House of Lords votes to block expulsion of hereditary peers
The amendment, put forward by shadow culture minister Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay, would abolish the aristocratic by-elections, meaning the number of hereditary peers would decrease as individuals die or retire.
There are currently 92 seats reserved for members of the Lords who are there by right of birth, but there are only 86 currently sitting.
This is because by-elections were suspended after Labour won the election last year and six hereditary peers have left the House since then by death, retirement or moving on.
Lord Parkinson argued that current sitting hereditary peers have 'served here with distinction and, in many cases, with more conspicuous industry than those who have been appointed'.
He told peers: 'I hope, through this modest amendment, we can applaud their diligence and their public service and seek to harness it for the benefit of the nation for a while longer.'
There have been numerous attempts to end the hereditary by-elections since their inception 26 years ago, including from Labour peer Lord Grocott.
Lord Parkinson said: 'The formulation he (Lord Grocott) has proposed in every parliamentary session since 2016, apart from this one, is exactly the same as the one we advance today.
'Just as with peers who proposed private bills under the last Labour government, he has found it difficult to make progress with his bills under Conservative governments.'
However, he said: 'On this, we give in… We yield to the mandate that they've won at the ballot box and take it at their word that further reform will follow.'
The Tory frontbencher concluded that, in return, he asks for 'clemency and generosity' to those hereditary peers currently sitting in the Lords to allow them to remain for the rest of their life if they wish.
Meanwhile, Lord Groccot said: 'I'm finding it difficult to compute exactly what's going on today because Friday after Friday, bill after bill, to a three-quarters empty House, I have been faced with substantial opposition, not just from individual members – not exclusively from the Tory Party, but overwhelmingly – but also from the Government, and the bill's got no further.
'And here we are now with a pretty full House all agreed that these by-elections are farcical.'
He said his motive in bringing forward his bills were to 'stop this absurdity' and lamented that 'time and time again' his bills were rejected and filibustered.
Lord Grocott said he had thought that no-one in the upper chamber could think a by-election to get into the House should be exclusively for men, or that it is feasible to have 'an electorate of three when you've got seven candidates'.
The Labour peer added: 'I'm flattered, I suppose, to find that suddenly everyone seems to be agreed on this. We could have saved ourselves so much time when I brought this in first in 2016.'
However, he said he prefers plans to expel the hereditary peers over ending the by-elections because it's 'better' and 'does the job more effectively', allowing the conversation to move on to further reform.
Lord Grocott concluded: 'Thank heavens that we are removing the hereditary principle as a mechanism for membership of this House. It's long, long, long overdue.
'It could have been dealt with much earlier, but let's not cry over spilt milk, let's just get on with this and get on with it quickly.'
Leader of the House of Lords Baroness Smith of Basildon said she is sure the Tories 'regret' not taking up her offer to ensure Lord Grocott's bill passed through the House.
She said: 'We could have done that and that opportunity was lost. It's a shame it was lost, but that's where we are now. We now are debating a manifesto commitment from the Labour Party…
'The principle of this was established 25 years ago that the hereditary principle would not be a route into this House.
'That does not decry any individual member who's arrived by that route, but the time has come to an end.'
It is expected that the House of Commons will reject this amendment to the Bill.
Before the vote, former senior diplomat Lord Kerr of Kinlochard warned that ping-pong between the two Houses would be 'poison' and 'disastrous' for the image of the Lords.
Later, peers rejected a move by the Liberal Democrats that would have forced the Government to bring forward proposals for an elected House of Lords.
The bid to secure 'a democratic mandate' for the upper chamber was defeated by 263 votes to 84, majority 179.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
31 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
DWP benefit cuts hit people with Parkinson's and MS
Labour backbencher Graeme Downie has proposed a welfare reform Bill amendment, so universal credit claimants with Parkinson's or MS (multiple sclerosis) who cannot work do not face repeated medical assessments to receive a payout. If MPs back his amendment, patients with 'evolving' needs who cannot work could also qualify for a higher rate of benefits. The Government's Bill has already cleared its first Commons hurdle at second reading, after work and pensions minister Sir Stephen Timms vowed not to restrict eligibility for the personal independence payment (Pip), with any changes coming in only after a review of the benefit. To meet his promise, ministers have had to table amendments to their own draft new law, to remove one of its seven clauses, which MPs will debate next Wednesday. Universal credit claimants with Parkinson's 'are already possibly struggling financially', Mr Downie said, ahead of the debate. He added: 'The cost of living with a condition like Parkinson's can be very high. You may well require or need additional support.' Today the UK government published its Bill that will cut eligibility criteria for, and access to, Personal Independence Payments (PIP). Here is our response 👇 🧵1/3 — Parkinson's UK (@ParkinsonsUK) June 18, 2025 The Dunfermline and Dollar MP said patients who struggle with their motor control might buy pre-chopped vegetables or chicken. 'Those things are expensive, so if you're already on universal credit and you're struggling, being able to do that significantly impacts your health, it significantly impacts your ability to live properly,' he continued. To qualify, claimants must have limited capability for work or work-related activity (LCWRA) and symptoms which 'constantly' apply. 🚨 Reminder: cuts to disability benefits affect everyone. You might not need disability benefits today. Or tomorrow. But you can become disabled at any time and find yourself in need of a financial safety net. — Scope (@scope) July 3, 2025 Mr Downie's amendment would expand these criteria to claimants with 'a fluctuating condition'. It would cover 'conditions like Parkinson's but also multiple sclerosis, ME (myalgic encephalomyelitis), long Covid and a whole range of other conditions where, you know, in the morning things could be really good and in the afternoon things could be really bad, and even hour by hour things could change', he said. 'I felt it was necessary to table an amendment to really probe what the Government's position is on this, and ensuring that people with Parkinson's and conditions like that are not excluded from even applying and being considered.' Mr Downie's proposal has backing from 23 cross-party MPs so far. Recommended reading: Juliet Tizzard, external relations director at Parkinson's UK, said: 'Criteria in the Bill say that a new claimant for the universal credit health payment will have to be 'constantly' unable to perform certain activities to qualify. 'This doesn't work for people with Parkinson's, whose symptoms change throughout the day. 'People with Parkinson's and other fluctuating conditions like multiple sclerosis will be effectively excluded from getting all the financial support they need. 'The Government has responded to our call and withdrawn the damaging restrictions to Pip. 'Now, they must do the same with the universal credit health element. The health of many people with Parkinson's is in their hands.'
STV News
an hour ago
- STV News
SNP attacks ‘disastrous' year of Starmer ‘U-turns, scandals and failure'
Sir Keir Starmer has been accused of presiding over a 'litany of broken promises, U-turns, scandals, and failures' since becoming Prime Minister. Marking the first anniversary of Labour's landslide general election victory, the SNP said the UK Government's record has been 'disastrous'. SNP Westminster leader Stephen Flynn pointed to Labour U-turns on the winter fuel payment and welfare cuts while criticising the Prime Minister's record on the economy. Labour won an overwhelming majority on July 4, 2024 but polling shows Starmer's ratings have since fallen dramatically, while a number of surveys now put Reform UK ahead of the party in Scotland. PA Media SNP Westminster leader Stephen Flynn attacked Labour's record on its first anniversary in Government (James Manning/PA). Flynn said: 'Keir Starmer's first year in office speaks for itself – a litany of broken promises, U-turns, scandals, and failures on the economy that have removed optimism from a public who were so desperate for change. 'Voters were promised a new direction but instead they got more of the same Westminster cuts and failure. 'Families and small businesses hammered by tax hikes, and soaring bills – with millions of people feeling worse off whilst being lectured that things are getting better. 'The UK economy has been downgraded, public finances have deteriorated, unemployment is up, poverty is at record levels and the cost of food, energy and household bills have risen by hundreds of pounds on Keir Starmer's watch. 'When people look back on the Labour Party's year in office they will remember the cuts to disabled people and pensioners' winter fuel payments, the betrayal of Waspi women and children in poverty, rising energy bills and food prices, and a Prime Minister who took thousands of pounds of designer clothes and freebies while imposing austerity cuts on the rest of us.' PA Media Tory MSP Rachael Hamilton said Keir Starmer is 'hopelessly out of his depth' (Andrew Milligan/PA). The Scottish Conservatives said the Prime Minister's first year has been 'catastrophic' as the party accused the Labour leader of 'betraying' its voters. Deputy leader Rachael Hamilton said Scotland 'can't afford another four years of a Prime Minister who is hopelessly out of his depth'. She said: 'Keir Starmer's first year in office has been a catastrophic series of broken promises and U-turns that people up and down the country are paying for. 'Labour's jobs tax and family farm tax have been utterly devastating for the careers, pay packets and bills of ordinary people. 'Their hostility to North Sea oil and gas is not just crushing livelihoods and communities across the North East, it's leading to higher fuel bills for everyone by making us more reliant on foreign imports. 'Ending universal winter fuel payments for pensioners was another broken election pledge and a betrayal of some of our most vulnerable people, one which the SNP shamefully copied in Scotland. 'Starmer has betrayed all those who voted for him by breaking his vow not to raise taxes – and he'll have to hike them again in the autumn after his humiliating surrender to Labour MPs on welfare reform.' PA Media Secretary of State for Scotland Ian Murray said Labour has already made life better for millions of Scots (Andrew Milligan/PA). But Scottish Secretary Ian Murray said millions of Scots are now better of since Labour came to power. He pointed to rises to the minimum wage worth up to £1,400 a year to low-paid Scots, the introduction of the right to sick and parental leave from day one of a job, and the extension of fuel duty cuts for drivers. Murray said the UK Government had given Holyrood a record settlement of £50bn, with at least £14bn in extra funding by 2029 when compared to Tory spending plans. He said: 'This time last year the Scottish people decided to stop sending a message to Westminster and sent a government instead – and every day since then Scottish Labour MPs have been at the heart of a Labour Government delivering a better deal for Scotland. 'After the Tories crashed the economy Labour got the public finances back on a secure footing and the result of that stability was four interest rate cuts in a row meaning cheaper mortgages for many Scots. 'The minimum wage got a record boost and stronger rights means Scots have more security at work. 'The UK Labour Government comprehensively ended austerity with billions of pounds more for public services in Scotland. 'But as waiting lists fall in England where Labour have taken control of the health service, the NHS in Scotland remains under SNP mismanagement, with one in six Scots on an NHS waiting list, people paying to go private because they can't wait anymore and cancer waiting times at their worst ever level. 'Scots can't risk a third decade of SNP mismanagement of our public services. That's why next May Scots should boot John Swinney out of office and chart a new direction, with Anas Sarwar as First Minister and a Scottish Labour government.' Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
Scottish Sun
2 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Brits brace for tax HIKES after week of Commons chaos – as Reeves faces ‘perfect storm' of Budget misery
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) BRITS brace higher taxes this autumn after Rachel Reeves warned Labour's welfare U-turns will come at a 'cost' - with experts saying the bill could hit £40 billion. The Chancellor yesterday opened the door to painful tax hikes after a week of Labour chaos, which saw her break down in the Commons and lose control of key spending plans. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 3 Chancellor Rachel Reeves Credit: Getty 3 Sir Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves share an awkward hug at the launch of the NHS 10-year plan Credit: Not known, clear with picture desk 3 The Chancellor was seen crying at PMQs sitting on the frontbencher next to Sir Keir Starmer Credit: PA In her first public comments since the dramatic scenes in Parliament, Ms Reeves admitted the Government's retreat on welfare cuts has blown a multi-billion-pound hole in the public finances — and taxpayers will be left to fill the gap. Pressed on whether she would raise taxes, she said: 'Of course there is a cost to the welfare changes that parliament voted through this week and that will be reflected in the budget. 'But I'm also very, very clear that [the] stability that we've been able to return to the economy, which has enabled the Bank of England to cut interests rates four times, is only possible because of the fiscal discipline which is underpinned by the fiscal rules. "And we'll be sticking to those because they're absolutely vital for the living standards of working people and also the costs that businesses face.' 'Of course there is a cost to the welfare changes that parliament voted through this week and that will be reflected in the Budget." The Chancellor's stark warning piles fresh pressure on families and businesses already battling high taxes and rising costs — and marks a sharp reversal from her pledge not to come back "with more borrowing or more taxes" after last year's Budget. Economists say the fallout could force Ms Reeves to announce at least £10 billion in tax rises this autumn - and possibly up to £40 billion - to stop the government breaking its own fiscal rules. Ben Zaranko, senior economist at the Institute for Fiscal Studies, warned: "It's not hard to imagine a world where they are of a ballpark similar scale to last autumn. "If you have the perfect storm of economic forecasts being downgraded, additional spending commitments because these reforms haven't got through parliament and the world is in a gloomier place generally, you could comfortably be into double figures billions even before you talk about any retail offers. "A £20, £30, £40billion budget is not what the government would want but it's not impossible by any means." It comes after Labour MPs forced the Chancellor into scrapping welfare reforms, including planned cuts to Personal Independence Payments, which alone will cost £5 billion. Ms Reeves also axed changes to winter fuel payments at a further £1.25 billion — while the threat of abolishing the two-child benefit cap looms large, piling extra pressure on the public finances. Allies of Ms Reeves believe Labour rebels must now 'own' the consequences of their revolt. The Chancellor broke her silence yesterday, insisting she was 'cracking on with the job' after wiping away tears next to the PM in the Commons. She told broadcasters: 'Clearly I was upset yesterday and everyone could see that. It was a personal issue and I'm not going to go into the details of that. 'My job as Chancellor at 12 o'clock on a Wednesday is to be at PMQs next to the Prime Minister, supporting the government, and that's what I tried to do. 'I guess the thing that maybe is a bit different between my job and many of your viewers' is that when I'm having a tough day it's on the telly and most people don't have to deal with that.' The markets were rattled by the Chancellor's Commons appearance, with the cost of government borrowing spiking amid speculation she could be sacked — but the PM later insisted she is going nowhere. The PM also claimed he hadn't noticed Ms Reeves crying, saying: 'I'm literally up and down, looking at who's asking me a question, thinking about my response and getting up and answering it. No Prime Minister ever has side conversations during PMQs.'
