
My part in Britain's illegal immigration crisis
What is less often considered is how our personal spending decisions are driving that illegal immigration. It is all well and good to bemoan what is happening in the abstract, but we then spend our cash with the food delivery companies and at the barber shops and nail bars which pull undocumented, illegal workers to our shores.
This reality was brought home to me last weekend when I tried to do what I have done on countless occasions – order a beer at Royal China on Baker Street in London's West End. Royal China serves perhaps London's most sublime dim sum – not the most cuisine-y or original, but certainly leagues above most of the capital's establishments.
My opinion on this is not an esoteric one. At weekend lunchtimes, its entrance and the street outside is thronging with people waiting to be called when a table is ready. And, best of all, you can still have a lunch for four without drinks for around £100, something of a bargain in London.
I must have eaten at this restaurant, and the others in its group, hundreds of times over nearly 30 years and have a sentimental attachment to them.
When the first branch opened in Queensway in Bayswater (now closed) in the mid 1990s, I was in my early 20s and used to go on Sundays with my mother after walks in Hyde Park. She was in and out of hospital at the time with the cancer that went on to kill her.
When I was running a think tank and a magazine in Marylebone, I dragged our authors there – with little regard to whether they had a fondness for Chinese food. My two teenage sons have been going for longer than they can remember.
What was different this time is that I was informed that the restaurant no longer serves alcohol, but I was welcome to bring my own drink. Corkage is now charged which, on my visit, ranged from £3 for unlimited beers to £50 for a bottle of whisky.
Why the change? After a raid by immigration officials, the restaurant lost its alcohol licence last August when it was found to be employing nine members of staff who were here illegally.
It was also fined £360,000 by the Home Office. This was the third time the restaurant had fallen foul of the law, having already had to pay penalties totalling £110,000.
All the fines were swiftly paid, and other branches of the restaurant in Canary Wharf and Harrow, as well as its more upmarket Michelin-guide listed sibling, Royal China Club, a hundred yards or so further north on Baker Street, are not accused of similar breaches and are still merrily serving alcohol.
The output of council staff is not usually written to entertain, but the City of Westminster's submission on Royal China makes for quite some reading. Of their 2018 raid, the report states:
'Upon officers parking the vehicles, one worker at the rear of the restaurant ran inside and warned the other workers that immigration officers were present, officers… could see staff running through the restaurant and discarding their uniform.
'There were 28 staff members encountered in total, nine members of staff were found to be working illegally and arrested.
'During the visit the fire alarm was set off… In the commotion one Chinese female who had admitted to entering the United Kingdom illegally managed to escape. The fire brigade attended and informed the officer in charge that there had been no fire and that the fire alarm had been pressed by someone inside the restaurant.'
And the record of last year's raid is similar:
'Upon officers entering the front of the premises they were asked by the staff member behind the bar to wait for the manager to arrive.
'Whilst officers were waiting, eight staff members attempted to escape from the premises via a lift at the rear loading area, another two members of staff fled via a rear staircase. Nine members of staff were arrested by the officers positioned at the rear and one male escaped.
'There were 29 staff members encountered in total, this time nine more illegal workers were found. The illegal workers consisted of six Indonesian males who had overstayed their visas, two Malaysian males who had overstayed their visas and one Chinese female who was working in breach of her visit visa conditions. The workers were arrested and escorted off the premises.
'One worker reported that they worked washing dishes 11 hours per day, six days per week and earning £400 a week, (around £6 per hour compared to the minimum wage of £11.44 per hour).'
Royal China is not an obscure establishment on some backstreet. If somewhere so public-facing in so prominent a location has flagrantly abused its position, what is going on elsewhere? One must assume, after being fined a total of £470,000, it is now compliant with the law.
My attempt to satiate a lunchtime craving for a beer has caused me to ask: has my fondness for dim sum, in however small a way, contributed to Britain's illegal immigration crisis?
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Sky News
29 minutes ago
- Sky News
President Bush determined to 'rid world of evil-doer Saddam Hussein', new records reveal
It would have been "politically impossible" to stop President Bush from invading Iraq, as he believed he was on a "crusade against evil", new records show. Newly declassified UK government files show Sir Tony Blair was warned by his US ambassador that George W Bush was determined to overthrow dictator Saddam Hussein, in the months before the invasion of Iraq. Sir Tony, who was prime minister at the time, was trying to encourage the US president to use diplomatic means to change the situation in the Middle Eastern country, and flew to Camp David in January 2003 to make the case, just two months before the joint US-UK invasion. The UK government was also hoping the United Nations Security Council would agree a new resolution specifically authorising the use of military force against Iraq. But the files, made public for the first time, show that Sir Tony's ambassador, Sir Christopher Meyer, warned him it would be "politically impossible" to sway Mr Bush away from an invasion unless Hussein surrendered. The documents, released by the National Archives at Kew in west London, show Sir Christopher also wrote that Mr Bush believed himself to be on "a crusade against evil to be undertaken by God's chosen people". Sir Tony's foreign policy adviser, Sir David Manning, told the PM that when he met Mr Bush, he should make the point that a new diplomatic resolution was "politically essential for the UK, and almost certainly legally essential as well". But the White House was becoming increasingly impatient at the unwillingness of France and Russia - both of whom held a veto - to agree a resolution so long as UN inspectors were unable to find any evidence of Iraqi weapons of mass destruction, the supposed justification for war. Sir Christopher warned Sir Tony shortly before his visit to see Mr Bush in January 2003 that options for a peaceful solution in Iraq had effectively run out. He wrote: "It is politically impossible for Bush to back down from going to war in Iraq this spring, absent Saddam's surrender or disappearance from the scene. "If Bush had any room for manoeuvre beforehand this was closed off by his State of the Union speech. "In the high-flown prose to which Bush is drawn on these set-piece occasions, he said in effect that destroying Saddam is a crusade against evil to be undertaken by God's chosen people." In a cable sent the previous month, Sir Christopher said that much of the impulse for deposing Hussein was coming from the president, a born-again Christian, who was scornful of what he saw as the "self-serving" reservations of the Europeans. "His view of the world is Manichean. He sees his mission as ridding it of evil-doers. He believes American values should be universal values," Sir Christopher stated. "He is strongly allergic to Europeans collectively. Anyone who has sat round a dinner table with low-church Southerners will find these sentiments instantly recognisable." In the end, Sir Tony and Mr Bush abandoned efforts to get a new Security Council resolution, blaming French President Jacques Chirac for refusing, and launched the invasion of Iraq anyway. Lobbying from Mandelson and anger at the French Among the new files, there are also a number of other revelations. These include: Current UK ambassador to the US, Sir Peter Mandelson, was so desperate to get back into government following his second resignation from Sir Tony's government that he asked Lord Birt, a policy adviser to Downing Street, to write to the prime minister in 2003, asking for him to receive a role - four months before Sir Peter was appointed as the UK's next European commissioner Sir Tony was furious at French president Jacques Chirac's efforts to undermine pressure being put on Zimbabwean dictator Robert Mugabe by the UK in 2003, over growing violence caused by a policy of driving the remaining white farmers from their lands in the African nation The prime minister also insisted on changing the rules around which parties can lay wreaths at the Cenotaph on Remembrance Sunday in a bid to protect the Northern Irish peace process in 2004, despite warning this could create an "adverse reaction" from the SNP and Plaid Cymru


The Independent
30 minutes ago
- The Independent
Delays to Hillsborough Law ‘extraordinary', writer Jimmy McGovern says
Delays to the introduction of a Hillsborough Law are 'extraordinary', Jimmy McGovern, who wrote a docudrama about the disaster, has said. McGovern, whose Bafta-winning 1996 drama Hillsborough drew attention to the families' fight for justice, said he had been following the progress of the legislation, which would include a duty for public bodies to tell the truth in the aftermath of major disasters, as well as legal aid for families. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer had pledged to bring in the law by the 36th anniversary of the tragedy, which was on April 15, but Downing Street said more time was needed to redraft it, amid fears it had been watered down and would not include a legal duty of candour. McGovern told the PA news agency: 'I just think it's extraordinary. What's going on there is people are demanding the right to lie. 'That's what it's all about. 'They don't want a law that will tell public officials that they must tell the truth. 'It killed 97 people, Hillsborough, and so they are demanding the right to lie over another Hillsborough. 'We demand the right to lie again'. Extraordinary.' An attempt by Liverpool West Derby MP Ian Byrne to introduce the Bill was blocked in the House of Commons earlier this month. McGovern's drama told the story of the tragedy at the FA Cup semi-final between Liverpool FC and Nottingham Forest at Hillsborough Stadium in Sheffield, in which 97 men, women and children died, and examined the build-up and aftermath. It has been credited as a key part in the families' fight for justice, which saw original inquest verdicts overturned and new inquests which found that the victims were unlawfully killed. McGovern said his work did not change anything, apart from the agenda. He said: 'The change was all brought about by the sheer determination of the Hillsborough families. 'But I take great pleasure in the fact that my docudrama did change the agenda for a short time.' He said writing drama offered the opportunity to give a different perspective on an issue. 'That's why the powers that be are always sniffy about docudrama, because the camera goes to the places where they don't want it to go,' he said. The writer said he was in a Manchester pub in 1982 when news came through that Argentine Navy cruiser the ARA General Belgrano had been sunk by the British during the Falklands War. He said: ' People in the pub stood up and cheered. 'And I said to myself, they should be on that ship. They should see what it's like. 'Well, the camera can do that. The camera fights against that kind of cheap, easy, bloodthirsty reaction.' McGovern's new drama, Unforgivable, airs on BBC Two at 9pm on Thursday and will be available on BBC iPlayer.


Sky News
32 minutes ago
- Sky News
Buckingham Palace courtiers lobbied John Major government for a new royal yacht, files reveal
Buckingham Palace courtiers lobbied the government as ministers agonised over whether to replace the Royal Yacht Britannia, newly released official files reveal. By 1993, it was apparent Britannia was reaching the end of its life but John Major's government was yet to decide whether to commission a new vessel - at an estimated cost of £50m. It was widely thought Queen Elizabeth II strongly favoured the idea of a new yacht, but the royals could not be seen trying to influence politics. However files released by the National Archives at Kew, west London, show senior palace staff privately approached No 10 to see if the Conservative PM would stress Britannia's "inestimable value" in a Commons statement. The plan was scotched by the Cabinet Office, which said any such comment would be highly "prejudicial". The issue of the new yacht came as support for the Royal Family was at a low ebb. There had been an angry backlash the previous year when ministers said taxpayers would foot the bill - which ran to £36m - for Windsor Castle to be restored after a fire. In the aftermath of her "annus horribilis" - which included the separation of Prince Charles and Diana - Elizabeth II agreed she would pay taxes for the first time. With the prime minister due to announce the move to parliament, Queen Elizabeth II's private secretary Sir Robert Fellowes saw an opportunity. He asked Mr Major's principal private secretary Alex Allan if the PM would insert a passage on the importance of Britannia, as well as the royals' dedicated aircraft and train. He suggested the prime minister should say it was not just a question of cost "but also the style in which we wish our head of state and members of the Royal Family to represent us" in their public duties. "I would also like to make clear that there is not, and never has been, any pressure from the Queen to build a replacement for HMY Britannia," he added. However, Nicolas Bevan, leading the working group set up to consider the future of Britannia, warned the proposed remark could be "prejudicial" to any future decisions. "Equally it hardly rings true to suggest that it is a matter of complete indifference to the Queen as to whether Britannia is replaced or not," he said. Despite misgivings over the cost, the government announced in January 1997 that a replacement yacht would be built if they retained power in the following year's general election. When Labour swept to power with a landslide win, they promptly reversed the decision. When Britannia was finally decommissioned, Queen Elizabeth II, who rarely displayed any emotion in public, was seen shedding a tear.