Oma's baba ghanoush
Oma, one of my favourite restaurants in London, serves what they consider to be 'Greek-ish' food. Baba ghanoush is Middle Eastern but you find it in Athens, and it works well with all the other dips so popular at the Greek table. Oma's is the best I've eaten.
Overview
Prep time
15 mins
Cook time
2 hrs
Serves
1 large bowl
Ingredients
For the confit garlic
1 garlic bulb
150ml neutral oil
For the aubergines
2 large aubergines (about 400g each)
2 tbsp finely chopped parsley, plus extra to serve
20ml olive oil
20ml lemon juice (or to taste)
extra-virgin olive oil, to serve
For the tahini sauce
50g tahini
25g plain Greek yoghurt
lemon juice, to taste
Method
Step
The confit garlic will be used twice in this recipe, so start with it. Peel every clove of 1 garlic bulb and put them in a small saucepan with 150ml neutral oil. Heat, but don't let it start to boil. Immediately turn the heat right down and cook low and slow. It takes about 1½ hours for the garlic to become completely soft. Take the cloves out of the oil, transfer to a bowl and mash. Cover with cling film. (You can save the oil for another dish.)
Step
Heat the oven to 190C/180C fan/gas mark 5. Holding 2 large aubergines using tongs or a large fork, scorch them in the naked flame on your hob. (You can do them one at a time.) Transfer them to a rimmed baking tray and cook in the oven until completely soft, about 15 minutes. Put them in a bowl, cover with cling film and let them cool.
Step
Peel and discard the aubergine skin. Chop the flesh to a rough purée. Add 30g confit garlic, along with 2 tbsp finely chopped parsley, 20ml olive oil and 20ml lemon juice. Season.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
3 days ago
- The Herald Scotland
Acclaimed Oxford scholar who never forgot his roots in Glasgow dies
Died: January 24, 2025 Martin McLaughlin, who died aged 74, was an esteemed Oxford University scholar who would gain a global reputation as a classicist and a literary historian. In Oxford, where his death has been borne heavily, he was a much-loved academic colleague who would become the Serena Agnelli Professor of Italian at Oxford, a position he would hold for 16 years. His contribution to the study of Italian language and literature made him one of the outstanding English-language scholars of his generation, a fact underlined in 2008 when was made a knight by the Italian government. To all whose lives he touched and were made better for his love and friendship he remained entirely unchanged as he began amassing a formidable suite of academic honours. His brother Aidan remarked: 'If Oxford changed him utterly as a scholar, a lecturer and a writer, it never succeeded at all in changing him as a person, a husband, a father, a grandfather, a brother, an uncle, great uncle and cousin. To us he remained the same Martino.' They recall the boy who took his younger sisters and their friends to play tennis at the convent in Portstewart, and had everyone pause mid-game when the Angelus bell rang so as not to upset the nuns. He was the big brother who took them to big games at Parkhead to see his beloved Celtic and bought them fish suppers on the way home. They remembered the son, brother and uncle who loved family get-togethers and had time for a story or chat with everyone from the oldest to the youngest. And while he could discuss any subject you cared to raise with him, they would all conclude with an assessment of Celtic's chances the following Saturday. At their silver wedding in 1999 Martin revealed that whilst his beloved Cathy could put up with all of his idiosyncrasies, she had declared that if he developed a pot belly, she would divorce him. 'So I've started drinking ten pints a night,' he said. Read more In June 2008, Martin sent an email to his friends and family, headed simply 'Gong'. It read: 'Hi, you guys, just to say that the Italian government has decided, in its infinite wisdom, to give me a gong! I am to be made 'Commendatore dell'Ordine della Stella della Solidarietà Italiana', but you can all just call me 'Eccellenza' for short!' Martin McLaughlin was born in Glasgow on December 4, 1950, the second oldest of eight children born to George and Jo. He followed the family tradition of attending St Aloysius before making the short journey down Sauchiehall Street and Woodlands Road to Glasgow University. It was here where his remarkable intellectual gifts first became evident. His First in Latin and Greek earned him a Snell Bursary which bore him to Balliol College, Oxford in 1973. He flourished there too, earning a First in Classics and Modern Languages, the first time such a combination was possible. He then returned to Scotland to spend 13 enjoyable years as a lecturer in Italian at Edinburgh University, a period in which he also managed to fit in a tidy doctorate by Oxford in 1983. Before long, England's academic Holy of Holies was beckoning him back and he duly made the journey to the south east of England in 1990 to become a lecturer. Professor McLaughlin's love for Italian literature was expressed in a formidable body of work as both translator and writer, specialising in authors who span both ends of Italian literature: Alberti who was one of the earliest writers in the Italian vernacular in the mid-1400s and Italo Calvino, perhaps the most famous 20th century Italian author. His books on these figures made him the leading English-language authority on Calvino. During his time at Oxford, his students and colleagues also began to experience his innate warmth and humanity. As news of his death spread, Professor McLaughlin's Facebook page began to thrum with messages and anecdotes from grateful students and colleagues. He was slightly whimsical about some of the odder Oxford traditions – for example the £200 annual sherry allowance granted to him to enable his tutorials to proceed in what he termed 'a well-oiled manner'. In 2000, on moving from Christchurch (alma mater of Lewis Carroll) to Magdalen, Oscar Wilde's old redoubt, he told anyone who would listen that, having reached the age of 50, the time had arrived for him to leave the college of Alice In Wonderland to move to that of Dorian Gray. Acclaimed Oxford scholar he may have become, but Martin McLaughlin never forgot his roots in Glasgow. Several times a year he would be back amongst the family on visits which usually coincided with an important Celtic fixture. The family's long-time family friend, Evelyn Connolly, wrote this about him recently: 'It was easy to be in his company.' Martin McLaughlin bequeathed a mighty academic legacy, but to his friends and family he left something greater still: a treasury of happy memories of his love and friendship. He is survived by his wife of 50 years, Cathy, his daughter Mairi, herself a noted scholar and professor at Berkeley University California, his granddaughter Iona and the now far-flung McLaughlin family. At The Herald, we carry obituaries of notable people from the worlds of business, politics, arts and sport but sometimes we miss people who have led extraordinary lives. That's where you come in. If you know someone who deserves an obituary, please consider telling us about their lives. Contact
Spectator
5 days ago
- Spectator
The Romans wouldn't have put up with Thames Water
It is embarrassing to compare Thames Water's efforts even to the Greeks, let alone the Romans. Most Greek cities got their water from public fountains fed by springs. Doctors new to a district examined the supply to determine likely ailments (one spring was said to make your teeth fall out). A few towns had piped supplies: Athens had one, and Greek Pergamum (in Turkey), from a source 20 miles away. An inscription there ordered wardens to ensure 'fountains are clean and pipes supplying them allow the free flow of water'. But the Romans were the great water engineers, spreading comfort and luxury thereby far down the social scale. Initially they were privately funded benefactions (not 'serious' enough for the state: this changed under the empire). The first (ten-mile) aqueduct – a water-leat, running along the ground and through tunnels – was commissioned in Rome in 312 bc. In the 4th C ad Rome had 11 aqueducts totalling 320 miles in length, the longest stretching for 56 miles, to serve 154 public lavatories, 1,352 water points and 46 brothels. They daily brought into Rome some 1.2 million cubic yards of water, about 25 gallons per inhabitant, per day. Why so much? Because it was needed in the noble cause of human pleasure: the Romans' 856 public baths, their universal means of social relaxation. Plebs and emperors alike used them (though they disgusted Marcus Aurelius – all 'oil, sweat, filth and greasy water'). The rich who had water piped into their homes provided a useful source of revenue. The Roman architect Vitruvius gives rules for checking its cleanliness at source: are the inhabitants there strong, without physical distortions or inflamed eyes? Does the water leave traces when sprinkled over certain alloy vessels? When boiled in a copper pan, does it leave a sludge? Will it cook vegetables quickly? Is it clear, from an untainted source? Vitruvius knew that lead pipes were unhealthy ('observe the lead workers' pallid complexion') but lead poisoning did not cause the fall of the Roman Empire.
New Statesman
5 days ago
- New Statesman
Have we reached peak humanity?
The spectre of decline is a seductive narrative. How easily nostalgic laments find their own straplines: late capitalism; the eclipse of the West; the collapse of public discourse; the atomisation of society; the impoverishment of the public square; and, as a niche addition, I can't resist including the downward trajectory of Test cricket. Perhaps the narrative arc of societal decline is weirdly in step with the individual ageing process, and we find a perverse personal consolation in believing that the world, or our framing of the world, has also peaked. Even allowing for that tendency, we seem particularly convinced about decline today. Every discipline has its theory about why – economists, for example, tell us that a generation will be miserable if it feels poorer than its parents' demographic. But I wonder if there is something here more fundamental than money. The privileges that are supposed to make us fulfilled and happy (such as leisure and choice) can be seen as reversing back into themselves. If modern capitalism gives you the time and freedom to become addicted to vapid and ephemeral digital technology, for example, then humanity becomes further detached from the most important anchor of all: the conviction that something of lasting value will be left behind. Decline takes many forms, and perhaps we are well tuned to understanding the impoverishment of grand ambition. It's an opportune moment for the writer and historian Johan Norberg to choose seven golden ages and interweave their rise and fall into a history of human progress: Athens, Rome, the Abbasid caliphate, Song China, Renaissance Italy, the Dutch Republic, and the Anglosphere. The authorial challenge is bringing it all together. And yet this highlights reel of world history won me over. As with any well-edited montage, we certainly know what side we're on. 'History casts long shadows,' Norberg concludes, 'but also light.' And it is light, in his history, that more often has the last word. The heroic threads are established at the outset and constantly remain in focus: innovation, openness, liberty, commerce, learning, assimilation, enquiry. You always get the point, sometimes a little too bluntly. After introducing classical Greek drama, Norberg adds: 'Netflix would not have been the same without it.' Is he exemplifying or parodying the popular historian's trait of linking everything to the here and now? But if Peak Human is the kind of muscular broad-brush storytelling that academic historians look down on, it is engaging and persuasive. Peak civilisations, of course, are portrayed as constantly in conflict with dark-age duds. First up on the wrong side of history are the Spartans, who Norberg gives such a mauling that you begin to feel sorry for them. Not only did the Spartans leave us 'no literature, no poetry, no art, no architecture and no innovative body of thought', but Norberg then adds the sucker punch that they weren't even any good at fighting. The Spartans, he concludes, 'are the most overrated warriors in ancient history; they just had very good PR'. Step forward the Athenians, who run the first leg in the civilised relay race. 'Only a regime as open, innovative, energetic, pragmatic and meritocratic as democracy,' we are told, 'could have followed the policy that won at Salamis.' The book's pattern is set, with each great golden age explained in the style of a business journalist charting the development of a superstar company. Military victories gave the Athenians 'proof of concept', so they 'doubled down on democracy and trade'. The sleight of hand required by any episodic world history is navigating the leap from one chapter to the next. Getting from ancient Greece to classical Rome, however, probably didn't cost Norberg much sleep, especially as Horace gave him the line 'Greece, the captive, took her savage victor captive'. In Norberg's summary of Rome's 'melting pot of marble', the definitive engine of greatness was the empire's strategic tolerance. 'The Romans did not embrace tolerance because they were enlightened,' Norberg concludes, 'they did it in order to beat everybody else and take their stuff. They wanted to integrate people to benefit from them.' Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe After pointedly lingering on the creative and economic hiatus after the fall of Rome – 'pitch dark' despite 'the heroic efforts of revisionist historians' – Norberg picks up the story in the 9th-century Abbasid caliphate. In AD 892, there were more than a hundred bookshops in Baghdad, which had become the new cradle of learning and free markets. Baghdad emerges as a nexus of social mobility and commerce, with successful businessmen achieving not only wealth but also corresponding status. So this Islamic 'bourgeois revolution' extended beyond the marketplaces of Athens and Rome, where commerce had still been seen as a necessary evil. (You won't be surprised that Norberg follows his Cato Institute colleague Deirdre McCloskey in recasting 'bourgeois' as an explicitly positive concept.) Norberg's next leaping off point for laissez-faire liberalism is Song dynasty China, where a 12th-century poet observed that 'great ships sail only for profit'. Marauding Mongol hordes rudely interrupt the flow of progress by shrinking the Song state. But with a little help from Marco Polo – who described the old Song capital of Hangzhou as 'the greatest city which may be found in the world, where so many pleasures may be found that one fancies oneself in paradise' – the flame is kept alive in a new cultural and trading crossroads: Venice. When the pope complained to the Venetians about their economic relationship with Syria and Egypt, they replied: 'We are Venetians first, only then Christians.' Open, secular, undogmatic: the book's firmly established heroic template. The Netherlands, despite its remarkable military exploits in the Eighty Years' War, is revealed as 'a bourgeois society that wanted to make money not war'. And the same openness is found at the heart of Britain's 18th-century ascent. Norberg cites Voltaire's description: 'Go into the London Stock Exchange – a more respectable place than many a court – and you will see representatives from all nations gathered together for the utility of men. Here Jew, Mohammedan and Christian deal with each other as though they were all of the same faith, and only apply the word infidel to people who go bankrupt.' Finally, Norberg reaches America, completing his distilled histories of elevated cultures, lovingly interleaved into a unified history of enlightened humanity. Although Norberg never hides his strong ideological convictions, he often finds room for the counter-view, while also being unfailingly courteous in crediting other historians. Though it's unclear whether the book is meant as an introduction or a refresher, I ended up thinking it didn't matter either way: one would have to be an incredibly erudite reader not to find anything new and surprising at every turn, no matter how familiar the terrain. Books such as this are feats of engineering, rather than style or originality. Can the narrative structure survive the conceptual weight it is being asked to support? That's where the intelligence of Norberg's book is found. Norberg frequently revisits a familiar objection to his thesis: slavery. To what extent did that inhuman and unpaid debt enable these so-called golden ages? Very significantly. But Norberg argues that slavery was seldom the definitive causal factor in the growth stories he admires. Other societies indulged slavery, Norberg stresses, not only the celebrated and economically successful ones. A similar question has obvious resonance in our own context today. Hyper-globalisation delivers cheap fast-fashion clothing, for example, churned out by child-labour sweatshops in Asia. When growth is driven by wilful blindness, are 'rise' and 'decline' appropriate concepts? The approved stamp 'artisan' might be an overused cliché today, but you can see what the concept is being defined against. I finished Peak Human unsure about something even more fundamental: the influence of mass digital information on our subliminal attitude towards knowledge. In Norberg's sunny enlightenment world-view, the exchange of information is the engine of progress. Assimilators thrive and the curious win. But the digital age – in which information is exchanged without any friction – now overwhelms us. We often feel defeated by information rather than excited by it. TS Eliot's aphorism feels truer than ever: 'Where is the wisdom we have lost in knowledge? Where is the knowledge we have lost in information?' If a part of us wants to switch off – literally and metaphorically – we are not necessarily turning away from the kind of creative human interaction that Norberg celebrates, but instead trying to salvage a more textured human experience. Today's ceaseless exchange of mostly meaningless pixelated 'content' seems to be undermining our higher instincts rather than supporting them. AI and the manipulation of digital information adds an extra layer of underlying disquiet. Our brilliance at manufacturing information is becoming inversely correlated with our confidence that the information is trustworthy. For all our material advances, there's a feeling of being tossed around on digital seas that we don't quite understand. For that reason, Peak Human feels incomplete. Norberg's spectrum charts 'peak-human' relative to 'declining-human'. But aren't we facing an even bigger question today: 'actually human' vs 'non-human'? When the sizeable chunk of human experience is reduced to watching rotating adverts on an iPhone, what Norberg wrote about Sparta leaving 'no literature, no poetry, no art, no architecture' becomes just as applicable to our vacant technological age as it was to Sparta's closed and military one. Norberg might counter: new technology is always unsettling but rarely turns out frightening. I'd say: this time could be different. We'll see. It's only a hunch, but I think this underlying anxiety about our place in the world is seeping into political restiveness. The paradox, of course, is that intellectual loss of confidence and bewilderment manifests itself as a yearning for childlike simplicity. 'Hard times create strongmen,' Norberg warns us near the end of the book, 'and strongmen create even harder times.' He's writing about the decline of the Dutch Republic, and the prince of Orange. But of course the shadow of America's own prince of orange, Donald Trump, falls across the page. The next peak for humanity feels distant. Ed Smith is director of the Institute of Sports Humanities Peak Human: What We Can Learn from the Rise and Fall of Golden Ages Johan Norberg Atlantic, 512pp, £22 Purchasing a book may earn the NS a commission from who support independent bookshops [See also: Dickens's Britain is still with us] Related This article appears in the 04 Jun 2025 issue of the New Statesman, The Housing Trap
