'Moment Of Pride And Glory': Jitendra Singh On Shubhanshu Shukla's Return From Space Mission
Calling it a historic milestone, Dr Singh said India's space capabilities are no longer limited to supporting roles but are now actively shaping global space exploration.
Union Minister Dr Jitendra Singh hailed the return of an Indian-origin astronaut from a groundbreaking space mission as a 'moment of pride and glory" for the country, emphasising India's rising stature in the global space community.
Speaking to reporters, Dr Singh said, 'It is a moment of pride and glory as one of our illustrious sons is back. Bharat has found a space in the world of space."
He highlighted the significance of the mission, saying, 'These are experiments that have never been done before. This marks a new era for India's scientific and technological ambitions."
Singh also outlined the next steps in the astronaut's return protocol. 'Everyone will be in quarantine till the 23rd, and then from the 24th, they will have discussions with ISRO," he said. 'Debriefings with Axiom and NASA will follow."
Calling it a historic milestone, Dr Singh said India's space capabilities are no longer limited to supporting roles but are now actively shaping global space exploration. 'This is a moment of glory for India for the successful mission, and it inspires a new generation to dream bigger," he added.
Astronaut Shubhanshu Shukla and three others of the commercial Axiom-4 mission returned to Earth as the Dragon 'Grace' spacecraft made a splashdown off the San Diego coast in southern California on Tuesday, capping a 22.5-hour journey after an 18-day stay at the International Space Station.
The spacecraft carrying Shukla, commander Peggy Whitson, and mission specialists Slawosz Uznanski-Wisniewski of Poland and Tibor Kapu of Hungary, undocked from the space station at 4:45 pm IST on Monday.
'Splashdown of Dragon confirmed – welcome back to Earth, @AstroPeggy, Shux, @astro_slawosz, and Tibi," SpaceX said in a post on X.
Speed boats of SpaceX, the transporter for the mission, were seen moving towards the spacecraft to bring it to the recovery ship, Shannon, where the astronauts will be brought out from the capsule.
The Axiom-4 crew will undergo a series of medical checks on board the ship before boarding a helicopter for a ride back to the shore.
view comments
First Published:
July 15, 2025, 15:18 IST
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
41 minutes ago
- Time of India
ISRO honour for JU lunar rover
1 2 3 4 5 6 Kolkata: A 10-member Jadavpur University (JU) team, Obseract, has competed with over a 1,000 teams to rank 5th in the ISRO Robotics Challenge-2024 for designing and operating an autonomous robotic vehicle (rover) that can traverse tough terrains like the lunar surface and execute diverse tasks within a simulated extraterrestrial setting. The team, comprising students, researchers and their mentors, received the trophy on July 25 at the U R Rao Satellite Centre, Bengaluru. The contest assigned robotic tasks inspired by Chandrayaan-4 problem statements. Out of 1,008 team, 273 proposals qualified. Obseract was among the 10 teams selected to attend the final challenge round in Bengaluru in 2023. The results were declared in Aug 2024. The team is now preparing for NIDAR 2025 and International Robotics Challenge 2026. The 42kg 6-wheeled rover is worth about Rs 2.7lakh. Its arm is capable of picking up 200gm samples. It can rotate 360° rotation around a single point without taking much space. The rover has a runtime of 9 hours on simple terrain and 4 hours during heavy use of its manipulator arm. Alumni of the1984 batch of the mechanical engineering department, besides others funded the project.
The Hindu
41 minutes ago
- The Hindu
As India's retractions surge, NIRF rankings only now begin penalising tainted research
Between 2004 and 2020, five research papers published by Zillur Rahman on various management topics, such as corporate social responsibility, self-service banking technologies, and service delivery options, were retracted. Yet, he served as the dean and professor of management studies at IIT Roorkee till May 2025. As per data from the Retraction Watch – a non‑profit scientific watchdog that reports retractions of academic papers from across the globe – the former dean's papers were retracted for various reasons, such as plagiarism, duplication, and concerns about data. 'When I reported about Mr. Rahman's retractions to IIT Roorkee on their LinkedIn page, they asked me to provide the list of retractions, and I did. Months later, when I followed up, they asked me to reach out via email. I did not pursue the matter further,' said Achal Agarwal, founder of India Research Watchdog, a not-for-profit that flags research misconduct in Indian academia. The Hindu reached out to Mr. Rahman and the IIT Roorkee's management. There has been no response. India is ranked third with the most number of retractions, only behind the U.S. and China, as per data from Post Pub, a platform that helps visualise country-wise statistics of retractions. Post-Pub data shows that India had a retraction rate (number of retractions for every 1,000 papers submitted) of 1.5 in 2012, which increased steeply to 3.5 in 2022. 'The U.S. has a very large science budget, so it's expected to see a higher number of retractions. China is aiming to become the global leader in research, which makes publishing a top priority. In India, the competition is intense, especially among Ph.D. aspirants and Master's students aiming for doctoral programs,' said John (name changed on request), a sleuth who flags frauds on Twitter. The need for legislation Ever since research papers became a parameter in the National Institutional Ranking Framework (NIRF), private universities have been churning out more research papers — albeit with a focus on quality. That's exactly why there are more papers and more retractions from private universities in the past ten years, as per data from Cornell University. The problem is twofold: the lack of stringent laws to curb scientific corruption and protect sleuths, and the negligence of educational institutions that foster impunity among researchers. In India, in the absence of legislation, the onus to prevent fraud is only on the institutions. However, sleuths say that most universities are mum – firing an academician over research fraud just doesn't happen in India, just as in other countries. 'As long as there is no good legislation to actually sue some of these frauds, nothing will happen. The legislation should have the norms to sue the frauds not just for the fake paper, but also for using government funding to create such a paper. It is a waste of public funding,' said John. The U.K. Research Integrity Office (UKRIO), established in 2006, is an independent charitable body that offers expert advice on research integrity and provides templates for misconduct investigations. Denmark's Act on Research Misconduct, enacted in 2017, assigns severe cases related to fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism to the Danish Board on Research Misconduct for investigation. 'In India, there is a need to have an autonomous, empowered body to look into the complaints. Currently, the complaints go to the respective body governing the institute, such as the Department of Science and Technology or the University Grants Commission (UGC). They don't take these complaints seriously,' said Ms. Agarwal. India Research Watch receives around 10 messages every day from whistleblowers across the country. The nuances of cheating Every retracted paper doesn't indicate fraud; sometimes researchers identify unintentional mistakes such as calculation errors, experimental flaws, or inaccurate data analysis, and withdraw the papers themselves. With the rise of sleuths and watchdog organisations, academicians have grown savvier, learning how to cover their tracks and evade detection. 'It is very difficult to catch smart frauds – those who don't blindly use Artificial Intelligence texts and those who don't just copy-paste texts and images,' Mr. John said. 'We check for tortured phrases, image overlaps, image fakery, statistically improbable data, and methodologies in an academic paper to find out its authenticity. However, the smart frauds have evolved – they plug all these gaps to get better with fraud,' Mr. John added. As it has been established that not all universities punish researchers with retractions, the ball seems to be in the court of publishers. Publishers such as Frontiers rely on AI to check the research papers, but a statement from the publisher says there have been cases of fraud even after the deployment of AI. Frontier's Artificial Intelligence Review Assistant (AIRA) was launched in 2018 and now includes over 50 verifications of submitted manuscripts. On July 29, the communications team of Frontier put out a notice that said, 'Frontier's Research Integrity Auditing team has uncovered a network of authors and editors who conducted peer review with undisclosed conflicts of interest and who have engaged in citation manipulation. The unethical actions of this network have been confirmed in 122 articles published in Frontiers, across five journals, and have led to their retraction.' Beyond plagiarism Ever since the colonial era, it has been mandatory for Indian researchers to send their theses to two foreign evaluators — a practice that began when British academics were the default choice. 'Rather than sending the papers to reputed universities in countries such as Germany, Australia, or the U.S., the lower-quality ones are often sent to universities in Malaysia or Thailand,' said Prof. V. Ramachandran of Anna University. He pointed to another nuance that is common in India's academic system — a nexus between guides, students, and examiners. 'The guides propose a list of examiners to the university — a list that students are aware of. These examiners are often acquaintances of the guide or the student,' Mr. Ramachandran explained, suggesting that universities should independently constitute evaluation panels. 'The examiners must be random and unknown to the student or the guide, and they should be from well-established institutions,' he said. In private universities, academicians are often pressured to publish research papers without adequate funding support. 'At institutions such as mine, faculty are expected to begin research with just ₹1–2 lakh — and that's considered a luxury. In many private universities, researchers are made to start with zero funding,' said a professor from a private university in Tamil Nadu, speaking on condition of anonymity. 'Research output is a key metric in the NIRF rankings, and students look at these rankings while choosing colleges. It's all tied to a profit-making model,' the professor said. Besides fraud, another issue plaguing research is the rise in publications in dubious journals. 'High-standard journals follow tough peer review processes, demand original data and sound science, and are mostly read and cited by reputed researchers across the world. On the other hand, low-standard journals have become dumping grounds for unethical research. Since good scientists don't read these journals, the fraud often goes unnoticed — and most of it never even gets retracted,' the professor from VIT added. Beyond elite institutions, the crisis of research quality runs deeper in smaller universities and colleges, particularly those funded by state governments. 'In Tier 2 and Tier 3 institutions — especially state universities — the drop in research quality isn't linear, it's exponential. Many are publishing in predatory venues. This is far more common in State universities, and that's where serious streamlining is needed,' said a senior academic from IISC Bangalore, seeking anonymity. 'Instead of counting papers, we should assess them on the impact of their teaching.' A long way to go Starting this year, the NIRF will begin assigning negative scores to higher educational institutions for research papers that have been retracted in the past three calendar years, along with any citations those papers had accumulated. While experts see this as a welcome step, many believe the journey toward ensuring research integrity in India remains long. 'At BITS Pilani, we are setting up a Research Integrity Office to proactively educate and sensitise our research community,' said Professor V. Ramgopal Rao, Group Vice Chancellor of BITS Pilani. 'With over 500 new Ph.D. students joining us each year, we see it as our responsibility to train both faculty and students on best practices in research, responsible experimentation, and academic ethics.' Professor Rao, who has been consistently vocal on the need to tackle research fraud, has advocated for the creation of oversight mechanisms both at the institutional and national levels. 'The UGC is fundamentally a grants commission. It neither has the mandate nor the necessary structures to investigate or act on cases of research misconduct. Even if the UGC withholds funding, such activities may continue unchecked,' he observed. The Government of India has introduced a bill in Parliament to set up the Higher Education Commission of India (HECI), which will serve as a single regulator replacing bodies like the UGC and AICTE. Commenting on this, Prof. Rao said, 'The proposed HECI will have the authority to impose penalties on institutions and even recommend their closure in extreme cases. However, since education is a concurrent subject under the Constitution, the Centre cannot act unilaterally. Cooperation from State governments is essential, and that makes the road to implementation long and uncertain.' Drawing a comparison with global practices, he added, 'In the U.S. and Europe, research fraud is treated with the seriousness it deserves. Academicians found guilty can lose their jobs. In India, unfortunately, we have seen cases where even vice-chancellors have been implicated in academic misconduct. When leadership itself is compromised, enforcing standards across the system becomes a much bigger challenge.' (Laasya is an Independent Journalist with bylines published in BBC, Thomson Reuters and Mongabay India among a dozen others. One day she is tracking climate finance; the next, she's decoding education reforms, dissecting caste realities or tracing wildlife in forgotten forests.)
United News of India
3 hours ago
- United News of India
Third satellite launch pad project set for March 2029 completion
New Delhi, Aug 6 (UNI) The Third Satellite Launch Pad (TLP) Project, a significant expansion of India's space infrastructure, has made steady progress following the receipt of financial sanction in March 2025, the Government informed Parliament today. It will be fully commissioned by March 2029, it said. Dr. Jitendra Singh, Union Minister of State (Independent Charge) for Science and Technology and Department of Space in a written reply to Lok Sabha said, 'The preliminary geo-technical investigation and topographical survey of the designated site were completed by May 2025, laying the groundwork for further development. Presently, bids for road construction and electrical works are being evaluated.' The project is structured around four critical milestones: completion of civil engineering works by May 2028, establishment of fluid handling systems and propellant storage facilities by July 2028, installation of launch pad facilities by September 2028, and full commissioning by March 2029, he said. Dr Jitendra Singh shared that the Department of Space has announced plans to engage Indian private sector firms and MSMEs through a transparent tendering process aligned with the government's Make-in-India and Atmanirbhar Bharat initiatives as envisaged by Prime Minister Narendra Modi. UNI AJ SSP
