The moments from Erin Patterson's evidence that didn't make headlines
A lawyer for the defence or prosecution gets the chance to ask questions of the other side's witness, to test the evidence they have given to the court.
It was a principle crown prosecutor Nanette Rogers SC was quick to highlight to accused killer Erin Patterson this week, as they locked horns over evidence drawn from a computer in Ms Patterson's home.
Dr Rogers had put to Ms Patterson that she'd used her computer in May 2022 to visit iNaturalist website pages containing information about death cap mushrooms.
The court was shown a log of individual URL visits prosecutors said were made on Ms Patterson's PC over a period of time.
Dr Rogers's questioning turned to the "visit count" recorded in the log for one particular URL.
Dr Rogers: You had visited this URL once before on this device, correct?
Ms Patterson: Yes, correct, and I believe it was two seconds earlier.
Dr Rogers: I suggest you're wrong about that; correct or incorrect?
Ms Patterson: Ah, I'm correct.
A short time later, the prosecutor indicated she would move on from the exhibit of URLs visited by the PC.
Dr Rogers: Now I'm moving on to a different topic.
Ms Patterson: Before you do, Dr Rogers, within this record is that second [website] visit … that I was talking about, 7:23:16, 7:23:18.
Dr Rogers: Ms Patterson, I am the person who asks the questions. If there's something that needs to be clarified in re-examination, then your barrister will do so.
Ms Patterson: No problem.
In her evidence, Ms Patterson also told Dr Rogers she did not recall if it was her who was operating the computer when it visited the page.
"Somebody did, and that somebody could have been me," she told the prosecutor.
The exchange was not the only one where Ms Patterson pointed out details she believed to be incorrect.
One example was when she was given a date in 2023 with the incorrect day of the week:
Dr Rogers: [Mobile phone tower expert Matthew Sorrell's] evidence was: "On Monday, 28th of April 2023, the mobile service records for you indicate a possible visit to the Loch township."
Ms Patterson: I'm really sorry, Dr Rogers, could you just repeat the date? ... I just lost focus.
Dr Rogers: On Monday, 28 April … his evidence was: "The mobile service records for you indicate a possible visit to the Loch township."
Ms Patterson: I don't mean to be argumentative, but I think the 28th of April was a Friday. The only reason I remember that, is [my daughter] had two ballets on the 29th and 30th of April and they were that weekend.
Dr Rogers: Ok, I'll change it
Ms Patterson: Ok.
It was an exchange Dr Rogers did not forget, referencing it later that day as she sought to inject a moment of levity into the hours-long examination.
Dr Rogers: I better check with you. Monday, 22 May, it's a Monday?
Ms Patterson: I don't know about that one.
Dr Rogers: It's a joke. It's a joke. I take out the 'Monday'.
Throughout her cross-examination, Ms Patterson was focused on Dr Rogers, blinking rapidly and speaking with a level voice as she rejected the suggestion her actions after the lunch were those of a guilty woman covering her tracks.
She repeatedly denied to the Supreme Court jury that she was guilty of the murder of three in-laws and the attempted murder of a fourth.
She rotated through outfits which have been widely described in media reports and sketches: a paisley-coloured top, a dark-coloured top with white polka dots and a pink shirt.
The 50-year-old kept her glasses in her hands during her hours on the stand, so they were ready if she was taken to one of the many trial exhibits on the computer monitor before her.
Her questioner, Dr Rogers, kept a brisk pace as she sought to make the most of the opportunity to ask questions of the accused.
At times, responses became more personal as Dr Rogers suggested the evidence of Ms Patterson strained credibility.
When questioning turned to the Monday after the Saturday lunch, Ms Patterson was asked about her movements after she discharged herself from Leongatha Hospital against medical advice.
The court heard she arrived about 8am that day but left about 10 minutes later, before returning after a roughly 90-minute absence.
Ms Patterson told the jury she had needed that time to see to things like putting the lambs away to protect them from foxes and packing her daughter's ballet bag, before she could be admitted to hospital for full treatment.
She told the court this week that after returning home she also laid down "for a while".
Dr Rogers: How long did you lie down for?
Ms Patterson: I don't know.
Dr Rogers: That's untrue, isn't it? … It's untrue that you lay down?
Ms Patterson: No.
Dr Rogers: Surely that's the last thing you would do in these circumstances?
Ms Patterson: It might be the last thing you'd do, but it was something I did.
Dr Rogers: After you'd been told by medical staff that you had potentially ingested a life-threatening poison, isn't it the last thing that you would do, is to lie down in those circumstances?
Ms Patterson: They didn't tell me it was life-threatening.
By any measure, Ms Patterson's time in the witness box was a lengthy one, stretching over eight days of hearings.
And in a case where the complex brief of evidence has ranged from computer and mobile phone data to the science of differentiating fungi, moments have often been needed by all of the parties conducting the trial to double-check the facts on record.
But by the end of the week, the time for questioning Ms Patterson was over, and the evidence phase of the trial drew to a close.
Now the prosecution and defence will trawl through the hours of transcripts and reams of documents as they prepare to deliver their final arguments in one of Australia's most closely watched trials in years.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
44 minutes ago
- News.com.au
British and Irish Lions hooker Dan Sheehan cited for hit on Wallabies flyhalf Tom Lynagh
British and Irish Lions hooker Dan Sheehan has been cited for foul play over an incident in Saturday's third Test against Australia that left Wallabies' flyhalf Tom Lynagh knocked out. The incident was briefly looked at by the match officials just before halftime but Sheehan initially escaped punishment even though replays showed he entered a ruck at speed and appeared to make dangerous contact with Lynagh's head. The Australian playmaker was taken from the field to undergo a head injury assessment, which he failed, preventing him from rejoining the match, which the Wallabies won 22-12. Sheehan's actions at the ruck were hotly debated on social media, with many incredulous that he was let off as Australian supporters argued he should have been given an instant red card. PREMIUM RUGBY CONTENT An independent reviewer later looked back at the incident and World Rugby subsequently released a statement in the early hours of Sunday morning announcing Sheehan had been cited and would face an expedited hearing later that day. 'British & Irish Lions player Dan Sheehan will have a citing complaint reviewed by an independent Foul Play Review Committee (FPRC) after being cited by the independent citing commissioner Adrien Menez for an act of foul play contrary to Law 9.20 (a) (a player must not charge into a ruck or maul …) in the Australia v British & Irish Lions third test in Sydney on Saturday, 2 August,' World Rugby said in the statement. Asked about the incident after the match, Lions coach Andy Farrell said he couldn't comment because he hadn't looked at it yet. 'There are all sorts of rugby incidents that we can pull apart. I've seen quite a few more incidents as well,' he said. 'We'll always go through the right channels when that's concerned.' Wallabies coach Joe Schmidt was also tight-lipped after launching a blistering attack on the way officials deal with head knocks from collisions at rucks after the Television Match Official failed to penalise the Lions over another contentious clean-out that would have ruled out their series-winning try in the second Test in Melbourne. But Schmidt was biting his tongue this time when asked about the hit on Lynagh, the talented young son of Wallabies great Michael Lynagh. 'In live, we didn't see Tom's incident, and it was probably a little bit later that we got a glimpse of it, and that's all I've seen so far,' Schmidt said. 'So I'd rather not comment on it until I've seen it. But … You know, there's always a difficulty for a TMO, I guess. He's watching the main TV broadcast, and then if he doesn't pick it up there, then he doesn't' access the other angles because everything's happening so quickly.' Schmidt did say that he didn't think there was any malice from the Irish hooker and also that he had checked in on Lynagh's health to ensure he was OK 'I've got massive respect for Dan,' Schmidt said. 'There's a few things like that that will happen in a really physical contest. 'For us with Tom, he is still a young kid and we'll try to look after him and make sure that he's fully fit on the back of getting that knock. But I had a good chat to him after the game and he's pretty resilient.'
News.com.au
2 hours ago
- News.com.au
DNA appeal for relatives of five 1948 NSW missing fishermen
NSW police believe five families could hold the key to the 80-year-old mystery of two fishing boats lost at the sea on the same day after being hit by ferocious weather. Despite extensive searches of the NSW coastline in the days and weeks following the separate catastrophes on May 15, 1948, neither the 'Joyce' nor 'Syd' vessels or anyone on board either of them, has ever been seen again. The Joyce departed from Woy Woy carrying seven work colleagues from the Nielsen Slipper Factory. Missing are Norman Eric Lester, 21, Brian Morris Parsons, 56, Robert Hayes, 30, Peter Proudfoot, 24, Berty Cyril law, 37, Norman John Tolley, 25 and Arthur Bowyer, 41. The 'Syd' was carrying four people – three men and a boy - when it set off from Patonga. Missing are Hugh Murray, 41, Cecil Aubrey Murray, 43, Neville Walters, 35, and Brian Murray, 14. Police investigating the disappearances hoped they'd had a breakthrough in May 2020, when a human jawbone was found on Umina Beach. Detectives have since discovered the jawbone belonged to Henry Coleman, who died aged 17 following an accidental drowning in August 1980. But police remain hopeful DNA will one day bring closure to all the families who lost someone that day. To date, six relatives of the fisherman have provided their DNA to police, and now – seventy-seven years on – police are appealing for the relatives of Neville Walters, Norman Eric Lester, Brian Morris Parsons, Robert Hayes and Peter Proudfoot to come forward and provide a DNA sample. Missing Persons Registry Manager, Detective Inspector Paul Fenwick, said DNA samples collected could assist in identifying the remains of those lost at sea. 'There are currently 352 unidentified bodies and human remains located in different areas throughout New South Wales,' detective Fenwick said as Missing Persons Week commences. 'DNA samples from the families of these missing fishermen will be compared against those remains and stored securely for future reference. 'Even after all these years, we continue to recover remains along the coastline. That DNA will continue to be tested against these discoveries. 'This is not just about solving a case. It's about recognising the lives lost and giving families the answers after nearly 80 years. 'We're appealing to anyone who may be related to these men – even distantly – to come forward and provide a DNA sample.' Marine Area Commander, Superintendent Joseph McNulty, said any evidence recovered from the sea is a chance to come full circle. 'When remains are found along our coastline, having DNA from family members on file gives us a chance to connect the past with the present – and possibly bring someone home,' Det Supt McNulty said. 'While the circumstances surrounding the disappearance of the 'Joyce' and the 'Syd' remain unknown, we know the ocean can conceal evidence for many years. 'When remains are recovered, having DNA from family members already on file allows us to act quickly and accurately in identifying them. It's a vital step in helping police bring closure to long-standing cases.' In 2006 Bruce Richards told Newscorp how he was just 16 when he joined the search for the Joyce. He was an apprentice shoemaker at the Nielsen factory. 'I remember every single one of them,' Mr Richards said of the missing men. The men had all worked together at the factory which was in the original Bayview Hotel in Railway St built in 1907 and later converted into a factory. 'I remember the day they had got together in the making room and arranged the fishing trip and where they would meet,' Mr Richards said. 'Their disappearance was a tragic day for the Woy Woy township which was very small then.' The town people rallied to raise money for a monument to honour the memory of the missing fishermen, originally erected outside the factory in Railway St and later moved to the Koolewong waterfront where it was neglected and vandalised. Today the restored monument is at Point Clare Cemetery. Mr Bowyer's son Arthur Bowyer Jnr told this week answers to the mystery he wanted for his daughter. 'I was only a kid so I didn't understand what was going on,' he said. 'My dad got a job at the slipper factory at Woy Woy because there was a drought on and we had to move from our sheep property out near Bourke,' he said. 'I remember my mother crying a lot when my father disappeared, but when you're a kid you just don't understand. 'I've gotten too far in life but for my daughter, answers would mean a lot.' Missing Persons Week is an annual national campaign that runs until Sunday.
News.com.au
3 hours ago
- News.com.au
Ex-police station with a backyard jail cell sells for $1m+
A former cop shop in Melbourne's south east featuring a backyard jail cell locked in a seven-figure sale yesterday. The ex-police station at 1082 Nepean Highway, Highett, now a five-bedroom home, proved to be hot property when it sold for $1.115m under the hammer. Ray White Carnegie director Tom Grieve declined to comment on the sales price but the Herald Sun attended the auction. Mr Grieve said police enthusiasts and history buffs were among the auction crowd. 'Somebody who came to watch the auction actually wanted to buy the door of the jail cell which is quite cool, it's quite heavy with all the bolts and latches,' Mr Grieve said. The house's buyers, Jess and her partner, said they were hoping to renovate the abode and potentially rent it out down the track. 'At the moment we are keen to get in and get the carpet up,' Jess said. 'Who knows what we will find, I am excited to see what it's going to bring.' She said they would likely retain the old jail cell as a storage space. The couple have previously renovated their first home, finding 1940s-era newspapers and milk bottle slips in the process. The Highett residence was listed with $1.2m-$1.3m asking range. In the city's east, one of Saturday's priciest sales was a circa-1892 house at 37 Mayston St, Hawthorn East, which changed hands for $3.831m. Jellis Craig Boroondara's Mark Salvati said the 'firecracker' auction kicked off with a $3.5m bid. 'There were two bidders and it was like ping pong between the two of them,' Mr Salvati said. He noted this his agency's Melbourne branches had been seeing high clearance rates in recent weeks. According to PropTrack, Victoria recorded a preliminary 66.6 per cent clearance rate from 410 early auction results this week. A total 795 homes across the state are slated to go under the hammer next week. Ray White Victoria's chief auctioneer Jeremy Tyrell with the Reserve Bank set to meet on Monday and Tuesday, a potential rate cut 'could really see the dam walls of supply burst open'. 'Buyer confidence during the week was very strong as competition ramped up with buyers keen to get in ahead of the market before any further rate drops,' Mr Tyrell added. 'As the real estate market begins to see positive growth across the state and in the capital, the stage is set for a big spring selling season.'
