
Parenting practices that have changed since you were a baby
Parenting is not for the faint of heart. It can take new parents a beat or two to fully tune in to what their baby's cries could mean. So many small but consequential decisions need to be made on a daily, if not hourly, basis. There are also questions. Many questions.
At a time when misinformation abounds, pediatrician Dr. David Hill is the calm voice of reassurance and reason, grounded in science. He encourages new parents to ask their baby's pediatrician questions, including about any advice they find on the internet.
'People come to me with stuff all the time,' Hill said, noting the importance of forging a solid parent-pediatrician relationship. That trust, he said, is what's 'going to steer us through this swamp of misinformation and disinformation that's out there right now.'
Hill is a father of five in a blended family who has been in practice for more than 25 years. He has been the associate medical editor of the American Academy of Pediatrics' book 'Caring for Your Baby and Young Child: Birth to Age 5, 8th edition,' and is slated to be the editor-in-chief for the next edition. He also cohosts the academy's podcast 'Pediatrics On Call.'
'The question I get the most often from new parents, and even those who have been at it for a while is, is this normal?' Hill told CNN Chief Medical Correspondent Dr. Sanjay Gupta recently on his podcast, Chasing Life.
'As somebody who's seen probably over 10,000 children … it is a joy for me to almost always be able to reassure, and be like, 'Yeah. That's fine. They do that. Kids do a lot of weird things, and they do a lot of things at their own pace,' Hill said. 'Normal can be all over the map.'
You can listen to the podcast's full episode here.
Hill said he strongly urges parents to seek out trusted, reliable sources for guidance. 'Sources of information that have been validated, that use real data,' he said. 'And honestly, talk to your child's doctor — develop that relationship, because that's what we've dedicated our lives to doing.'
Hill works closely with the AAP on the organization's parent-facing information. 'I do that because I know, over decades of experience, how dedicated everybody in that group is to making sure we get this right, including being willing to get egg on our faces and say, 'You know what? We were wrong,' when we were wrong,' Hill said. 'And that's really critical. Anybody who's never wrong, I don't trust, because none of us is perfect.'
During the decades Hill has been in practice, he has witnessed some of the babies he saw at the start of his career become parents themselves. During that time, he has also watched the science of child health evolve.
'What I tell these new parents is sometimes the complete opposite of what I said when they were babies!' he said via email.
Here are the five biggest changes Hill has seen over his career.
Sleep guidelines literally flipped in 1994, when Hill finished medical school. That year, the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development launched the first 'Back to Sleep' campaign urging parents to put their baby to sleep on their back. Before then, parents had been told to put an infant to sleep on the belly to avoid aspiration.
But that's not all. The US Consumer Product Safety Commission banned drop-side cribs from the marketplace in 2011 and warned against inclined sleepers in 2019, Hill said. And the Safe Sleep for Babies Act, signed into federal law in 2022, outright banned the sale of drop-side cribs and crib bumpers that could potentially suffocate infants.
He noted that in 1990, there were 154 sudden unexpected infant deaths per 100,000 babies, a number that fell 44% to a low of 86 in 2011. (It has since gone up to 100 deaths per 100,000 in 2022).
'While some of those deaths are from mysterious or unavoidable causes,' he said, 'many could still be prevented by following all the safe sleep guidelines, including not only placing infants on their backs to sleep, but never co-sleeping (and) avoiding soft bedding.'
Complete avoidance is out, and small exposures are in.
'I still remember in 2015 searching all the drawers in our practice for outdated infant feeding handouts that, if parents followed them, could put their babies at increased risk of developing life-threatening food allergies,' Hill said. 'These handouts told parents to avoid giving their infants and toddlers anything containing peanuts or eggs until they turned at least 2 years old, even 3 if they had eczema or a family history of allergies.'
But, Hill said, in 2015, the results of the LEAP trial confirmed what some earlier studies had suggested: 'That it wasn't early peanut exposure that had caused a doubling of peanut allergies in the preceding decade. It was the advice in these handouts!' he said.
Now parents and guardians are advised to introduce peanut-containing products and eggs along with other solid foods in the first year of life, as soon as babies are safely taking solids, usually around 6 months of age.
Preventing babies from having any exposure to potential allergens apparently left their immune systems oversensitive when they finally did encounter them later on.
Umbilical cords used to be treated with a messy (for doctors) purple 'triple' dye — an antiseptic to keep bacterial infections at bay. Now, the recommendation in well-resourced countries and communities is to let the cord dry on its own — and to keep a close eye on it.
'The purpose of the dye was to prevent potentially dangerous infections of the umbilical cord and surrounding tissues (omphalitis),' Hill said. 'Then, a few brave souls, perhaps fed up with their dry-cleaning bills, decided to see what would happen if we used alcohol instead of the dye. It turned out … nothing.'
Hill said the next step was to just let the cord dry on its own, taking care not to trap it in a wet or soiled diaper for extended periods and to avoid soaking it at bathtime. That practice is where the guidance stands today.
Some known risk factors for omphalitis, Hill said, include low birth weight, prolonged rupture of membranes or prolonged labor, maternal infection, nonsterile delivery or home birth, and improper cord care.
'If you see the skin around the belly button turning red or notice an unusually foul discharge, get your baby seen,' he advised.
What about bathing? Should new parents avoid baths until the cord falls off? 'Advice on this one varies, but it's not clear there's any more danger from a brief immersion than from a sponge bath,' he said.
The vaccination schedule for infants and children has been updated throughout the years as new shots become available, offering better protection against childhood scourges.
'My dad is also a pediatrician, and I grew up hearing horror stories of babies suffering from meningitis and sepsis. It seems my dad was always dashing off to the hospital to perform spinal taps,' Hill recalled. 'This started to change, however, in 1985, when a vaccine against Haemophilus influenza B, one of the most dreaded infections of childhood, came out.
'In training and early in my career, I saw awful infections from another bacteria, pneumococcal pneumonia. These infections became much rarer in 2000, when the first pneumococcal vaccine for children came out,' he said. 'Since then, that vaccine has expanded from covering seven subtypes of pneumococcus to covering as many as 23.'
Just in the past year, Hill said he witnessed another infantile infection he dreaded, RSV, or respiratory syncytial virus, plummet in frequency and severity thanks to both vaccines for expectant mothers and antibody injections for babies.
Another change involves a paradigm shift in the way pediatricians think about health and well-being, Hill said.
'In pediatrics, one of those tectonic shifts hit in 1998, the year I started practice and the year the ACEs Study came out,' he said, referring to a study that looked at adverse childhood experiences. Those potentially traumatic events include physical, emotional and/or sexual abuse; the death of a parent; mental illness; or violence or substance abuse in the household, any of which can create toxic stress in a child, leading to changes in brain development and affecting future mental, physical and emotional health.
How to get help
Help is available if you or someone you know is struggling with suicidal thoughts or mental health matters.
In the US: Call or text 988, the Suicide & Crisis Lifeline.
Globally: The International Association for Suicide Prevention and Befrienders Worldwide have contact information for crisis centers around the world. 'Many people had noticed that traumatic events in childhood … seemed to impact later health,' Hill said. 'The ACEs Study measured and quantified the extent and duration of these effects, and the results were more dramatic and longer-lasting than anyone had guessed.'
An explosion of research followed, Hill said, which led to a new approach in pediatrics.
'Every child faces stressful events, some severe enough to impact their health. But the safe, stable, nurturing relationships that children build with the adults around them can protect them,' he explained. 'Understanding these interactions inspires trauma-informed care, an effort to work with families to address the stresses in their lives and to build those emotional connections that can help their children thrive.'
Under this approach, Hill said, pediatricians pivoted from asking 'What's wrong with you?' to asking 'What happened to you, and how can we help?'
'A key concept here is the 'good enough parent,'' he said. 'No parent is perfect, but perfection is not required to be safe, stable, and nurturing.'
As a parent himself, Hill said that thought 'brings me a sigh of relief.'
We hope these five tips help you catch up on the latest parenting guidance. Listen to the full episode here. And join us next week for a new episode of the Chasing Life podcast.
CNN Podcasts' Jennifer Lai contributed to this report.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
8 hours ago
- New York Post
Piercing your kids' ears puts them at risk for this allergy — the EU even has laws for it
Tiny studs, big trouble? Parents itching to pierce their kids' ears might want to put down the needle — a growing body of research suggests the popular practice could cost more than just a few tears. 'Delay ear piercings in young girls,' Dr. Niha Qamar (@doctor._.q), a board-certified allergist and immunologist, said in a recent TikTok, warning it could increase the risk of a serious, lifelong allergy. Dr. Niha Qamar is a board-certified allergist based in New York. TikTok/@doctor._.q Nationwide, nickel is the leading cause of allergic contact dermatitis — a red, itchy rash that flares up when the skin touches a normally harmless material. Roughly 1.1 million American children are affected by a nickel sensitivity, and studies show that number has quadrupled over the past 30 years. Researchers say early ear piercings are a major factor. In a Swedish study of 960 schoolgirls aged 8 to 15, researchers found that 'the ones who had ear piercings had 13% nickel allergy, versus 1% of the girls who didn't have ear piercings,' Qamar said. Another study out of Finland showed that 31% of pierced kids had a reaction to nickel — compared to just 2% of those without. And in the US, a study found that just 4% of men with no piercings were sensitive to nickel, while 11.1% and 14% of those with one or multiple piercings, respectively, were affected. 'Europe actually passed legislation to decrease the amount of nickel in jewelry (for this reason),' Qamar said. Many Americans get their ears pieced as infants or young children. deltahman – That regulation, the Nickel Directive, was introduced by the European Union in 1994 to limit how much nickel can leach from items like earrings. In the years since, countries like Denmark have reported major drops in sensitization, along with an estimated $2 billion in related health care savings. Nickel allergy isn't deadly, but it can make life miserable. Reactions may include hives, cracked skin, burning, itching and discoloration. More severe symptoms can strike when someone eats nickel-rich foods or has a metal device implanted. Blisters, diarrhea, fatigue, headaches and full-body swelling are all on the table. With no cure, managing symptoms becomes a lifelong battle — and avoiding nickel isn't easy, since it lurks in everything from jewelry and belt buckles to bra hooks and braces. Some people require treatment, which can include medication and even light therapy. With nickel sensitization on the rise in the US, major medical groups are calling for tighter regulations like those already in place in Europe. In 2020, the American Academy of Pediatrics urged the federal government to crack down on nickel in clothing and jewelry. 'The burden of symptoms and cost is high,' the policy statement notes. 'The United States can act on EU data revealing that legislation to limit exposures in childhood, especially with earrings, can impact the prevalence and potentially the severity of disease.' Until then, Qamar says parents should play it safe and hold off on piercing their kids' ears. 'If your child is getting pieced ears, get jewelry that is nickel free,' she recommended. 'That will reduce the risk of nickel sensitization.'


Time Magazine
10 hours ago
- Time Magazine
The Clashing Advice Over COVID-19 Shots for Kids
Should you give your baby a COVID-19 shot? The answer isn't as straightforward or as much of a consensus as it used to be: In an unusual move, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) is recommending a different approach to childhood vaccination than the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Both groups agree that families should make individual decisions in consultation with their doctors about whether kids should be vaccinated. But the AAP has a stricter stance for the youngest eligible children in the U.S., recommending that all of them get COVID-19 shots. The CDC stopped recommending COVID-19 vaccines for healthy children older than six months following guidance from the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., in May. The CDC does, however, recommend the shot for children who are moderately or severely immunocompromised. A day after the AAP released its recommendations, Kennedy fired back at the organization on social media, accusing them of allowing pharmaceutical-company donors to guide their recommendations. AAP maintains that its recommendations are based on science. Here's what to know about the clashing advice regarding COVID-19 vaccines for kids. What does the AAP recommend in terms of COVID-19 shots for children? Whether most children should get a COVID-19 vaccine should be based on their particular risk, the AAP says—taking into account their underlying conditions, such as asthma, obesity, or diabetes, as well as whether they live in a household with people at high risk for developing severe disease. That risk is higher for the youngest eligible age group—ages 6 months to 23 months—which is why the AAP recommends that all kids in this age group get vaccinated. 'For the youngest kids, the hospitalization rate is similar to that for adults 50 to 64 years old,' says Dr. Sean O'Leary, chair of the AAP Committee on Infectious Diseases. 'It's not nothing. And that's for something that can be prevented by a vaccine, which has been better studied than any medical product in our history. We have a very strong level of confidence in the safety of the vaccine.' HHS did not respond to TIME's request for comment. Why are the recommendations different? Generally, the CDC sets the schedule for which vaccines people should get and at which ages. The CDC makes its decision based on advice from its Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). ACIP is made up of independent experts who volunteer to review data, discuss their findings, and make recommendations to help guide the CDC. But Kennedy—a longtime vaccine-skeptic who now oversees the CDC as head of HHS—fired all members of ACIP in June, accusing them of following industry interests. Kennedy replaced them days later with people he had selected, 'many of them with strong anti-vaccine views,' says O'Leary. Read More: How Having a Baby Is Changing Under Trump After ACIP was replaced, AAP—which typically works closely with the advisory committee and other liaison groups in setting vaccination schedules—decided not to attend ACIP's first meeting under the new administration in the spring. 'We saw from that meeting that ACIP has gone off the rails, essentially, in terms of the way they are operating and the messaging from the new members, which is very much around sowing distrust about vaccines and not making evidence-based vaccine recommendations,' says O'Leary. Weeks later, the AAP and other liaison groups were asked to discontinue their participation in ACIP work groups, O'Leary says. 'We received an email un-inviting us,' he says. The reason provided, he says, was that the organizations represented 'special interest groups,' which O'Leary says is a 'poor interpretation of the rules. All of the organizations at the table have expertise, and there are a lot of reasons to have representation from professional societies.' Which advice will doctors and pharmacists follow? O'Leary says pediatricians are anticipating having to have more conversations with families about the conflicting vaccine advice, and that the AAP is providing guidance to help inform those discussions on its website and via emails to its members. 'Politics has entered the exam room in a way that it never has before,' he says. 'These discussions will be contextual, depending on how well the pediatrician knows the family, what relationship they have, and how frank they can be with them in the discussion.' Ultimately, he says, the message from pediatricians should be this: 'We are committed to the health of children, and our recommendations are based on the best available science.' Read More: What the New COVID-19 Vaccine Guidance Means For You Pharmacists must take a slightly different approach, since they are only allowed to vaccinate according to the CDC's recommendations, while doctors can vaccinate outside of strictly approved conditions or populations in so-called 'off-label' use. Since current CDC recommendations say that families should make their own decisions about whether their children receive the shot, pharmacists will vaccinate kids if parents want them to have the shots, but won't specifically recommend that people get them. 'Our guidance is to always follow what the CDC or HHS recommends,' says Rick Gates, chief pharmacy officer at Walgreens. If families come in with questions about whether their child should get the COVID-19 shot, pharmacists will probably refer them back to their pediatrician or family physician. Will insurance cover COVID-19 vaccines for kids if the CDC doesn't recommend them? It's still not clear how insurers will respond to the differing recommendations. 'This is a real concern,' says Dr. David Higgins, an infectious-disease expert at AAP. Traditionally, a recommendation from ACIP means that a shot will be covered, since any vaccines recommended by the committee have to be reimbursed by insurers under the Affordable Care Act. It's not clear how insurers will interpret the individual choice of families when it comes to vaccinating children. The AAP is urging insurers to continue covering the COVID-19 vaccine for infants six to 23 months, despite the fact that ACIP does not recommend the vaccine for all kids in this age group. 'The AAP is already engaging with private insurers and policymakers to ensure our evidence-based recommendations are covered,' Higgins says, 'and we will continue to advocate to make vaccines accessible to every child in every community.'


CNN
15 hours ago
- CNN
Irate parents turn to legal action over the marketing of so-called ‘toddler milks'
For people who cannot or choose not to breastfeed, infant formula is lifesaving, supplying their babies with precious nutrients they need to grow and thrive. Concerned about contaminants and the use of controversial seed oils in the nation's tightly regulated infant formula supply, US Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has launched a review of infant formula regulations he calls Operation Stork Speed. Yet while industry and experts debate those regulations, there is another type of 'formula' — for toddlers ages 1 to 3 years old — that no one is overseeing. 'Toddler milks' are marketed to parents who have been using infant formula as a necessary next step in their child's nutritional journey, according to the American Academy of Pediatrics. Critics say these expensive concoctions — first introduced into the United States in the 1990s — are not nutritionally necessary, may be contributing to childhood obesity, and should not be sold at all. 'Cow's milk is nutritionally adequate for nearly all children over 12 months and is up to 30 times less expensive than these toddler drinks,' said Dr. George Fuchs, a professor of pediatric gastroenterology at the University of Kentucky's College of Medicine in Lexington. 'Yet mothers are buying these inferior products due to deceptive marketing, all the while believing they are doing what's best for their child,' said Fuchs, who coauthored a 2023 American Academy of Pediatrics clinical report that called for changes in how toddler formulas are promoted for sale. In fact, some toddler beverages may be potentially harmful to young children due to excess added sugars, defined as sweeteners that don't naturally occur in food, Fuchs said. The recommended amount of added sugar for infants and children younger than age 2 is zero, according to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Yet research from 2019 found that on average, infants consume 1 teaspoon of added sugar a day while toddlers consume about 6 teaspoons a day. 'Infants and children exposed to high sugar, fat or salt in their diets develop a preference for these as they grow older,' Fuchs said. 'Studies show this is a risk for childhood obesity and all of its consequences through adulthood.' Despite these concerns, toddler formulas are not regulated by the Infant Formula Act, nor by the infant formula regulations of the US Food and Drug Administration, said AAP report coauthor Dr. Steven Abrams, a professor of pediatrics at the Dell Medical School at the University of Texas at Austin. 'When making an infant formula, manufacturers have to meet fixed levels of nutrients and protein levels that have been mandated by law,' said Abrams, who is also a member of the 'Operation Stork Speed' expert panel on infant formula, which met in early June. 'If you're making a formula for children over 12 months of age, there are no such restrictions,' he told CNN. 'Manufacturers can put in or take out any nutrients they want and do almost anything to market and sell it.' The Infant Nutrition Council of America, or INCA, which represents the formula industry, told CNN via email that toddler nutritional drinks 'contribute to nutritional intake and potentially fill nutritional gaps for children 12 to 36 months.' 'Research demonstrates that nutrient intakes for young children often fall below adequate levels for iron, vitamin D, E, calcium, choline, potassium, and fiber,' an INCA spokesperson said. In addition, 'the labeling of toddler nutritional drinks produced by INCA members explicitly identifies the product as a toddler drink intended for children 12 months and older on the front of the package label.' When your baby relies on formula to grow and thrive, the infant nutrition aisle at your grocery store quickly becomes familiar territory. So, it wasn't long before Damary Santana noticed the brightly colored cans labeled as 'toddler drink' nestled next to the infant formulas she was buying for her infant son. 'They stood out because of the colors they use, like red, which catches your eye,' Santana told CNN. 'The labels on the cans were also very eye-catching because they said the formula would support my baby's brain development and immune system.' Saying she wanted the best for her son as he neared his first birthday, Santana decided to pay $35 to $45 a can for toddler milk so she could give him the nutrition he needed. 'I also started giving it to my daughter when she turned one,' said Santana, who lives in Charleston, Massachusetts. 'It was during the Covid pandemic and there was a lot of shortages, so I was buying two to three cans at a time for both my kiddos — it was very expensive.' Today, Santana is a plaintiff in a proposed class action lawsuit against Abbott Nutrition, maker of the two Similac toddler formulas she fed her children: Go & Grow toddler drink and Pure Bliss toddler drink. Santana said she joined the lawsuit after she learned from her pediatrician that toddler milk is completely unnecessary for her children's development. 'Everything that's on that label is pretty much just advertising to get parents like me to buy the formula,' Santana said. 'I could have used that money for other necessities, like clothes and diapers.' The lawsuit was filed by attorney Andrew Rainer, director of the Center for Public Health Litigation, a nonprofit public interest law practice at the Northeastern University School of Law in Boston. The law center, which is part of the Public Health Advocacy Institute, or PHAI, initiates legal action against tobacco, food and soda companies that sell products it claims contribute to preventable chronic diseases. The president of PHAI, Richard Daynard, is famous for his role in the fight to expose the marketing practices of the tobacco industry. 'Toddler milks are expensive, nutritionally unnecessary and may be harmful to children due to added sugars,' Rainer told CNN. 'The products are labeled 'Stage 3,' implying they are the next nutritionally recommended product for purchase after infant formula, which is numbered 'Stage 1' and transitional formula, which is numbered 'Stage 2.' 'We are suing to get Abbott to change their advertising and pay compensation to all the parents who purchased these products as a result of Abbott's misleading, unlawful and unfair marketing practices,' Rainer added. In response, Abbott Nutrition, a leader in the infant and toddler formula market, told CNN the case was 'without merit.' 'Our toddler nutrition products are properly labeled, and our claims are well-supported. Of note, several courts have rejected similar claims about Abbott products, including a California jury earlier this year,' a spokesperson said via email. The lawsuits Abbott supplied to CNN, however, were not about toddler formulas. The California lawsuit alleged Abbott places excess sugar in PediaSure, a nutritional supplement designed to feed malnourished children — a jury rejected those claims. Another two cases focused on added sugars in Ensure, a product often used to treat malnutrition after chemotherapy, surgery and in the elderly. One was dismissed; in the other, a judge denied the plaintiff's motion to bring the case as a class action. While the 'Stage 1' and 'Stage 3' signage that appeared on the original Pure Bliss infant and toddler products has been removed, the label on both the Irish Farms infant and toddler products are nearly identical. Like the original Pure Bliss toddler drink, the Irish Farms toddler product still contains 4 grams of added sugar per serving. Since the Santana lawsuit was filed, Abbott has launched an extension of the Pure Bliss by Similac product line: Irish Farms Infant Formula and Irish Farms Toddler Drink With Probiotics, both made with 'Fresh Milk From Cows in Ireland.' 'No changes were made to the formulation. These products offer the same great nutrition, just with a new name and label,' the company says on the FAQ section of its website. Abbott faces additional proposed class action lawsuits. A California mother filed suit against Abbott in September 2024 for its marketing of Go & Grow 360 Total Care Toddler Drink by Similac. In mid-August, a judge denied in part Abbott's petition to dismiss the case, allowing several claims to move forward. Two fathers in California filed suit in December 2024 alleging Abbott injects 'up to 12 grams of added sugar per serving, equivalent to almost half a can of soda' into Similac's Go & Grow 360 Total Care toddler drink powder and Similac's Go & Grow 360 Total Care Sensitive toddler drink poweder. The lawsuit was dismissed without prejudice, which allows the claims to be resubmitted to the court in future. When asked, Abbott provided no further comment concerning these lawsuits. 'Sensitive' formulas are marketed to parents who worry their children suffer from lactose intolerance, which is rare in children younger than age 6. 'If there's a take-home message for the world, it's that you don't need to put your baby on low lactose formulas with names like 'gentle 'or 'sensitive' because of routine baby symptoms like spitting or a bit of colic,' Abrams told CNN. 'It doesn't work for those things, plus more than 95% of all babies are not lactose sensitive — lactose is the natural sugar in breast milk. Yet a third to half of the marketplace is made up of these sensitive or gentle formulas,' Abrams said. 'The marketing also plays in the guilt of moms who aren't able to breastfeed, because who doesn't want sensitive formula for your sweet little baby, right?' Other key players in the infant and toddler formula market have also faced proposed class action lawsuits. Mead Johnson Nutrition, which makes Enfagrow Premium Toddler Nutritional Drink and Enfagrow NeuroPro Toddler Nutritional Drink products, has been accused of using 'deceptive and unlawful practices in labeling and marketing,' according to a lawsuit filed by three California parents in July 2024. A motion to dismiss was granted in part and denied in part by a federal court in California in July; the plaintiffs filed an amended complaint in early August. In response, Mead Johnson Nutrition told CNN via email that its products use 'evidence-based nutrition' to support the development needs of young children. 'While we cannot comment on pending litigation, we stand behind our products and their labeling to ensure appropriate use by parents. In this case, we are pleased all fraud-based claims were dismissed and we remain confident our products are accurately labeled and responsibly marketed,' a spokesperson said. Gerber Products Company was sued in 2020 over its marketing of Gerber Good Start Grow Stage 3, which was sold as 'necessary' for the 'nutritional needs of children ages 12 to 24 months,' according to the lawsuit. 'Contrary to the recommended nutritional needs of children in this age range, the Product contains 15 grams of added sugar,' the lawsuit stated. Gerber's motion to dismiss was denied in part and granted in part, but the lawsuit was dropped in early 2022 when the plaintiff moved out of state, said Spencer Sheehan, the New York attorney who filed the case. 'The judge's denial of Gerber's dismissal motion was positive and recognized and credited the legal theories we raised,' Sheehan told CNN. 'I don't think there's any marketing that can save or make this category of products useful — personally, I don't think these products should even be sold.' CNN reached out to Gerber and was told the company sold its infant formula portfolio in late 2022 to Perrigo, the third largest manufacturer of infant formula in the US and Canada, according to its website. Good Start is now marketed as Good Start Dr. Brown's, with three infant formulations: one for gas, fussiness and spit-up; a second for easy digestion and softer poops; and a third that is milk- and lactose-free. However, there is no product for toddlers. CNN reached out to Perrigo but did not receive a reply. The American Academy of Pediatrics has long said 'breast is best' and strongly encourages breastfeeding babies for as long as possible. Oddly, it was the success of this mission that led to the birth of the toddler milk industry in the US, said Jennifer Harris, a senior research adviser of marketing initiatives at the Rudd Center for Food Policy and Health at the University of Connecticut's Hartford campus. 'Toddler drinks are just a marketing tactic formula companies use to offset the decline in infant formula sales due to the increase in breastfeeding,' said Harris, who studies how food is marketed to children. 'There's no health benefit in these toddler drinks, it's all just a marketing ploy — a very lucrative one at that,' she said, echoing a key allegation in the Public Health Advocacy Institute lawsuit. 'There's absolutely no reason for this product category to exist, none at all,' she said. Harris is the senior author of a February 2020 study, which tracked sales and advertising dollars for the infant and toddler formula industry between 2006 and 2015. Sales volume, which is the total amount of infant formula sold, dropped 7% and advertising dollars declined over the 10-year-period. During the same time frame, advertising for toddler milks rose fourfold, with a 158% increase in annual sales volume. Today the 'growing up' milk market, as it is called, is exploding, said Rainer, citing available market data. 'Since 2018 the nationwide sales of toddler milks — a product no one needs — has averaged well over $500 million per year,' he said. Critics say labels on toddler milks are often similar in color and styling to labels on a brand's infant formulas, which makes it easy for parents to confuse the two, Harris said. 'It's easy for parents to grab the toddler version instead of the infant formula,' she said. 'Or they think, 'Oh, this one is less expensive, I'll just get this instead.'' Like Damary Santana, parents in focus groups told researchers they were swayed by labels that say toddler milks provide numerous immune-boosting and brain-nourishing additives. 'I feel like the marketing does a really good job of playing to a mother's fears,' a Hartford, Connecticut, mother told Harris and her team in 2022. 'Because who wants to feel like, I didn't give my child the thing to support their immune system? Or they're not going to have brain or eye development if I don't give them this.' Because toddler milks are not regulated by the FDA or Infant Formula Act, formula makers can 'market anything they want,' Abrams said. 'The World Health Organization's marketing code for breast-milk substitutes, which is accepted throughout most of the world, specifically does not allow the marketing of toddler formulas in this way,' he said. 'The United States, however, does not legally accept the restrictions in the code.' The Public Health Advocacy Institute and more than two dozen other organizations and individuals petitioned the FDA in July 2020 to set limits on the advertising of toddler milks while improving transparency on ingredient labels. Was there any response? 'Crickets,' said Harris, who signed the citizen petition. 'We followed up a few years later, and the FDA basically said 'Hey, we have a lot on our plate, and this isn't a top priority.'' Updating infant formula guidelines was the focus of the June meeting of the expert advisory council for Operation Stork Speed, but toddler milks were also discussed. Panel members acknowledged the issue of parents unknowingly giving toddler milks instead of formula to their infants because they couldn't tell the products apart, according to a posted summary. 'The labels of these products should clearly state that they are not appropriate for infants,' the committee agreed. The committee also discussed the AAP's recommendation that toddler products should no longer be positioned on store shelves next to infant formulas. Finally, the committee recommended that the FDA become involved in regulating toddler milk marketing, perhaps by 'incorporating some aspects of the WHO Code of Marketing of Infant Formulas.' Will the FDA implement actions on toddler milks as recommended by experts? Andrew Nixon, director of communications for the US Department of Health and Human Services — which oversees the FDA — told CNN via email: 'We do not speculate on potential, future policy decisions.' Get inspired by a weekly roundup on living well, made simple. Sign up for CNN's Life, But Better newsletter for information and tools designed to improve your well-being.