Joe Rogan says Hunter Biden 'could be president'
Joe Rogan has praised Hunter Biden as Democrats' next great hope after the presidential scion's ranting three-hour interview tackled everything from his crack-cocaine addiction to the failures of the party. 'He could be president,' Rogan declared on Wednesday's episode of the Joe Rogan Experience while featuring a clip of Biden's viral sit-down with YouTuber Andrew Callaghan.
Rogan lauded Biden for his frankness and intellect around the subject off addiction, adding that 'he's a lot smarter than people give him credit for.' During Biden's interview with Callaghan, the scandal-scarred first son explained the psychology behind addiction and Americans' perceptions of crack-cocaine, leading Rogan to call it 'the greatest crack advertisement of all time.'
'If crack wasn't terrible for you, this guy makes me want to try crack,' Rogan told guest Joe DeRosa on his podcast Wednesday. 'I'm not going to. I'm not giving any advice, but I'm saying this guy, like legitimately this might be the best advertisement for crack of all-time.
'He's a lot smarter than people give him credit for,' Rogan continued. 'He's talking, and one of the things he was talking about was why smoking things are so addictive, why smoking cigarettes are so addictive, and the psychology behind it. He's not dumb. 'But he's just a guy who became an addict, and that [expletive] your whole life up. It [expletive] you. You become a subhuman.'
'And your dad is one of the most famous people on the planet. It's so crazy. Rogan then played the clip of Biden explaining crack addiction. 'He could be president. How about that? He could. No [expletive]. Hunter Biden, after all he'd been through, look, his dirty laundry's all out there. We all see it. He was a freak.'
He added: 'He's smarter than his dad when his dad was young, and he was a crackhead.' A day earlier, conservative commentator 'Comfortably Smug' of the Ruthless podcast hailed Biden as 'the Joe Rogan of the left,' earning a shout-out from Megyn Kelly.
On Kelly's own show Tuesday, she called Biden's honesty 'entertaining.' 'A little misguided on pointing the finger at others, many others for doing things that he himself has done,' she said. '[But] it was very entertaining to see him break out the machine gun, the rhetorical machine gun, and go after every prominent democrat .'
Breitbart editor-in-chief Alex Marlow branded Biden's interview 'the most entertaining content [he'd] watched all year', calling him 'the left's Joe Rogan in waiting.' The interview, during which Biden teed off on everyone from James Carville to George Clooney, has secured nearly 2.5 million views on YouTube.
'What right do you have to step on a man who's given 52 years of his [expletive] life to the services of this country and decide that you, George Clooney, are going to take out basically a full page ad in the [expletive] New York Times to undermine the president,' Biden said of the actor, who turned on the president after his disastrous debate performance against Donald Trump in 2024.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
A new generation of populists is showing Democrats how to defeat Trump
As Democrats continue to sift through the wreckage of the 2024 election, one truth should be impossible to ignore: they are bleeding support among working-class voters and Donald Trump's stumbles alone will not save them. From Black and Latino men to young and low-income voters, Trump's re-election made it clear that working Americans increasingly feel alienated from the Democratic party. Democrats today might not be as sanguine about sidelining the working class as Chuck Schumer was before the 2016 election, when he claimed that for every blue-collar voter Democrats lost, they could pick up two college-educated Republicans. But it's clear that many Democrats still don't see winning back working-class voters as essential – either to defeat Maga or to build durable, majoritarian progressive coalitions for the future. A new report from the Center for Working-Class Politics (CWCP) and Jacobin magazine, based on an analysis of hundreds of public opinion questions spanning six decades, suggests that blue-collar voters are not out of reach – if Democrats are willing to lead with economic populism. The report shows that American workers have long supported – and still overwhelmingly favor – a bold progressive economic agenda. If Democrats placed these policies consistently at the heart of their platform, they could not only improve conditions in working-class communities but also begin to rebuild trust with the very voters they need most. Progressive economic reforms – from raising the federal minimum wage and implementing a federal jobs guarantee to expanding social security, taxing the rich, and investing in public goods such as education and infrastructure – are supported not only by Democratic-leaning voters but also by substantial segments of Donald Trump's base. And while national Democrats remain unsure how to reconnect with these voters, a new generation of economic populists across the country is already showing the way. In New York City, Zohran Mamdani won the Democratic mayoral primary campaigning to tax the rich, fund public goods and confront corporate landlords. In Nebraska, independent union leader Dan Osborn – a mechanic and labor activist – ran on a tight platform of workers' rights and corporate accountability and over-performed Kamala Harris by 14 points in a deep-red state. In difficult House swing districts, Democrats are leaning into economic populism with promising results. In Pennsylvania's 17th district, Chris Deluzio, a representative and navy veteran, champions 'economic patriotism', calling out economic elites and damaging trade agreements while pushing to rebuild domestic industry and strengthen labor rights. In New Mexico's second district, Gabe Vasquez has built his platform around a sharp critique of corporate greed – condemning CEOs and wealthy investors for inflating profits while shortchanging workers – and has pushed for a $15 minimum wage and cutting taxes for working families. Meanwhile, in Wisconsin's third district, Democrat Rebecca Cooke – a waitress and small business owner who grew up on a dairy farm – is mounting a 2026 comeback bid after over-performing other Democrats and losing by less than three points in 2024, running on a platform that targets corporate price gouging, expands affordable rural housing and defends family farms. These candidates come from different regions and backgrounds, and hold diverse ideological positions, but nonetheless share a core political strategy: they are highly disciplined economic populists who speak to working-class voters in language that's grounded, direct and relatable. And, contrary to many centrist pundits, while they do need to avoid fringe rhetoric, Democrats don't have to embrace social conservatism to do it. The CWCP study shows that while working-class voters are generally to the right of middle-class voters on cultural issues, most hold moderate, and in some cases even progressive, views on issues such as immigration, abortion and civil rights. These voters do not want Democrats to mimic Republicans on controversial wedge issues, but they do want a commonsense message focused on the economic realities of working Americans. Yet working-class voters don't just embrace politicians who support the right policies. Our previous research shows that they want leaders who understand people like them, share a similar class background and speak plainly about what they'll do and why it matters. The path to winning back working-class voters runs through authenticity, clarity and a credible commitment to improving people's lives. Unfortunately, the national party has been slow to adapt. Harris's 2024 campaign offered ambitious economic proposals that could have benefited millions of working Americans. But as the race wore on, she grew increasingly reluctant to lead with economic populism, instead doubling down on a strategy rooted in fear of Trump. That may have comforted donors and consultants, but it left many working-class voters cold – and opened the door for Republicans to posture as the party of the people. This vacuum has given Republicans room to pose as economic populists, despite an agenda that overwhelmingly serves corporations and the wealthy. Trump's so-called Big Beautiful Bill Act delivered massive tax cuts for the rich while masquerading as a working-class boon. House Republicans have attacked union protections and slashed social welfare programs – moves wildly out of step with working-class preferences. But without a compelling Democratic alternative, the right's billionaire populism can take hold. If Democrats want to rebuild a durable majority, they need candidates who stay focused on populist economics and steer clear of the culture wars. Reversing the Democratic party's working-class decline will not be solved by platitudes or photo ops with hard hats. It demands a real shift in priorities. It means crafting campaigns that focus relentlessly on tangible economic outcomes and elevating candidates who reflect the experience of the working class. And it demands a clear, consistent message that puts class and dignity back at the center of Democratic politics. Jared Abbott is the director of the Center for Working-Class Politics Bhaskar Sunkara is the president of the Nation magazine and the founding editor of Jacobin
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Democrats sound alarm over Trump's reported $1bn plan to retrofit gifted Qatari jet
Leading Democrats are sounding the alarm over Donald Trump's reported plan to divert funds from the US nuclear arsenal to convert a luxury jet gifted by Qatar into a new Air Force One. The US president provoked an outcry in May when it emerged that he would accept a $400m Boeing 747-8 jet as a free gift from the Qatari royal family. Stripping down and securing the plane so it can transport Trump for a few years will cost taxpayers an estimated $1bn. Now Democrats are seizing on media reports that the retrofit will be partly funded by money redirected from Sentinel, a nuclear missile modernisation programme already running years behind schedule and said to be 81% over budget. In a letter obtained by the Guardian, senators Elizabeth Warren, Tammy Duckworth, Ed Markey and Adam Schiff, along with representatives John Garamendi and Jamie Raskin, demand answers from Troy Meink, the secretary of the air force. The letter reminds Meink that, in testimony to the Senate armed services committee, he acknowledged the Qatari plane needs 'significant modifications' to meet Air Force One standards. These are likely to include defences against threats ranging from surface-to-air missiles to a nuclear blast, secure and reliable communications systems, and protections against counterintelligence. The Democrats write: 'In June, you told Congress that the cost of retrofitting the Qatari Boeing 747-8 'wouldn't be anywhere near' the reported $1 billion estimate. Do you still believe this to be the case?' The air force has reportedly assessed $934m previously appropriated for the Sentinel programme as 'excess to need', allowing these funds to be used for other classified programmes, including the retrofits for the Qatari jet. In their letter, the Democrats ask Meink: 'Has the Air Force assessed whether shifting funds out of the Sentinel program will increase the program's costs or risk further delaying the program's schedule? 'Did or will any of the $934 million from the Sentinel program go to retrofits for the Qatari Boeing 747-8, or were or will those funds be diverted to other programs?' Warren and her colleagues criticise a lack of transparency, noting that the total price tag for the Qatari jet retrofit is classified, preventing policymakers and the public from understanding if 'additional retrofit costs will eat into other Air Force programs beyond Sentinel'. The Democrats request a commitment from the air force to ensure that it is 'fully cooperating with any independent investigation into the acceptance of the Qatari jet and/or the Qatari jet's retrofitting'. Sign up to This Week in Trumpland A deep dive into the policies, controversies and oddities surrounding the Trump administration after newsletter promotion Democrats have previously suggested that the gift to Trump likely violates the constitution's prohibition on accepting foreign emoluments. They point out that the jet would only be used by the government for a few years at most before being donated to Trump's presidential library. Trump has previously defended the ethics of his decision. He said: 'I would never be one to turn down that kind of an offer. I could be a stupid person and say: 'No, we don't want a free, very expensive airplane.'' He also compared it with 'favours on the golf course. When they give you a putt, you pick it up and you walk to the next hole and you say: 'Thank you very much.'' But the senators and representatives take a different view. 'However,' they write, 'by providing the president with a 'palace in the sky' it clearly appears that Qatar is trying to curry favor with the administration.' Meanwhile the Trump Organization recently announced a new Trump-branded resort along the coast of Qatar, partnering with Qatari Diar, a property company backed by that country's sovereign wealth fund.
BBC News
3 hours ago
- BBC News
Texas redistricting feud escalates as Democrats face bomb and FBI threats
A dispute over a plan to re-draw electoral boundaries in the US state of Texas has escalated again after a senator said the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) had agreed to help find Democrats who have fled the FBI would not confirm whether they agreed to help and the senator, Republican John Cornyn of Texas, did not specify what kind of assistance the FBI would comes a day after some Democrats were forced to evacuate a hotel where they were staying in Illinois, as they protest Republicans' efforts to change the map of congressional districtsEarlier this week, US President Donald Trump said the FBI "may" have to get involved. Sen Cornyn said in a statement that FBI Director Kash Patel had "approved my request for the FBI to assist state and local law enforcement in locating runaway Texas House Democrats".On Tuesday, Sen Cornyn wrote to the FBI asking it to get involved, saying he was "concerned that legislators who solicited or accepted funds to aid in their efforts to avoid their legislative duties may be guilty of bribery or other public corruption offenses,". It is not clear whether federal officers were already involved in the search for more than 50 state lawmakers who have left Texas. The location of many of them is well known. On Tuesday they held a press conference in a Chicago-area hotel decrying the gerrymandering escalation comes one day after a bomb threat was called into a hotel where some of the Democrats were staying."This morning, a threat was made against the safety of the members of the Texas House Democratic Caucus," Texas House Democrats wrote on Twitter. "We are safe, we are secure, and we are undeterred. We are grateful for Governor Pritzker, local, and state law enforcement for their quick action to ensure our safety."On Tuesday, Trump was asked whether the FBI should get involved in the matter, and replied "they may have to", adding "it almost looks like [Democrats have] abandoned the state"."I know they want them back. Not only the attorney general, the governor wants them back," Trump said. "So a lot of people have demanded they come back. You can't just sit it out. You have to go back. You have to fight it out. That's what elections are all about." The move to flee the state is part of a tactic to block a vote in the Texas House on redistricting. The proposal by Republicans would create five more Republican-leaning seats in the US House of Representatives, where the party holds a slim least two-thirds of the 150-member state legislative body in Texas must be present to proceed with the vote. The quorum is unreachable while they are out of the Democrats have said the state's governor and Republicans are trying to silence them. Gene Wu, chairman of the Texas House Democratic Caucus, has accused Greg Abbott of seeking to "silence my dissent by removing a duly-elected official from office", and argued "my constitutional duty is to not be a willing participant".
