
Is Libya's General Khalifa Haftar really that powerful?
However, shortly after their jet touched down at Benghazi Airport, the cluster of EU foreign ministers – as well as European Commissioner for Migration Magnus Brunner – were sent packing.
There was no agreement, not even a meeting. They were unceremoniously kicked out and declared "personae non gratae," a source on the European side told Euronews at the time, adding that the delegation was caught in a diplomatic 'trap' in which Haftar tried to force them to take a photo with, and tacitly legitimise, his Benghazi-based government.
While the EU itself has been remiss to publicly comment on what one senior Libyan analyst said was outright 'humiliation,' it is understood that the man they were hoping to strike a deal with was General Khalifa Haftar.
As the head of the powerful Libyan National Army, despite not leading the internationally recognised government, Haftar has become the de facto ruler of vast swathes of the North African country, which has lacked a unified state since the fall and assassination of notorious dictator Muammar Gaddafi in 2011.
Although Haftar is arguably the most powerful person in Libya today, he was once persona non grata himself, living quietly in exile right up to Gaddafi's demise.
Keep your friends close…
Born to an Arab Benuin family in northeastern Libya at the start of Britain's eight-year occupation of the country, Khalifa Belqasim Omar Haftar was, even according to his allies, 'a very quiet young lad who did not do much work.'
However, he managed to gain admission to the Benghazi Military University Academy, where friends from his time there reportedly also refer to him as 'a very stern boy.'
'He would not ask for a fight, but if it came to him, he knows how to handle it,' Haftar's friends described him.
It was at the academy where Haftar got to know a student in the year above — one Muammar Gaddafi.
They became fast friends, with Haftar even labelling Gaddafi an 'angel'. The two united over their revolutionary spirit, fomented by a recent political coup that toppled the monarchy and political class in Libya's neighbour, Egypt.
'We were massively affected by Jamal Abdel Nasser's era and what was going on in Egypt,' Haftar later explained.
Haftar was also said to be a massive admirer of the Iraqi vice president at the time — soon to become another household name.
'Khalifa's most important son is named Saddam, who by the way is named after Saddam Hussein. He's the most like his father, I think that tells you all you need to know,' Tim Eaton from the Chatham House Institute said during an interview with Euronews from London.
It is also likely that he chose his title, field marshal, as a nod to Yugoslav socialist leader Josip Broz Tito, experts believe.
Just three years after his graduation, Haftar was instrumental in the 1969 coup, which toppled King Idris and replaced him with Gaddafi, who had expansionist ambitions of spreading his Islamic socialist ideology — also known as Jamahiriya — beyond Libya's borders.
In subsequent years, Haftar trained in the Soviet Union and rose through the ranks of Gaddafi's military, commanding the Libyan troops supporting Egyptian troops entering Israeli-occupied Sinai during the Yom Kippur War in 1973.
This cemented what was to become an enduring relationship between the Libyan military commander and leaders in Cairo.
But keep your enemies closer
In 1986, Haftar was made a colonel before becoming the military chief of staff. As the Gaddafi regime became increasingly authoritarian and rogue, his rise seemed inexorable.
However, his luck suddenly turned: Gaddafi's favourite commander led a disastrous mission in the late 1980s into neighbouring Chad, which led to the capture of almost 700 Libyan soldiers, including Haftar himself.
He was jailed, along with his men. Then it was the US, not Libya, that secured his release, which Libyan analyst Anas El Gomati contends was a turning point in the Haftar-Gaddafi relationship.
'Haftar was like Gaddafi's chosen sword until he became his sharpest blade turned inward,' the founder of Libya's self-described first think tank told Euronews.
As El Gomati explained, Haftar 'was abandoned as a scapegoat, then spent two decades in Virginia plotting revenge."
"He didn't just oppose Gaddafi, he became his dark mirror, learning every lesson about authoritarian control," El Gomati pointed out.
In fact, Haftar spent the next 24 years in exile and working with Libyan opposition movements, living just kilometres away from Washington, in Langley, the home of the CIA.
In 2019, a former advisor to Haftar in the mid-2010s, Mohamed Bouzier, concurred with El Gomati in an interview with the BBC. 'He was inhabited by Gaddafi. He was inhabited by envy of Gaddafi. How Gaddafi ruled this country," Bouzier said.
However, some Libya insiders privately told Euronews of rumours that Gaddafi had actually gifted his former military chief an opulent mansion in Cairo during this time — the same house in which Haftar's most powerful son, Saddam, grew up.
Back in the fold
When protests erupted across the Arab world in 2011, Libyans took to the streets in cities across the country.
After decades of discussing plots to overthrow Gaddafi with willing Western ears and, as Libya expert Claudia Gazzini describes it, 'sort of defecting to the Americans', Haftar finally saw cracks emerging and soon went to the Libyan capital Tripoli.
However, the International Crisis Group's senior analyst pushed back on the idea of Haftar becoming a key US puppet in the Libyan revolution.
'I haven't heard anybody make it so explicit. It would make sense, but nobody has said the Americans told him to go back there.'
Even if they did, it wouldn't have been a short-term success, she continued.
'In 2012-2013, he based himself in Tripoli, but he wasn't a big name at the time, because there were just so many different armed groups in Tripoli an the power was balanced out between all these people.'
El Gomati was less diplomatic: 'Haftar was a footnote, a Cold War fossil.'
It was not until 2014 that Haftar's head really appeared above the parapet, when he announced an operation which he said was to root out extremists in Benghazi.
Even then, Gazzini contends that he was not taken seriously. 'He came on TV. It was very pathetic. He actually came on TV with a big map behind him saying: 'Hey, you know, we need to rebel against these bad Islamists.''
A claim that both Gazzini and Eaton doubt, with the latter telling Euronews that 'for Haftar, there's always been good islamists and bad Islamists.'
'There's actually a lot of Salafists (Islamist extremists) in his ranks, just ones who can take orders," Eaton explained.
However, Operation Dignity, as it was known, helped consolidate Haftar's power over Libya's second biggest city and much of the country's east.
Over the following years, he built up his power and became the supreme commander of the Libyan National Army in 2015.
None of this happened in a vacuum.
Family at home, friends abroad
Over the decades, Haftar had built up close relationships in Cairo, but when he returned to Libya, Egypt was also in the midst of revolutionary fervour, tending towards the Islamist Muslim Brotherhood group.
As Gazzini explained, 'There was a jihadist threat in Libya and then we have Egypt, which was very weak."
"If you go back to before 2013 before (Abdel Fattah) El-Sisi, there was this fear that Egypt could implode ... And the Europeans also didn't want Egypt to collapse," she explained.
Faced with difficult choices and fearing the likes of the self-proclaimed IS group spreading their influence in North Africa, some analysts believe that European leaders gave Haftar — whose power and army grew in strength — the silent nod of approval to do what he thinks is right.
"They needed a new Gaddafi, someone who could stop democracy from becoming contagious. Haftar fit the mould: ruthless, ambitious, and willing to trade sovereignty for support," El Gomati believes.
Egypt also backed him as a known known, someone in the immediate neighbourhood who understood the context, but also the perils the region was facing.
The list of backers, silent or otherwise, only continued to grow from there on out. In addition to Cairo, Haftar gained the support of governments ranging from Moscow to Washington, even though the UN did not recognise his wider authority as a legitimate head of state.
However, according to Gazzini, it was Abu Dhabi and Paris who ended up as his most unquestioning supporters. While the Emirates saw the allure of Libya's oil reserves — the largest in Africa — France and Europe more widely were dealing with an influx of refugees through the Mediterranean, hundreds of thousands of whom were hoping to reach the continent via Libya.
In all that, Haftar saw his chance to utilise the international support and finally become the ruler of Libya — and who knows, maybe even bigger than Gaddafi himself.
When Haftar announced his intention to overthrow the Tripoli-based, internationally recognised Government of National Accord on the day UN Secretary General António Guterres arrived in the capital in 2019, even Egypt warned him against it.
'But he was full of hubris from the Emiratis who wanted to do it. They were giving him aerial cover. The French also wanted to do it,' Gazzini told Euronews from the IRG offices in Rome.
It is a hubris that some have compared to his ally, Russian President Vladimir Putin's full-scale invasion of Ukraine.
Similarly, Haftar's attempts also failed. Tripoli refused to fall into Haftar's troops' hands, and Libya fell back into a form of stalemate.
Divided we stand
Throughout this time, Haftar was accumulating extraordinary wealth for his family, whom he had installed in various positions, experts say.
As Eaton told Euronews, 'There was a debate on whether when Khalifa (Haftar) died, could his sons come in and take over. It seems that they have come in and started creating their own portfolios even before.'
And it is all in the family and the hands of his children, as El Gomati succinctly outlined.
'Saddam runs the ground forces. Khaled commands the personal guard. Belkacem controls the billions in Libya's reconstruction fund. Sedig runs the reconciliation file,' he explained. The family has amassed a portfolio estimated to be worth billions.
Despite his failure to seize the wider country, Haftar and his sons continue to run much of the country.
'He controls everything that matters in eastern Libya,' El Gomati said.
'Oil fields, ports, airports, military bases, and the central bank's printing press. He has his own air force, controls cross-border smuggling routes… It operates like a state within a state.'
Euronews has reached out to Khalifa and Saddam Haftar for comment.
As shown by the EU's lack of retribution over the past week, the self-proclaimed field marshal also maintains significant international backing.
He was recently in Russia for talks with Putin – a trip he was rumoured to have died on, but once again, he miraculously recovered.
The 'humiliation' of the EU delegation also isn't the first time Haftar has managed to push around supposed allies in Europe.
The analysts Euronews spoke to put this down to Europe's domestic wranglings over 'irregular migrations,' and the simple fact that 'there's no way migrant boats would be leaving the east without Haftar knowing.'
Gazzini gave the example of her native Italy: 'At some point, a lot of migrants were going to the coast of Italy about a year and a half ago, he let it be known that he wanted an official visit and an official invitation to Rome. And he got that.'
At the end of his interview, El Gomati did not mince words about the European approach to the Libyan commander. 'Europeans keep volunteering as victims. Haftar treats EU diplomats like desperate suitors because that's exactly what they are.'
It is a point that Eaton also touches upon, albeit somewhat more diplomatically. 'There's a real imbalance,' he concluded.
However, Europe is not acting in a vacuum either. It is often trying to play by international rules and conventions in an arena where shady actions speak much louder than words and agreements on paper.
Sometimes, it is better to have a strongman on your side — or at least his ear.
'We have very little leverage compared to other states. Compare it with the Russians, who have MiGs and have fighter jets that are at Haftar's disposal," Gazzini admitted.
'Compare us to the Emiratis who bring in reinforcements and ammunition in violation of the embargo.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Euronews
2 hours ago
- Euronews
Trump tells European leaders he will meet with Putin and Zelenskyy
US President Donald Trump intends to meet face-to-face with his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin, possibly as early as next week, the New York Times reported on Wednesday quoting two people familiar with the plan. After those talks, Trump will reportedly hold a three-way including himself, Putin and Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. Trump announced those plans in a call with Zelenskyy and European leaders on Wednesday evening, sources said. The meetings would include only those three presidents and will not include any European representatives. The European leaders in the call on Wednesday appeared to accept what Trump said, one of the people familiar with the call said. That comes after Zelenskyy said in his nightly address on Wednesday that Russia appeared to be more inclined to a ceasefire after US special envoy Steve Witkoff's visit to Moscow. "The pressure on them works. But the main thing is that they do not deceive us in the details – neither us nor the US," he said. Speaking about Witkoff's talks with Putin in Moscow, Trump called the meeting "highly productive" in a post on his Truth Social platform and claimed that "great progress was made" without going into details. "Everyone agrees this war must come to a close, and we will work towards that in the days and weeks to come. Thank you for your attention to this matter!" he posted. But a White House official quoted by the Reuters news agency said that while the meeting went well and the "Russians are eager to continue engaging," the secondary sanctions Trump had threatened to impose on Russia were still expected to be implemented on Friday. Witkoff in Moscow Earlier on Wednesday, Putin held talks with Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff in Moscow, days before the White House's revised deadline for Russia to reach a peace deal with Ukraine or potentially face severe economic penalties. Trump's deadline for Putin to make peace in Ukraine ends on Friday, revised down from the initial 50 days he set. Washington has threatened "severe tariffs" and other economic penalties if the fighting doesn't stop. However, Trump himself has doubted the effectiveness of sanctions, saying Sunday that Russia has proven to be "pretty good at avoiding sanctions." The Kremlin has insisted that international sanctions imposed since the full-scale invasion have had a limited impact. But Ukraine maintains sanctions are taking their toll on Moscow's war machine and wants Western allies to ramp them up. Trump has also expressed increasing frustration with Putin over Russia's escalating strikes on civilian areas of Ukraine. The meeting between Putin and Witkoff lasted about three hours. Putin's foreign affairs adviser Yuri Ushakov said that Putin and Witkoff had a "useful and constructive conversation" that focused on the Ukrainian war and "prospects for possible development of strategic cooperation between the US and Russia." Before those talks, Witkoff took a walk through Zaryadye Park, close to the Kremlin, with Kirill Dmitriev, the Russian president's envoy for investment and economic cooperation. Dmitriev said later on the social media platform X that 'dialogue will prevail.' Dmitriev played a key role in three rounds of direct talks between delegations from Russia and Ukraine in Istanbul in recent months, as well as discussions between Russian and US officials. Those negotiations made no progress on ending the three-year war following Russia's but did facilitate POW exchanges between the two sides.


Euronews
7 hours ago
- Euronews
Russia now appears more inclined towards a ceasefire, Zelenskyy says
Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said in his nightly address on Wednesday that Russia appeared to be more inclined to a ceasefire after US special envoy Steve Witkoff's visit to Moscow. "The pressure on them works. But the main thing is that they do not deceive us in the details – neither us nor the US," he said. Those comments come after Zelenskyy held a phone call with his US counterpart Donald Trump in which he reiterated Ukraine's support for a just peace with Russia. "Ukraine will definitely defend its independence. We all need a lasting and reliable peace. Russia must end the war that it itself started," Zelenskyy said in a post on X, adding that European leaders had also joined the call without specifying which ones. Speaking about Witkoff's talks with Putin in Moscow, Trump called the meeting "highly productive" in a post on his Truth Social platform and claimed that "great progress was made" without going into details. "Everyone agrees this war must come to a close, and we will work towards that in the days and weeks to come. Thank you for your attention to this matter!" he posted. But a White House official quoted by the Reuters news agency said that while the meeting went well and the "Russians are eager to continue engaging," the secondary sanctions Trump had threatened to impose on Russia were still expected to be implemented on Friday. Witkoff in Moscow Earlier on Wednesday, Putin held talks with Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff in Moscow, days before the White House's revised deadline for Russia to reach a peace deal with Ukraine or potentially face severe economic penalties. Trump's deadline for Putin to make peace in Ukraine ends on Friday, revised down from the initial 50 days he set. Washington has threatened "severe tariffs" and other economic penalties if the fighting doesn't stop. However, Trump himself has doubted the effectiveness of sanctions, saying Sunday that Russia has proven to be "pretty good at avoiding sanctions." The Kremlin has insisted that international sanctions imposed since the full-scale invasion have had a limited impact. But Ukraine maintains sanctions are taking their toll on Moscow's war machine and wants Western allies to ramp them up. Trump has also expressed increasing frustration with Putin over Russia's escalating strikes on civilian areas of Ukraine. The meeting between Putin and Witkoff lasted about three hours. Putin's foreign affairs adviser Yuri Ushakov said that Putin and Witkoff had a "useful and constructive conversation" that focused on the Ukrainian war and "prospects for possible development of strategic cooperation between the US and Russia." Before those talks, Witkoff took a walk through Zaryadye Park, close to the Kremlin, with Kirill Dmitriev, the Russian president's envoy for investment and economic cooperation. Dmitriev said later on the social media platform X that 'dialogue will prevail.' Dmitriev played a key role in three rounds of direct talks between delegations from Russia and Ukraine in Istanbul in recent months, as well as discussions between Russian and US officials. Those negotiations made no progress on ending the three-year war following Russia's but did facilitate POW exchanges between the two sides.


Euronews
9 hours ago
- Euronews
Croatian MEP's wartime photo causes a stir in neighbouring Serbia
A social media post by the European Parliament's rapporteur for Serbia Tonino Picula created a stir in neighbouring Serbia and prompted calls for his removal from his position. Picula, a member of Croatia's centre-left SDP party, tweeted on Tuesday to commemorate the 30th anniversary of the Operation Storm, a military operation that effectively put an end to the ethnic Serb parastate and the years-long war in the country. In the photo, a visibly younger Picula in military uniform brandishes a heavy machine gun. "Let us thank everyone who contributed to the defence of the sovereignty and freedom of the Republic of Croatia," the post read. Picula fought on the side of the Croatian army and took part in the Operation Storm, and has previously publicly shared photos from the frontlines. Reactions were swift. Following the condemnation on social networks and in Serbian media, opposition SSP party leader Dragan Đilas criticised Picula, saying the MEP "compromised his position ... because you can't be a rapporteur with an automatic gun in your hands." "We believed you were a man of the future and not of the past. And it was like that until today," Đilas said in a statement on Tuesday. Austrian MEP Harald Vilimsky from the far-right Freedom Party (FPÖ) and European spokesperson for the Vienna FPÖ parliamentary group Maximilian Krauss slammed what they said was "disturbing and politically highly dangerous". "It is completely inappropriate for an EU rapporteur, who plays a key role in the sensitive dialogue between the EU and Serbia, to post a picture in combat gear, thereby offending many people. This is a serious diplomatic misstep," Vilimsky said in a statement released on Tuesday. "With this post, Picula has impressively demonstrated that he is unsuitable for this role. Anyone who publicly celebrates a military presence while simultaneously issuing constitutional recommendations to Serbia is squandering all credibility. This is an affront to all the victims and displaced persons of this tragedy," Krauss added. The two FPÖ politicians have requested an immediate investigation into Picula's actions by relevant EU authorities, they said. Operation Storm, which took place over the course of four days in early August 1995, remains a contested issue between the two neighbouring countries. Croatia's declaration of independence from the former Yugoslavia in 1991 triggered a rebellion by minority ethnic Serbs who took control of about one-fifth of the country's territory in the Belgrade-backed parastate of the Republic of Serb Krajina. Croatia retook all of its territory in the 1995 military action. UN estimated that around 150,000 ethnic Serbs fled to what is today Serbia and Montenegro, and between 10,000 and 15,000 arrived in the general area of Banja Luka in neighbouring Bosnia. Serbia claims the number surpasses 250,000, on top of numerous civilian victims during the offensive. Most ethnic Serbs have not returned to Croatia following Operation Storm, and the minority now comprises around 3.2% of Croatia's population, according to the 2021 census, significantly less than 12.2% in 1991. This is not the first time that Picula has faced criticism in Serbia. In May, Serbian Parliament Speaker Ana Brnabić accused Picula of interference in the domestic affairs of the Western Balkan country after Picula retorted that the statements of President Aleksandar Vučić were becoming "more and more bizarre". Brnabić accused the Croatian MEP of being part of a witch hunt against a sovereign country, saying, "Picula, stay away from Serbia". Picula has repeatedly rejected accusations of harbouring "anti-Serb" sentiments. Euronews has reached out to MEP Picula for comment.