Connecticut leaders announce increased funding for Community Health Centers
Gunshot victim walks into New Haven hospital, police investigating
The nonprofit, community-based facilities provide primary and preventative care to everyone, regardless of income or insurance status.
Gov. Lamont said that service is crucial right now.
'I think it represents the very best in health care in our country,' Gov. Lamont said. 'Something we ought to try to replicate.'
The state's Community Health Centers serve approximately 440,000 people each year.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
3 minutes ago
- New York Times
Joseph Lovett, TV Producer Who Shed an Early Light on AIDS, Dies at 80
Joseph Lovett, a broadcast news producer and documentarian who made one of the first long-form network television segments on the AIDS crisis and who plumbed his own personal tragedies in works that blended reporting and public health advocacy, died on July 14 at his home in Manhattan. He was 80. The cause was cardiopulmonary arrest, his grandnephew Sayer Pease said. As an openly gay producer, Mr. Lovett was a rarity in the broadcast news world of the 1970s and '80s. Working at CBS and ABC, he pursued news segments aimed at destigmatizing gay life in the United States and drawing attention to the AIDS crisis at a time when that subject was largely overlooked by mainstream news organizations. In May 1983, when Mr. Lovett produced the first long-form news segment on AIDS for the ABC News program '20/20,' the disease had received slim coverage since being identified by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in 1981. Only a handful of mainstream outlets, including 'PBS NewsHour,' The New York Times Magazine and Newsweek, had spotlighted it. After witnessing friends dying of the disease, he resolved to cover it. In the resulting segment, a young Geraldo Rivera sounded the alarm about the crisis in interviews with public officials, patients, researchers and activists, including Dr. Edward N. Brandt Jr., assistant secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services; Dr. Anthony Fauci, who at the time was an immunology researcher at the National Institutes of Health; and the playwright and AIDS activist Larry Kramer. The segment criticized the Reagan administration's slow response to the crisis and singled out The Times for an absence of AIDS-related articles on its front page. After it aired, letters of support poured in from AIDS patients, health officials and fellow journalists across the country. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Washington Post
3 minutes ago
- Washington Post
RFK Jr.'s slander of mRNA technology will harm Americans
Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s decision to cancel almost $500 million in contracts for projects to develop vaccines using mRNA technology underscores perhaps the greatest harm that he might inflict on the nation with his anti-vaccine ideology. The disparagement of existing immunizations by the health and human services secretary is dangerous on its own, in that it might persuade people to forego recommended shots and reduce herd immunity against diseases. But potentially even worse are the impacts that will be harder to see: the diseases that public health officials won't be able to fight because of the lifesaving innovations he is cutting short. Kennedy's resistance against mRNA vaccines is without evidence. In fact, the technology — which instructs the body's cells to produce a harmless bit of virus that is then used to train the immune system, as opposed to using weakened or dead versions of a virus — delivered arguably the most important achievement of President Donald Trump's first term: the production of effective vaccines against the novel coronavirus within the span of a few months. Such speed was practically unheard-of in biomedical research. Thanks to the urgency created by Operation Warp Speed, the federal government was able to mount an impressive vaccination rollout that boosted the population's immunity to the coronavirus just when it was needed. As with any medical treatment, these vaccines were not perfect. In very rare instances among adolescents, they resulted in a serious side effect known as myocarditis, or inflammation of the heart muscle. Their effectiveness also waned over time as the coronavirus mutated, as is the case with vaccines for other respiratory diseases. But there can be no doubt: These vaccines saved millions of lives. Kennedy absurdly claimed in a video statement that 'mRNA vaccines don't perform well against viruses that infect the upper respiratory tract.' He further claimed that a single mutation in a virus can render vaccines 'ineffective.' He even went so far as to argue that this effect 'encourages' mutations and could 'prolong' a pandemic. This is just plain wrong, as the covid pandemic demonstrated. The effectiveness of mRNA coronavirus vaccines might have diminished over time, but they continued to protect people against severe illness over the course of multiple strains. In fact, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention continued to recommend the shots for vulnerable populations for that reason, and manufacturers updated boosters to combat new strains. Giving up on this game-changing technology will slow down scientific innovation, leaving Americans more vulnerable to diseases. Kennedy just canceled or altered 22 mRNA projects that were supported by the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority. On the chopping block are vaccine developments for several respiratory illnesses. That includes a project to defend the country against the H5N1 bird flu virus, which scientists warn could spiral into a deadly pandemic if someone contracts it while also infected with the seasonal flu virus. And that's just the beginning. Researchers are eager to deploy mRNA technology against a slew of other hard-to-tackle pathogens, from hepatitis C to HIV to malaria. There are even efforts to use this approach to activate the immune system to attack cancer cells and to treat other genetic diseases. Some scientists have suggested this research could also be essential for national security, as it might help defend against attacks from biological weapons. Calling Kennedy's latest actions shortsighted understates the gravity of his slander. Americans will bear the cost of his rejection of science.
Forbes
3 minutes ago
- Forbes
USAID And PEPFAR Cuts Could Lead To Massive Loss Of Life Overseas
A Lancet paper published in July evaluates data to illustrate the importance of roughly two decades of American humanitarian aid offered through the United States Agency for International Development and the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief. The piece subsequently projects what the future could look like in light of the steep cuts imposed by President Trump to USAID and PEPFAR. Authors estimate that USAID-funded programs have helped prevent more than 91 million deaths globally in the past 20 years, including 30 million fatalities among children. Projections suggest that ongoing deep funding cuts—combined with the dismantling of the agency—could result in more than 14 million additional deaths by 2030. On inauguration day, President Trump ordered a sweeping 90-day spending freeze on virtually all U.S. foreign aid, including many forms of health and food assistance. An independent agency, USAID, was largely gutted. The USAID undertakes a wide range of activities, which include among other things food aid and distribution (often in conflict zones), clean water provision, maternal and infant health support, mass administration of rehydration salts for children suffering from diarrhea, malaria prevention and treatments and polio vaccinations in countries where the disease is still endemic. The agency was established under President John F. Kennedy in the early 1960s to administer humanitarian aid programs around the world. Congress appropriates funds for USAID's operations. The agency employed roughly 10,000 people, two-thirds of whom worked overseas. In fiscal year 2024, the agency received more than $44 billion in federal funding. Most of that money was spent in Asia, sub-Saharan Africa and Europe (primarily on humanitarian efforts in Ukraine). While a considerable sum, it merely accounts for 0.4% of the entire federal budget. The Trump administration has slashed 86% of USAID funding. Only a small fraction of aid programs remains in place. The employee head count is now under 500. As carried out by successive administrations since Bush, including the first Trump administration, PEPFAR represented the largest commitment in history by any nation to address a single disease, HIV/AIDS. But gradually the second Trump administration is unraveling this initiative, too. KFF reported that while PEPFAR received a limited waiver on Feb. 1, allowing it to continue certain 'life-saving HIV services,' the waiver doesn't include essential pre-exposure prophylaxis for anyone other than pregnant and breastfeeding women. The State Department has sought $2.9 billion in funding to continue HIV-AIDS programs in the next fiscal year—considerably lower than PEPFAR's current budget of $4.1 billion. Moreover, USAID was the main agency working on behalf of PEPFAR. Without USAID and its staff, PEPFAR's implementation capacity has been seriously affected. Going forward, the Trump administration intends to transform PEPFAR from an aid program to one that is aligned with its 'America First' priorities. The plan, as described by the New York Times, outlines the administration's intentions to 'transition' countries off of PEPFAR, in some cases within two years. The program would in essence no longer be involved in aid and saving lives overseas. Rather, it would focus on detecting outbreaks that could threaten the U.S. and at the same time create new markets for American drugs and technologies. On the ground, journalists are painting a grim picture of the implications of the drastic curtailment in U.S. aid. A story in America Magazine, for example, describes in detail the local impact in Eswatini, a country in Southern Africa, of the gutting of USAID and reductions in PEPFAR. Cuts have severely limited access to HIV treatments and testing in clinics. During the height of the HIV/AIDS pandemic, the population of Eswatini plummeted, and life expectancy dropped from 61 in 1988 to 44 by 2003. It reverted to 61 in 2023, thanks in large part to USAID and PEPFAR. But now the gains in health outcomes are in jeopardy. The ramifications of a greatly diminished U.S. presence in health aid, international development and disaster assistance could be profound, specifically around the global humanitarian programs which rely on USAID. In terms of international assistance, the U.S. was by far the world's largest donor. The U.S. spent $68 billion on international aid in 2023. And the Trump administration's actions are also affecting what is termed the President's Malaria Initiative, an organization also founded by former President Bush. Through the work of this entity, the U.S. had become the global leader in donating to anti-malaria programs and research. According to the New York Times, one of Trump's executive orders has led to two-thirds of the staff being let go from the Malaria Initiative. And by pulling out of the World Health Organization, Trump further diminishes the critical role the U.S. plays in combating neglected tropical diseases, such as leishmaniasis, river blindness, Dengue fever and trachoma. These preventable and mostly treatable infectious diseases affect millions of people in tropical regions of the world, causing severe health problems, including anemia, blindness, chronic pain, infertility and bodily disfigurement. Historically, despite the large burden imposed by neglected tropical diseases on many people, they've received a relatively small portion of resources for drug development and treatment distribution. U.S. aid agencies had been filling some of the void. Until now.
