Warrant against senior HSVP officials for delay in land compensation
Gurgaon: A city court on Tuesday directed police to issue a bailable warrant against Haryana Shehri Vikas Pradhikaran (HSVP) and its chief administrator after it failed to pay compensation to a landowner "for years despite a court order".
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
An HSVP official, when contacted by TOI, said it will analyse the order and take "appropriate action after obtaining legal opinion".
Additional district judge Jagdeep Singh passed the order on an execution petition filed by Nav Rattan Singh through his counsel Jagjeet Singh. Warrants were issued when HSVP repeatedly failed to pay the amount of the enhanced compensation of the acquired land, which was increased by Punjab and Haryana high court in 2017.
The court — while passing the order due to payment delay in a case where Pradhikaran had acquired land — directed DCP (HQ) to execute the bailable order, failing which action would be initiated against the official.
The court order said DCP (headquarters) shall ensure the execution of bailable warrants, failing which the officer shall have to appear in person on the next date of hearing to explain the reasons for non-execution of the warrant.
"This court is left with no other option except to issue bailable warrants in the sum of Rs 10,000 each against the HSVP (Gurgaon) administrator and its chief administrator to be executed through the office of DCP (headquarters) before July 28," the order said.
The court said a perusal of the record would reveal that the present execution petition was preferred way back in 2019 and to date, HSVP has not paid the compensation amount to the landowner.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
Jagmeet Singh, counsel for the petitioner, said the govt should devise a fair and transparent mechanism so that landowners are paid compensation in a timely manner. He said, "People oppose the acquisition of their land because they are not paid just and proper compensation within the prescribed time."
Around half an acre of land belonging to Nav Rattan Singh, situated in the village of Daultabad (Gurgaon), was acquired for the construction of a master storm drain in 1998. However, the amount of enhanced compensation was not paid to the landowner by HSVP. Due to this, landowner Singh filed an execution petition before the district judge (Gurgaon) in 2019. Even after nearly six years of filing the execution petition, HSVP did not pay the amount.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Under rule of law, litigant asimportant as bar, bench: CM
Lucknow: Chief Minister on Saturday said that under the rule of law, a litigant is as important as the bar and the bench. Speaking at the inauguration of the advocate chambers and a parking building on the Allahabad high court premises, the CM recalled a programme addressed by Prime Minister Narendra Modi in 2017 where he emphasised that the first condition of good governance is the rule of law. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The inauguration of the new projects, constructed at a cost of Rs 680 crore, took place in the presence of Chief Justice of India Justice BR Gavai. "Advocates strive for justice even though their working conditions are highly difficult. Many have to operate from broken chambers and even while sitting under trees," Yogi said. "Today is the 300th birth anniversary of Lokmata Ahilyabai Holkar. This is also the Amrit Mahotsav year of the implementation of the Constitution of India. The arrangements made at the court are excellent. Along with multi-level parking, the facility also includes advocate chambers, a cafeteria, a modern kitchen, and conference amenities. This can serve as a new model for infrastructure development," the CM said, adding that funds required for expansion work would be made available soon. He also advocated for putting the multilevel car park to commercial use, citing the example of a multilevel parking in Gorakhpur, built six years ago, which initially failed as its usage was very low. "I suggested that the top two floors be converted into commercial spaces. As soon as this was implemented, the entire complex started getting fully occupied. People who earlier used to park their vehicles on the streets now park inside the complex and enjoy the facilities," he said. Yogi said that when he took over as CM in 2017, at least 10 districts in UP did not have district courts. There were times when either the chief justice or the state govt did not approve the proposed designs. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now "Eventually, the govt instructed executing agencies to create a model that could serve as a standard where, along with integrated court complexes, provisions for parking and advocate chambers are included. Of the proposals we submitted, approvals have been received for seven districts from here, and Rs 1,700 crore has already been released. The court cases for remaining three districts have also been resolved, and we will provide them with similar facilities in respective districts," the CM said. Speaking about the integrated court complex, the CM said that once in place, it would provide litigants with access to all judicial services under one roof, including chambers and parking for advocates, as well as housing facilities for judicial officers. He also spoke about the initiatives taken by the govt for advocates, underlining the increase in Advocate Fund from Rs 1.5 lakh to Rs 5 lakh, and the age limit from 60 to 70 years. "A separate corpus fund of Rs 500 crore has also been established which will be used in cases such as an accident involving an advocate. The trustee committee will utilise this fund to support the affected family," he said. He hailed the role of the Allahabad high court in managing the Prayagraj Maha Kumbh, which was attended by over 66 crore people. "If everyone fulfils responsibilities in line with the spirit of the Constitution envisioned by Babasaheb BR Ambedkar, meaningful results can be achieved," he said.
The Hindu
3 hours ago
- The Hindu
Watch: Mumbai Monsoon Chaos: Aaditya Thackeray on BMC Crisis & Metro Failures
With an annual budget of over Rs 74,000 Crore, the BMC is the richest municipal corporation in the country. But pending municipal elections, it is being governed by an administrator for the last three years. No public representatives, no accountability. In these three years, the Fds have dipped by Rs 10,000 Crore, from Rs 92,000 Crore to Rs 82,000 Crore. The current liabilities stand at a record high of nearly Rs 2 Lakh Crore. While all major cities across the world face issues with heavy rainfall, what Mumbai saw this time was a breakdown of systems which are supposed to stand up to much worse. Roads caved in though the corporation spends crores on their upkeep every year. The newly opened Aqualine of the Mumbai Metro, built at a cost of Rs 37,000 Crore, couldn't keep up with the first spell of monsoon either. In a dug up city, hospitals were flooded, newer acute flooding spots emerged. Even the State Secretariat saw water logging. Is this due to the breakdown of democratic processes? To talk about all this and more - from the Mumbai floods and the erosion of democratic processes, to the BJP's allegations, and from Adani corporation to the Bullet train project – We have with us Shiv Sena UBT leader Aaditya Thackeray.
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
SC declines to interfere with HC order on compensation to OJS examinee
Cuttack: The Supreme Court on Friday declined to interfere with the Orissa high court's direction to Odisha Public Service Commission (OPSC) to pay Rs 1 lakh compensation for procedural lapses that resulted in non-evaluation of an answer of a candidate who appeared for the Odisha Judicial Service (Main) Examination. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Jyotirmayee Dutta appeared for the OJS Main Exam 2022, results of which were declared Dec 4, 2023. She failed to qualify for the next stage by a narrow margin of five marks. Acting on Jyotirmayee's petition, the HC directed OPSC to pay the compensationto her within 60 days on Feb 13 this year. But OPSC had filed a special leave petition (SLP) in SC challenging the HC order. While dismissing the SLP, the bench of Justices Surya Kant, Dipankar Datta and Bijay Bishnoi said, "Having regard to the peculiar facts and circumstances of this case, we are not inclined to interfere with the cost amount awarded by the high court in favour of the respondent — a young law graduate, who is aspiring to become a judicial officer." However, the bench added, "The observations made in the impugned judgment are only in the context of the mistake detected in evaluation of one of the answers written by the respondent and the same are not to be treated as a precedent to be applied in future cases." According to case records, Jyotirmayee filed a petition in HC on Aug 27, 2024 alleging that a question in the 'law of property' paper was left unevaluated, and its marks were not added to the total. She asserted that if her answers had been properly scrutinised, the outcome of the examination would have been different, and she would have qualified for the next stage. Acting on it, the HC arranged for her answer script to be independently assessed by experts from three reputed universities. Though non-evaluation of a question was confirmed and marks were awarded for it, the petitioner did not achieve the necessary marks to pass the exam. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Accordingly, the HC dismissed the petition on Feb 13, but ordered, "However, considering the mental trauma and financial burden the petitioner has endured in pursuing this case to highlight the said lapse, this court deems it appropriate to award compensation of Rs 1 lakh to the petitioner, which shall be paid by the OPSC within a period of 60 days from the date of this judgment."
