Google Home is getting even dumber: Now thermostat voice commands are broken
TL;DR Google Home users with thermostats can no longer use the simple command 'turn off the thermostat' to control their device.
Instead, users have to say 'set thermostat to off' to turn it off, which is an unnatural command for this control.
Nest Thermostat users are no strangers to Google downgrading their smart home experience, but a recent downgrade has all thermostat users on Google Home scratching their heads. As it turns out, Google's smart home ecosystem no longer accepts a simple command to turn off the thermostat, forcing you to say more convoluted commands out loud just to get back in control of your smart home.
Reddit user NSuave pointed out how their Google Nest Hub in their kitchen no longer responds to the 'turn off the thermostat' or 'turn off the nest' command. Instead, the device advises the user to use the command 'turn off the thermostat,' which is the very command used in the first place.
We tried turning off a Nest Thermostat 3rd gen through voice commands, but the command no longer works. Instead, we have to say 'set the thermostat to off,' a rather unnatural command, to get it to respond correctly. Thankfully, controlling the temperature via voice continues to work properly.
The Reddit thread is filled with frustrated Google Home and Google Assistant users complaining about how things break every now and then within this smart home ecosystem. This often also breaks any automation that users may have meticulously set up. Broken commands like these also require the entire family to adopt new lingo just to get the basic functionality of their house to work again.
We've reached out to Google for a statement on this issue. We'll keep you updated when we learn more about it.
Got a tip? Talk to us! Email our staff at
Email our staff at news@androidauthority.com . You can stay anonymous or get credit for the info, it's your choice.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
an hour ago
- CNBC
Top Wall Street analysts recommend these three stocks for attractive growth potential
A softer-than-expected July inflation report has improved investor sentiment and revived hopes for a rate cut. Traders await more economic data to gain further insights about the state of the U.S. economy. Looking beyond macro uncertainties and tariff pressures, it is always a good idea for investors to search for stocks that have strong long-term growth potential and enhance their portfolio returns. To this end, recommendations from top Wall Street analysts can help pick attractive stocks, as these experts perform an in-depth analysis of a company's financials and growth prospects. Here are three stocks favored by the Street's top pros, according to TipRanks, a platform that ranks analysts based on their past performance. First on this week's list is social media platform Pinterest (PINS). The company recently reported mixed results for the second quarter of 2025. While second-quarter revenue surpassed expectations, earnings missed the Street's consensus estimate. Meanwhile, Pinterest's third-quarter revenue outlook topped analysts' estimates. In reaction to the Q2 print, BMO Capital analyst Brian Pitz increased the price forecast for Pinterest stock to $41 from $40 and reiterated a buy rating. TipRanks' AI Analyst has an "outperform" rating on PINS stock with a price target of $40. Pitz noted that Pinterest delivered upbeat revenue and adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization) in the quarter, fueled by the company's solid execution and the strength in the retail and financial services businesses. However, the analyst pointed out that Q2 performance was adversely impacted by a 25% drop in advertising pricing resulting from the company's rising market share in previously unmonetized markets around the globe. Pitz views Pinterest as a "Clear AI Winner." While users are gaining from AI-powered search functions and algorithm upgrades on PINS' platform, advertisers are using Performance+ Creative Preview to observe modifications made by PINS+ creative tools and maximize ad efficiency. "As AI continues to drive enhancements, we see it as a clear tailwind for PINS to both improve user experience and drive greater efficiency," said Pitz. The analyst added that advertisers are also benefiting from Pinterest's useful customer insights, given that Gen-Z now constitutes more than half the platform's user base. Pitz ranks No. 95 among more than 9,900 analysts tracked by TipRanks. His ratings have been profitable 72% of the time, delivering an average return of 19.2%. See Pinterest Statistics on TipRanks. We next move to the AI cloud computing company CoreWeave (CRWV), which reported market-beating revenue for the second quarter and issued better-than-anticipated top-line guidance for the third quarter. However, the AI infrastructure company reported a larger-than-expected loss for the second quarter. Following the Q2 results, Jefferies analyst Brent Thill reiterated a buy rating on CoreWeave stock with a price target of $180. The 5-star analyst highlighted the 86% year-over-year jump in CRWV's remaining performance obligations (RPO). However, Thill noted the disappointment related to the limited sequential upside in RPO compared to the high buyside expectations following the $4 billion expanded deal with OpenAI signed in May. Nonetheless, Thill remains optimistic, given that CoreWeave signed expansion deals with two hyperscalers, which he believes reflects "the unrelenting demand for high performance compute and CRWV's best in class capabilities." Thill's bullish view on the company's backlog is also supported by the ramp-up in its capacity. Notably, CoreWeave added 600 megawatts of contracted power, bringing the total capacity to 2.2 gigawatts. Overall, the analyst is confident about RPO acceleration going forward, given that AI demand continues to exceed supply. Thill ranks No. 317 among more than 9,900 analysts tracked by TipRanks. His ratings have been successful 61% of the time, delivering an average return of 12.3%. See CoreWeave Ownership Structure on TipRanks. Finally, let's look at the well-known coffee chain Starbucks (SBUX). Jefferies analyst Brent Thill upgraded Starbucks stock to buy from hold and increased the price target to $115 from $100. Tarantino has "high conviction that turnaround strategies under new leadership will be effective in transforming Starbucks into a better company." Given the recent underperformance of SBUX stock – which has sunk by 16% over the past six months – Tarantino believes that it now has an improved risk/reward profile. He expects the turnaround initiatives under chairman and CEO Brian Niccol to drive improvement in U.S. comparable sales in Fiscal 2026. The company's turnaround initiatives are focused on ensuring high levels of hospitality and a faster speed of service in stores. Moreover, Tarantino expects to gain more visibility on SBUX's earnings outlook over the upcoming quarters, as the impact of the turnaround efforts starts to become clear. In particular, the analyst expects more details on Starbucks' cost-saving initiatives and greater clarity on store-level labor investments to provide insights into the company's long-term aim to revive its operating margin to the level of 17% seen in Fiscal 2019, compared to 10.3% in Fiscal 2025. Overall, Tarantino expects SBUX's multiple to expand on signs of improvement in financial performance, driven by the company's turnaround efforts. Tarantino ranks No. 441 among more than 9,900 analysts tracked by TipRanks. His ratings have been successful 61% of the time, delivering an average return of 10.8%. Interestingly, TipRanks' AI Analyst is not quite as keen as Tarantino, assigning a "neutral" rating on SBUX stock with a price target of $99. See Starbucks Insider Trading Activity on TipRanks.
Android Authority
2 hours ago
- Android Authority
This open-source fasting app actually helped me hit my fitness goals
Dhruv Bhutani / Android Authority I was never an athletic kid, and that continued through most of my 20s. That is, until I decided to change things up, drop some weight, and focus more on my health. Intermittent fasting was a big part of that journey, and I've been following it for several years now. In fact, it's the one constant in my wellness journey that has actually stuck with me. Much as I've dabbled with workout plans, picked up the best fitness trackers, tracked macros with obsessive detail, and even experimented with sleep optimization, it's the 16:8 fasting approach that has been the most sustainable thing I've done for my health. Ironically, what hasn't been sustainable is finding a fasting app that doesn't eventually go down the usual rabbit hole of ads and subscriptions. Trust me, I've tried them all. While most fasting and fitness apps start out helpful, the core experience very quickly gets buried under microtransactions and basic features locked behind paywalls. Curious about what fasting zone you're in? You'd better be prepared to pony up some cash. Everything from custom fasting windows to simple insights that used to be free is suddenly a premium feature. And don't get me started on the notification spam every time I open the app. Look, I just need a glorified stopwatch. I don't need your app to support a full-fledged wellness program and the accompanying fees. So I did what any self-respecting tech enthusiast would do: I looked at open-source solutions to the problem. That's how I found FastTrack, a minimal, open-source, self-hosted, and rather excellent fasting tracker on GitHub. What it lacks in flash, it makes up for in substance. While it might not have dedicated apps on the Play Store or gamification elements to keep you on track, it has all the features you actually need. That simplicity is exactly why I've stuck with it all this time, and why you might too. Don't want to miss the best from Android Authority? Set us as a preferred source in Google Search to support us and make sure you never miss our latest exclusive reports, expert analysis, and much more. The right kind of minimalism Dhruv Bhutani / Android Authority When I first started intermittent fasting, I was already deep into my fitness journey. Between tracking workouts, counting calories, and trying to lose weight without dropping too much muscle mass, intermittent fasting was a crucial part of the equation. But I needed this done without unnecessary friction. Just a timer and a way to check how long I'd fasted, without being given advice about reaching a zen state of mind. FastTrack keeps it simple with a timer, a log, and basic weight tracking. FastTrack, on the other hand, is, for the most part, just a simple timer app. It opens quickly in the browser as a bookmark and gives me a single button to start or stop a fast. Yay for simplicity. The onboarding process is just as straightforward, with no wizards or welcome screens talking me through the benefits of fasting. I already know what I'm getting into. Just make an account, log in, tap a button, and get on with your day. Honestly, I wish more apps worked like that. This simplicity impacted me in more ways than one. Without the friction of constant upselling, notifications, or convoluted interfaces, I started tracking more consistently. It's the same approach serious fitness enthusiasts take. A spreadsheet with reps, or a notepad, if you're old-school, wins out over a flashy app every single time. That lack of friction helped me reach, and even exceed, my daily goals because it's easy to lose track of time when you're not being bombarded by hourly notifications aimed at cheering you on. In my case, they just gave me anxiety over how much time was still left in my fast. Over the last few months, I haven't missed a single fast, and my feeding windows have become tighter and more consistent. This has translated directly into noticeable results. My body fat percentage is lower, I have more energy during workouts, and most importantly, I've built a routine that I stick to diligently. Dhruv Bhutani / Android Authority For all its simplicity, FastTrack isn't just a stopwatch with a shiny coat of paint. It maintains a proper log of all my fasts and lets me add comments, which has helped me spot patterns in my fitness journey. All data is retained locally, and I can easily glance at when I'm likely to cut a fast short or push for longer fasting windows. It's been extremely useful in optimizing my nutrition intake as well. If I'm consistently running on fumes by the end of a fast without significant physical activity, it's clear that my calorie intake is significantly lower than it should be. After particularly heavy workouts, I'd often eat earlier than planned. All of that is obvious, sure, but having that data on hand helps me see broader patterns and the bigger picture. In fact, I'd say the data-driven feedback loop has worked far better for me than any motivation I derived from commercial apps. As someone who prefers purpose-built tools and devices, I get a strange kind of motivation from using something that doesn't try to keep nudging me. FastTrack serves no notifications. It just runs as a tool. And because of that, I opened it more often and used it more honestly. Lacking gamification parameters, I had no incentive to round off an extra 30 minutes in my daily fast. Nor was I concerned about breaking a streak or unlocking a collectible. I just remain focused on tracking my progress, which, for someone trying to hit specific goals and maintain a training plan, is exactly what I need. Worth the effort of setup Dhruv Bhutani / Android Authority Look, I'm well aware that self-hosted tools aren't for everyone. As easy as FastTrack is to set up, the lack of Play Store or App Store availability, or a one-click setup, definitely increases the difficulty level. You've got to hit the command line, install Docker, and then get it up and running. You've also got to deal with — shudder — what a localhost is. If you want to access it remotely, you'll want to configure a reverse proxy. But once installed, I haven't had to touch it again. Given the simplistic feature set, the app is light on resources, so I just popped it onto my NAS. On the flip side, as I mentioned earlier, there's no cloud sync or dedicated app, so a remote proxy is a necessity if you find yourself on the move often. That said, it's easily circumvented by running a service like Tailscale. No self-hosted app will ever be as easy to set up as downloading a cloud-based app, but the data ownership and simplicity make it worth it. If that sounds like a lot of work to track fasts, I'll be honest, the initial setup is. Especially when there's no dearth of apps like Zero on the Play Store. But as I delve more into data ownership and deal with subscription fatigue, I'm okay with the one-time effort of setting up open-source alternatives. All those other apps come with strings attached, be it dodgy data retention policies, hidden microtransactions, or constant ad and notification spam. Some of them simply won't work if you deny internet access or want something as basic as adding personal notes to your log. That's a no-go for me. FastTrack does none of that. It gives me complete control over the experience, in exchange for a bit more effort during the setup process. Why I'm sticking with FastTrack I've tried all the popular fasting apps over the years. Most had beautiful, well-polished interfaces compared to FastTrack's more utilitarian offering. Others tried to combine fasting with community features, sleep tracking, or holistic wellness. But none of them helped me build the kind of consistency I've managed over the past few months with FastTrack. Not because they weren't capable, but because they all tried to do too much. FastTrack's biggest strength is that it doesn't try to be anything other than what it is. And at the end of the day, consistency is all that matters, whether you're focusing on your health or trying to stick to using an app daily. FastTrack's simplicity and focus helped me be more consistent with my health and see tangible results. FastTrack has also given me useful, distraction-free insights into my routine. I've got it saved as a shortcut on my home screen, allowing it to integrate seamlessly into my day without any issues. And best of all, it has helped me stick to my fasting window, which in turn helped me hit the body composition goals I'd been chasing for over a year. There are more convenient apps out there, sure — and the best app is the one that works for you. FastTrack may not be for everyone, but for anyone serious about fasting who's tired of cluttered experiences, it might just be the last fasting app you ever need. Follow
Android Authority
3 hours ago
- Android Authority
5 reasons I swapped Google Keep for this open-source app
Dhruv Bhutani / Android Authority As a journalist and avid enthusiast of productivity apps, I've used more note-taking apps than I care to admit. Google Keep, OneNote, SimpleNote, and a pretty wide assortment of open-source tools have all been a part of my note-taking arsenal at one point or another. To be sure, some of these were excellent, some less so, while others like Google Keep and OneNote begrudgingly became a key part of my workflow. Google Keep, in particular, has been a constant companion for its simplicity, quick note-taking, and wide web-based availability. Despite its relatively limited feature set, the colorful sticky note format feels like an extension of the dozen or more sticky notes plastered on my work desk. But as my note-taking needs have grown more complex, Keep's limitations just can't, ahem, keep up. I've used more note-taking apps than I care to admit, but only one has truly replaced them all. Keep isn't the only note-taking app that I regularly use. I was an early adopter of Microsoft OneNote and clung to it after the downfall of Evernote. In theory, it packs every feature I need, including rich formatting and easy interlinking with other notes. However, the app is heavy, clunky, and, often enough, way too much for everyday use. I've been looking for something that can handle both serious work and quick note-taking without drowning me in options or locking my notes into a proprietary format. Sounds like a tall order. That's what I thought until I discovered Outline. It's an open-source app that sits at the cross section of note-taking and personal knowledge management, and it has completely replaced both Google Keep and OneNote for my use. Here's why. Is Google Keep your primary note-taking app? 3539 votes Yes, I use it all the time. 76 % I use the default notes app on my phone (for eg. Samsung Notes). 7 % I prefer a full-fledged suite like Notion or Obsidian. 8 % I don't have a preferred note-taking app. 10 % An interface that works for you, not against you Dhruv Bhutani / Android Authority One of my biggest gripes with OneNote is its incredibly cluttered interface. In typical Microsoft fashion, it's a productivity tool with a surprisingly obtuse user experience that hampers productivity instead of aiding it. Google Keep is the opposite of that. It's too barebones. Outline strikes a rare balance by offering a clean interface that lets your notes shine while still providing all the tools you need just a click away. The app takes a lot of inspiration from Notion but improves on it with a much more fluid presentation. There are no unnecessary menu bars or floating toolbars, and there is effectively no lag at all, even when embedding large pages within an existing note. That lightning-quick performance was a big upsell when I initially started testing out Outline, and it remains just as fast today. When you open a page, it's ready for you to type and start taking notes. When you write for a living, that quick access makes a big difference. Outline strikes the rare balance between speed, simplicity, and the power to handle serious work. The other feature that sold me on Outline was markdown support. For those who aren't clued in on markdown, it is effectively a way to tag rich formatting in your notes and have it show up exactly the same across platforms and apps. I love it. While Google Keep supports all the usual formatting options like bold, italics, and bullet points, it isn't robust enough. OneNote, on the other hand, goes off the deep end. Try exporting a document and see the proprietary mess you get. In fact, when drafting an article in OneNote, I couldn't even copy and paste the document into our own CMS due to the sheer amount of cruft it adds. Outline is built with markdown in mind. Everything you write is effectively plain text with tags added for formatting. These documents can be opened in any other markdown editor, making it a dream if document portability is as important to you as it is to me. There's no risk of losing formatting or spending a whole lot of time cleaning up your copy. Moreover, this markdown support has made it easy for me to import years' worth of notes from other markdown editors I've used. A self-hosted knowledge hub that is entirely in your control Dhruv Bhutani / Android Authority Another frustration I've had with Google Keep has been its lack of structure. While labels are a good first step and helpful to an extent, there is no real way to easily interlink notes. OneNote tries to solve that with sections and notebooks, but it's not particularly free-form the way modern tools are. Unlike Google Keep, Outline lets you create a living network of notes, documents and media. Outline takes a page out of Wikipedia and lets you create an interconnected knowledge system. You can create links between pages, just like a wiki. This helps avoid replication of information, and if you're working on a big project, you can seamlessly link notes, documents, and more directly back to your primary document. It's a big improvement over nested pages. As someone deep into the self-hosting and productivity game, I keep notes on interesting apps that I'm trying out, and all of these are linked to a master document that details my current stack. Interlinking pages is just one advantage that Outline offers. The app also works seamlessly with a wide range of integrations that make managing and accessing external information a cinch. For example, you can toss in a Google Sheets link and Outline will offer to embed the document, complete with a preview and the ability to interact with the sheet. Similarly, you can embed presentations, Figma artboards, Airtable documents, and more. That deep integration extends beyond inbound connections. If you're deploying Outline for a small business, you can integrate it with a work-focused messenger like Slack. This integration allows you to search for and share Outline documents straight from a chat window. It's incredibly useful and something that is simply not possible with Google Keep or OneNote. If you're looking to push the app even further, you can connect it with Zapier for limitless automation. You catch my drift. There's no proprietary lock-in here, just plain text files you control completely. While all those features are excellent to have, there are a few more aspects of Outline that sold it to me. You see, self-hosting and data ownership are extremely important to me. While I'm not averse to using cloud services, I always try to maintain an offline, self-hosted copy of every file, document, or photograph. However, both Google Keep and OneNote store your data on their respective company servers. Convenient as that is, there are significant tradeoffs. You have to trust that your data will always be safe, the service will always be around — I'm looking at you, Google — and that privacy policies won't change. In the age of AI-everything, I just don't trust any company enough. Outline is open-source and offers a straightforward self-hosted alternative. You can run it on your own server, perhaps a Synology NAS, or even host it on a VPS to have easy online access. While that shifts the onus of maintenance, backups, and security on you, it's a compromise I'm comfortable with. Of course, the company does offer a cloud-hosted alternative for a price, and if the rest of the feature set is all that you're looking for, Outline is still a great choice. But for me, data ownership is the biggest upsell. Dhruv Bhutani / Android Authority On that note, Outline has one more feature that appeals to me. Data ownership is nothing without ease of data transfers. Open-source apps can cease development too. If you've tried exporting documents from Google Keep or OneNote, you'd know how cumbersome that can be. Export options are limited, and the document structure is cumbersome by design, making it hard to transfer those documents to another app. Outline's markdown-based approach guarantees that your notes are just files in a folder. Back them up, copy them, sync them, or import them into a brand-new app that you're enjoying more than Outline. There's no proprietary lock-in here. Why Outline has become my go-to for serious note-taking Much as I like trying out the latest and greatest productivity apps, my switch from Google Keep and OneNote to Outline wasn't just about chasing the new shiny. I needed to solve a very real problem I faced in my workflow. And despite switching over to Outline, I haven't entirely discarded Keep just yet. Instead, I use it like a scratch pad or sticky note for ephemeral lists like grocery shopping or when making a quick note. Outline has earned a permanent spot in my self-hosting stack and I don't see myself going back. But for notes that I make for research, long-form writing, journaling, or, for that matter, anything that I need to stick around, Outline is what I turn to. The app has the depth and feature set of a commercial offering, all the advantages of self-hosting that are important to me, and an interface that just gets out of the way to facilitate productivity. All of this has made it my go-to app of choice for note-taking and personal knowledge management. I just don't see myself going back to Google Keep or OneNote for those tasks again. Follow
