Take a Look Inside Lemaire's First China Boutique in Chengdu
Lemaire's first boutique in China, located in Chengdu's Taikoo Li district, is a masterful blend of tranquility and cultural heritage. Designed byF.O.G. Architecture, this 140-square-meter space opts for a recessed façade that creates a buffer zone between the bustling shopping center and the serene interior. This entryway, adorned with movable potted plants housed in traditional Sichuan sauce jars, echoes the under-eaves spaces of classical Chinese architecture, offering visitors a ritualistic passage into the store's immersive environment.
Materiality plays a central role in the store's design, with local bamboo serving as a recurring motif throughout the space. From bamboo flooring and curtains to stone textures that mimic woven bamboo, the design balances authenticity and abstraction in its architectural narrative. Traditional Sichuan crafts are thoughtfully integrated, showcasing collaborative efforts between the architects, local artists and regional artisans. Examples include Yi-made Cha'erwa wool shawls that are repurposed as curtain panels and woven Cizhu bamboo door handles. This fusion of local craftsmanship and global aesthetics ensures the boutique remains contextually authentic while aligning with Lemaire's minimalist design philosophy.
Moroccan Bejmat tiles, a distinctive signature element frequently used by Lemaire, are incorporated into the design, referencing the subtle greyscale tones found in traditional Chinese masonry. This choice further enhances the boutique's harmonious interplay of diverse materials. Architectural details within the space also derive inspiration from local historical structures. For instance, baseboards are reimagined from the wooden thresholds of the Du Fu Thatched Cottage, transforming them into soft and fluid transitions between different surfaces.
The store's serene atmosphere is reinforced by its thoughtful spatial organization, which subtly integrates technical ingenuity into its design. Vertical boards are discreetly embedded within door frames, while gaps left on both sides of the threshold imply their presence without disrupting the visual flow. The extended lintel above the entrance doubles as a wooden hanging bar, elegantly displaying apparel while maintaining the boutique's understated aesthetic.
Lemaire ChengduBoutique 1342, 1/F Building 18, Taikoo Li ChengduNo. 8 Zhongshamao Street, Jinjiang DistrictChengdu, Sichuan, China 610021
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
21 minutes ago
- The Hill
From aid to trade: Recalibrating US strategy for global prosperity
The dissolution of the U.S. Agency for International Development marks a seismic realignment in America's approach to global development — shifting emphasis from traditional aid models to a greater focus on commercial partnerships grounded in mutual economic interest. Developing nations have long called for closer U.S. trade ties and greater investment in infrastructure. Last month, President Trump made the pivot explicit during a meeting with five West African presidents: 'We're shifting from aid to trade.' The need for stronger economic engagement is urgent. China now accounts for four times as much trade with Africa as the U.S. While China has been building industrial zones, a large amount of America's past approach has been relying on inflexible five-year plans and virtue-signaling grants. I experienced this contrast firsthand. In 2016, I founded Lori Systems, a logistics tech company in Africa. We were once offered a grant from a Western development finance institution, on the condition that half of our truck drivers be women. This condition made no sense, though. Less than 1 percent of truck drivers in their own country were women, to say nothing of the countries where we were working. In contrast, Chinese investors who approached us asked us how an investment could accelerate their nation's infrastructure goals. They focused on tangible outcomes, not performative ones. U.S. foreign assistance has saved many lives and contributed to the stabilization of fragile states, but over time it became mired in bureaucracy and stagnation. The world has changed — and so must the nation's approach. As researcher Efosa Ojomo shows, prosperity stems from treating nations as commercial partners, not charity cases. This will unlock trade, stronger institutions and sustained growth. Trump is pushing for a much needed forward-looking reengagement — an evolution that aligns U.S. strategic interests with emerging market economic outcomes. That means: Engaging countries as partners, not dependents; with skin in the game and measurable outcomes. Backing U.S. businesses to win on the global stage. Investing in strategic infrastructure that drives economic stability such as power, ports, fiber and cloud infrastructure aligned with U.S. interests. Preserving high-impact programs like the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief and the President's Malaria Initiative, which have delivered unmatched, life-saving results and global health stability. This approach isn't charity — it's smart foreign policy. Vietnam shows how trade can help lift nations while serving U.S. interests. In 1995, nearly all Vietnamese lived in poverty and exports totaled only $5 billion. Over the next three decades, exports climbed to $400 billion, extreme poverty was reduced to almost zero, and two-way trade with the U.S. reached $113 billion — providing strong diversification to American supply chains. As President Nguema of Gabon said last month, 'We are not poor countries. We are rich countries when it comes to raw materials, but we need partners to support us and help us develop those resources with win-win partnerships.' He welcomed the revised U.S. leadership doctrine but warned that in America's absence 'other countries might come instead of you.' The old system frustrated many American taxpayers and disillusioned partner nations. A modern, pro-growth model is not only more respectful but also potentially more effective if done right. Now is the moment the nation can shift from a dynamic of donors and recipients to one of partners pursuing shared interests. America's private sector, one of history's greatest engines of value creation, has the opportunity to drive lasting development across emerging markets and the world. Joshua Sandler is the CEO of Truegov, a GovTech company. He previously built venture-backed businesses across Africa and advised governments on infrastructure, trade, tax policy and economic development.
Epoch Times
23 minutes ago
- Epoch Times
US Adds Steel, Copper, Lithium to High-Priority List Under Uyghur Forced Labor Law
The United States will add steel, copper, lithium, and two other products to its import restriction list under the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA), the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) announced on Aug. 19. DHS said it was also adding caustic soda and red dates to its high-priority list for enforcing the UFLPA, which bans the import of products made with forced labor in China's Xinjiang region, where the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has been committing human rights abuses against Uyghurs and other ethnic minorities, according to human rights groups and lawmakers. 'The use of slave labor is repulsive and we will hold Chinese companies accountable for abuses and eliminate threats its forced labor practices pose to our prosperity,' DHS Secretary Kristi Noem said in a statement. To date, there are 144 entities listed on the UFLPA Entity List that have been accused of using forced labor of Uyghurs and other ethnic minorities in the Xinjiang region, according to the statement. DHS stated that as of Aug. 1, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) had blocked more than 16,700 imports valued at nearly $3.7 billion to examine whether they are prohibited under the UFLPA, of which more than 10,000 shipments were denied entry. 'America has a moral, economic, and national security duty to eradicate threats that endanger our nation's prosperity, including unfair trade practices that disadvantage the American people and stifle our economic growth,' Noem stated. 'The Trump administration is taking action.' The department also released its update to the UFLPA enforcement strategy, underscoring the Trump administration's efforts to block the entry of Chinese goods made with forced labor into the United States. According to the strategy report, the Forced Labor Enforcement Task Force listed high-priority sectors to provide importers with transparency and allow businesses to scrutinize supply chains involving products in those sectors. 'Ending forced labor is an economic and national security imperative for the United States,' Christopher Pratt, senior DHS official performing the duties of the undersecretary for strategy, policy, and plans, stated in the report. Pratt said that cracking down on imports made with forced labor helps protect compliant U.S. and international manufacturers from 'unfair competition' while also promoting American businesses and industries. Under the UFLPA, businesses are banned from importing products produced wholly or in part in Xinjiang, unless they can provide 'clear and convincing evidence' that no forced labor was used in producing the imported goods, according to the DHS website. The United States has described the detention of more than 1 million Uyghur and other Muslim minorities in Xinjiang as a genocide, and both the first Trump administration and the Biden administration have imposed sanctions on Chinese officials for suppression in Xinjiang. In March, the State Department imposed visa restrictions on current and former Thai officials involved in the deportation of 40 Uyghurs from Thailand to China on Feb. 27.
Chicago Tribune
an hour ago
- Chicago Tribune
President Donald Trump thinks owning a piece of Intel would be a good deal for the US. Here's what to know
SAN FRANCISCO — President Donald Trump wants the U.S. government to own a piece of Intel, less than two weeks after demanding the Silicon Valley pioneer dump the CEO that was hired to turn around the slumping chipmaker. If the goal is realized, the investment would deepen the Trump administration's involvement in the computer industry as the president ramps up the pressure for more U.S. companies to manufacture products domestically instead of relying on overseas suppliers. The Trump administration is in talks to secure a 10% stake in Intel in exchange for converting government grants that were pledged to Intel under President Joe Biden. If the deal is completed, the U.S. government would become one of Intel's largest shareholders and blur the traditional lines separating the public sector and private sector in a country that remains the world's largest economy. In his second term, Trump has been leveraging his power to reprogram the operations of major computer chip companies. The administration is requiring Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices, two companies whose chips are helping to power the craze around artificial intelligence, to pay a 15% commission on their sales of chips in China in exchange for export licenses. Trump's interest in Intel is also being driven by his desire to boost chip production in the U.S., which has been a focal point of the trade war that he has been waging throughout the world. By lessening the country's dependence on chips manufactured overseas, the president believes the U.S. will be better positioned to maintain its technological lead on China in the race to create artificial intelligence. That's what the president said August 7 in an unequivocal post calling for Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan to resign less than five months after the Santa Clara, California, company hired him. The demand was triggered by reports raising national security concerns about Tan's past investments in Chinese tech companies while he was a venture capitalist. But Trump backed off after Tan professed his allegiance to the U.S. in a public letter to Intel employees and went to the White House to meet with the president, who applauded the Intel CEO for having an 'amazing story.' The company isn't commenting about the possibility of the U.S. government becoming a major shareholder, but Intel may have little choice because it is currently dealing from a position of weakness. After enjoying decades of growth while its processors powered the personal computer boom, the company fell into a slump after missing the shift to the mobile computing era unleashed by the iPhone's 2007 debut. Intel has fallen even farther behind in recent years during an artificial intelligence craze that has been a boon for Nvidia and AMD. The company lost nearly $19 billion last year and another $3.7 billion in the first six months of this year, prompting Tan to undertake a cost-cutting spree. By the end of this year, Tan expects Intel to have about 75,000 workers, a 25% reduction from the end of last year. Although rare, it's not unprecedented for the U.S. government to become a significant shareholder in a prominent company. One of the most notable instances occurred during the Great Recession in 2008 when the government injected nearly $50 billion into General Motors in return for a roughly 60% stake in the automaker at a time it was on the verge of bankruptcy. The government ended up with a roughly $10 billion loss after it sold its stock in GM. U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told CNBC during a Tuesday interview that the government has no intention of meddling in Intel's business, and will have its hands tied by holding non-voting shares in the company. But some analysts wonder if the Trump administration's financial ties to Intel might prod more companies looking to curry favor with the president to increase their orders for the company's chips. Intel was among the biggest beneficiaries of the Biden administration's CHIPS and Science Act, but it hasn't been able to revive its fortunes while falling behind on construction projects spawned by the program. The company has received about $2.2 billion of the $7.8 billion pledged under the incentives program — money that Lutnick derided as a 'giveaway' that would better serve U.S. taxpayers if it's turned into Intel stock. 'We think America should get the benefit of the bargain,' Lutnick told CNBC. 'It's obvious that it's the right move to make.'
