logo
2025 GMC Canyon: 6 reasons to love it, 3 reasons to think twice

2025 GMC Canyon: 6 reasons to love it, 3 reasons to think twice

Yahoo26-01-2025

The 2025 GMC Canyon is not only one of the most capable off-road pickup trucks in its class; it's one of the most powerful as well. Unfortunately, to get that top trim off-road performance, you'll have to shell out a ton of bread. Fortunately, even the base models are mighty capable.
Other than a cosmetic blackout package called the "Nightfall Edition," the only exterior updates this year are a few new colors, namely Glacier Metallic, Desert Sun, and Rapids Metallic. The "ProGrade Trailering System" and the "Safety Plus Package" are also now standard on all Canyons.
Considering how new this generation is, we weren't expecting that many changes, so this was a pleasant surprise for folks who want the base model Elevation trim. That being said, what are some of the Canyon's best selling points, and what are some reasons that might lead you to shop elsewhere?This exterior design, which was introduced as the 2023 model, is bold and unique. Yes, the Chevrolet Colorado is its brother, but the Canyon has a unique nose, tail, and accessories. Even the base Elevation trim sits high and has a wide stance.
Despite its midsize status, the Canyon looks big and has a presence in the real world. I would go so far as to say that when it's loaded up with AEV accessories, it's one macho-looking hombre. Still, even the bare-bones WT trim is handsome and distinctive.
Even though General Motors ditched the excellent I4 turbodiesel when this new model came out, they replaced it with one of the most powerful gasoline engines in its class. Every trim of the 2025 GMC Canyon uses the same turbocharged 2.7-liter engine that makes 310 hp and 430 lb-ft of torque. While the horsepower is far less than the Ford Ranger Raptor's 405 hp, it makes just as much torque.
Thus, it's not as fast as the Ranger Raptor, but it's still quick. The Canyon's 0 to 60 mph times have been reported to be well under 7 seconds. It's also more efficient, with EPA ratings of 18 mpg city and 22 mpg highway, compared to the Ranger Raptor's 16 mpg city and 18 mpg highway ratings.The Canyon comes with an 11.3" diagonal touch-screen, an 11" diagonal color Driver Information Center, and an optional 6.3" diagonal multi-color head-up display in higher trims.
Many standard features are available on the lower models, while others, like heated & ventilated seats and a heated steering wheel, are optional on all but the Denali.I'm impressed with the nice details in the base model Elevation, such as the subtle and tasteful use of faux metal trim, excellent screen placement, and attractive interior design.
If you choose the next-level AT4, you will be upgraded to contrasting-color trim pieces with matching synthetic leather and cloth seating. The Denali adds leather throughout the cabin, real-looking wooden inserts, and lots of extra tech. Lastly, the AT4X uses lots of white and red leather with optional AEV badges, should you opt for that package.
When properly equipped, the GMC Canyon can tow a maximum of 7,700 lbs. That's best in class, and I can attest it's a great little truck to tow with. Its maximum payload of 1,720 lbs is second in its class, but it still rivals many full-size pickup trucks in the market.
Keep in mind that those numbers drop when you go up to higher trims with additional hardware. The weight and drag coming from things like larger tires, beefier off-road suspension, and armor reduce hauling capability,As great a work truck as it is, the GMC Canyon doubles as a terrific daily driver. Its overall size isn't much smaller than that of a full-size pickup truck, but it's easier to maneuver, park, and store. Its excellent power also makes passing, overtaking, and off-the-line speed a relative breeze.
Even the base model 4WD Canyon comes with the tried and true Eaton G80 automatic locking rear differential. It spools up and locks at low rpm, and it works automatically. A driver-selectable full-locking rear differential is available, and you can even add both front and rear lockers with the AT4X package.
The Canyon has 9.6 inches of ground clearance right out of the box, which can be upgraded to 12.2 inches if you opt for the AT4X. That trim also includes the Dynamic Suspensions Spool Valve (DSSV) Multi-Matic shocks, which use proven racing technology to self-adjust for any terrain.At the top of the off-road tree sits the Canyon AT4X AEV Edition. In addition to knobby Goodyear Wrangler Territory MT LT315/70R17 mud-terrain tires, the AT4X AEV Package delivers serious underside protection, advanced suspension, rugged tires, locking differentials, increased ride height, and impressive power.
Some wish GMC would give the public more layout choices than the single cab configuration and five-foot bed.
The space inside the cab is also a bit tight in the back seat. Unexpectedly, the two odd ducks among the midsize pickup truck gang, the Jeep Gladiator and the Honda Ridgeline, have the most useable and comfortable backseat space.
The bottom line is that you can get a comparable Chevrolet for thousands less. A Chevrolet Colorado WT 4WD with no packages will run up to $8,000 less than a GMC Canyon Elevation. Even if you opt for the beefier engine on the Chevrolet, the savings remain in the thousands.
Yes, the interior design is not quite as fancy as GMC's setup, and there are fewer goodies available overall, but that's not a dealbreaker for some. I would compare and contrast the GMC with the Chevrolet if you're concerned about price.
Speaking of price.Buckle up, buttercup, because these prices are going to create turbulence. The base model Elevation starts at $39,995, and it's a whopping $3,300 to get the 4WD option. The AT4 is $47,295 with standard 4WD, while the Denali is even pricier at $53,595, albeit also with standard 4WD.
In terms of packages, the AT4X is priced at $6,980, while the Nightfall Edition comes in at $4,595. Both options are worth considering if you're looking to enhance the functionality or add a touch of pizzazz to your Canyon. The good news is that the AT4X AEV Edition package was at least discounted from $10,000 to $8,000.
All in all, a fully loaded 2025 GMC AT4X AEV Edition will run you around $68,000. Add a few options, and you will be well into the $70,000 zone. Yikes.
Just so we're clear: a 2025 Ford Ranger Raptor, one of the best vehicles in this class, starts at about $56,000 and peaks at under $60,000.
As I've said about the Ford Ranger Raptor, Toyota Tacoma TRD Pro, and similar trucks, resisting the allure of the top-tier models can still land you an outstanding pickup truck.
If you do opt to pay to play, then you will get one of the most capable off-road vehicles sold in the United States right out of the box, a theory that also applies to the 2025 GMC Canyon.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

GM CEO Mary Barra on Trump tariffs and US manufacturing: 'We could have done better'
GM CEO Mary Barra on Trump tariffs and US manufacturing: 'We could have done better'

Yahoo

time5 hours ago

  • Yahoo

GM CEO Mary Barra on Trump tariffs and US manufacturing: 'We could have done better'

General Motors CEO Mary Barra acknowledges the company could have been better positioned during its conversations with President Donald Trump in his first term — particularly when it came to the Detroit automaker's North American manufacturing operations. GM's top executive said onstage at the Wall Street Journal's Future of Everything conference in New York City that she brings lessons learned from past interactions with Trump's White House to today's tariff-related conversations. 'When we didn't see eye to eye on some things, I think there's actually some things where General Motors could have handled some situations better,' Barra said May 28 about the company's past chats with Trump's administration. 'We had to do some restructuring, and we could have executed better, which would have positioned it a lot better.' During the negotiation of USMCA in 2018, the current trade agreement between the United States, Mexico and Canada that Trump managed during his first term, conversations between the President and GM occasionally turned ugly. At the time, GM was in the process of shuttering its massive assembly plant in Lordstown, Ohio, which had focused on manufacturing small cars, amid restructuring efforts that involved layoffs of nearly 6,000 salaried workers in North America. Trump claimed these job cuts had "nothing to do with tariffs" then imposed by his administration on China and the European Union. Vehicle costs: Economists estimate new tariff costs to range between $2,000 to $12,000 per vehicle The changes made national headlines and drew negative attention, and tweets from the president. 'But even through that period and then beyond, we've always continued to have dialogue, and that's a kind of a lesson learned. I've been very clear that I believe in electric vehicles, I'm very clear about the importance of manufacturing,' Barra told WSJ editor in chief Emma Tucker. 'Having the dialogue to make sure they understand our industry — because I think we do have a shared goal of strengthening it — has been beneficial.' GM is facing costs up to $5 billion from Trump's tariffs alone, the company reported during its most recent earnings report. Barra applauded the relief stemming from the most recent executive orders signed April 29 which were 25% tariffs on all imported autos which began in April and another 25% on all auto parts set to begin by May 3. The change prevented stacking tariffs with previously announced tariffs on steel and aluminum, the costs of which Barra described as 'untenable.' GM has made a variety of production changes at plants in the United States this year, including an $888 million investment the company announced late May 27 in its New York propulsion assembly plant to produce the next generation V-8 engine, the automaker's largest ever in an engine plant. GM said April 23 that it planned to expand transmission production at its Toledo (Ohio) Propulsions Systems plant, where it builds transmissions used in the Silverado and Sierra pickup trucks. 'We're trying to make changes to pay less tariffs because we're strengthening our U.S. manufacturing,' Barra said. 'There's decisions we can make when we look at the entire equation … we have the capacity available in some of the assembly plants and engine plants that we have in this country that we're going to continue to utilize.' On April 3, Trump put a 25% tariff — the tax an importer pays on a good when it crosses international borders — on all imported vehicles. His objective was to encourage more U.S. manufacturing. Trump was set to then enact 25% tariffs on all imported parts starting May 3. Since most vehicles assembled in the United States contain a lot of imported parts, the duties on those parts would run into thousands of dollars per vehicle. Ford Motor Co. rolled out a campaign and discounts the day tariffs first kicked in, offering its employee-pricing plan, known as the A Plan, to consumers on most of Ford 2024 and 2025 model year vehicles through June 2. But executives later said prices may necessarily rise to counteract tariff costs on the company's bottom line. General Motors did not join automakers that cut costs and advertised tariff-free pricing deals, and Barra would not commit to post-tariff vehicle price changes, citing the dynamic pricing of the automotive industry even without tariffs that requires changing to stay competitive. 'I've had the opportunity to talk to the president and his administration on a regular basis, and one of the things that I'm very appreciative is they have taken the time to understand ... the dynamics of our industry,' Barra said. 'I can't speak to all the other industries that are facing tariffs, but I can tell you for decades now, it has not been a level playing field with U.S. automakers globally with either tariffs or non-tariff trade barriers.' Senior autos writer Jamie L. LaReau contributed to this report. Jackie Charniga covers General Motors for the Free Press. Reach her at jcharniga@ This article originally appeared on Detroit Free Press: GM CEO: We could have done better under Trump tariffs

Why General Motors (GM) Shares Are Trading Lower Today
Why General Motors (GM) Shares Are Trading Lower Today

Yahoo

time6 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Why General Motors (GM) Shares Are Trading Lower Today

Shares of automotive manufacturer General Motors (NYSE:GM) fell 5.2% in the afternoon session after President Trump announced plans to double tariffs on steel and aluminum imports to 50%. Automakers rely heavily on these raw materials for vehicle production, and a tariff hike would directly increase production costs and reduce profits. For investors, this could also signal downward pressure on earnings, potential cuts to forward guidance, and increased uncertainty. The stock market overreacts to news, and big price drops can present good opportunities to buy high-quality stocks. Is now the time to buy General Motors? Access our full analysis report here, it's free. General Motors's shares are somewhat volatile and have had 13 moves greater than 5% over the last year. In that context, today's move indicates the market considers this news meaningful but not something that would fundamentally change its perception of the business. The biggest move we wrote about over the last year was 4 months ago when the stock dropped 11.1% on the news that the company reported weak fourth-quarter 2024 earnings and provided guidance that assumed a stable policy environment in the US, thus failing to help investors shrug off concerns relating to the impact of regulatory measures. A key concern is the Trump administration's potential plans to reduce incentives like tax credits, which have helped accelerate the demand for EVs. If these plans are implemented, both GM and other EV players may need to rethink their growth forecasts. A Berstein analyst added following the earnings release "In our view, the guidance for 2025 leaves no room for errors, and also does not include impact from regulatory changes in the U.S., especially on tariffs and BEV support." On a more positive note, General Motors beat analysts' revenue expectations, and its full-year EPS guidance came in higher than Wall Street's estimates. Overall, this was a mixed quarter, which failed to clear up uncertainties. General Motors is down 8% since the beginning of the year, and at $47.27 per share, it is trading 21.5% below its 52-week high of $60.20 from November 2024. Investors who bought $1,000 worth of General Motors's shares 5 years ago would now be looking at an investment worth $1,724. Unless you've been living under a rock, it should be obvious by now that generative AI is going to have a huge impact on how large corporations do business. While Nvidia and AMD are trading close to all-time highs, we prefer a lesser-known (but still profitable) semiconductor stock benefiting from the rise of AI. Click here to access our free report on our favorite semiconductor growth story.

GM CEO Mary Barra on Trump tariffs and US manufacturing: 'We could have done better'
GM CEO Mary Barra on Trump tariffs and US manufacturing: 'We could have done better'

USA Today

time8 hours ago

  • USA Today

GM CEO Mary Barra on Trump tariffs and US manufacturing: 'We could have done better'

GM CEO Mary Barra on Trump tariffs and US manufacturing: 'We could have done better' Show Caption Hide Caption General Motors: History, innovation, and legacy Learn about the rich history and notable innovations of General Motors, from its founding in 1908 to its leadership in electric and autonomous vehicle technology. Barra applauded the relief stemming from the most recent executive orders signed April 29 which prevented tariffs stacking on previously announced steel and aluminum taxes. During the negotiation of USMCA in 2018, conversations between the president and GM occasionally turned ugly. GM is in the middle of changing its manufacturing operations to reduce tariff costs, Barra said. General Motors CEO Mary Barra acknowledges the company could have been better positioned during its conversations with President Donald Trump in his first term — particularly when it came to the Detroit automaker's North American manufacturing operations. GM's top executive said onstage at the Wall Street Journal's Future of Everything conference in New York City that she brings lessons learned from past interactions with Trump's White House to today's tariff-related conversations. 'When we didn't see eye to eye on some things, I think there's actually some things where General Motors could have handled some situations better,' Barra said May 28 about the company's past chats with Trump's administration. 'We had to do some restructuring, and we could have executed better, which would have positioned it a lot better.' During the negotiation of USMCA in 2018, the current trade agreement between the United States, Mexico and Canada that Trump managed during his first term, conversations between the President and GM occasionally turned ugly. At the time, GM was in the process of shuttering its massive assembly plant in Lordstown, Ohio, which had focused on manufacturing small cars, amid restructuring efforts that involved layoffs of nearly 6,000 salaried workers in North America. Trump claimed these job cuts had "nothing to do with tariffs" then imposed by his administration on China and the European Union. The changes made national headlines and drew negative attention, and tweets from the president. 'But even through that period and then beyond, we've always continued to have dialogue, and that's a kind of a lesson learned. I've been very clear that I believe in electric vehicles, I'm very clear about the importance of manufacturing,' Barra told WSJ editor in chief Emma Tucker. 'Having the dialogue to make sure they understand our industry — because I think we do have a shared goal of strengthening it — has been beneficial.' GM is facing costs up to $5 billion from Trump's tariffs alone, the company reported during its most recent earnings report. Barra applauded the relief stemming from the most recent executive orders signed April 29 which were 25% tariffs on all imported autos which began in April and another 25% on all auto parts set to begin by May 3. The change prevented stacking tariffs with previously announced tariffs on steel and aluminum, the costs of which Barra described as 'untenable.' GM has made a variety of production changes at plants in the United States this year, including an $888 million investment the company announced late May 27 in its New York propulsion assembly plant to produce the next generation V-8 engine, the automaker's largest ever in an engine plant. GM said April 23 that it planned to expand transmission production at its Toledo (Ohio) Propulsions Systems plant, where it builds transmissions used in the Silverado and Sierra pickup trucks. 'We're trying to make changes to pay less tariffs because we're strengthening our U.S. manufacturing,' Barra said. 'There's decisions we can make when we look at the entire equation … we have the capacity available in some of the assembly plants and engine plants that we have in this country that we're going to continue to utilize.' On April 3, Trump put a 25% tariff — the tax an importer pays on a good when it crosses international borders — on all imported vehicles. His objective was to encourage more U.S. manufacturing. Trump was set to then enact 25% tariffs on all imported parts starting May 3. Since most vehicles assembled in the United States contain a lot of imported parts, the duties on those parts would run into thousands of dollars per vehicle. Ford Motor Co. rolled out a campaign and discounts the day tariffs first kicked in, offering its employee-pricing plan, known as the A Plan, to consumers on most of Ford 2024 and 2025 model year vehicles through June 2. But executives later said prices may necessarily rise to counteract tariff costs on the company's bottom line. General Motors did not join automakers that cut costs and advertised tariff-free pricing deals, and Barra would not commit to post-tariff vehicle price changes, citing the dynamic pricing of the automotive industry even without tariffs that requires changing to stay competitive. 'I've had the opportunity to talk to the president and his administration on a regular basis, and one of the things that I'm very appreciative is they have taken the time to understand ... the dynamics of our industry,' Barra said. 'I can't speak to all the other industries that are facing tariffs, but I can tell you for decades now, it has not been a level playing field with U.S. automakers globally with either tariffs or non-tariff trade barriers.' Senior autos writer Jamie L. LaReau contributed to this report. Jackie Charniga covers General Motors for the Free Press. Reach her at jcharniga@

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store