Why everything you assumed about Gen Z is wrong
Generation Z, that enigmatic demographic of men and women born between 1997 and 2012 or so, have been presumed to hold wildly progressive views. In the stereotype of public imagination this is – or has been – a group that will go to the wall for net zero, dump a partner if their views on gender politics give them the 'ick', or leave any job that has the temerity to demand their presence in the office.
Except it may not be true. A growing mass of evidence suggests that far from the leftie snowflake cohort of lore, Gen Z are disparate in their politics and care about the same things older generations do – jobs, houses, security – more than culture wars or social issues.
A report from the John Smith Centre at Glasgow University, published this week, has added to this feeling. Working with the polling company Focaldata, the institute conducted 260 interviews with people aged 18 to 29. Contrary to what may have been expected, it found that Gen Z are more worried about crime than the environment, surprisingly split on the benefits of migration, and focused on jobs, housing and family above all.
'It goes back to Maslow's hierarchy of needs,' says Eddie Barnes, the director of the John Smith Centre. 'The bottom of that triangle is basics (including food, water, shelter, sleep, housing, health, finances). That's where the younger generation are. This is a generation that has not had much in the way of wage growth, they've had extremely high housing costs, and financial insecurity. Those, not culture war issues, are the top priorities. What do people care about? It's the financial stuff. Crime ranks much more highly than the environment, which was a big surprise.'
When asked what the biggest contributors were to them feeling 'nervous, anxious or on edge', respondents replied: 'financial worries' (37 per cent), 'work pressures' (23 per cent) and 'job security or unemployment' (20 per cent). Climate change languished on 10 per cent. Another question asked: 'When you think about community, which of the following groups or places come to mind?' Some 42 per cent said family, 38 per cent said their 'local town or city', and 36 per cent said their 'friends and social circles'. Gender, by comparison, was only 7 per cent. The 'most important issues facing the UK today' were inflation and the cost of living, health care, housing and crime. Only 20 per cent said climate change and the environment. The figure is down on a global survey from 2019, which found that 41 per cent of young people thought climate change was more pressing than anything else. The poll carried out for the John Smith report did not ask a specific question about the pandemic, but Barnes says it came up in focus groups conducted as part of the research.
'There was a feeling Covid was yet another thing that had damaged young people's upbringing,' he says. 'One young person said, 'We'll never get that time back again.' There wasn't bitterness or anger, but a feeling of lament.'
Whatever the various causes, the result is a generation apparently more hardened to economic reality than millennials. 'Home ownership and the economy are far more important than climate change,' says 25-year-old Oliver Freeston, a Reform councillor from Lincolnshire. 'Climate change is natural, it's been happening for thousands of years. If we have this crazy drive to net zero it's going to bankrupt the country. It's not lowering bills, it's increasing them. For young people it's already tough with stagnating wages and a high tax burden. We don't need it to be made any harder.'
In his constituency, he says, young people echo fears from older generations about excess migration, too. 'People say it's only the older people concerned about migration,' he says. 'I know so many people my age who are becoming politically motivated because they're not happy with the way the high street is changing, how they can't get on the property ladder, how rents are going up, they can't get a GP appointment. This affects young people just as much as it affects older people.' Some 51 per cent of respondents surveyed for the John Smith Centre research agreed immigration has changed their communities for the better, but 32 per cent disagreed. Immigration had more support among better-educated and higher-earning groups, as it does in older generations.
But a concern with economic basics is not confined to young people on the political Right. Saira Banu, also 25 and completing a master's degree at King's College London, contributed to a focus group for the report. Originally from Dubai, she voted Labour at the last election, but agrees the priority for her peers is financial. 'I'm constantly worrying about money because I live in London and it's expensive and there's a housing crisis,' she says. 'I have friends who commute in from Birmingham because they can't afford to live in London. It's a privilege to be able to worry about the climate and culture wars and things like that.'
On politics itself, the survey found that Labour retained a lead, with 30 per cent of respondents saying they would vote for it, but the Greens and Reform were tied in second place, at around 15 per cent each. The Tories would get only 9 per cent of the vote. But more broadly the report found respondents were 'disillusioned with traditional parties' and that Labour and the Conservatives could no longer count on their vote.
'Why are we talking about Gen Z as these hyper-progressive or hyper-regressive people who are super interested in social issues and identity issues, when very clearly their concerns are about cost of living, getting a house and getting a good job?' says James Kanagasooriam, of Focaldata. 'Gen Z is being parsed by other people in a way that isn't, I think, potentially that accurate. [The study] is a great sense check on what is actually important.'
He adds that Gen Z are less homogeneous in their voting intentions than previous generations: 'People who are trying to divine the next generation need to remind themselves that they are not like the generation before them. Prior to the 2019 general election, boomers were almost unilaterally voting for the Right and millennials were unilaterally voting for the Left. It's clear that Gen Z people will go their own way.'
Donald Trump's re-election in the US, helped by a stronger-than-expected performance among young men, had prompted fears that young people in the UK similarly crave a powerful leader. A study commissioned by Channel 4 earlier this year found that 52 per cent of Gen Z thought 'the UK would be a better place if a strong leader was in charge who does not have to bother with elections'. The John Smith report found that they support democracy by 57 per cent to 27 per cent, but agree that 'democracy in the UK is in trouble' by 63 per cent to 24 per cent.
More generally, the picture painted in the John Smith report is surprisingly sunny. Despite their fears about housing, the cost of living and job insecurity, nearly two thirds of respondents said they felt 'optimistic' about their own futures, although again this figure skewed higher among those with higher levels of education and income.
Barnes, who was formerly the head of strategy for Ruth Davidson, the ex-leader of the Scottish Conservatives, says that the report points to a simple path to improving trust in politics. 'To show that politics is working it's pretty simple,' he says. 'Build more houses, get an economy growing. That's the big message coming from this poll.
'There has been a lot of doom and gloom about Gen Z, and that 'oh, God, it's going to hell',' he adds. 'But perhaps we should be wary of catastrophising them when they seem to be broadly positive about the country.' With a yawning pensions deficit and a murky economic outlook, Britain's ageing population is counting on Gen Z to provide for them. It is lucky that the kids seem – perhaps surprisingly – all right.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Trump's CDC pick treads carefully in Senate debut
Susan Monarez, a longtime federal health official nominated by President Trump to lead the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), faced senators in a confirmation hearing Wednesday, providing a first glimpse at her personal views and any signs of daylight with Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. While Monarez said 'vaccines save lives' and said there was no evidence of links between vaccines and autism, a debunked theory espoused by Kennedy, she was careful not to directly contradict her would-be boss despite prodding by Democratic senators. Trump chose Monarez after his first choice for CDC Director, former Florida Rep. Dave Weldon (R), failed to gain enough support among Senate Republicans. Monarez has worked in federal health policy for nearly two decades and was acting CDC director before her nomination, giving her a few months of experience in the role. Though she has held high-ranking positions in numerous offices in the federal government, CDC director would be her most public-facing role to date. She is also the first CDC nominee to require Senate confirmation, a change made after the COVID-19 pandemic thrust the role into the national spotlight. To those who've worked with her, Monarez is known as a strong believer in science and data, but her personal views on many hot-button issues were not publicly known before her appearance before the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP). Members of the committee were keen to learn her opinions on issues like infectious diseases, vaccines, food additives, water fluoridation and immunization guidance — all of which touch on policies that have been changed or contested under Kennedy. HELP Ranking Member Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) asked Monarez for her thoughts on Kennedy's announcement on Wednesday that the U.S. would no longer be funding the global vaccine alliance Gavi. 'I think vaccines save lives. I think that we need to continue to support the promotion of utilization of vaccines,' Monarez told Sanders. 'I wasn't involved in that decision making. If I'm confirmed as a CDC director, I will certainly look into it, and I'm happy to follow up.' She also told Sanders that she did not see any causal link between vaccinations and autism, a possibility that Kennedy has repeatedly refused to discount despite mountains of evidence finding no connection. At the same time the hearing was taking place, the CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) was holding its first meeting after being completely remade by Kennedy. Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.), chair of the HELP committee, has expressed his reservations about the new makeup of the committee, noting the members' lack of experience multiple times throughout the hearing Wednesday. The night before the ACIP meeting, Virginia physician Michael Ross withdrew from the committee rather than submitting to the required financial conflict-of-interest review for its members. Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.) asked Monarez whether the committee and its recommendations should be permitted and trusted when ethics reviews of its members have not been completed. While Monarez waffled on the question at first, she ultimately agreed that the members should not be participating in meetings if they have not gone through the ethics approval process. Sen. Angela Alsobrooks (D-Md.) asked Monarez for her views on community water fluoridation. Kennedy has said he plans to tell the CDC to stop recommending water fluoridation, which is ultimately a state and local decision. Alsobrooks noted that Monarez is one of her constituents and asked if she believed the water in Potomac, Md., which is fluoridated, is safe to drink. 'I believe the water in Potomac, Maryland is safe,' Monarez said. Despite expressing views that did not align with Kennedy's, Monarez avoided directly saying she disagreed with any of his views, even under intense questioning. Discussing Kennedy, Sen. Maggie Hassan (D-N.H.) asked Monarez, 'Is there anything you disagree with him about?' 'So look, if I'm confirmed as CDC director, I look forward to supporting the secretary with science and evidence and making sure that I am giving him the best information possible to help support some of these critical decisions,' Monarez responded. Hassan pressed the issue, pointing to the recent measles outbreaks in Texas. The senator noted how Kennedy had previously minimized the potential harms of measles. Monarez started to discuss measles as a 'critical issue' before Hassan interrupted her. 'Right, which is why your being able to independently state in public that you differ with the secretary is a really, really important thing right now. You're showing a real reluctance to do this,' Hassan said. The senator from New Hampshire also asked Monarez what she would do if Trump asked her to do something that went against the law. 'We'll always follow the law and the president would never ask me to break the law,' said Monarez. 'Well I'd ask you to review recent facts and perhaps reflect on that answer,' Hassan responded.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
I Volunteered For Zohran Mamdani's Campaign, And Here's What Dems Need To Learn If They Want To Win
Note: This post is an Op-Ed and shares the author's personal views. In mid-May, my husband and I set out on our first wedding anniversary, "Zohran Mamdani" pins on T-shirts, to canvas for a candidate who neither of us thought would win the New York Democratic mayoral primary, but who we believed in nonetheless. Last night, he decisively won. Despite my degree in politics with economics, I had never directly been involved in a political campaign before. Part of this was practical — as an immigrant, the option to do so in the US had been unavailable to me up until recently. But, then again, it wasn't like I'd knocked on doors before moving here. I realize I'm pushing 30, but I still technically count as Gen Z, okay! And yes, I got the fan, but not the bandana. But that first-time canvas turned into another canvas, which turned into volunteering at a campaign office, which turned into learning how to cut turf, which turned into going to a Mamdani rally co-headlined by Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, which turned into standing outside poll sites for two days in blistering heat. Do you know how good it feels to try and hand out posters to your local businesses, only to realize that most of them already have one? Related: "He Torched His Entire Reputation For Nothing": 27 Of The Best Political Tweets From This Messy, Messy Week I'm hardly alone in this: Around 50,000 people volunteered for the campaign, knocking on over a million doors. Said volunteers included a guy I had saved on my phone with the last name "Hinge" and an ex-roommate. We're everywhere! No matter rain or shine, meeting everyone from the fresh college grad to the hardened socialist who'd been canvassing for decades was a pleasure. It didn't matter if I had a disappointing canvas, because someone else would have a better day the next day, and so on, multiplying through the city into a grassroots movement many have called unprecedented. Shoutout to Lemon, my fave campaign contributor. I can't speak for the hundreds of thousands of New Yorkers who voted for Mamdani, but what sticks out to me is the clarity of his message: Make New York affordable for all New Yorkers. There's a reason thousands of volunteers could yell things like "fast and free buses" and "freeze the rent" back at him, call-and-response style, during his rallies. It's obvious what the man's actual policies are — can the same be said of his opponents? Related: Donald Trump And Tucker Carlson Are Feuding, And Today It Escalated Even More And yes, the economic populist message works. A big one for me was universal childcare; I don't want to have to choose between living in New York and starting a family. Naysayers will claim it's unrealistic, but New Mexico has free childcare for the majority of its residents. Why not the wealthiest city in the country? Lots of people, with varying degrees of sincerity, have noted Mamdani's social media prowess. And sure, the guy knows how to make a funny video or two. He's a charismatic dude! But it's dismissive to conclude that the takeaway is "get good at TikTok." On top of his policies, what truly swayed me into volunteering was seeing how Zohran maxed out funding for the campaign, largely based on small donors (i.e., normal people). Compare that with his main competitor, former governor Andrew Cuomo, who was bankrolled by a $25-million super PAC, which included donations from Trump donors and the uber-wealthy (not mutually exclusive). It was something that came up time and time again while talking to the most weary of voters; no, you don't need to feel like your candidate has already been bought. While we're at it, let's talk about Cuomo. As a rape survivor, it was a goddamn slap in the face that he was even able to run after resigning in disgrace following sexual harassment allegations. How am I supposed to champion the Democratic Party as the party better for women with him at the helm? Another important thing to consider is that Mamdani won the race without watering down any of the ideology that other Democrats may consider too "risky." He's a Democratic Socialist. He's a huge advocate for Palestine. He's pledged millions for trans healthcare. The results are stunning, with young people galvanized into a formidable voting bloc that many thought impossible. It's going to be a long few months before the election, where I (obviously) hope Mamdani will officially become mayor. Maybe Cuomo will follow incumbent Eric Adams's lead and run as an independent. Difficulties may arise! But should Mamdani become mayor, as he likely will, I'm not delusional. I'm sure I will be disappointed by him. Many will try to hold him back at every turn. But good God, at least we're not having to talk down a mayor from flying to Turkey all the time. And to the Democratic Party, many of which viewed this as a referendum on the direction of the party as a whole: Please don't fuck this up. Also in In the News: "Honestly Speechless At How Evil This Is": 26 Brutal, Brutal, Brutal Political Tweets Of The Week Also in In the News: People Are Roasting "MAGA Makeup" On TikTok, And It Might Be The Shadiest Thing I've Seen All Year Also in In the News: Jeff Bezos's Fiancée Lauren Sánchez Reacted To Criticism Of Her Inauguration Outfit
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
What Zohran Mamdani's rise in New York City means for the Democratic Party nationally
Zohran Mamdani's dramatic, strong showing in New York City's Democratic mayoral primary, where he forced a concession from former Gov. Andrew Cuomo, amounts to a massive shot in the arm for progressives and other Democrats who have been imploring their party's elder statesmen to step aside for a new generation of leaders. Mamdani ran his campaign as an unapologetic progressive against an established favorite who argued his pragmatism would best meet the moment; a 33-year-old fresh face against a field of experienced candidates; a democratic socialist at a time when many Democrats worry whether that moniker alienates them from swing voters; and a critic of Israel's conduct in its war against Hamas, despite criticism from moderate Democrats who accused him of stoking antisemitism. Tuesday night's election was far from a clear test case for any single one of those factors, with Cuomo's 2021 resignation as governor amid allegations of sexual harassment and Covid mismanagement also in play. And New York City Democratic primary voters are hardly representative of the swing-district and swing-state electorates that determine who holds power in Washington — one reason why Republicans are already using Mamdani as a rhetorical foil to swing-seat Democrats. But Mamdani's surge — putting him on the precipice of the Democratic nomination, with the results of the ranked choice tabulation set to come next week — is putting the rest of the Democratic Party on notice. "Voters are sick of the status quo, sick of being force-fed these old, uninspiring candidates and told to vote for them or else, and they want change. If mainstream Democrats don't understand that and offer that, voters are gonna look elsewhere," said Lis Smith, a longtime Democratic operative who was a key part of Pete Buttigieg's 2020 presidential bid and who previously worked for Cuomo. "Andrew Cuomo as a candidate combined the worst qualities of Joe Biden and Donald Trump," Smith continued. "He left office in disgrace like Donald Trump did and was running on a vengeance tour, and like Joe Biden, he was old, he didn't have any new ideas, no ability to inspire people." During his victory speech Tuesday night, Mamdani discussed not only the impact he hopes to have on the city, but how he believes his win will echo across the country. 'The mayor will use their power to reject Donald Trump's fascism, to stop masked ICE agents from deporting our neighbors and to govern our city as a model for the Democratic Party, a party where we fight for working people with no apology,' Mamdani said. He added, 'If this campaign has demonstrated anything to the world, it is that our dreams can become reality.' Maya Rupert, a Democratic strategist who managed the 2021 mayoral campaign of Democrat Maya Wiley, told NBC News that Mamdani's 'decisive victory' is a signal to the left that its candidates can run unapologetically authentic campaigns that take tough issues head-on with progressive solutions. 'These issues aren't unpopular; we just need a way to communicate them across geography, across a multiracial coalition, across partisan divides. He was able to do that, and more than that, show other people across the country how it can be done,' she said. 'We've heard this so much since the election: Democrats have gone too far afield, the vilification of talking about social justice, talking about racial justice, that you can't do that stuff and also win. You can, and if it's where your politics are, you can't do it any other way, I really believe that. So I hope there are more people that are going to take this moment and decide to run like this because it really does seem to be our path forward,' she said. Not everyone in the party agrees. Reps. Laura Gillen and Tom Suozzi, two New Yorkers who are veterans of battleground congressional races, put out statements criticizing Mamdani after his victory — Gillen called him 'too extreme' and Suozzi said that his 'concerns remain' about Mamdani. As he did on election night, Mamdani spent much of the campaign grounding his appeal to voters around the economy. His campaign website prominently declares that he's running to 'lower the cost of living for working class New Yorkers.' His most-talked-about policy platforms centered around affordability: proposals like free city buses, freezing rents, reforms to make housing more affordable, city-owned grocery stores and free child care, all paid for by raising taxes on the top 1% and corporations. "What Zohran did that was so important was he was talking about finances the way New Yorkers talk about finances," Rupert said, pointing to Mamdani's emphasis on personal economic issues compared to other Democrats with a tendency to focus on macroeconomic trends. "Instead of talking about New York as a whole, he brought it down to a granular level for people, what it meant." The focus on the economy is something many Democrats, Mamdani supporters or not, say is a key takeaway for party members looking to glean something from his victory. House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries of Brooklyn, who did not endorse a candidate in the mayoral primary, repeatedly referred to Mamdani's economic message during an interview Wednesday on MSNBC's 'Morning Joe' when asked to explain the election result. 'The relentless focus on affordability had great appeal across the city of New York. He also clearly outworked, out-organized and out-communicated the opposition. So when someone is successful at being able to do all three things at the same time, it's usually going to work out,' he said. While Cuomo also discussed his plans to make the city more affordable, much of his campaign was based around his unique experience and history standing up to Trump. But that experience was a double-edged sword, and Mamdani repeatedly reminded voters of Cuomo's checkered past, at a moment when many Democrats are calling for new faces in their party. David Hogg, the Florida activist and former national party official who broke with the Democratic National Committee over his decision to support primary challengers running against Democratic officeholders, said that the result reinforced the movement to energize young voters around a push for a new direction. 'The people have spoken — and they're saying that the establishment is cooked,' he said in a statement. Hogg's group, Leaders We Deserve, was the top donor to one of the leading outside groups backing Mamdani's effort. Basil Smikle, a former executive director of the state Democratic Party who ran Ray McGuire's 2021 mayoral campaign, told NBC News that the result was a 'repudiation of establishment politics that I think will ripple across the country.' But he also cautioned that Cuomo's 'baggage' was tied up into that anti-establishment fervor, and the consistent anti-Cuomo message from virtually every other candidate in the field was a unique dynamic that wouldn't exist in most other races. Smith, the Democratic operative, added that she does believe Democrats of all stripes can learn from Mamdani's positive message and his "go-everywhere media strategy." But the longtime party strategist didn't believe the result was an unconditional victory for the progressive policies. "Obviously, I'm skeptical that everyone who voted for Zohran Mamdani agreed with all his economic and public safety policies, and I say that as someone who ended up ranking him. A lot of his ideas are going to be nonstarters in most places," she said. Unlike most Democratic primaries in deep-blue territory, victory for Mamdani won't assure him a glide path to general election victory in the fall. New York City Mayor Eric Adams is running for re-election as an independent, after Trump's Justice Department dropped federal corruption charges he was facing. And Cuomo could do the same, running on a ballot line his campaign created months ago. Cuomo said in a statement Tuesday night that he was considering whether to take that path. The Rev. Al Sharpton, the MSNBC host and longtime civil rights activist, said during an interview Wednesday on 'Morning Joe' that the dynamics make for a 'very interesting fall election.' Regarding Mamdani, 'you have The New York Times saying he's not qualified; you're going to a broader base of voters. Will some of the older voters, even in the Black and Latino community, come out and vote for him when you have Eric Adams, the incumbent mayor, on the ballot? … What about Jewish voters where Mamdani, rightly or wrongly, has been called antisemitic?' Sharpton asked. 'He made history last night, the question is whether or not it can stick with a general election,' Sharpton added. Jeffries and Democrats' Senate leader, Chuck Schumer (also a New Yorker), put out statements congratulating Mamdani, but they didn't explicitly call for the party to fall in line behind him. Rupert told NBC News that after years and years of progressive Democrats being told to unite around the nominee when the establishment's choice wins a primary, she hopes the party will do the same now that the shoe is on the other foot. She was heartened to see Democratic National Committee Chairman Ken Martin's quick congratulations for Mamdani on Tuesday night. 'This is going to be a moment for the establishment, for a lot of the people who lined up behind Cuomo. It has to mean something to win the nomination,' she said. 'Democrats have spoken, they made a selection, and I would really, really hope that if he is facing headwinds from different directions, that the party would come together the same way I've seen the party come together over and over again when progressives need to say: 'All right, let's make sure that people turn out and vote for [someone] who wouldn't have been our first choice.'' This article was originally published on