&w=3840&q=100)
India says de-dollarisation is not part of its financial agenda amid Trump's tariffs
Amid the brewing tensions with US President Donald Trump's administration, India made it clear that de-dollarisation is not part of its financial agenda. On Thursday, the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) dismissed suggestions that India is working towards de-dollarisation within BRICS nations.
MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal made it clear that such a move is 'not part of India's financial agenda'. 'We have made our position very clear on this issue earlier as well. De-dollarisation is not part of India's financial agenda,' MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said at the weekly media briefing.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Jaiswal's remarks were in response to questions about Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva's statement that BRICS nations may consider an alternative currency amid tension with the United States over steep tariffs on the group. It is pertinent to note that Trump has opposed the idea of de-dollarisation and often issued threats of dire consequences.
India-US ties have deteriorated significantly after Trump announced nearly 50 per cent tariffs on Indian goods. The White House argued that the tariffs were imposed because India purchased Russian oil amid the ongoing Ukraine war, with senior officials in the Trump administration accusing India of helping Russia in the conflict.
Brazil pushes for de-dollarisation
Jaiswal's remarks were in response to Lula's push for creating a trade currency that can be used among Brics nations. Explaining his position, Lula insisted that the idea should be tested.
'We can discuss in the BRICS. There is a need to have a trade currency between us and the BRICS. I do not reject it because we must test; if the testing fails, then I would be wrong. But someone has to convince me that I am wrong,' the Brazilian leader exclaimed.
Lula is scheduled to visit India in January next year. When asked if Prime Minister Narendra Modi had invited Lula following their recent phone conversation, Jaisawal said, 'We had gone to Rio to attend the BRICS summit. We also paid a state visit to Brasilia. And at that time, the Prime Minister, as is normal in bilateral ties, invited President Lula to visit India at an appropriate time.'
It is pertinent to note that Trump has also announced a 50 per cent tariff on imports from Brazil starting August 1, while calling the trial of former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro a 'witch hunt' that 'should not take place.' When it comes to its own challenges, India has maintained that it will continue engaging with BRICS members on issues of shared interest while safeguarding its economic and strategic priorities.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
'India is a member of the BRICS group, and we continue to remain in touch with member countries to discuss issues of shared interest,' the MEA spokesperson said in the Thursday briefing.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
30 minutes ago
- Time of India
How a Trump-Putin-Xi world resembles the one envisioned in Orwell's 1984
How a Trump-Putin-Xi world resembles the one envisioned in Orwell's 1984 John Authers Bloomberg Updated: Aug 16, 2025, 18:51 IST IST The present world order resembles one envisioned in the classic. The US, Russia and China trying to consolidate power, while countries like India might yet take different sides. Vladimir Putin 's encounter with Donald Trump in Anchorage summons bad memories of past summits in Munich or Yalta, in which the destiny of smaller Eastern European nations was decided by greater powers without their participation. But a fictional model from the postwar era seems more prophetic. George Orwell's 1984, written in 1948, tells of a world divided into three great powers. They are:
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
30 minutes ago
- First Post
‘Bizarre and self-destructive': Sachs warns Trump's tariffs risk isolating America, hails India's measured response
Renowned economist Jeffrey Sachs has sharply criticised US President Donald Trump's tariffs on India, calling them 'bizarre' and 'very self-destructive of US foreign policy interests.' In an interview with ANI, Sachs said the tariffs undermine years of work to strengthen US-India relations and reflect a 'shocking level of incompetence' by the Trump administration. He highlighted that the tariffs, including a 50% levy imposed in July on Indian goods over continued Russian oil imports, are not only economically harmful but also potentially unconstitutional. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'He said years of hard work in improving US-India relations is being undermined by the Trump administration. 'It's a shocking level of incompetence. I see incompetence in the US government, I'm never surprised, but I'd say that this reached this level that I have to admit actually surprised me,' he said, answering a query regarding the Trump administration imposing 25 per cent secondary tariffs on India. Trump announced 25 per cent tariffs on Indian goods in July, even as there were hopes of an interim India-US trade deal that would have otherwise helped avoid elevated tariffs. A few days later, he imposed another 25 per cent tariff, taking the total to 50 per cent, citing India's continued imports of Russian oil. Sachs highlighted the legal challenges facing the Trump administration in the wake of tariffs.'…Tariffs are wrong in that they're destructive for the US economy. It violates international law. It's a breakdown of our political system in the United States. We have a constitution. We don't have one-person rule," he said, while also referring to powers of the Congress under Article I, Section 8 of the US Constitution. 'There's actually a lawsuit now in the US Appellate Court, which says that Trump has violated the law by imposing these tariffs. There's a real possibility that Trump's entire tariff regime will be deemed, as it should be, unconstitutional,' he added. The economist said that from an economic point of view as also geopolitical point of view, Trump's policies 'are doomed to fail'. 'They (tariffs) will not improve the US economy. They will isolate the United States geopolitically. They will strengthen the BRICS and other groups…,' Jeffrey Sachs told ANI. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'Trump hates the BRICS. Why? Because they stand up and say to the US, you don't run the world. The world is multipolar and we want to cooperate with you, but we don't want you to run the world. President Lula summarized it best. He said, we don't want an emperor. This is basically the point. Trump thinks he's an emperor,' he added. On India's diplomatic strategy, Sachs praised the government's measured approach. 'India's right. Take a deep breath. Don't do anything dramatic. Don't get too vituperative. I personally would do exactly what Prime Minister Modi's doing. He's flying to meet with President Xi Jinping. He's meeting with President Putin. He's meeting with President Lula. Those are India's real partners, by the way. Not only is the BRICS the fast-growing part of the world economy, but it's also the part of the world that says we don't want an emperor. We want multi-polarity and we want multilateralism,' Sachs said. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Sachs praised India's measured diplomatic response, lauding Prime Minister Narendra Modi's strategy of engaging with global leaders including China's Xi Jinping, Russia's Vladimir Putin, and Brazil's Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva. 'India's right. Take a deep breath. Don't do anything dramatic… Those are India's real partners. Not only is the BRICS the fast-growing part of the world economy, but it's also the part that says we don't want an emperor. We want multi-polarity and multilateralism,' he said. India and the US began negotiations for a Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA) in March 2025, aiming to conclude the first stage by October-November 2025. The talks focus on balanced access to sectors such as agriculture and dairy, which provide livelihoods to millions. Commerce and Industry Minister Piyush Goyal told Parliament that the Indian government is closely examining the impact of Trump's tariffs and will take all necessary steps to safeguard national interests. With inputs from agencies
India.com
30 minutes ago
- India.com
What is the use of Aadhaar card if it can't prove Indian citizenship? Know what other critical uses Aadhaar has
Representational Image Amid the ongoing debate over Aadhaar card not being a valid proof Indian citizenship, another critical question has arisen asking why the document is deemed mandatory in many cases when it cannot be used to prove the citizenship of a person. Here are some key uses of Aadhaar card for citizens. What are the uses of Aadhaar card? While Aadhaar is not a proof of citizenship, it is however a proof of identity, providing each person living in India with a unique identification number, which cannot be the same for any two individuals. Aadhaar is mandatory to avail the benefits of government schemes as it ensures that the benefits are transferred to the individual whose name is registered under a particular scheme. Aadhaar card is used for KYC of bank accounts and to avail other financial and banking services such as loans, EMIs, etc. Aadhaar is also required to avail benefits like LPG subsidy, pension, and scholarships for students. The document can also be used to avail a new mobile connection. Why Aadhaar is not proof of Indian citizenship? During a recent hearing in the Bihar Special Intensive Review (SIR) case, the Election Commission of India (ECI) argued in the Supreme Court that the Aadhaar card is not considered a valid proof of Indian citizenship, reiterating the Union government's position on the matter, even though it is one of the most important documents in India, mandatory for availing key public and private services. According to the central government, Aadhaar is merely a proof of identity, not citizenship, and this difference was pointed out by the ECI during the July 10 hearing in the Supreme Court. The EC told the apex court that Aadhaar can't validate a person's citizenship. The apex court has also reiterated that Aadhaar cannot be considered a decisive document to prove Indian citizenship, and can only be used as a proof of identity and address.
