Insurrection Act authorizes the president to deploy armed forces or the National Guard domestically to suppress armed rebellion, riots or other extreme circumstances. It allows US military personnel to perform law enforcement activities - such as making arrests and performing searches - generally prohibited by another law, the Posse Comitatus Act. The last time a president invoked this section of US code in tandem with the Insurrection Act was in 1992, during the riots that engulfed Los Angeles after the acquittal of police officers in the beating of Rodney King. The Insurrection Act has been invoked throughout US history to deal with riots and labor unrest, and to protect Black Americans from the Ku Klux Klan. Advertisement During his 2024 campaign, Trump and aides discussed invoking the Insurrection Act on his first day in office to quell anticipated protests, and he said at an Iowa rally that he would unilaterally send troops to Democratic-run cities to enforce order. 'You look at any Democrat-run state, and it's just not the same - it doesn't work,' Trump told the crowd, suggesting cities like New York and Los Angeles had severe crime problems. 'We cannot let it happen any longer. And one of the other things I'll do - because you're supposed to not be involved in that, you just have to be asked by the governor or the mayor to come in - the next time, I'm not waiting.' Trump's willingness to use the armed forces to put down protests has drawn fierce blowback from civil liberties groups and Democrats, who have said suppressing dissent with military force is a violation of the country's norms. 'President Trump's deployment of federalized National Guard troops in response to protests is unnecessary, inflammatory, and an abuse of power,' Hina Shamsi, director of the National Security Project at the American Civil Liberties Union, said in a statement. 'By taking this action, the Trump administration is putting Angelenos in danger, creating legal and ethical jeopardy for troops, and recklessly undermining our foundational democratic principle that the military should not police civilians.' Goitein said Trump's move to invoke only the federal service law might be calculated to try to avoid any political fallout from invoking the Insurrection Act, or it's merely a prelude to doing so. 'This is charting new ground here, to have a president try to uncouple these authorities,' Goitein said. 'There's a question here whether he is essentially trying to deploy the powers of the Insurrection Act without invoking it.' Advertisement Trump's move also was unusual in other ways, Goitein said. Domestic military deployments typically come at the request of a governor and in response to the collapse of law enforcement control or other serious threats. Local authorities in Los Angeles have not asked for such help. Goitein said the last time a president ordered the military to a state without a request was in 1965, when President Lyndon B. Johnson sent troops to Alabama to protect civil rights demonstrators. Georgetown law professor Steve Vladeck wrote on his website that invoking the Armed Services Act - and not the Insurrection Act - means the troops will be limited in what role they will be able to perform. 'Nothing that the President did Saturday night would, for instance, authorize these federalized National Guard troops to conduct their own immigration raids; make their own immigration arrests; or otherwise do anything other than, to quote the President's own memorandum, 'those military protective activities that the Secretary of Defense determines are reasonably necessary to ensure the protection and safety of Federal personnel and property,'' Vladeck wrote. Rachel E. VanLandingham, a former Air Force attorney and professor at the Southwestern Law School in Los Angeles, echoed the point. Unless acting under federal orders from the president, National Guard units are state organizations overseen by governors. While under state control, Guard troops have broader law enforcement authorities, VanLandingham said. In this situation, the service members under federal control will have more restraints. 'But it can easily and quickly escalate to mortal and constitutional danger,' she said, if Trump decides to also invoke the Insurrection Act, which would give these Guard members and any active-duty troops who may be summoned to Los Angeles the authority to perform law enforcement duties. Advertisement During his first term as president, Trump suggested invoking the Insurrection Act to deal with protests over the 2020 police killing of George Floyd, but his defense secretary at the time, Mark T. Esper, objected and it never came to fruition. Trump asked the governors of a handful of states to send troops to D.C. in response to the Floyd protests there. Some governors agreed, but others turned aside the request. National Guard members were present outside the White House in June of that year during a violent crackdown on protesters demonstrating against police brutality. That same day, D.C. National Guard helicopters overseen by Trump's Army secretary then, Ryan McCarthy, roared over protesters in downtown Washington, flying as low as 55 feet. An Army review later determined it was a misuse of helicopters specifically designated for medical evacuations. Trump also generated controversy when he sent tactical teams of border officers to Portland, Oregon, and to Seattle to confront protesters there.
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Signs removed at family business pizza takeaway as building listed for sale
SIGNS have been removed from a family business pizza takeaway in Warrington, as the building is listed for sale. Signage has been removed in recent weeks on the Don Quattro building, located at Fearnhead Cross on Insall Road. The business is a sister venue for the ever-popular Donatello Italian restaurant, which opened on Orford Lane in 1996. Don Quattro opened in spring 2022, due to the success of Donatello takeaways during the Covid pandemic, and it was hoped that this would be the first of a few takeaway venues in the town. However, the 982 square-foot building has been listed for sale with estate agents Morgan Williams Commercial, with offers in the region of £120,000 considered. The listing states: 'We are delighted to bring to market this wonderful leasehold business for sale. 'The property is a prominent detached former pizza takeaway, suitable for similar retail trades. 'Inside, the unit is fully refurbished and contains high-quality equipment, which is available for purchase. Signs have been removed from the Don Quattro pizza takeaway building in Fearnhead 'The fixtures and fittings list is extensive, and it includes items such as an artisan rotating base pizza oven, full extraction system, and CCTC. 'The property benefits from its own private car park, which can hold approximately seven cars at one time. 'Kitchen and prep areas are well stocked with equipment that forms part of the sale. 'The property is currently trading by our clients as an established pizzeria business, and it will be ideal for a similar use or other takeaway food businesses. 'Our client is the current owner of the business, and they are looking for offers in the region of £120,000 to take full ownership of the lease and fixtures and fittings. 'The purchaser will be assigned the existing, long-term FRI lease direct from the landlord, whereby the current rent passing is £30,000 per annum. 'The property benefits from planning consent under application number 2021/39225, which permits takeaway trade between the hours of 5pm to 11pm, Monday to Friday, midday to 11.30pm on Saturdays, and midday to 11pm on Sundays and bank holidays.'
