Retailers denounce harsh tax measures
Listen to article
The Chainstore Association of Pakistan (CAP), which represents the country's organised retail sector, has voiced concerns over harsh tax measures and enforcement practices, particularly those introduced through the Finance Act 2025.
"Retail chains in the formal sector have worked tirelessly for years to adopt technology, ensure transparent sales reporting and contribute significantly to the nation's tax revenues as well as its exports," said Asfandyar Farrukh, Chairman CAP.
"Yet, we face an unsustainable environment where legitimate businesses are treated as potential offenders, subjected to arbitrary tax assessments and left exposed to daily harassment that threatens both our operations and workforce."
The association noted that while formal retailers accounted for only around 10% of Pakistan's retail trade, they generated the majority of tax revenue from the sector. However, recent tax policies and enforcement actions have placed growing pressure on the industry and threaten progress in documenting the economy.
"It is our considered view that, given ever-increasing revenue targets and the slow pace of broadening the tax base, some FBR field formations are using enforcement powers to impose excessive and arbitrary tax assessments and penalties on the already compliant businesses simply to boost collections," said Tariq Mehboob, Patron-in-Chief of CAP.
Similarly, the SITE Association of Industry Karachi rejected the controversial Sections 37A and 37B introduced in the Finance Act, declaring that the industrial community would not tolerate such oppressive laws.
SITE Association President Ahmed Azeem Alvi condemned the provisions of these laws, which granted powers to FBR officers to arrest honest taxpayers based solely on suspicion and even file FIRs.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
9 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Pakistan-IMF talks on tax-free sugar import underway
ISLAMABAD: Finance Secretary Imdadullah Bosal said on Wednesday that negotiations are underway between the government and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) on the issue of exemption of duties and taxes on the import of sugar. During the meeting of the National Assembly Standing Committee on Finance held on Wednesday, the Ministry of Finance secretary stated that one of the structural benchmark agreed between the fund and the government is not to grant tax exemptions/amnesty schemes. 'We are in consultation with the IMF regarding tax exemption on sugar,' he added. TCP cuts volume sought in sugar tender to 50,000MT The committee members also raised questions that whether additional revenue measures would be taken in case of tax exemption on sugar imports. The Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has exempted Customs duty on the import of 500,000 metric tons of sugar and also reduced sales tax rate from 18 percent to 0.25 percent and withholding tax up to 0.25 percent on the import of commodity by the Trading Corporation of Pakistan (TCP) or the private sector. The FBR has also exempted three percent minimum value-added tax (VAT) on the import of sugar having quantity of 500,000 metric tons. FBR Chairman Rashid Mahmood Langrial informed the committee that the FBR has not moved any summary to the federal cabinet for exemption of duties and taxes on the import of sugar. The federal cabinet has taken the decision on a summary moved by the Ministry of National Food Security and Research (MNFSR). The FBR has issued the exemption notifications after receiving decision of the Federal Cabinet, Langrial stated. The FBR chairman stated that there are 54 percent taxes imposed on sugar including 20 percent import duty. There should not be such a high import tariff on the commodity. The prices of sugar at one time came down to Rs 130 per kg, he said. The Chairman of the Finance Committee, Naveed Qamar, was of the view that there is no shortage of sugar in the country. There are sufficient stocks of the commodity in the country. It is not clear what would be the rationale behind the import of sugar in the presence of ample stocks. The government should only be worried about the price of wheat which is de-regulated, but sugar is regulated in the country. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Express Tribune
14 hours ago
- Express Tribune
NA panel grills officials on sugar import
The National Assembly Standing Committee on Finance on Wednesday raised several questions regarding sugar imports and the provision of duty exemptions during its meeting chaired by Syed Naveed Qamar. The committee also took up various legislative agenda items, including the Parliamentary Budget Office Bill and a proposed tweak to Corporate Social Responsibility law. Members further questioned officials about a meeting between the government and the business representatives concerning certain budgetary measures. Addressing the issue of sugar imports, the chair asked for clarification from officials. Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) Chairman Rashid Langrial responded that the Ministry of National Food Security would be in a better position to answer. However, Qamar insisted that the FBR must have played a role. Langrial explained that the FBR had implemented the federal cabinet's decision to reduce the 18% sales tax and 20% customs duty on sugar imports. "Reducing taxes and duties on sugar lowers its price in the local market," he told the committee. However, the committee chair suggested that the government should withdraw from involvement in the sugar sector, because there was no shortage of the commodity in the country. Committee member Javed Hanif asked about the International Monetary Funds' (IMF} position on the sugar import. In response, Federal Finance Secretary Imdad Ullah Bosal said they were negotiating with the lender, adding that the government would have to implement the IMF's conditionalities. Later, the chair raised a query about the talks between the government and the businessmen on the issue of their protest. Minister of State for Finance Bilal Azhar Kayani replied that talks were held on Tuesday and a committee has been set up to find solution to the controversial issues within a month. Meanwhile, a report of the sub-committee on the corporate social responsibility law was presented in the meeting. While reviewing amendments to the law, the committee was told that the Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan (SECP) opposed the amendments. The SECP chairman informed the committee that these amendments would increase operational costs for companies. However, the chair noted that corporate social responsibility could not be left solely to the discretion of the private sector. The SECP chief said that the issue had come up only for oil and gas firms, but it was being applied to all companies. The finance secretary backed the SECP's contention, saying that "doing so would increase the companies' production cost". Committee Member Nafisa Shah pointed out that companies were already paying 18% sales tax and super tax, yet the Ministry of Finance appeared to object specifically to social sector spending. She added that while the law requires firms to allocate 1% of their profits to CSR, many were spending beyond that threshold. Minister of State Kayani suggested that the Finance Ministry and the SECP should bring their proposals after consulting with the companies. Committee Member Mirza Ikhtiar Baig said that all the chambers of commerce and industry and multinational companies were consulted on this law. The Finance Secretary requested the committee for some more time to consider the matter.
Business Recorder
15 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Finance Act expands definition of tax fraud
ISLAMABAD: The Finance Act 2025 has significantly expanded the definition of tax fraud, prompting considerable unrest and concern among the business community. This extensive revision has raised alarm bells, as many fear it may impose stricter regulations and heavier penalties, potentially impacting their operations and compliance efforts. Explaining the issue, Arshad Shehzad, noted legal expert and advocate Supreme Court informed, the scope of sales tax fraud is expanded to the extent that even routine tax affairs are now included in its ambit. The amended legal position now grants excessive and potentially abusive powers to the tax officer which causes unrest among the business community. Arrests for tax fraud: major changes made in sales tax law thru Finance Bill It is imperative to note that power to arrest is co-related to the charge of tax fraud and it is not the power of arrest which causes unrest but the enlarged scope of tax fraud which may cause arrest to the genuine taxpayer is the point of recent controversy among business community and government. The provision of amended section 2(37) is reproduced hereunder:- (37) 'tax fraud' means knowingly, intentionally or dishonestly doing any act or causing to do any act or omitting to take any action or causing the omission to take any action, to cause loss of tax or attempting to cause loss of tax under this Act, including- a) using or preparing false, forged and fictitious documents including return, statements annexure and invoices; b) suppression of supplies that are chargeable to tax under this Act; c) false claim of input tax credit including based on fictitious transactions; d) making taxable supplies of goods without issuing any tax invoice; e) issuance of any tax invoice without supply of goods; f) suppression and non-payment of withholding tax in the prescribed manner beyond a period of three months from due date of payment of tax; g) tampering with or destroying of any material evidence or documents required to be maintained under this Act or the rules made there under; h) acquisition, possession, transportation, disposal or in any way removing, depositing, keeping, concealing, supplying, or purchasing or in any other manner dealing with, any goods in respect of which there are reasons to believe that these are liable to confiscation under this Act or the rules made there under; i) making of taxable supplies without getting registration under this Act; j) generating fake input through manipulation of return filing system of the Board and making fake entries in the sales tax returns or in the annexures; and, k) making fictitious compliance of section 73, including routing of payments back to the registered person, or for the benefit of the registered person, through a bank account held by a supplier or a purported supplier. Arshad Shehzad further explained that upon reviewing the new provisions of tax fraud, it is evident that clauses 'a' through 'f' contain general allegations that the tax department routinely levels against taxpayers. For instance, the department claims that all input tax invoices are inadmissible or illegal if, according to their interpretation, the supplier has since become non-active or suspended following the transaction. Based on these clauses, the department initiates proceedings under the guise of tax fraud and claims the authority to make arrests under section 37(AA). Another common charge against taxpayers is the suppression of sales, which the department often alleges based on various presumptions, such as utility consumption, raw material usage ratios, or bank credit entries. Allegations of non-payment or short payment of withholding tax have also been included under the definition of tax fraud. Ironically, short payment and not payment of withholding is now also included under the charge of tax fraud. Moreover, the explanatory clause states that all these offences are considered intentional unless proven; otherwise, effectively shifting the burden of proof onto the taxpayer. This contradicts the fundamental principle that everyone is presumed innocent until proven guilty. Such powers are typically granted under the NAB ordinance, which was amended by politicians who previously suffered from such harsh laws, Shehzad informed. In his opinion, in order to undermine the Supreme Court of Pakistan's judgment in the Taj International case, the recent amendments are introduced. These laws suggest that, despite having access to resources and electronic means, the tax department may not be willing to perform its duties adequately. Instead, it seems poised to target genuine taxpayers under the pretence of tax fraud, using harassment, coercive measures, and intimidation to collect undue taxes. Such draconian laws create an unwelcoming environment for business and investment in the country and therefore government need to review the law and issue necessary SOP to tone down the scope of tax fraud in more appropriate manner to protect genuine business community from the potential threat of this law, Arshad Shehzad concluded. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
