Women will soon be able to request a female Uber driver in these US cities
Lisa Eadicicco
, CNN
Uber is piloting a new option for its US app that will allow female passengers to request women drivers, coming after the company has long grappled with preventing sexual assault on its platform.
Photo:via CNN Newsource
Uber is piloting a new option for its US app that will allow female passengers to request women drivers, coming after the company has long grappled with preventing sexual assault on its platform.
The feature, called Women Preferences, will launch in a pilot stage in Los Angeles, San Francisco and Detroit in the next few weeks, Uber said in a blog post on Wednesday.
It marks the first time the popular ride share app is bringing this option to its service in the United States after launching it in 40 other countries.
Uber joins Lyft and other taxi hailing apps, like HERide and Just Her Rideshare, that connect female passengers with women drivers.
"Across the US, women riders and drivers have told us they want the option to be matched with other women on trips," vice president of operations in the US and Canada Camiel Irving said in a press release.
Women riders in cities where the feature is available will see a new option called Women Drivers.
They'll also be able to pre-book rides with women drivers and set a preference in the app to be matched with a female driver.
The feature works both ways; women drivers will be able to request female passengers too with a new "Women Rider Preference" option in the settings menu.
Riders and drivers will still be able to connect more broadly with non-female passengers and drivers if they wish, even with these preferences set.
The company conducted testing and collected feedback from other markets like Germany and France to make sure the feature would work reliably considering most Uber drivers are men, Irving wrote in Uber's blog post.
Sexual assault has been a problem for Uber for years; nearly 6,000 sexual assault reports were made from 2017-2018, according to Uber's safety report.
That number had dropped significantly to 2,717 by 2022, the report said, although five passengers
sued Uber in 2022 over sexual assault incidents
that occurred between August 2021 and February 2022.
The California Public Utilities Commission fined Uber $59 million in 2020 for not handing over sexual assault data, but that fine was slashed to $150,000 after the company cut a deal requiring it to provide anonymised data on sexual assault incidents.
Uber has launched other features to promote safety in recent years, such as a hub in the app for managing safety preferences.
- CNN
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
a day ago
- NZ Herald
Driverless cars from China expanding into Europe next year through ride-hailing companies
Momenta will soon provide assisted driving technology to Chinese company IM Motors for its cars sold in Britain. While Momenta has not specified the model Uber will be using, it has already signalled it will choose a Chinese model. In China, 'the pace of development and the pressure to deliver at scale push companies to improve quickly,' said Gerhard Steiger, the chair of Momenta Europe. A worker on an electric car assembly line at Jiangling Motors factory in Nanchang, China. The factory will make the RT6 for Baidu and Lyft to use in Europe. Photo / Keith Bradsher, The New York Times China's state-controlled banking system has been lending money at low interest rates to the country's electric car industry in a bid for global leadership. Chinese driverless cars are starting to move into other markets as well. Baidu and Uber announced last month that they would start offering their self-driving cars this year in Asia outside China and in the Middle East. Automakers in China have not yet tried to offer driverless cars in the United States. That is partly because of concerns about the high costs of personal injury lawsuits and the 100% tariffs imposed last year on electric cars imported from China. In addition, the US, citing security, severely limited in January the use of Chinese assisted-driving systems. For navigation, the cars use cameras that take dozens of high-resolution images per second of the road and roadside areas. Automakers and software companies have said that very little information from these photos is uploaded or stored. But collection of the data has raised concerns among US policymakers and companies. China also has stringent restrictions on driving-related data. Elon Musk, chief executive of Tesla, began offering driverless cars in Austin, Texas, in June. Waymo, formerly known as the Google self-driving car project, also has driverless cars in Austin as well as Los Angeles, San Francisco, Phoenix and Atlanta. In Europe, Volkswagen has said it is developing a driverless version of its electric ID. Buzz minivan. But automakers outside China face very high costs for radars, cameras, and other technology required for so-called robotaxis. The price of the electric cars themselves is also higher. An ID. Buzz, without self-driving gear, retails for US$62,000 to US$72,000. The somewhat smaller Jiangling RT6 is less than US$30,000 ($51,000). Self-driving car experiments are already under way in more than a dozen Chinese cities and are being conducted by at least 19 automakers. Last year, Baidu turned its experiment in Wuhan, a city in central China, into the world's largest. A driverless Baidu robotaxi on a road with other vehicles in Wuhan, China. Photo / Qilai Shen, The New York Times The Chinese Government has backed the technology. The government sets demands on the safety of driverless technology and has used censorship to suppress online discussion of crashes and other safety incidents. And China's legal system makes it difficult to win large verdicts from car manufacturers. As a result, Chinese companies are accumulating databases of real-world driving they can use to train their autonomous driving models. Momenta and Baidu trained their driverless car systems in China. In the US, personal injury lawyers have begun focusing on the industry. Last week, a jury in Florida found that flaws in Tesla's self-driving software bore one-third of the responsibility for a crash in 2019 that killed a 22-year-old woman and severely injured her boyfriend. The jury verdict, if upheld on appeal, would require Tesla to pay as much as US$243 million in punitive and compensatory damages to the woman's parents and to her boyfriend. Driverless technology works better with electric cars than with fuel-powered cars. This is because computers can vary the power going to the wheels in an electric car extremely quickly. China is the world's main producer of electric cars. Expanding robotaxi services to new cities, not to mention new countries, is not easy. While the individual cars do not have drivers, they typically require one controller for every several cars to handle difficulties and answer questions from users. And the cars often need to be specially programmed for traffic conditions unique to each city. Lyft and Baidu nonetheless said they had plans for 'the fleet scaling to thousands of vehicles across Europe in the following years'. This article originally appeared in The New York Times. Written by: Keith Bradsher Photographs by: Qilai Shen, Keith Bradsher, ©2025 THE NEW YORK TIMES
RNZ News
5 days ago
- RNZ News
US President Donald Trump fires labour statistics official over jobs numbers
A news ticker broadcasts the news of the firing of the commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange on 1 August, 2025. Photo: AFP / MICHAEL M. SANTIAGO By Kit Maher , Matt Egan and Alicia Wallace , CNN President Donald Trump has fired Dr Erika McEntarfer, the commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, whom he accused, without evidence, of manipulating the monthly jobs reports for "political purposes". The BLS' monthly labour report Friday (US time) showed that the US economy added only 73,000 jobs in July, far below expectations. It also sharply revised down the employment growth that had been previously reported in May and June - by a combined 258,000 jobs. After the revisions, the jobs report showed the weakest pace of hiring for any three-month period since the pandemic recession in 2020. "In my opinion, today's Jobs Numbers were RIGGED in order to make the Republicans, and ME, look bad," Trump said in a Truth Social post. Although the May and June jobs numbers were worse than initially believed, revisions are normal in this process. The BLS' initial monthly jobs estimates are often based on incomplete data, so they are revised twice after the initial report - followed by an annual revision every February. Additionally, BLS economists use a formula to smooth out jobs numbers for seasonal variations and that can exacerbate revisions, when they fall outside economists' expectations. On Friday, Trump incorrectly called the revisions a "mistake". "McEntarfer said there were only 73,000 Jobs added (a shock!) but, more importantly, that a major mistake was made by them, 258,000 Jobs downward, in the prior two months," Trump said on Truth Social. "Similar things happened in the first part of the year, always to the negative. The Economy is BOOMING under 'TRUMP'." Trump said McEntarfer "faked" the jobs numbers before the election to try to boost former Vice President Kamala Harris' chances in the 2024 presidential election. "We're doing so well. I believe the numbers were phony, just like they were before the election, and there were other times. So, you know what I did? I fired her, and you know what? I did the right thing," Trump told reporters Friday on the South Lawn. Trump has also threatened the firing of Federal Reserve Chaie Jerome Powell. Photo: AFP McEntarfer was confirmed by the Senate 86-8 in January 2024 for a term of four years. CNN has reached out to McEntarfer for comment. Until Trump replaces McEntarfer, Deputy Commissioner William Wiatrowski will serve as Acting Commissioner, the administration said. Trump has previously criticised the BLS for its jobs data and revisions, and he told reporters Friday evening he's "always had a problem with these numbers". In 2016, during his first presidential campaign, Trump claimed that the unemployment rate was significantly higher than the BLS let on. In 2024, he accused former President Joe Biden's administration of orchestrating a cover-up, after the BLS reported that it had overcounted jobs by 818,000 over the previous 12 months. "I was thinking about it this morning, before the numbers that came out. I said, 'Who is the person that does these numbers?' And then they gave me stats about before the election," Trump said. "We need people that we can trust," he added. Trump and his administration have also praised the BLS data when it has been favourable to them. During Trump's first term, former White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer said, in March 2017, that the jobs data was no longer "phony", after the BLS issued a strong jobs report. A month ago, current White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt posted on social media that the economy had beaten expectations for jobs in four straight BLS labour reports. The BLS is nonpartisan, and businesses and government officials rely on the accuracy of its data to make determinations about investment, hiring, spending and all sorts of key decisions. "It's outrageous for anyone in government to question the integrity of the BLS," said Jason Furman, a Harvard professor and former Obama economic adviser. "Accurate statistics are essential to the economy." Furman doubted that replacing McEntarfer would compromise the BLS, but he said even the possibility or appearance of that notion "would be bad". "Countries that have tried to fake those statistics have often ended up with economic crises as a result," Furman said. Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody's Analytics, said the BLS data is at the "highest standard", and "as accurate as it can be". "Anything that undermines that or even the perception of that high standard is deeply worrisome," Zandi said. "I've never seen anything even close to this." At Moody's, Zandi said he has hired a number of former BLS economists, whom he called "fantastic". "They do great work," Zandi said. "They are critical to a well-functioning economy." Democratic Virginia Senator Mark Warner accused Trump of working the referees. "Firing the ump doesn't change the score," Warner said in a statement. "Americans deserve to know the truth about the state of the Trump economy." Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer said she supported replacing McEntarfer. "A recent string of major revisions have come to light and raised concerns about decisions being made by the Biden-appointed Labor Commissioner," Chavez-DeRemer said on X. "I support the President's decision to replace Biden's Commissioner, and ensure the American People can trust the important and influential data coming from BLS." The BLS jobs survey is widely considered by economists to be robust. It samples more than 100,000 businesses and government agencies each month, representing roughly 629,000 individual worksites. As part of larger cost-cutting taking place around practically every part of Trump's government, the BLS is laying off staff and, as a result, reducing the scope of its work. For example, the BLS posted a notice in June stating it stopped collecting data for its Consumer Price Index in three cities - Lincoln, Nebraska; Buffalo, New York; and Provo, Utah - and increased "imputations" for certain items - a statistical technique that, when boiled down to very rough terms, essentially means more educated guesses. That worried Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell. In testimony before Congress in June, Powell said he believed the BLS data to be accurate, but he was upset about what could become a trend. "I wouldn't say that I'm concerned about the data today, although there has been a very mild degradation of the scope of the surveys," Powell said at the time, in response to a question about survey data quality. "I would say the direction of travel is something I'm concerned about." - CNN
NZ Herald
6 days ago
- NZ Herald
China dominates the global market for electric vehicles, batteries and solar panels - all invented in the US
Electric vehicles Once, it looked like America's roads would be filled with electric cars. The US inventor William Morrison developed the first successful electric car in 1890, and interested urbanites soon began converting stables to charging ports. By the early 1900s, about one-third of all vehicles on the road were electric. In New York City, a cab company called the Electric Vehicle Company operated electric vehicles with exchangeable batteries, like an early form of Uber or Lyft. At the time, however, many rural areas still lacked reliable electricity: it wasn't until the 1930s that widespread electrification got under way. Oil companies, though, had already created a network to distribute fuel across the country. 'A lot of rural America was still using gasoline for stoves and kerosene for home lighting,' said David Kirsch, a professor of management and entrepreneurship at the University of Maryland. 'You could buy it at many, many general stores across the country.' That made fuel engines more convenient for consumers. The internal combustion engine was improving much faster than battery technology. The Ford assembly line allowed the new fuel cars, like the Model T, to be produced more quickly. By the 1930s, there were only a tiny number of EVs on the road. More than 50 years later, the country had another chance. California said it would require automakers to sell a certain amount of electric vehicles. General Motors built the EV1, a small two-seater sedan that became quickly popular in the state. But when the California regulators backed off the plan in the mid-1990s, GM quietly repossessed the vehicles and discarded them. The US would continue to focus on fuel cars. It was that dominance in fuel-powered cars that initially motivated China to move into EVs more than a decade ago. Around 2010, China's Minister of Science and Technology, Wan Gang, began pushing the country to branch out into electric cars. American companies were already dominating combustion engines, and the country was looking for technologies that its companies could dominate over the next few decades. Between 2010 and 2023, China rolled out a huge bank of subsidies to encourage EV adoption. Interested buyers could get a rebate on an EV of up to 60,000 yuan, or roughly US$8000 ($13,600) – a huge benefit in a country where the average new car costs just US$23,000. EV owners also were exempt from sales tax and received a special coloured licence plate (green instead of blue) that allowed them to bypass the years-long wait for a licence. Manufacturers also received boosts, including tax breaks and faster permitting and siting for factories that produced EVs and batteries. According to one estimate from the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, the Chinese Government poured around US$231 billion into EV adoption – and that's likely an underestimate. The investments paid off. In 2010, both China and the US were selling just over 1000 EVs a year. Last year, the US sold 1.2 million – while China sold 6.4 million. And as Congress cuts EV incentives, the divide is likely to widen. 'There's a real danger of the US becoming more technologically isolated in the automotive sector,' said Ilaria Mazzocco, deputy director and senior fellow in Chinese business and economics at the Centre for Strategic and International Studies. Lithium-ion batteries Batteries followed a similar trajectory to electric vehicles. In the early 1970s, M. Stanley Whittingham, then a scientist at Exxon, created the first functional lithium-ion battery – a design that was later improved upon by John Goodenough at the University of Oxford and the Japanese scientist Akira Yoshino at Asahi Kasei Corp. Initially, the new technology became popular in the 1990s in electronics such as early laptops and cellphones – they were compact and reliable. By the early 2000s, the batteries began making their way into a new generation of electric cars. An American company called A123 was an early manufacturer of lithium iron phosphate batteries with enough capacity to power a car. In 2009, the Department of Energy gave the company hundreds of millions of dollars in a grant under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. But the US wasn't boosting the sales of EVs, and early battery companies struggled to find a toehold in a market dominated by fuel-powered cars and trucks. A123 went bankrupt and was later purchased by a Chinese company. By the early 2010s, as China boosted its sales of EVs, the country was also pouring billions of dollars into battery technology and battery manufacturing. At the same time, the country invested in processing critical minerals like cobalt, nickel and graphite – adding stability to the complex battery supply chain. In 2021, the technology got another boost: China began to require that companies add 10 to 30% battery storage to the grid for each gigawatt of wind or solar coming online. Battery production surged. 'It just exploded,' said Iola Hughes, head of research at Rho Motion, a battery research firm and part of the consulting firm Benchmark Mineral Intelligence. Today, China boasts 85% of the world's global capacity for battery cell manufacturing. For EV batteries, the picture is even starker: China holds 94% of the market share for producing lithium iron phosphate batteries. Solar panels For decades, solar panels were a distinctly American creation. In 1954, scientists at Bell Labs created the world's first commercially viable solar cell, which converted 6% of incoming light into electricity. By the 1970s, solar was booming in the US. The country was in the midst of an oil crisis, and the federal Government directed millions of dollars into research and development of solar. Scientists and engineers from around the world flooded into the US to develop solar technologies. President Jimmy Carter had 32 panels installed on the roof of the White House. According to one estimate, 95% of the world's solar industry in 1978 was based in the US. But in the 1980s, everything changed. President Ronald Reagan slashed funding for renewables and research and development into solar power. 'It was really ideological,' said Greg Nemet, professor of public affairs at the University of Wisconsin at Madison. 'They cut the solar budget by 85% within a couple of years.' Germany and Japan filled the vacuum left by American leadership, gobbling up experienced engineers and scientists. Then, in the early 2000s, European countries began offering huge subsidies for installations of wind and solar. Chinese companies saw an opportunity – and started building millions of panels. 'There was a lot of growing demand in the early to mid-2000s, thanks to all these incentives in Europe, and a lot of entrepreneurs in China just set up factories to serve that demand,' Mazzocco said. After the 2008 financial crisis, Europe shut down those subsidies as the continent shifted towards austerity. But unlike the US decades before, China decided to continue to support the development of solar power. 'The Chinese Government stepped in,' Mazzocco said. So far, China has invested US$50b in new solar power production, and the country now accounts for about 80% of the global solar supply chain. Today, eight of the top 10 solar panel manufacturers are based in China. The other two are in India and Singapore. Experts say that the country's success is based on two things: reliable policy and a push to adopt the new technologies. 'I look across the period from say '69 to the present – what strikes me is how inconsistent we have been with policy,' said Kirsch. 'The Chinese have just cleaned our clock by having consistent policy.' At the same time, China pushed consumers to adopt the technologies even as they encouraged manufacturers to build them. 'Technologies succeed when you combine a technological opportunity with a market opportunity,' said Nemet. Despite all of the US inventions, Nemet says, the country never focused on making sure there was enough domestic demand for those technologies. 'The US was really good at creating these technological opportunities – but we just weren't supporting the market side enough,' he said.
