Hisham's suspension not discussed in meeting as it was not vital, says Zahid
"The issue (Hishammuddin's suspension) was not discussed. The matter is not that important," said Umno president Datuk Seri Dr Ahmad Zahid Hamidi after a roundtable session on the gig economy and industry.
When asked about Hishammuddin's latest video on social media, which hinted that he would unlikely appeal his six-year suspension from the party, Zahid said he had not watched the video.
"I haven't watched the video though I have been informed of it. When the time comes, I will bring the matter (Hishammuddin's suspension) to the Umno Supreme Council and let them decide," he said.
The Sembrong Umno division had previously proposed that Hishammuddin's suspension be lifted, in line with efforts to strengthen the party at all levels ahead of the next general election.
Supreme Council member Datuk Dr Mohd Puad Zarkashi had called on division leaders to focus on persuading Datuk Seri Hishammuddin Hussein to appeal his own suspension.
Hishammuddin was suspended from Umno for six years, or two party election terms, effective Jan 27, 2023.
On the roundtable, Zahid, who is also deputy prime minister and chairman of the high-level committee (HLC) for the establishment of the Gig Economy Commission (SEGiM), said Malaysia was leading the way in drafting laws for the gig economy.
He said Malaysian Gig Economy Secretariat chairman Datuk Seri Mohd Sharkar Shamsuddin was currently in Switzerland to present how Malaysia drafted its Gig Workers Bill to the International Labour Organisation (ILO).
"There are a few countries that are amending their laws for the gig economy, but in Malaysia, we are drafting a new Act.
"Sharkar, who represents the Malaysian Gig Economy Secretariat, is in Geneva to present to the ILO, as they too want to learn from Malaysia's experience," he said.
He said the Gig Workers Bill, which is expected to be tabled in the next Parliamentary sitting, is a crucial step in introducing a social protection framework for over 1.12 million Malaysians involved in the sector.
He said the law would ensure fairness by balancing the welfare of gig workers with the efficiency and flexibility of digital platform operators.
"SEGiM will be placed under the Prime Minister's Department to ensure integrated policy coordination at the national level.
"MDEC will continue to serve as the technical secretariat, consolidating industry input and coordinating engagement sessions with the Human Resources Ministry, the Transport Ministry, and relevant agencies.
"Our goal is clear, which is to strike a balance between industry interests and the welfare of gig workers while positioning the gig economy as a key driver of a more just, responsive, and sustainable national digital economy.
"I am confident that with strong collaboration among all stakeholders, Malaysia can emerge as a leader in developing a resilient gig economy ecosystem centred on the wellbeing of its people," he said.
Zahid added that it is important for gig workers to not only have job opportunities, but also upskilling and reskilling opportunities. Hence, it is to be included in the National TVET Council's agenda.
"This is to provide a future for gig workers who want to transition into permanent employment or become self-employed entrepreneurs when techno-entrepreneurship training is provided by TVET institutions in collaboration with SEGiM and the Human Resources Ministry.
"The experience gained in the gig economy can help them to either gain employment or become entrepreneurs as a means to earn additional or stable income," he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
25 minutes ago
- New Straits Times
NST Leader: Ensure Gig Workers Bill delivers
THERE is finally some clarity about the long awaited Gig Workers Bill after Deputy Prime Minister Datuk Seri Dr Ahmad Zahid Hamidi said it is expected to be tabled in the Dewan Rakyat in August or September. But several concerns about this future economy have to be sorted out. Chiefly, the bill has to balance worker protection with business viability and sustainability. The bill is designed to safeguard the gig economy and create a social protection framework for the 1.12 million Malaysians working in the sector. The bill is also meant to provide equitable protection that builds a fair, inclusive and resilient future. Zahid has touted the bill as a world's first and that the International Labour Organisation was keen to learn from Malaysia's experience. However, despite its importance, industry players are adopting a "wait-and-see" attitude. The gig economy is a major economic contributor and a source of employment to youngsters. A key question about the bill is on whether it addresses career advancements. The bill also has place in the Education Ministry's effort to stem Sijil Pelajaran Malaysia absenteeism, as more students are forfeiting the examination to become riders and drivers for quick and easy money. The Department of Statistics Malaysia conducted a study in 2022 and found that the majority of p-hailing riders are aged between 15 and 30 and earn about RM2,500 a month. Major industry players maintained that the bill offered little clarity because no regulatory impact assessment has been done. Over the years of deliberations, the industry hasn't seen dispute resolution, deactivation compensation and wage requirement resolved. It's clear that more industry consultations and inclusivity is needed in the bill's drafting, especially discussions with platforms, gig workers, academics and experts. There are other worries: will there be spikes in operational costs, more entry barriers, disruptions in business models and higher consumer costs? Gig worker associations are uneasy with excessive regulations that may stifle innovation, discourage platform investment, reduce job opportunities and harm economic benefits. They are asking: Will the bill clearly define gig workers, provide practical mechanisms for dispute resolution, income protection and social security? This is why there have been multiple postponements to the bill's tabling. Nevertheless, the bill is a global pioneering legal framework for gig workers, espousing a fair, inclusive and resilient future economy.
Focus Malaysia
2 hours ago
- Focus Malaysia
Coherent SST reform requires zero exemptions for policymakers
THE Malaysian government's recent changes to the Sales and Service Tax (SST) are true to an at least decade-old tradition of self-defeating consumption tax policies. Raising taxes is a thankless but necessary task that requires astute policy design and nuanced messaging to manage both economic and political narratives. Both the 1 July changes and the case for them have left policymakers open to justifiable but needless criticism. Malaysian policymakers have long recognised the need to significantly increase revenue collections but have struggled to convince Malaysians. Tax reforms repeatedly adopt a narrow, small-target strategy that—by lacking both vision and tangible economic sustainability and equity objectives—instead become lightning rods for critics. Malaysians worried about their household budgets naturally fear higher taxes and do not count fiscal sustainability among their chief concerns. Making the case for consumption tax reform needs and deserves better than pointing to unsustainable budget deficits and delivering patronising rebukes of SST critics. It requires a consistent, coherent and non-condescending narrative that garners public support for changes that will improve not threaten their livelihoods. Policymakers should be explaining the importance of taxing consumption, how it supports a tax strategy that balances fairness, competitiveness and sustainably, and how the money raised will be used to benefit Malaysians. Consumption taxes have advantages that are especially relevant to Malaysia's circumstances. Malaysia has a large visiting and undocumented population whose income cannot be taxed but whose consumption can be. It has a sizeable informal sector contributing around a quarter of gross domestic product, whose income likewise escapes direct taxes but whose inputs may be partially captured by consumption levies. Shaping consumption choices through price signals will be essential to making Malaysia's future economic development less carbon intensive and more sustainable. Consumption taxes progressed alone cannot address Malaysia's revenue needs or be implemented equitably. Consumption taxes are regressive as low-income households consume more of their disposable incomes and therefore experience a greater relative impact. Attempts to neutralise these impacts by exempting or setting to zero the rate for basic goods introduces complexity for businesses and consumers, exempts rich and non-Malaysian consumers at the same time, and opens policymakers to arguments of inconsistency or bias. Accompanying changes to income taxes, transfers or welfare for low-income households would be a superior approach. Malaysians would be more receptive to tax hikes if their purpose were more tangibly linked to spending for their benefit. Public wariness remains high in the shadow of 1MDB and other newsworthy examples of funds being misused, with the government's fiscal challenges explicitly associated with corruption. At the same time Malaysians want better schools and hospitals, greater access to safe and efficient transport and technology, more generous social welfare and more. Transparent and well communicated spending intentions are an essential enabler of tax reform. The SST reforms have thus far been mapped poorly in these regards. Far from presenting a coherent vision for equitably, efficiently and sustainably raising revenue to spend in the interests of Malaysians, the reforms adopt a piecemeal and discriminatory approach to taxation. Two particularly concerning elements that have attracted fair criticism are the inclusion of basic goods and differential rates for local and imported goods. Malaysia is a net importer of food including many staple products, with openness to trade a critical contributor to food security both at the household and national levels. SST increases that represent an implicit import tariff, especially on basic and healthy goods like fruit, send precisely the wrong signal at a time when Malaysia is trying to counter global economic policy uncertainty. Malaysia must reinforce its openness to trade and investment by avoiding discriminatory taxes on overseas goods. Bowing to public backlash to provide post-announcement tax exemptions for imported apples and oranges (among other changes) further illustrates the policy development and communication shortcomings. Policymakers were either unaware of or misread public sensitivity on the price and availability of basic food imports, and in the absence of a compelling defence for the proposed SST increase were forced to make concessions. Evident is both a need for wider consultation and that complex and subjective tax design leaves policymakers exposed. Making the case for tax reform in Malaysia should also stick to message not mechanism. Long-running arguments comparing the SST with a restored GST are of greater distraction than consequence to the current debate. Either mechanism can be tailored to achieve comparable coverage and revenue outcomes, and tax incidence (who ultimately pays: consumers or producers) is determined by markets not tax design. Differences in administrative efficiency and effectiveness are important considerations that are adaptable to a consumption tax with either (or any) name. What Malaysia needs from policymakers is greater tax policy reform coherence, communication and ambition. And the leadership to design and deliver tax strategies and mechanisms that benefit Malaysia and Malaysians. ‒ July 2, 2025 Dr Stewart Nixon is the deputy director of research at the Institute for Democracy and Economic Affairs (IDEAS). The views expressed are solely of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Focus Malaysia. Main image: Bigstock
The Sun
4 hours ago
- The Sun
MACC investigates Singaporean tycoon in Sabah corruption scandal
PUTRAJAYA: The Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) is investigating a Singaporean tycoon following allegations of involvement in a corruption scandal linked to mining licence approvals in Sabah. The probe comes after a viral social media article highlighted claims of bribery involving local politicians and businessmen. MACC chief commissioner Tan Sri Azam Baki confirmed the investigation, stating that witnesses will soon be called to provide statements. 'We are looking into the matter seriously, and necessary actions will be taken based on the findings,' he said. A source within MACC revealed that the tycoon is suspected of funding bribes connected to Datuk Albert Tei and several UMNO leaders in Sabah. This development follows recent court charges against two Sabah state assemblymen and a businessman for corruption related to mining approvals. The accused were charged under Section 16(b)(A) of the MACC Act 2009 for offering bribes and Section 16(a)(A) for receiving bribes. The case has drawn significant public attention, raising concerns over corruption in natural resource management.
