logo
China's deflationary slide is worsening as companies spiral into price wars

China's deflationary slide is worsening as companies spiral into price wars

CNBC11-07-2025
BEIJING — From coffee to cars to real estate, there's a recurring pattern in China: companies rush into an industry, then resort to discounts to stay afloat. That has economists worried.
Natixis' study of 2,500 listed Chinese companies reinforce how volume is growing while value is being hurt by deflationary pressure, Alicia Garcia Herrero, the firm's chief economist for Asia-Pacific, said on a webinar Friday. "You can see it sector by sector, company by company."
"On the surface you're dominating, but deep inside you're paying a high price to dominate," she said. "You don't get the revenue needed to continue."
A reflection of the breadth of impact, consumer prices fell by 0.1% in the first six months of the year from a year ago, while factory-gate producer prices dropped by 2.8%, official data shows. In that time, only seven of 48 producer price sub-categories rose, versus about half of the 37 consumer price components.
That fierce and often unproductive competition is described as "involution" in China. The government has picked up on the term in recent policy documents, calling for efforts to tackle the trend.
While the trend has made tech and products more affordable for the mass market, it has also underscored worries of a vicious cycle that forces businesses to cut more jobs.
"With involution, the Chinese economy feels much colder than the headline growth suggests," Larry Hu, chief China economist at Macquarie, said in a report Thursday. He pointed out that mainland China-listed "A share" companies expanded their workforces by just 1% in 2024, the slowest on record.
"From a more fundamental perspective, involution is both a feature and a bug of the 'China model,'" he said. "Massive investment leads to price wars and poor returns for shareholders. But for policymakers, intense competition could help achieve industrial upgrading and self-reliance."
China's push into electric cars has been the most apparent example, with industry giant BYD offering some discounts of nearly 30% or more this year and smartphone company Xiaomi pricing its latest SUV below that of Tesla's Model Y.
U.S. coffee giant Starbucks has struggled in China with falling sales as it maintains prices of around 30 yuan per cup ($4.20) — while a host of rivals from Luckin Coffee to boutiques sell lattes for as low as 9.9 yuan.
Even in commercial real estate, property owners who have tried to raise prices in Beijing ended up facing higher vacancies, Rayman Zhang, managing director for North China, at property manager JLL, told reporters Thursday. He noted that there's still insufficient demand — with little expectation for a turnaround in the near future.
China is expected Tuesday to report second-quarter gross domestic product growth of 5.2% from a year ago, according to a Reuters poll. That would be slower than the 5.4% increase in the first quarter, but in line with the national target of around 5% growth for the year.
But the second half of the year will likely reveal a far more stressful picture, warned Jianwei Xu, senior economist for Greater China at Natixis. He was also speaking at Friday's webinar.
"We are seeing the profits especially for manufacturing companies, are still decreasing," he said. "There could be more households under stress in [the second half of the year] because it will be more difficult to find a job."
This isn't the first time China has dealt with overcapacity, analysts pointed out, referencing excessive capacity in the state-dominated commodities sector about a decade ago. But this time, fewer state-owned companies are involved, making it more difficult for policymakers to act.
"The dominance of private firms in industries with overcapacity tends to complicate the coordination of mergers, even with government guidance," Robin Xing, chief China economist at Morgan Stanley, and a team said in a report Thursday.
"The economy is also starting from a weaker point, which necessitates more demand-side stimulus to counter the impact of supply reduction," the report said. "However, the government's debt level is already high (~100% of GDP), which may constrain its willingness and ability to undertake aggressive fiscal expansion."
China's top leaders are expected to maintain the current fiscal stimulus at a high-level Politburo meeting late this month. Beijing in March raised the country's fiscal deficit for the year to 4% — up from 3% last year.
Notably, Chinese President Xi Jinping on July 1 led a high-level financial and economic commission meeting that called for more governance of "low price, disorderly competition," according to a CNBC translation of Chinese state media.
The ruling Chinese Communist Party's official Qiushi journal on July 1 even outlined several measures that promote standardized government behavior to address involution-style competition, warning of serious economic damage. The article cited high-level government meetings from the last several months.
"To achieve the growth target, Beijing will have no choice but to launch a major demand stimulus," Hu said. "Afterwards, the improved domestic demand would ease the price competition among material producers and internet giants. But for manufacturers, it will be a long and painful process to absorb the existing capacity."
Exacerbating problems with resolving China's domestic overcapacity is the trade war with the U.S., Goldman Sachs analysts pointed out in a July 1 report.
The U.S. and European Union became more critical of China's persistent overcapacity issues last year. Both have raised tariffs on Chinese electric cars in particular in an attempt to protect domestic automakers. The U.S. in April also targeted China with higher duties across the board.
The escalation of tariffs has made Chinese manufacturers more determined to build factories overseas, "potentially generating redundant supply in the coming years," the Goldman report said. The analysts estimated a 0.5% to 14% increase in capacity by the end of 2028, up from the 0.4% to 10% expansion projected a year ago.
And among seven sectors — air conditioners, solar modules, lithium batteries, electric vehicles, power semiconductors, steel and construction machinery — five have more capacity than the entire global demand, the Goldman analysts said. Only ACs, and EVs — just barely — enjoy some market potential.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

More And More Chinese Factories Are Going 'Lights Out.' Should We Be Worried?
More And More Chinese Factories Are Going 'Lights Out.' Should We Be Worried?

Forbes

time3 minutes ago

  • Forbes

More And More Chinese Factories Are Going 'Lights Out.' Should We Be Worried?

While America has its sights on re-sparking a manufacturing flame, in China, it's already lights out. Meaning, literally—the lights in warehouses across the country are dimming, as more and more factories there are operating independent of human intervention. These 'lights out factories' speak to the ever-widening chasm in robotic manufacturing. It's China—and everyone else. But it doesn't necessarily mean manufacturers here in America should be hustling to flip their own switches. Our path to competitiveness looks different—and more human. What Is Lights Out Manufacturing? As factories introduce increasingly robust automation into their operations, some have their sites set on a new goal: Going fully automated, to the point that humans can walk out and cut the lights behind them. In a recent video, the Wall Street Journal dug into how automation is allowing Chinese electric vehicle-maker Zeekr to pump out up to 300,000 cars a year—more than 800 a day—just four years after it was founded. It has taken Tesla more than a decade to reach similar levels. And indeed, inside Zeekr's operation, there's a portion where robots work under dimmed lights, un-aided by human workers. It's 'an area of the plant so automated, and with so little human presence, that, in theory, the lights could be completely shut off,' the WSJ says. In China, labor costs have been going up for years, the WSJ notes, and automation is seen as an important strategy to blunt the impact. The speed at which China is deploying robotics inside its manufacturing plants is unmatched. In 2023, the country installed 276,000 industrial robots, six-times that of next-best, which was Japan at 46,000, according to the International Federation of Robotics. The U.S. installed 38,000 industrial robots that year. The Manufacturers That Can—And Can't—Go 'Dark' It's one thing for a highly repetitive shop to go 'dark.' Plenty of the manufacturing operations that American companies outsourced to China require the same tasks done hour after hour, day after day. If you're simply stamping the same part over and over, and you look around and everything is working as it should, then sure, you could walk out. At that point, nobody needs to be there to program the CNC. Nobody has to change the job or move anything around. And in most cases, supervisors can monitor and modify from a remote control room as needs arise. That said, while there may be a few opportunities here in the U.S. to get to that fully automated benchmark, the vast majority never will. Even with tariffs, the most repetitive factories likely aren't coming back—and that's OK. Companies here generally have higher SKU volumes, which means they're consistently switching from making one product to another, rarely doing the same thing repetitively for hours on end. There's room for robotics to make these operations more efficient and faster, but they won't do so without some level of human assistance. That is to say: American manufacturers must start introducing robotics at a higher rate—it's the only way we'll compete globally long-term—but our north star shouldn't be lights-out manufacturing. In fact, U.S. manufacturing is likely to enter an era in which the rate of change and technological evolution inside our factories will render a lights out strategy simply impractical. In the ideal future state of the industry, upgrades—both to the products themselves and how we make those products—will be constant. Even at Zeekr, outside of the 'lights out' portion of the operation, human workers are needed for a variety of additional tasks, like assembling internal cables. 'Workers also go into the factories to perform tasks like robot maintenance,' WSJ says. Competing Globally—While Growing The Manufacturing Workforce The conversation about automation isn't just about feasibility—it's also about consequences, particularly for the American manufacturing workforce. We can and should be automating aggressively. Our path to regaining our position as the top manufacturing industry in the world runs through technology. America possesses the ingenuity to rebuild a thriving industry and reshore much of what went overseas. We must build new, highly advanced and automated factories to compete with China. But in our case, that doesn't mean displacing workers. That happened already—some 2.8 million manufacturing jobs were lost from 2001 to 2018, as the trade deficit with China grew. And yet, our industry still faces a shortage: close to 2 million manufacturing roles could go unfilled over the next eight years, as the Manufacturing Institute and Deloitte found. Will we bring back every job that left? Of course not, but that's not the goal. Instead, we're going to use robotics to make human jobs safer, cleaner, higher tech, and more appealing. Robotics will help American manufacturers cut production costs and improve quality and competitiveness. It can also help us close the talent gap and keep production humming along in the face of such a steep talent gap. We can and should be filling our industry with higher-tech, higher-impact jobs, evolving any of the few remaining repetitive roles so they better fit the future workforce. That will require investments in reskilling. They'll be worth it. Lights-out manufacturing may be part of China's playbook—but it shouldn't be ours. America's manufacturing future doesn't hinge on building factories that run without people. It hinges on building smarter factories, where automation and human ingenuity work side-by-side to empower a state of constant evolution. We must invest in robotics not to eliminate jobs, but to unlock better ones: jobs that are safer, more technical, and more resilient to global pressures. The goal isn't darkness—it's a brighter future for American manufacturing.

China pushes back after Nvidia deal sparks controversy
China pushes back after Nvidia deal sparks controversy

Yahoo

time10 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

China pushes back after Nvidia deal sparks controversy

China pushes back after Nvidia deal sparks controversy originally appeared on TheStreet. Nvidia was blindsided earlier this year when the US government enacted tougher restrictions on selling artificial intelligence chips to China. The restriction prevented Nvidia from selling its H20 chip within the Middle Kingdom, forcing CEO Jensen Huang to take a shockingly large $4.5 billion write-off for unsold chip inventory in the fiscal first quarter. Nvidia wasn't the only one impacted. AMD, Nvidia's closest competition for graphic processors used to train and operate AI chatbots and agents, was forced to stop selling its Instinct MI308 AI chip in China, costing it $800 million in Q2. Unsurprisingly, CEO Huang has been vocal in pleading the case for encouraging the adoption of US tech in AI globally to prevent China from gaining a greater foothold. Those efforts weren't in vain, given that Huang's argument helped Nvidia and AMD ink a new deal with the US government in August to resume exports, but that deal, which requires stiff payments to the US, has raised concerns over "pay to play," with some more bluntly calling it a "shakedown." The backlash has put US officials, including Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, a former hedge fund manager, on the defensive, causing them to push back against criticism. Those comments haven't sat well with China, which responded with harsh restrictions on Nvidia. Nvidia-AMD China deal 'really weird' and 'crony capitalism' The US government's rescission of Nvidia () and AMD's () export licenses was justified by concerns that providing next-gen AI chips to companies there could be a threat to national security if systems running on them ever targeted America. Despite those concerns, the US reversed course this month after negotiations with Nvidia and AMD provided a framework for the companies to pay money to the US government based on China's chip sales. Specifically, Nvidia and AMD agreed to fork over 15% of their China sales to the US government in exchange for the ability to market their chips there again. In a CNBC interview on Aug. 13, Ray Wang, the founder and chairman of Constellation Research, called the surprising deal "bizarre" and "really weird." Others have gone further. 'The willingness displayed in this arrangement to 'negotiate' away America's competitive edge that is key to our national security in exchange for what is, in effect, a commission on a sale of AI-enabling technology to our main global competitor, is cause for serious alarm," wrote six Democratic Senators, including Chuck Schumer and Elizabeth Warren, in a letter to President Trump on Aug 15. Tulane University's Walter Isaacson said in a CNBC interview on August 21: "State capitalism often evolves into crony capitalism, where you have favored companies and industries that pay tribute to the leader, and that is a recipe for not only disaster, but just sort of a corrupt sense of messiness.' Bessent pushes back on Nvidia-China deal chatter While the deal may not pass the sniff test with some, the White House believes agreements like this could provide much-needed money for America's coffers. 'I said, 'listen, I want 20% if I'm going to approve this for you, for the country," said President Trump in a press conference after the deal with Nvidia and AMD was made public. Trump says Nvidia eventually convinced him to lower it to 15%, and that he wasn't concerned about the national security aspect as much because it is an 'old chip" and 'obsolete.' The H20 is based on Nvidia's Hopper architecture rather than its current Blackwell. It is essentially a throttled-down version of the H100 and H200 chips preceding Blackwell and was launched in early 2024 as a successor to Nvidia's A100 chip. More Nvidia: Nvidia earnings face high bar on data-center demand, China deal Nvidia quietly buys more stock in AI infrastructure favorite Soros supercharges Nvidia stake, loads up on AI plays In an interview with CNBC, Secretary Bessent doubled down on the fact that the deal only covers H20, which is less of a security threat than Blackwell chips. When asked by host Joe Kernan if this was akin to a shakedown, Bessent responded: "H20s are pretty far down the Nvidia stack. It's not a national security risk," said Bessent. "The last thing we want is Huawei belt and road where Huawei is selling chips to the rest of the world and the US is excluded." Bessent went on to say that he and those in the industry want US technology to be the global standard. That doesn't apply, however, to the latest technology - at least not yet. Bessent said that any next-gen chips built on the Blackwell architecture would require another export license. China fires back at U.S. over Nvidia deal Bessent wasn't the only US Cabinet member to make comments on the matter. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, the former CEO of Wall Street firm Cantor Fitzgerald, suggested the Nvidia deal makes sense because it still keeps our latest technology out of Chinese hands. "We don't sell them our best stuff, not our second best stuff, not even our third best. The fourth one down, we want to keep China using it," said Lutnick on CNBC. The comments drew the ire of Chinese officials. According to the Financial Times, the Cyberspace Administration of China (CAC), National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC), and Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (MIIT) are telling buyers to press pause on H20 orders. Specifically, the CAC instructed tech companies, including ByteDance and Alibaba, to avoid buying H20 chips until a national security review is complete or they'll face fines, reports Engadget. The NDRC similarly asked Chinese companies not to buy Nvidia chips. China officials have been pushing for Chinese companies to buy more homegrown technology, rather than technology made in the West, particularly America. How we got here: AI gold rush makes GPUs hot commodities The sheer size of activity in AI is staggering, and there's a lot of money at stake. According to Grand View Research, the total AI ecosystem will enjoy 35.9% compound annual growth through 2030, reaching $1.8 every industry is exploring potential use cases, including: Manufacturing: Quality control and supply chain efficiency Retail: Just-in-time inventory, anti-theft, and marketing Financials: Money management and loan evaluation Healthcare: Drug development, patient outcomes The rush of activity is requiring tremendous computing power, and that's taxed legacy server networks heavily reliant on central processing units, or CPUs, less suited to handling AI workloads. As a result, enterprises and cloud network providers, including hyperscalers Amazon, Microsoft, and Google, are plowing hundreds of billions of dollars into servers run on GPUs and software from Nvidia, primarily, that can do the work efficiently. For perspective, Amazon's capital expenditures, or Capex, totaled $32.2 billion and Alphabet's totaled $22.4 billion in the second quarter, up from $17.6 billlion and $13.2 billion, respectively, in the same quarter last year. Much of those dollars have flowed to Nvidia for its AI chips. In Q2, Nvidia's sales rose 69% to $44.1 billion. Here is Nvidia's revenue over the past three years: 2025 $130.5 billion. 2024 $60.9 billion 2023: $27 billion Most sales have been from US AI activity, but China has contributed to demand. Nvidia estimated that restrictions on the H20 cost it $8 billion in the second quarter alone. The company is scheduled to report its fiscal Q2 results on August 27. Todd Campbell owns Nvidia shares. 💵💰Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter 💰💵 China pushes back after Nvidia deal sparks controversy first appeared on TheStreet on Aug 20, 2025 This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Aug 20, 2025, where it first appeared.

China suspends Argentine poultry imports five months after ban lifted
China suspends Argentine poultry imports five months after ban lifted

Yahoo

time10 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

China suspends Argentine poultry imports five months after ban lifted

By Ella Cao and Lewis Jackson BEIJING (Reuters) -China has suspended imports of Argentine poultry products from August 20, just five months after lifting a two-year ban. The ban came after the Argentine government temporarily halted shipments of poultry products due to the detection of avian flu in a commercial farm. The notice of suspension, which was posted on a Chinese customs website, did not state a reason for the move or how long the suspension might stay in place. Customs authorities did not immediately respond to a request for comment. However, this week Argentina's national health service (Senasa) confirmed a case of highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) in the province of Buenos Aires, leading to the temporary halt in exports. Senasa said that exports would resume if no further outbreaks were detected in commercial establishments following 28 days of slaughter, cleaning, and disinfection. China mainly imports poultry products such as chicken feet, chicken wings, and bone-in chicken pieces. "This decision may help support the prices of some poultry products as China has restricted imports from some major suppliers," said Pan Chenjun, a senior animal protein analyst at Rabobank in Hong Kong. "However, its overall impact (on prices) is likely limited due to China's current surplus of poultry meat and the industry's ongoing financial struggles." China's poultry meat imports from January to July totalled 226,013 metric tons, down 2% compared to the same period last year, customs data shows. Beijing has also suspended poultry and related imports from its largest supplier, Brazil, since May and imports from Spain this month, with authorities noting bird flu outbreaks in both countries.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store